Does a multi-component intervention including pictorial risk communication about subclinical atherosclerosis improve perceptions of cardiovascular disease risk without deteriorating efficacy beliefs?

• Published in: Social science & medicine (1982) 2024-01, Vol.341, p.116530-116530, Article 116530
• Main Authors: Andersson, Elin M, Liv, Per, Nordin, Steven, Näslund, Ulf, Lindvall, Kristina
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Atherosclerosis; Atherosclerosis - prevention & control; Cardiovascular disease; Cardiovascular Diseases - prevention & control; Cardiovascular System; Child, Preschool; Communication; Humans; Pictorial communication; Prevention; Response efficacy; Risk Factors; Risk perception; Self efficacy; Vascular age
• ISSN: 0277-9536; 1873-5347; 1873-5347
• DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116530

Pictorial communication about subclinical atherosclerosis can improve cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk, but whether it leads to long-term shifts in self-rated CVD risk (risk perception) and beliefs about possibility to influence personal risk (efficacy beliefs) is unknown. To study the impact of personalized color-coded and age-related risk communication about atherosclerosis and motivational conversation, compared to traditional risk factor-based communication, on risk perception and efficacy beliefs. Also, whether risk perception increases with message severity. The effect of the pragmatic RCT Visualization of Asymptomatic Atherosclerotic Disease for Optimum Cardiovascular Prevention (VIPVIZA) was analyzed using a linear mixed effects model with risk perception and efficacy believes at 1-year and 3-year follow up as dependent variables. Participants' (n = 3532) CVD risk perception and efficacy beliefs were assessed with visual analog scales (0-10). Fixed effects were group (intervention vs control), time point (1 year or 3 years) and interaction between group and time point. Further, the models were adjusted for corresponding baseline measurement of the dependent variable and a baseline × time point interaction. Effect of pictorial color-coded risk in the intervention group was investigated using a corresponding mixed effects model, but with pictorial risk group (message severity) as exposure instead of intervention group. After one year, the intervention group rated their CVD risk as higher (m = 0.46, 95% CI 0.32-0.59), with an effect also after 3 years (m = 0.57, 95% CI 0.43-0.70). The effect was consistent in stratified analyses by sex and education. Overall, no effect on efficacy beliefs was observed. In the intervention group, differences in CVD risk perception were found between participants with different color-coded risk messages on atherosclerosis status. Personalized, color-coded and age-related risk communication about atherosclerosis had an effect on risk perception with an effect also after 3 years, whereas overall, no effect on efficacy beliefs was observed.