Loading…

Experimental reduction in interaction intensity strongly affects biotic selection

The link between biotic interaction intensity and strength of selection is of fundamental interest for understanding biotically driven diversification and predicting the consequences of environmental change. The strength of selection resulting from biotic interactions is determined by the strength o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ecology (Durham) 2016-11, Vol.97 (11), p.3091-3098
Main Authors: Sletvold, Nina, Ågren, Jon
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5354-13090562645551067ed55f799c5594d3ffc4c188e4a5863e011c062a3779ae493
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5354-13090562645551067ed55f799c5594d3ffc4c188e4a5863e011c062a3779ae493
container_end_page 3098
container_issue 11
container_start_page 3091
container_title Ecology (Durham)
container_volume 97
creator Sletvold, Nina
Ågren, Jon
description The link between biotic interaction intensity and strength of selection is of fundamental interest for understanding biotically driven diversification and predicting the consequences of environmental change. The strength of selection resulting from biotic interactions is determined by the strength of the interaction and by the variance between fitness and the trait under selection. When the relationship between trait and absolute fitness is constant, selection strength should be a direct function of mean population interaction intensity. To test this prediction, we excluded pollinators for intervals of different length to induce five levels of pollination intensity within a single plant population. Pollen limitation (PL) increased from 0 to 0.77 across treatments, accompanied by a fivefold increase in the opportunity for selection. Trait-fitness covariance declined with PL for number of flowers, but varied little for other traits. Pollinatormediated selection on plant height, corolla size, and spur length increased by 91%, 34%, and 330%, respectively, in the most severely pollen-limited treatment compared to open-pollinated plants. The results indicate that realized biotic selection can be predicted from mean population interaction intensity when variation in trait-fitness covariance is limited, and that declines in pollination intensity will strongly increase' selection on traits involved in the interaction.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ecy.1554
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_swepu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_DiVA_org_uu_309823</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>44082162</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>44082162</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5354-13090562645551067ed55f799c5594d3ffc4c188e4a5863e011c062a3779ae493</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0V2LEzEUBuAgittdBf-AMuDNXjhrvs4kuVxq_YAFEVTwKqTpmSVlOqlJhrX_3tR2KwiKIRACD-_h8BLyjNErRil_jX53xQDkAzJjRpjWMEUfkhmljLemA31GznNe03qY1I_JGVdaUSrNjHxa_NhiChscixuahKvJlxDHJuxvweTuvwXHHMquySXF8XbYNa7v0ZfcLEMswTcZB_xln5BHvRsyPj2-F-TL28Xn-fv25uO7D_Prm9aDANkyQQ2FjncSABjtFK4AemWMBzByJfreS8-0RulAdwIpY5523AmljENpxAV5dcjNd7idlnZbt3BpZ6ML9k34em1jurXTZOsczUXllwe-TfH7hLnYTcgeh8GNGKdsmQaqFNTnP6jkABQ4q_TlH3QdpzTWvS0z1EhpAMQ_lRaqQhDs91ifYs4J-9NKjNp9zbbWbPc1V_riGDgtN7g6wfteK2gP4C4MuPtrkF3Mvx0Dnx_8OpeYTl5KqjnruPgJzpa3zg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1837909531</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Experimental reduction in interaction intensity strongly affects biotic selection</title><source>Wiley:Jisc Collections:Wiley Read and Publish Open Access 2024-2025 (reading list)</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><creator>Sletvold, Nina ; Ågren, Jon</creator><creatorcontrib>Sletvold, Nina ; Ågren, Jon</creatorcontrib><description>The link between biotic interaction intensity and strength of selection is of fundamental interest for understanding biotically driven diversification and predicting the consequences of environmental change. The strength of selection resulting from biotic interactions is determined by the strength of the interaction and by the variance between fitness and the trait under selection. When the relationship between trait and absolute fitness is constant, selection strength should be a direct function of mean population interaction intensity. To test this prediction, we excluded pollinators for intervals of different length to induce five levels of pollination intensity within a single plant population. Pollen limitation (PL) increased from 0 to 0.77 across treatments, accompanied by a fivefold increase in the opportunity for selection. Trait-fitness covariance declined with PL for number of flowers, but varied little for other traits. Pollinatormediated selection on plant height, corolla size, and spur length increased by 91%, 34%, and 330%, respectively, in the most severely pollen-limited treatment compared to open-pollinated plants. The results indicate that realized biotic selection can be predicted from mean population interaction intensity when variation in trait-fitness covariance is limited, and that declines in pollination intensity will strongly increase' selection on traits involved in the interaction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-9658</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1939-9170</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-9170</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ecy.1554</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27870049</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ECGYAQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; Covariance ; Ecosystem ; Fitness ; floral evolution ; Flowers ; Gymnadenia conopsea ; Lepidoptera - physiology ; natural selection ; opportunity for selection ; Orchidaceae - genetics ; Orchidaceae - physiology ; Plant ecology ; Plant reproduction ; plant-animal interactions ; Plants (botany) ; Pollen ; Pollen - physiology ; pollen limitation ; Pollination ; pollinator-mediated selection ; Pollinators ; Predictions ; Reduction ; Reproductive fitness ; selection intensity ; Selection, Genetic ; Strength ; trait-fitness covariance</subject><ispartof>Ecology (Durham), 2016-11, Vol.97 (11), p.3091-3098</ispartof><rights>2016 The Ecological Society of America</rights><rights>2016 by the Ecological Society of America</rights><rights>2016 by the Ecological Society of America.</rights><rights>Copyright Ecological Society of America Nov 2016</rights><rights>2016 Ecological Society of America</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5354-13090562645551067ed55f799c5594d3ffc4c188e4a5863e011c062a3779ae493</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5354-13090562645551067ed55f799c5594d3ffc4c188e4a5863e011c062a3779ae493</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/44082162$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/44082162$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925,58238,58471</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27870049$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-309823$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sletvold, Nina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ågren, Jon</creatorcontrib><title>Experimental reduction in interaction intensity strongly affects biotic selection</title><title>Ecology (Durham)</title><addtitle>Ecology</addtitle><description>The link between biotic interaction intensity and strength of selection is of fundamental interest for understanding biotically driven diversification and predicting the consequences of environmental change. The strength of selection resulting from biotic interactions is determined by the strength of the interaction and by the variance between fitness and the trait under selection. When the relationship between trait and absolute fitness is constant, selection strength should be a direct function of mean population interaction intensity. To test this prediction, we excluded pollinators for intervals of different length to induce five levels of pollination intensity within a single plant population. Pollen limitation (PL) increased from 0 to 0.77 across treatments, accompanied by a fivefold increase in the opportunity for selection. Trait-fitness covariance declined with PL for number of flowers, but varied little for other traits. Pollinatormediated selection on plant height, corolla size, and spur length increased by 91%, 34%, and 330%, respectively, in the most severely pollen-limited treatment compared to open-pollinated plants. The results indicate that realized biotic selection can be predicted from mean population interaction intensity when variation in trait-fitness covariance is limited, and that declines in pollination intensity will strongly increase' selection on traits involved in the interaction.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Covariance</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Fitness</subject><subject>floral evolution</subject><subject>Flowers</subject><subject>Gymnadenia conopsea</subject><subject>Lepidoptera - physiology</subject><subject>natural selection</subject><subject>opportunity for selection</subject><subject>Orchidaceae - genetics</subject><subject>Orchidaceae - physiology</subject><subject>Plant ecology</subject><subject>Plant reproduction</subject><subject>plant-animal interactions</subject><subject>Plants (botany)</subject><subject>Pollen</subject><subject>Pollen - physiology</subject><subject>pollen limitation</subject><subject>Pollination</subject><subject>pollinator-mediated selection</subject><subject>Pollinators</subject><subject>Predictions</subject><subject>Reduction</subject><subject>Reproductive fitness</subject><subject>selection intensity</subject><subject>Selection, Genetic</subject><subject>Strength</subject><subject>trait-fitness covariance</subject><issn>0012-9658</issn><issn>1939-9170</issn><issn>1939-9170</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqN0V2LEzEUBuAgittdBf-AMuDNXjhrvs4kuVxq_YAFEVTwKqTpmSVlOqlJhrX_3tR2KwiKIRACD-_h8BLyjNErRil_jX53xQDkAzJjRpjWMEUfkhmljLemA31GznNe03qY1I_JGVdaUSrNjHxa_NhiChscixuahKvJlxDHJuxvweTuvwXHHMquySXF8XbYNa7v0ZfcLEMswTcZB_xln5BHvRsyPj2-F-TL28Xn-fv25uO7D_Prm9aDANkyQQ2FjncSABjtFK4AemWMBzByJfreS8-0RulAdwIpY5523AmljENpxAV5dcjNd7idlnZbt3BpZ6ML9k34em1jurXTZOsczUXllwe-TfH7hLnYTcgeh8GNGKdsmQaqFNTnP6jkABQ4q_TlH3QdpzTWvS0z1EhpAMQ_lRaqQhDs91ifYs4J-9NKjNp9zbbWbPc1V_riGDgtN7g6wfteK2gP4C4MuPtrkF3Mvx0Dnx_8OpeYTl5KqjnruPgJzpa3zg</recordid><startdate>201611</startdate><enddate>201611</enddate><creator>Sletvold, Nina</creator><creator>Ågren, Jon</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>Ecological Society of America</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>DF2</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201611</creationdate><title>Experimental reduction in interaction intensity strongly affects biotic selection</title><author>Sletvold, Nina ; Ågren, Jon</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5354-13090562645551067ed55f799c5594d3ffc4c188e4a5863e011c062a3779ae493</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Covariance</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Fitness</topic><topic>floral evolution</topic><topic>Flowers</topic><topic>Gymnadenia conopsea</topic><topic>Lepidoptera - physiology</topic><topic>natural selection</topic><topic>opportunity for selection</topic><topic>Orchidaceae - genetics</topic><topic>Orchidaceae - physiology</topic><topic>Plant ecology</topic><topic>Plant reproduction</topic><topic>plant-animal interactions</topic><topic>Plants (botany)</topic><topic>Pollen</topic><topic>Pollen - physiology</topic><topic>pollen limitation</topic><topic>Pollination</topic><topic>pollinator-mediated selection</topic><topic>Pollinators</topic><topic>Predictions</topic><topic>Reduction</topic><topic>Reproductive fitness</topic><topic>selection intensity</topic><topic>Selection, Genetic</topic><topic>Strength</topic><topic>trait-fitness covariance</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sletvold, Nina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ågren, Jon</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Uppsala universitet</collection><jtitle>Ecology (Durham)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sletvold, Nina</au><au>Ågren, Jon</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Experimental reduction in interaction intensity strongly affects biotic selection</atitle><jtitle>Ecology (Durham)</jtitle><addtitle>Ecology</addtitle><date>2016-11</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>97</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>3091</spage><epage>3098</epage><pages>3091-3098</pages><issn>0012-9658</issn><issn>1939-9170</issn><eissn>1939-9170</eissn><coden>ECGYAQ</coden><abstract>The link between biotic interaction intensity and strength of selection is of fundamental interest for understanding biotically driven diversification and predicting the consequences of environmental change. The strength of selection resulting from biotic interactions is determined by the strength of the interaction and by the variance between fitness and the trait under selection. When the relationship between trait and absolute fitness is constant, selection strength should be a direct function of mean population interaction intensity. To test this prediction, we excluded pollinators for intervals of different length to induce five levels of pollination intensity within a single plant population. Pollen limitation (PL) increased from 0 to 0.77 across treatments, accompanied by a fivefold increase in the opportunity for selection. Trait-fitness covariance declined with PL for number of flowers, but varied little for other traits. Pollinatormediated selection on plant height, corolla size, and spur length increased by 91%, 34%, and 330%, respectively, in the most severely pollen-limited treatment compared to open-pollinated plants. The results indicate that realized biotic selection can be predicted from mean population interaction intensity when variation in trait-fitness covariance is limited, and that declines in pollination intensity will strongly increase' selection on traits involved in the interaction.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>27870049</pmid><doi>10.1002/ecy.1554</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0012-9658
ispartof Ecology (Durham), 2016-11, Vol.97 (11), p.3091-3098
issn 0012-9658
1939-9170
1939-9170
language eng
recordid cdi_swepub_primary_oai_DiVA_org_uu_309823
source Wiley:Jisc Collections:Wiley Read and Publish Open Access 2024-2025 (reading list); JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection
subjects Animals
Covariance
Ecosystem
Fitness
floral evolution
Flowers
Gymnadenia conopsea
Lepidoptera - physiology
natural selection
opportunity for selection
Orchidaceae - genetics
Orchidaceae - physiology
Plant ecology
Plant reproduction
plant-animal interactions
Plants (botany)
Pollen
Pollen - physiology
pollen limitation
Pollination
pollinator-mediated selection
Pollinators
Predictions
Reduction
Reproductive fitness
selection intensity
Selection, Genetic
Strength
trait-fitness covariance
title Experimental reduction in interaction intensity strongly affects biotic selection
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T10%3A15%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_swepu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Experimental%20reduction%20in%20interaction%20intensity%20strongly%20affects%20biotic%20selection&rft.jtitle=Ecology%20(Durham)&rft.au=Sletvold,%20Nina&rft.date=2016-11&rft.volume=97&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=3091&rft.epage=3098&rft.pages=3091-3098&rft.issn=0012-9658&rft.eissn=1939-9170&rft.coden=ECGYAQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ecy.1554&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_swepu%3E44082162%3C/jstor_swepu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5354-13090562645551067ed55f799c5594d3ffc4c188e4a5863e011c062a3779ae493%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1837909531&rft_id=info:pmid/27870049&rft_jstor_id=44082162&rfr_iscdi=true