Loading…

Quality and generation rate of solid residues in the boiler of a waste-to-energy plant

•Ash was sampled at 10 different points of the boiler of a waste-to-energy plant.•Samples were analysed for the chemical composition, PCDD/F and leaching behaviour.•Enrichment trends of elements were investigated in relation to boiler conditions.•No significant differences were found between boiler...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of hazardous materials 2014-04, Vol.270, p.127-136
Main Authors: Allegrini, E., Boldrin, A., Jansson, S., Lundtorp, K., Fruergaard Astrup, T.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•Ash was sampled at 10 different points of the boiler of a waste-to-energy plant.•Samples were analysed for the chemical composition, PCDD/F and leaching behaviour.•Enrichment trends of elements were investigated in relation to boiler conditions.•No significant differences were found between boiler ash samples. The Danish waste management system relies significantly on waste-to-energy (WtE) plants. The ash produced at the energy recovery section (boiler ash) is classified as hazardous waste, and is commonly mixed with fly ash and air pollution control residues before disposal. In this study, a detailed characterization of boiler ash from a Danish grate-based mass burn type WtE was performed, to evaluate the potential for improving ash management. Samples were collected at 10 different points along the boiler's convective part, and analysed for grain size distribution, content of inorganic elements, polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans (PCDD and PCDF), and leaching of metals. For all samples, PCDD and PCDF levels were below regulatory limits, while high pH values and leaching of e.g. Cl were critical. No significant differences were found between boiler ash from individual sections of the boiler, in terms of total content and leaching, indicating that separate management of individual ash fractions may not provide significant benefits.
ISSN:0304-3894
1873-3336
1873-3336
DOI:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.01.048