Sexual selection and the evolution of male and female cognition: A test using experimental evolution in seed beetles

The mating system is thought to be important in shaping animal intelligence and sexual selection has been depicted as a driver of cognitive evolution, either directly by promoting superior cognitive ability during mate competition, or indirectly via genic capture of sexually selected traits. However...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Evolution 2019-12, Vol.73 (12), p.2390-2400
Main Authors: Baur, Julian, Nsanzimana, Jean d’Amour, Berger, David
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Beetles
Behavior
Chemoreception
Cognition
Cognition & reasoning
Cognitive ability
Coleoptera
Evolution
Females
Genetic diversity
Intelligence
Learning
Males
mating mind hypothesis
Monogamy
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Polygamy
Seeds
sexual antagonism
Sexual selection
Spatial discrimination learning
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The mating system is thought to be important in shaping animal intelligence and sexual selection has been depicted as a driver of cognitive evolution, either directly by promoting superior cognitive ability during mate competition, or indirectly via genic capture of sexually selected traits. However, it remains unclear if intensified sexual selection leads to general improvements in cognitive abilities. Here, we evaluated this hypothesis by applying experimental evolution in seed beetles. Replicate lines, maintained for 35 generations of either enforced monogamy (eliminating sexual selection) or polygamy, were challenged to locate and discriminate among mates (male assays) or host seeds (female assays) in a spatial chemosensory learning task. All lines displayed learning between trials. Moreover, polygamous males outperformed monogamous males, providing evidence that sexual selection can lead to the evolution of improved male cognition. However, there were no differences between regimes in rates of male learning, and polygamous females showed no improvement in host search and even signs of reduced learning. Hence, sexual selection increased performance in cognitively demanding mate search, but it did not lead to general increases in cognitive abilities. We discuss the possibility that sexually antagonistic selection is an important factor maintaining abundant genetic variation in cognitive traits.
ISSN:0014-3820
1558-5646
1558-5646
DOI:10.1111/evo.13793