Comments on the Role of Consent and Individual Autonomy in the PIP Breast Implant Scandal

The featured case discussion on the role of consent and individual autonomy in the PIP breast implant scandal raises interesting and important questions regarding the right of patients (and individuals in general) to decide whether to have their personal data included in medical registries and used...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Public health ethics 2013-07, Vol.6 (2), p.223-226
Main Author: Forsberg, Joanna Stjernschantz
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Case Discussion
Europe
European Commission
Medical ethics
Patients
Public health
Scandals
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The featured case discussion on the role of consent and individual autonomy in the PIP breast implant scandal raises interesting and important questions regarding the right of patients (and individuals in general) to decide whether to have their personal data included in medical registries and used for research. The fate of the National Breast Implant Registry, following the introduction of a policy that demanded formally recorded informed consent, is particularly enlightening. Combined with the (ex post) fact that reliable and comprehensive data would have been useful in this specific case, it clearly illustrates the dangers of overemphasizing individual autonomy in observational research. The issue is timely, as the European Commission has recently proposed a new Data Protection Regulation (European Commission, 2012) that may have serious implications for registry based research. In this commentary, I will first discuss two aspects of the regulatory framework that arguably contribute to the problematic situation and then offer an alternative view on why requiring consent should not be the default position in this kind of research.
ISSN:1754-9973
1754-9981
1754-9981
DOI:10.1093/phe/pht020