Loading…
New Experimental Evaluation Strategies Regarding Slag Prediction of Solid Biofuels in Pellet Boilers
Pellet boilers and pellet stoves are widely used for heat production. But in most cases, only specific wood pellets with a low ash content are approved due to the increased risk of slagging and limited deashing capacity. The ash fusion test (AFT), according to prCEN/TS 15370-1, is currently the only...
Saved in:
Published in: | Energy & fuels 2019-11, Vol.33 (11), p.11985-11995 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a413t-9a94133ac1771214fcee386668b1dc9adf4210f2fa40f68ace3e82b4e7fbcde13 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a413t-9a94133ac1771214fcee386668b1dc9adf4210f2fa40f68ace3e82b4e7fbcde13 |
container_end_page | 11995 |
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 11985 |
container_title | Energy & fuels |
container_volume | 33 |
creator | Schön, Claudia Feldmeier, Sabine Hartmann, Hans Schwabl, Manuel Dahl, Jonas Rathbauer, Josef Vega-Nieva, Daniel Jose Boman, Christoffer Öhman, Marcus Burval, Jan |
description | Pellet boilers and pellet stoves are widely used for heat production. But in most cases, only specific wood pellets with a low ash content are approved due to the increased risk of slagging and limited deashing capacity. The ash fusion test (AFT), according to prCEN/TS 15370-1, is currently the only standard method for the prediction of slagging. This method is not feasible for all biomass fuel types, since sometimes the characteristic temperatures cannot be determined or the characteristic shapes do not occur for temperature determination. Furthermore, the method is costly and requires complex instrumental infrastructure. Hence, a demand for more expressive or more rapid methods to characterize slag formation potential of fuels is often claimed. Based on a literature study, four such laboratory test methods were chosen, partly adapted, and then experimentally investigated. These methods included thermal treatment of the fuel itself or the ashes of the fuel and were the rapid slag test, CIEMAT, the slag analyzer, and the newly developed pellet ash and slag sieving assessment (PASSA) method. Method performance was practically assessed using 14 different biomass fuel pellets, which were mainly from different assortments of wood, but also herbaceous or other nonwoody fuels. The results from the tests with these four alternative methods were evaluated by comparing to both results from standard AFT and results from full-scale combustion tests performed over a maximum of 24 h. Seven different pellet boilers were assessed, of which one boiler was used to apply all 14 test fuels. According to the granulometric ash analysis (i.e., the ratio of >1 mm-fraction toward total ash formed), the sensitivity of the new test methods to depict slagging phenomena at a suitable level of differentiation was assessed. Satisfactory conformity of the boiler ash assessment (reference) was found for both, the slag analyzer and the PASSA method. The latter may, in particular, be seen as a promising and relatively simple low-input procedure, which can provide more real-life oriented test results for fixed-bed combustion. The standardized AFT could, however, not sufficiently predict the degree of slag actually formed in the reference boiler, particularly when only wood fuels are regarded. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.9b03098 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>acs_swepu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_DiVA_org_umu_166837</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>a8911435</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a413t-9a94133ac1771214fcee386668b1dc9adf4210f2fa40f68ace3e82b4e7fbcde13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkctOwzAQRS0EEqXwDfgDSLHjNHGWbSkPqYKKAlvLScaRKzeu7ITSv8d9CLHrajbnXs3MQeiWkgElMb2XpR9AA67eqg6MH-QFYSTnZ6hHhzGJhiTOz1GPcJ5FJI2TS3Tl_ZIQkjI-7KHqFTZ4-rMGp1fQtNLg6bc0nWy1bfCidbKFWoPH71BLV-mmxgsjazx3UOlyD1mFF9boCo-13W-AdYPnYAy0eGy1Aeev0YWSxsPNcfbR5-P0Y_Iczd6eXiajWSQTytool3mYTJY0y2hME1UCMJ6mKS9oVeayUklMiYqVTIhKuSyBAY-LBDJVlBVQ1kfRoddvYN0VYh2Okm4rrNTiQX-NhHW16FadoKGTZYG_O82bthNZyjMe8OyAl85670D9BSgROxciuBD_XIiji5Bkh-QOWNrONeENJ1O_7NaW4w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>New Experimental Evaluation Strategies Regarding Slag Prediction of Solid Biofuels in Pellet Boilers</title><source>American Chemical Society:Jisc Collections:American Chemical Society Read & Publish Agreement 2022-2024 (Reading list)</source><creator>Schön, Claudia ; Feldmeier, Sabine ; Hartmann, Hans ; Schwabl, Manuel ; Dahl, Jonas ; Rathbauer, Josef ; Vega-Nieva, Daniel Jose ; Boman, Christoffer ; Öhman, Marcus ; Burval, Jan</creator><creatorcontrib>Schön, Claudia ; Feldmeier, Sabine ; Hartmann, Hans ; Schwabl, Manuel ; Dahl, Jonas ; Rathbauer, Josef ; Vega-Nieva, Daniel Jose ; Boman, Christoffer ; Öhman, Marcus ; Burval, Jan</creatorcontrib><description>Pellet boilers and pellet stoves are widely used for heat production. But in most cases, only specific wood pellets with a low ash content are approved due to the increased risk of slagging and limited deashing capacity. The ash fusion test (AFT), according to prCEN/TS 15370-1, is currently the only standard method for the prediction of slagging. This method is not feasible for all biomass fuel types, since sometimes the characteristic temperatures cannot be determined or the characteristic shapes do not occur for temperature determination. Furthermore, the method is costly and requires complex instrumental infrastructure. Hence, a demand for more expressive or more rapid methods to characterize slag formation potential of fuels is often claimed. Based on a literature study, four such laboratory test methods were chosen, partly adapted, and then experimentally investigated. These methods included thermal treatment of the fuel itself or the ashes of the fuel and were the rapid slag test, CIEMAT, the slag analyzer, and the newly developed pellet ash and slag sieving assessment (PASSA) method. Method performance was practically assessed using 14 different biomass fuel pellets, which were mainly from different assortments of wood, but also herbaceous or other nonwoody fuels. The results from the tests with these four alternative methods were evaluated by comparing to both results from standard AFT and results from full-scale combustion tests performed over a maximum of 24 h. Seven different pellet boilers were assessed, of which one boiler was used to apply all 14 test fuels. According to the granulometric ash analysis (i.e., the ratio of >1 mm-fraction toward total ash formed), the sensitivity of the new test methods to depict slagging phenomena at a suitable level of differentiation was assessed. Satisfactory conformity of the boiler ash assessment (reference) was found for both, the slag analyzer and the PASSA method. The latter may, in particular, be seen as a promising and relatively simple low-input procedure, which can provide more real-life oriented test results for fixed-bed combustion. The standardized AFT could, however, not sufficiently predict the degree of slag actually formed in the reference boiler, particularly when only wood fuels are regarded.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0887-0624</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1520-5029</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-5029</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.9b03098</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>American Chemical Society</publisher><subject>Energiteknik ; Energy Engineering</subject><ispartof>Energy & fuels, 2019-11, Vol.33 (11), p.11985-11995</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a413t-9a94133ac1771214fcee386668b1dc9adf4210f2fa40f68ace3e82b4e7fbcde13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a413t-9a94133ac1771214fcee386668b1dc9adf4210f2fa40f68ace3e82b4e7fbcde13</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4428-3201 ; 0000-0003-1705-2977</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-76878$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-166837$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schön, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feldmeier, Sabine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartmann, Hans</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwabl, Manuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dahl, Jonas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rathbauer, Josef</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vega-Nieva, Daniel Jose</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boman, Christoffer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Öhman, Marcus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burval, Jan</creatorcontrib><title>New Experimental Evaluation Strategies Regarding Slag Prediction of Solid Biofuels in Pellet Boilers</title><title>Energy & fuels</title><addtitle>Energy Fuels</addtitle><description>Pellet boilers and pellet stoves are widely used for heat production. But in most cases, only specific wood pellets with a low ash content are approved due to the increased risk of slagging and limited deashing capacity. The ash fusion test (AFT), according to prCEN/TS 15370-1, is currently the only standard method for the prediction of slagging. This method is not feasible for all biomass fuel types, since sometimes the characteristic temperatures cannot be determined or the characteristic shapes do not occur for temperature determination. Furthermore, the method is costly and requires complex instrumental infrastructure. Hence, a demand for more expressive or more rapid methods to characterize slag formation potential of fuels is often claimed. Based on a literature study, four such laboratory test methods were chosen, partly adapted, and then experimentally investigated. These methods included thermal treatment of the fuel itself or the ashes of the fuel and were the rapid slag test, CIEMAT, the slag analyzer, and the newly developed pellet ash and slag sieving assessment (PASSA) method. Method performance was practically assessed using 14 different biomass fuel pellets, which were mainly from different assortments of wood, but also herbaceous or other nonwoody fuels. The results from the tests with these four alternative methods were evaluated by comparing to both results from standard AFT and results from full-scale combustion tests performed over a maximum of 24 h. Seven different pellet boilers were assessed, of which one boiler was used to apply all 14 test fuels. According to the granulometric ash analysis (i.e., the ratio of >1 mm-fraction toward total ash formed), the sensitivity of the new test methods to depict slagging phenomena at a suitable level of differentiation was assessed. Satisfactory conformity of the boiler ash assessment (reference) was found for both, the slag analyzer and the PASSA method. The latter may, in particular, be seen as a promising and relatively simple low-input procedure, which can provide more real-life oriented test results for fixed-bed combustion. The standardized AFT could, however, not sufficiently predict the degree of slag actually formed in the reference boiler, particularly when only wood fuels are regarded.</description><subject>Energiteknik</subject><subject>Energy Engineering</subject><issn>0887-0624</issn><issn>1520-5029</issn><issn>1520-5029</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkctOwzAQRS0EEqXwDfgDSLHjNHGWbSkPqYKKAlvLScaRKzeu7ITSv8d9CLHrajbnXs3MQeiWkgElMb2XpR9AA67eqg6MH-QFYSTnZ6hHhzGJhiTOz1GPcJ5FJI2TS3Tl_ZIQkjI-7KHqFTZ4-rMGp1fQtNLg6bc0nWy1bfCidbKFWoPH71BLV-mmxgsjazx3UOlyD1mFF9boCo-13W-AdYPnYAy0eGy1Aeev0YWSxsPNcfbR5-P0Y_Iczd6eXiajWSQTytool3mYTJY0y2hME1UCMJ6mKS9oVeayUklMiYqVTIhKuSyBAY-LBDJVlBVQ1kfRoddvYN0VYh2Okm4rrNTiQX-NhHW16FadoKGTZYG_O82bthNZyjMe8OyAl85670D9BSgROxciuBD_XIiji5Bkh-QOWNrONeENJ1O_7NaW4w</recordid><startdate>20191121</startdate><enddate>20191121</enddate><creator>Schön, Claudia</creator><creator>Feldmeier, Sabine</creator><creator>Hartmann, Hans</creator><creator>Schwabl, Manuel</creator><creator>Dahl, Jonas</creator><creator>Rathbauer, Josef</creator><creator>Vega-Nieva, Daniel Jose</creator><creator>Boman, Christoffer</creator><creator>Öhman, Marcus</creator><creator>Burval, Jan</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>D93</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4428-3201</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1705-2977</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20191121</creationdate><title>New Experimental Evaluation Strategies Regarding Slag Prediction of Solid Biofuels in Pellet Boilers</title><author>Schön, Claudia ; Feldmeier, Sabine ; Hartmann, Hans ; Schwabl, Manuel ; Dahl, Jonas ; Rathbauer, Josef ; Vega-Nieva, Daniel Jose ; Boman, Christoffer ; Öhman, Marcus ; Burval, Jan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a413t-9a94133ac1771214fcee386668b1dc9adf4210f2fa40f68ace3e82b4e7fbcde13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Energiteknik</topic><topic>Energy Engineering</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schön, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feldmeier, Sabine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartmann, Hans</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwabl, Manuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dahl, Jonas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rathbauer, Josef</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vega-Nieva, Daniel Jose</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boman, Christoffer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Öhman, Marcus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burval, Jan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Umeå universitet</collection><jtitle>Energy & fuels</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schön, Claudia</au><au>Feldmeier, Sabine</au><au>Hartmann, Hans</au><au>Schwabl, Manuel</au><au>Dahl, Jonas</au><au>Rathbauer, Josef</au><au>Vega-Nieva, Daniel Jose</au><au>Boman, Christoffer</au><au>Öhman, Marcus</au><au>Burval, Jan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>New Experimental Evaluation Strategies Regarding Slag Prediction of Solid Biofuels in Pellet Boilers</atitle><jtitle>Energy & fuels</jtitle><addtitle>Energy Fuels</addtitle><date>2019-11-21</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>11985</spage><epage>11995</epage><pages>11985-11995</pages><issn>0887-0624</issn><issn>1520-5029</issn><eissn>1520-5029</eissn><abstract>Pellet boilers and pellet stoves are widely used for heat production. But in most cases, only specific wood pellets with a low ash content are approved due to the increased risk of slagging and limited deashing capacity. The ash fusion test (AFT), according to prCEN/TS 15370-1, is currently the only standard method for the prediction of slagging. This method is not feasible for all biomass fuel types, since sometimes the characteristic temperatures cannot be determined or the characteristic shapes do not occur for temperature determination. Furthermore, the method is costly and requires complex instrumental infrastructure. Hence, a demand for more expressive or more rapid methods to characterize slag formation potential of fuels is often claimed. Based on a literature study, four such laboratory test methods were chosen, partly adapted, and then experimentally investigated. These methods included thermal treatment of the fuel itself or the ashes of the fuel and were the rapid slag test, CIEMAT, the slag analyzer, and the newly developed pellet ash and slag sieving assessment (PASSA) method. Method performance was practically assessed using 14 different biomass fuel pellets, which were mainly from different assortments of wood, but also herbaceous or other nonwoody fuels. The results from the tests with these four alternative methods were evaluated by comparing to both results from standard AFT and results from full-scale combustion tests performed over a maximum of 24 h. Seven different pellet boilers were assessed, of which one boiler was used to apply all 14 test fuels. According to the granulometric ash analysis (i.e., the ratio of >1 mm-fraction toward total ash formed), the sensitivity of the new test methods to depict slagging phenomena at a suitable level of differentiation was assessed. Satisfactory conformity of the boiler ash assessment (reference) was found for both, the slag analyzer and the PASSA method. The latter may, in particular, be seen as a promising and relatively simple low-input procedure, which can provide more real-life oriented test results for fixed-bed combustion. The standardized AFT could, however, not sufficiently predict the degree of slag actually formed in the reference boiler, particularly when only wood fuels are regarded.</abstract><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><doi>10.1021/acs.energyfuels.9b03098</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4428-3201</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1705-2977</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0887-0624 |
ispartof | Energy & fuels, 2019-11, Vol.33 (11), p.11985-11995 |
issn | 0887-0624 1520-5029 1520-5029 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_swepub_primary_oai_DiVA_org_umu_166837 |
source | American Chemical Society:Jisc Collections:American Chemical Society Read & Publish Agreement 2022-2024 (Reading list) |
subjects | Energiteknik Energy Engineering |
title | New Experimental Evaluation Strategies Regarding Slag Prediction of Solid Biofuels in Pellet Boilers |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T15%3A08%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-acs_swepu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=New%20Experimental%20Evaluation%20Strategies%20Regarding%20Slag%20Prediction%20of%20Solid%20Biofuels%20in%20Pellet%20Boilers&rft.jtitle=Energy%20&%20fuels&rft.au=Scho%CC%88n,%20Claudia&rft.date=2019-11-21&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=11985&rft.epage=11995&rft.pages=11985-11995&rft.issn=0887-0624&rft.eissn=1520-5029&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.9b03098&rft_dat=%3Cacs_swepu%3Ea8911435%3C/acs_swepu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a413t-9a94133ac1771214fcee386668b1dc9adf4210f2fa40f68ace3e82b4e7fbcde13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |