Relative fitness of a generalist parasite on two alternative hosts: a cross‐infestation experiment to test host specialization of the hen flea Ceratophyllus gallinae (Schrank)

• Published in: Journal of evolutionary biology 2016-05, Vol.29 (5), p.1091-1101
• Main Authors: Appelgren, A., McCoy, K. D., Richner, H., Doligez, B.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Animals; Ceratophyllus gallinae; Chickens - parasitology; ecological speciation; Ecology, environment; ectoparasite adaptation; Female; Ficedula albicollis; Flea Infestations; Genetic Fitness; host race; host range; Host-Parasite Interactions; individual fitness; Life Sciences; multi-host systems; Parasites; Parus major; Population; reproductive success; Siphonaptera; spatial scale; Specialization; Symbiosis
• ISSN: 1010-061X; 1420-9101; 1420-9101
• DOI: 10.1111/jeb.12850

Host range is a key element of a parasite's ecology and evolution and can vary greatly depending on spatial scale. Generalist parasites frequently show local population structure in relation to alternative sympatric hosts (i.e. host races) and may thus be specialists at local scales. Here, we investigated local population specialization of a common avian nest‐based parasite, the hen flea Ceratophyllus gallinae (Schrank), exploiting two abundant host species that share the same breeding sites, the great tit Parus major (Linnaeus) and the collared flycatcher Ficedula albicollis (Temminck). We performed a cross‐infestation experiment of fleas between the two host species in two distinct study areas during a single breeding season and recorded the reproductive success of both hosts and parasites. In the following year, hosts were monitored again to assess the long‐term impact of cross‐infestation. Our results partly support the local specialization hypothesis: in great tit nests, tit fleas caused higher damage to their hosts than flycatcher fleas, and in collared flycatcher nests, flycatcher fleas had a faster larval development rates than tit fleas. However, these results were significant in only one of the two studied areas, suggesting that the location and history of the host population can modulate the specialization process. Caution is therefore called for when interpreting single location studies. More generally, our results emphasize the need to explicitly account for host diversity in order to understand the population ecology and evolutionary trajectory of generalist parasites.