Loading…

New Experimental Evaluation Strategies Regarding Slag Prediction of Solid Biofuels in Pellet Boilers

Pellet boilers and pellet stoves are widely used for heat production. But in most cases, only specific wood pellets with a low ash content are approved due to the increased risk of slagging and limited deashing capacity. The ash fusion test (AFT), according to prCEN/TS 15370-1, is currently the only...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Energy & fuels 2019-11, Vol.33 (11), p.11985-11995
Main Authors: Schön, Claudia, Feldmeier, Sabine, Hartmann, Hans, Schwabl, Manuel, Dahl, Jonas, Rathbauer, Josef, Vega-Nieva, Daniel Jose, Boman, Christoffer, Öhman, Marcus, Burval, Jan
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a413t-9a94133ac1771214fcee386668b1dc9adf4210f2fa40f68ace3e82b4e7fbcde13
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a413t-9a94133ac1771214fcee386668b1dc9adf4210f2fa40f68ace3e82b4e7fbcde13
container_end_page 11995
container_issue 11
container_start_page 11985
container_title Energy & fuels
container_volume 33
creator Schön, Claudia
Feldmeier, Sabine
Hartmann, Hans
Schwabl, Manuel
Dahl, Jonas
Rathbauer, Josef
Vega-Nieva, Daniel Jose
Boman, Christoffer
Öhman, Marcus
Burval, Jan
description Pellet boilers and pellet stoves are widely used for heat production. But in most cases, only specific wood pellets with a low ash content are approved due to the increased risk of slagging and limited deashing capacity. The ash fusion test (AFT), according to prCEN/TS 15370-1, is currently the only standard method for the prediction of slagging. This method is not feasible for all biomass fuel types, since sometimes the characteristic temperatures cannot be determined or the characteristic shapes do not occur for temperature determination. Furthermore, the method is costly and requires complex instrumental infrastructure. Hence, a demand for more expressive or more rapid methods to characterize slag formation potential of fuels is often claimed. Based on a literature study, four such laboratory test methods were chosen, partly adapted, and then experimentally investigated. These methods included thermal treatment of the fuel itself or the ashes of the fuel and were the rapid slag test, CIEMAT, the slag analyzer, and the newly developed pellet ash and slag sieving assessment (PASSA) method. Method performance was practically assessed using 14 different biomass fuel pellets, which were mainly from different assortments of wood, but also herbaceous or other nonwoody fuels. The results from the tests with these four alternative methods were evaluated by comparing to both results from standard AFT and results from full-scale combustion tests performed over a maximum of 24 h. Seven different pellet boilers were assessed, of which one boiler was used to apply all 14 test fuels. According to the granulometric ash analysis (i.e., the ratio of >1 mm-fraction toward total ash formed), the sensitivity of the new test methods to depict slagging phenomena at a suitable level of differentiation was assessed. Satisfactory conformity of the boiler ash assessment (reference) was found for both, the slag analyzer and the PASSA method. The latter may, in particular, be seen as a promising and relatively simple low-input procedure, which can provide more real-life oriented test results for fixed-bed combustion. The standardized AFT could, however, not sufficiently predict the degree of slag actually formed in the reference boiler, particularly when only wood fuels are regarded.
doi_str_mv 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.9b03098
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>acs_swepu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_DiVA_org_umu_166837</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>a8911435</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a413t-9a94133ac1771214fcee386668b1dc9adf4210f2fa40f68ace3e82b4e7fbcde13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkctOwzAQRS0EEqXwDfgDSLHjNHGWbSkPqYKKAlvLScaRKzeu7ITSv8d9CLHrajbnXs3MQeiWkgElMb2XpR9AA67eqg6MH-QFYSTnZ6hHhzGJhiTOz1GPcJ5FJI2TS3Tl_ZIQkjI-7KHqFTZ4-rMGp1fQtNLg6bc0nWy1bfCidbKFWoPH71BLV-mmxgsjazx3UOlyD1mFF9boCo-13W-AdYPnYAy0eGy1Aeev0YWSxsPNcfbR5-P0Y_Iczd6eXiajWSQTytool3mYTJY0y2hME1UCMJ6mKS9oVeayUklMiYqVTIhKuSyBAY-LBDJVlBVQ1kfRoddvYN0VYh2Okm4rrNTiQX-NhHW16FadoKGTZYG_O82bthNZyjMe8OyAl85670D9BSgROxciuBD_XIiji5Bkh-QOWNrONeENJ1O_7NaW4w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>New Experimental Evaluation Strategies Regarding Slag Prediction of Solid Biofuels in Pellet Boilers</title><source>American Chemical Society:Jisc Collections:American Chemical Society Read &amp; Publish Agreement 2022-2024 (Reading list)</source><creator>Schön, Claudia ; Feldmeier, Sabine ; Hartmann, Hans ; Schwabl, Manuel ; Dahl, Jonas ; Rathbauer, Josef ; Vega-Nieva, Daniel Jose ; Boman, Christoffer ; Öhman, Marcus ; Burval, Jan</creator><creatorcontrib>Schön, Claudia ; Feldmeier, Sabine ; Hartmann, Hans ; Schwabl, Manuel ; Dahl, Jonas ; Rathbauer, Josef ; Vega-Nieva, Daniel Jose ; Boman, Christoffer ; Öhman, Marcus ; Burval, Jan</creatorcontrib><description>Pellet boilers and pellet stoves are widely used for heat production. But in most cases, only specific wood pellets with a low ash content are approved due to the increased risk of slagging and limited deashing capacity. The ash fusion test (AFT), according to prCEN/TS 15370-1, is currently the only standard method for the prediction of slagging. This method is not feasible for all biomass fuel types, since sometimes the characteristic temperatures cannot be determined or the characteristic shapes do not occur for temperature determination. Furthermore, the method is costly and requires complex instrumental infrastructure. Hence, a demand for more expressive or more rapid methods to characterize slag formation potential of fuels is often claimed. Based on a literature study, four such laboratory test methods were chosen, partly adapted, and then experimentally investigated. These methods included thermal treatment of the fuel itself or the ashes of the fuel and were the rapid slag test, CIEMAT, the slag analyzer, and the newly developed pellet ash and slag sieving assessment (PASSA) method. Method performance was practically assessed using 14 different biomass fuel pellets, which were mainly from different assortments of wood, but also herbaceous or other nonwoody fuels. The results from the tests with these four alternative methods were evaluated by comparing to both results from standard AFT and results from full-scale combustion tests performed over a maximum of 24 h. Seven different pellet boilers were assessed, of which one boiler was used to apply all 14 test fuels. According to the granulometric ash analysis (i.e., the ratio of &gt;1 mm-fraction toward total ash formed), the sensitivity of the new test methods to depict slagging phenomena at a suitable level of differentiation was assessed. Satisfactory conformity of the boiler ash assessment (reference) was found for both, the slag analyzer and the PASSA method. The latter may, in particular, be seen as a promising and relatively simple low-input procedure, which can provide more real-life oriented test results for fixed-bed combustion. The standardized AFT could, however, not sufficiently predict the degree of slag actually formed in the reference boiler, particularly when only wood fuels are regarded.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0887-0624</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1520-5029</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-5029</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.9b03098</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>American Chemical Society</publisher><subject>Energiteknik ; Energy Engineering</subject><ispartof>Energy &amp; fuels, 2019-11, Vol.33 (11), p.11985-11995</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a413t-9a94133ac1771214fcee386668b1dc9adf4210f2fa40f68ace3e82b4e7fbcde13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a413t-9a94133ac1771214fcee386668b1dc9adf4210f2fa40f68ace3e82b4e7fbcde13</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4428-3201 ; 0000-0003-1705-2977</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-76878$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-166837$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schön, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feldmeier, Sabine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartmann, Hans</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwabl, Manuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dahl, Jonas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rathbauer, Josef</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vega-Nieva, Daniel Jose</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boman, Christoffer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Öhman, Marcus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burval, Jan</creatorcontrib><title>New Experimental Evaluation Strategies Regarding Slag Prediction of Solid Biofuels in Pellet Boilers</title><title>Energy &amp; fuels</title><addtitle>Energy Fuels</addtitle><description>Pellet boilers and pellet stoves are widely used for heat production. But in most cases, only specific wood pellets with a low ash content are approved due to the increased risk of slagging and limited deashing capacity. The ash fusion test (AFT), according to prCEN/TS 15370-1, is currently the only standard method for the prediction of slagging. This method is not feasible for all biomass fuel types, since sometimes the characteristic temperatures cannot be determined or the characteristic shapes do not occur for temperature determination. Furthermore, the method is costly and requires complex instrumental infrastructure. Hence, a demand for more expressive or more rapid methods to characterize slag formation potential of fuels is often claimed. Based on a literature study, four such laboratory test methods were chosen, partly adapted, and then experimentally investigated. These methods included thermal treatment of the fuel itself or the ashes of the fuel and were the rapid slag test, CIEMAT, the slag analyzer, and the newly developed pellet ash and slag sieving assessment (PASSA) method. Method performance was practically assessed using 14 different biomass fuel pellets, which were mainly from different assortments of wood, but also herbaceous or other nonwoody fuels. The results from the tests with these four alternative methods were evaluated by comparing to both results from standard AFT and results from full-scale combustion tests performed over a maximum of 24 h. Seven different pellet boilers were assessed, of which one boiler was used to apply all 14 test fuels. According to the granulometric ash analysis (i.e., the ratio of &gt;1 mm-fraction toward total ash formed), the sensitivity of the new test methods to depict slagging phenomena at a suitable level of differentiation was assessed. Satisfactory conformity of the boiler ash assessment (reference) was found for both, the slag analyzer and the PASSA method. The latter may, in particular, be seen as a promising and relatively simple low-input procedure, which can provide more real-life oriented test results for fixed-bed combustion. The standardized AFT could, however, not sufficiently predict the degree of slag actually formed in the reference boiler, particularly when only wood fuels are regarded.</description><subject>Energiteknik</subject><subject>Energy Engineering</subject><issn>0887-0624</issn><issn>1520-5029</issn><issn>1520-5029</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkctOwzAQRS0EEqXwDfgDSLHjNHGWbSkPqYKKAlvLScaRKzeu7ITSv8d9CLHrajbnXs3MQeiWkgElMb2XpR9AA67eqg6MH-QFYSTnZ6hHhzGJhiTOz1GPcJ5FJI2TS3Tl_ZIQkjI-7KHqFTZ4-rMGp1fQtNLg6bc0nWy1bfCidbKFWoPH71BLV-mmxgsjazx3UOlyD1mFF9boCo-13W-AdYPnYAy0eGy1Aeev0YWSxsPNcfbR5-P0Y_Iczd6eXiajWSQTytool3mYTJY0y2hME1UCMJ6mKS9oVeayUklMiYqVTIhKuSyBAY-LBDJVlBVQ1kfRoddvYN0VYh2Okm4rrNTiQX-NhHW16FadoKGTZYG_O82bthNZyjMe8OyAl85670D9BSgROxciuBD_XIiji5Bkh-QOWNrONeENJ1O_7NaW4w</recordid><startdate>20191121</startdate><enddate>20191121</enddate><creator>Schön, Claudia</creator><creator>Feldmeier, Sabine</creator><creator>Hartmann, Hans</creator><creator>Schwabl, Manuel</creator><creator>Dahl, Jonas</creator><creator>Rathbauer, Josef</creator><creator>Vega-Nieva, Daniel Jose</creator><creator>Boman, Christoffer</creator><creator>Öhman, Marcus</creator><creator>Burval, Jan</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>D93</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4428-3201</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1705-2977</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20191121</creationdate><title>New Experimental Evaluation Strategies Regarding Slag Prediction of Solid Biofuels in Pellet Boilers</title><author>Schön, Claudia ; Feldmeier, Sabine ; Hartmann, Hans ; Schwabl, Manuel ; Dahl, Jonas ; Rathbauer, Josef ; Vega-Nieva, Daniel Jose ; Boman, Christoffer ; Öhman, Marcus ; Burval, Jan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a413t-9a94133ac1771214fcee386668b1dc9adf4210f2fa40f68ace3e82b4e7fbcde13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Energiteknik</topic><topic>Energy Engineering</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schön, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feldmeier, Sabine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartmann, Hans</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwabl, Manuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dahl, Jonas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rathbauer, Josef</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vega-Nieva, Daniel Jose</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boman, Christoffer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Öhman, Marcus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burval, Jan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Umeå universitet</collection><jtitle>Energy &amp; fuels</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schön, Claudia</au><au>Feldmeier, Sabine</au><au>Hartmann, Hans</au><au>Schwabl, Manuel</au><au>Dahl, Jonas</au><au>Rathbauer, Josef</au><au>Vega-Nieva, Daniel Jose</au><au>Boman, Christoffer</au><au>Öhman, Marcus</au><au>Burval, Jan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>New Experimental Evaluation Strategies Regarding Slag Prediction of Solid Biofuels in Pellet Boilers</atitle><jtitle>Energy &amp; fuels</jtitle><addtitle>Energy Fuels</addtitle><date>2019-11-21</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>11985</spage><epage>11995</epage><pages>11985-11995</pages><issn>0887-0624</issn><issn>1520-5029</issn><eissn>1520-5029</eissn><abstract>Pellet boilers and pellet stoves are widely used for heat production. But in most cases, only specific wood pellets with a low ash content are approved due to the increased risk of slagging and limited deashing capacity. The ash fusion test (AFT), according to prCEN/TS 15370-1, is currently the only standard method for the prediction of slagging. This method is not feasible for all biomass fuel types, since sometimes the characteristic temperatures cannot be determined or the characteristic shapes do not occur for temperature determination. Furthermore, the method is costly and requires complex instrumental infrastructure. Hence, a demand for more expressive or more rapid methods to characterize slag formation potential of fuels is often claimed. Based on a literature study, four such laboratory test methods were chosen, partly adapted, and then experimentally investigated. These methods included thermal treatment of the fuel itself or the ashes of the fuel and were the rapid slag test, CIEMAT, the slag analyzer, and the newly developed pellet ash and slag sieving assessment (PASSA) method. Method performance was practically assessed using 14 different biomass fuel pellets, which were mainly from different assortments of wood, but also herbaceous or other nonwoody fuels. The results from the tests with these four alternative methods were evaluated by comparing to both results from standard AFT and results from full-scale combustion tests performed over a maximum of 24 h. Seven different pellet boilers were assessed, of which one boiler was used to apply all 14 test fuels. According to the granulometric ash analysis (i.e., the ratio of &gt;1 mm-fraction toward total ash formed), the sensitivity of the new test methods to depict slagging phenomena at a suitable level of differentiation was assessed. Satisfactory conformity of the boiler ash assessment (reference) was found for both, the slag analyzer and the PASSA method. The latter may, in particular, be seen as a promising and relatively simple low-input procedure, which can provide more real-life oriented test results for fixed-bed combustion. The standardized AFT could, however, not sufficiently predict the degree of slag actually formed in the reference boiler, particularly when only wood fuels are regarded.</abstract><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><doi>10.1021/acs.energyfuels.9b03098</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4428-3201</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1705-2977</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0887-0624
ispartof Energy & fuels, 2019-11, Vol.33 (11), p.11985-11995
issn 0887-0624
1520-5029
1520-5029
language eng
recordid cdi_swepub_primary_oai_DiVA_org_umu_166837
source American Chemical Society:Jisc Collections:American Chemical Society Read & Publish Agreement 2022-2024 (Reading list)
subjects Energiteknik
Energy Engineering
title New Experimental Evaluation Strategies Regarding Slag Prediction of Solid Biofuels in Pellet Boilers
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T15%3A08%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-acs_swepu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=New%20Experimental%20Evaluation%20Strategies%20Regarding%20Slag%20Prediction%20of%20Solid%20Biofuels%20in%20Pellet%20Boilers&rft.jtitle=Energy%20&%20fuels&rft.au=Scho%CC%88n,%20Claudia&rft.date=2019-11-21&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=11985&rft.epage=11995&rft.pages=11985-11995&rft.issn=0887-0624&rft.eissn=1520-5029&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.9b03098&rft_dat=%3Cacs_swepu%3Ea8911435%3C/acs_swepu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a413t-9a94133ac1771214fcee386668b1dc9adf4210f2fa40f68ace3e82b4e7fbcde13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true