Concentric needle single fiber electromyography: Comparative jitter on voluntary-activated and stimulated Extensor Digitorum Communis

• Published in: Clinical neurophysiology 2008-07, Vol.119 (7), p.1614-1618
• Main Authors: Kouyoumdjian, João Aris, Stålberg, Erik V
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Axons - physiology; Biological and medical sciences; Concentric needle electrode; Electrodiagnosis. Electric activity recording; Electromyography - instrumentation; Extensor Digitorum Communis; Female; Fingers - innervation; Fingers - physiology; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Humans; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects); Jitter; Linear Models; Male; Medical sciences; MEDICIN; MEDICINE; Middle Aged; Muscle Fibers, Skeletal - physiology; Nervous system; Neurology; Single fiber electromyography; Striated muscle. Tendons; Vertebrates: osteoarticular system, musculoskeletal system
• ISSN: 1388-2457; 1872-8952; 1872-8952
• DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2008.03.008

Abstract Objective To compare the jitter values in voluntarily activated (v-CNE) and stimulated (s-CNE) techniques for Extensor Digitorum Communis muscle using a disposable concentric needle electrode (CNE). Quantifying jitter using a CNE in conjunction with a stimulated technique has not been reported previously. Methods Forty-one normal subjects were studied, 15 male and 26 female with a mean age of 34.1 ± 10.7 years (19–55). The jitter values were expressed as the mean consecutive difference (MCD) of 20 analyzed potential pairs using v-CNE and 30 isolated potentials using s-CNE. Results The mean MCD ( n = 41) was 23.0 ± 2.8 μs for v-CNE and 18.2 ± 2.2 μs for s-CNE. The mean jitter of all recorded potentials was 22.9 ± 6.7 μs for v-CNE ( n = 820) and 18.3 ± 5.2 μs for s-CNE ( n = 1230). Upper limits for the 18th (v-CNE) and 27th highest (s-CNE) MCD were 38.9 and 30 μs, respectively (95% confidence limit). The jitter decrease in s-CNE compared to v-CNE was 1:0.79. Conclusions Our findings of the jitter values using CNE were similar to other published reports using the voluntarily activated technique; however, these are the first described for the stimulated technique using CNE. Significance The present study confirms that CNE can be used for the stimulated jitter acquisition and measurement, although certain precautions must be taken regarding signal quality, e.g., observing minimal summation.