Loading…

The influence of food waste on dioxin formation during incineration of refuse-derived fuels

We report a preliminary characterization of three refuse-derived fuels (RDFs) produced from recovered wood (RW) and two municipal solid wastes (MSWs) with different food waste contents. The fuels were characterized with respect to elemental composition and emissions of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-diox...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Fuel (Guildford) 2014-09, Vol.132, p.165-169
Main Authors: Svensson Myrin, Eva, Persson, Per-Erik, Jansson, Stina
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We report a preliminary characterization of three refuse-derived fuels (RDFs) produced from recovered wood (RW) and two municipal solid wastes (MSWs) with different food waste contents. The fuels were characterized with respect to elemental composition and emissions of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDD) and dibenzofurans (PCDF) during combustion in a full-scale incinerator. The first RDF (RDF 1) had a low food waste content because it was based on MSW collected from a region where extensive separation of kitchen waste in the household is common. RDF 2 was based on MSW from a region with no organized separation of kitchen waste and therefore had a higher food waste content. A RW fuel with no added MSW was combusted to provide reference data. RDF 1 had very favourable fuel quality and PCDD/F emissions. In particular, its combustion generated lower PCDD/F concentrations (14.6ng/m3) than that of RDF2 (23.9ng/m3) or RW (22.6ng/m3). This may have been because its relatively high heating value increased its combustion efficiency and the relatively high Cl and Fe contents of RDF 2 promoted PCDD/F formation and chlorination. Both RDF materials had lower moisture contents and higher heating values than the RW fuel.
ISSN:0016-2361
1873-7153
1873-7153
DOI:10.1016/j.fuel.2014.04.083