Loading…
Comparison of microscopy, culture and in-house PCR and NASBA assays for diagnosis of Neisseria gonorrhoeae in Russia
This study aimed to assess the laboratory diagnosis of Neisseria gonorrhoeae in St. Petersburg, Russia. In total, 334 consecutive symptomatic patients were enrolled. Cervical and urethral specimens from women (n=286) and urethral specimens from men (n=48) were analyzed by microscopy, culture and two...
Saved in:
Published in: | APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica et immunologica Scandinavica microbiologica et immunologica Scandinavica, 2008-02, Vol.116 (2), p.133-138 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | This study aimed to assess the laboratory diagnosis of Neisseria
gonorrhoeae in St. Petersburg, Russia. In total, 334 consecutive symptomatic
patients were enrolled. Cervical and urethral specimens from women
(n=286) and urethral specimens from men (n=48) were
analyzed by microscopy, culture and two in‐house NAATs, i.e. polymerase chain
reaction (PCR) and nucleic acid sequence‐based amplification (NASBA), developed
in Russia. All N. gonorrhoeae‐positive samples were confirmed using
porA pseudogene and 16S rRNA gene sequencing. All methods
displayed 100% specificity, i.e. positive predictive values of 100%. Compared to
the PCR (most sensitive method in the present study), in women the sensitivity
of both microscopy and culture was 31.8%, and that of NASBA was 90.9%. In men,
microscopy, culture and NASBA displayed a sensitivity of 75%, 50% and 100%,
respectively. The negative predictive values of microscopy, culture, and NASBA
were 97.3%, 97.3%, and 99.6% in women, and 97.8%, 95.7%, and 100% in men,
respectively. According to the PCR, the prevalences of N. gonorrhoeae were 4.5% (women) and 8.3% (men). In conclusion, both the investigated Russian NAATs displayed a high sensitivity and specificity. However, in general the diagnosis of gonorrhoea in Russia is suboptimal and crucially requires validation, improvements and quality assurance. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0903-4641 1600-0463 1600-0463 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1600-0463.2008.00929.x |