Intersectional inequalities in mental health across multiple dimensions of inequality in the Swedish adult population

• Published in: Social science & medicine (1982) 2021-08, Vol.283, p.114184-114184, Article 114184
• Main Authors: Fagrell Trygg, Nadja, Månsdotter, Anna, Gustafsson, Per E.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Country of birth; Discriminatory accuracy; Health disparities; Health inequalities; Health research; Income; Inequality; Intersectionality; Mental health; Multiple jeopardy hypothesis; Polls & surveys; Population; Sexual orientation; Side effects; Sociodemographics
• ISSN: 0277-9536; 1873-5347; 1873-5347
• DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114184

Intersectionality has recently gained traction in health inequality research emphasizing multiple intersecting dimensions of inequality as opposed to the traditional unidimensional approaches. In this study inequalities in mental health were estimated across intersections of gender, income, education, occupation, country of birth, and sexual orientation. The outcomes and inequalities of intersectional strata were disentangled analogously to the possibilities described by intersectionality theory; as a result of either of the two inequality dimensions, as a result of the sum the dimensions, or as a unique outcome not equaling the sum. Furthermore the study examined the discriminatory accuracy of the six inequality dimensions as well as the intersectional space comprising 64 strata. The study population (N = 52,743) consists of a yearly random sample of the Swedish population 26–84 years between 2010 and 2015, from The Health on Equal Terms survey. Mental health was measured through a self-administered General Health Questionnaire (GHQ)-12, and sociodemographics through survey and linked register data. Intersectional inequalities in mental health were estimated for all pairwise combinations of inequality dimensions by joint inequalities, excess intersectional inequalities and referent inequalities. The findings of the study found that the sum of dimensions contributed to the overall (joint) inequality in mental health rather than a reinforced adverse effect of multiple disadvantages or the contribution by a single dimension. Nevertheless, the dimension of income was found to be the most important in terms of relative contribution. The discriminatory accuracy was low indicating that policy action targeting mental health should be universal rather than focusing on particular groups. The results highlight the unpredictable inequality patterns revealed by an intersectional approach, even for a single health outcome and within one country, and illustrate the need for empirical investigations into the actual population patterns in health that appear in the intersections of multiple disadvantages. •Diverse patterns of mental health across multiple intersecting social dimensions.•Several doubly disadvantaged groups had better mental health than expected.•Income was a dominant driver of intersectional inequalities in mental health.•The discriminatory accuracy of intersectional inequalities was however low.