Loading…

Social dominance orientation and climate change denial: The role of dominance and system justification

Extending previous research, we examined whether the relation between social dominance orientation (SDO) and climate change denial reflects group-based dominance (SDO and nature dominance) or general system justification. Moreover, we examined whether the relation between personality (domineering an...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Personality and individual differences 2015-11, Vol.86, p.108-111
Main Authors: Jylhä, Kirsti M., Akrami, Nazar
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Extending previous research, we examined whether the relation between social dominance orientation (SDO) and climate change denial reflects group-based dominance (SDO and nature dominance) or general system justification. Moreover, we examined whether the relation between personality (domineering and empathy) and denial is mediated by group-based dominance variables. The results showed that the group-based dominance variables reduce the effect of system justification on denial to nonsignificant. Also, social dominance and nature dominance explain unique parts of the variance in denial. Moreover, path analyses showed that the relations between empathy and system justification with denial are mediated by both of the group-based dominance variables, while the relation between domineering and denial is mediated only by SDO. Together, these results suggest that denial is driven partly by dominant personality and low empathy, and partly by motivation to justify and promote existing social and human-nature hierarchies. We conclude by suggesting that climate change mitigation efforts could be more successful if framed as being clearly beneficial for everybody and nonthreatening to existing social order. •Climate change denial reflects dominance, (low) empathy, and system justification.•Social dominance and nature dominance explain unique parts of the variance in denial.•Social and nature dominance mediate the relation of system justification with denial.•Social dominance mediates the relation between domineering and denial.•Social and nature dominance mediate the relation between empathy and denial.
ISSN:0191-8869
1873-3549
1873-3549
DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2015.05.041