Loading…
Contrasting identifying assumptions of average causal effects: robustness and semiparametric efficiency
Semiparametric inference on average causal effects from observational data is based on assumptions yielding identification of the effects. In practice, several distinct identifying assumptions may be plausible; an analyst has to make a delicate choice between these models. In this paper, we study th...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of machine learning research 2023, Vol.24 (197), p.1 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 197 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Journal of machine learning research |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Gorbach, Tetiana de Luna, Xavier Waernbaum, Ingeborg Karvanen, Juha |
description | Semiparametric inference on average causal effects from observational data is based on assumptions yielding identification of the effects. In practice, several distinct identifying assumptions may be plausible; an analyst has to make a delicate choice between these models. In this paper, we study three identifying assumptions based on the potential outcome framework: the back-door assumption, which uses pre-treatment covariates, the front-door assumption, which uses mediators, and the two-door assumption using pre-treatment covariates and mediators simultaneously. We provide the efficient influence functions and the corresponding semiparametric efficiency bounds that hold under these assumptions, and their combinations. We demonstrate that neither of the identification models provides uniformly the most efficient estimation and give conditions under which some bounds are lower than others. We show when semiparametric estimating equation estimators based on influence functions attain the bounds, and study the robustness of the estimators to misspecification of the nuisance models. The theory is complemented with simulation experiments on the finite sample behavior of the estimators. The results obtained are relevant for an analyst facing a choice between several plausible identifying assumptions and corresponding estimators. Our results show that this choice implies a trade-off between efficiency and robustness to misspecification of the nuisance models. |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>swepub</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_DiVA_org_uu_509114</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>oai_DiVA_org_umu_190082</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-s160t-2ded3e8f6650e03404362c330a468bde30dcf1339646eeca0cc9b24783db4c4c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjMtKxDAUQLNQcBz9h36AhZvcNG0XLob6hAE36jakyU2JTB80iTJ_r6IfMKtzFodzxja8QizrVjQX7DLGDwBeV0Jt2G03T2k1MYVpKIKjKQV__HUTYx6XFOYpFrMvzCetZqDCmhzNoSDvyaZ4xc69OUS6_ueWvT3cv3ZP5f7l8bnb7cvIFaRSOHJIjVeqAgKUIFEJiwhGqqZ3hOCs54itkorIGrC27YWsG3S9tNLilt38feMXLbnXyxpGsx71bIK-C-87Pa-DzllX0HIuf_LyhHzMmrcAjcBvb8RYWg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Contrasting identifying assumptions of average causal effects: robustness and semiparametric efficiency</title><source>Association for Computing Machinery:Jisc Collections:ACM OPEN Journals 2023-2025 (reading list)</source><creator>Gorbach, Tetiana ; de Luna, Xavier ; Waernbaum, Ingeborg ; Karvanen, Juha</creator><creatorcontrib>Gorbach, Tetiana ; de Luna, Xavier ; Waernbaum, Ingeborg ; Karvanen, Juha</creatorcontrib><description>Semiparametric inference on average causal effects from observational data is based on assumptions yielding identification of the effects. In practice, several distinct identifying assumptions may be plausible; an analyst has to make a delicate choice between these models. In this paper, we study three identifying assumptions based on the potential outcome framework: the back-door assumption, which uses pre-treatment covariates, the front-door assumption, which uses mediators, and the two-door assumption using pre-treatment covariates and mediators simultaneously. We provide the efficient influence functions and the corresponding semiparametric efficiency bounds that hold under these assumptions, and their combinations. We demonstrate that neither of the identification models provides uniformly the most efficient estimation and give conditions under which some bounds are lower than others. We show when semiparametric estimating equation estimators based on influence functions attain the bounds, and study the robustness of the estimators to misspecification of the nuisance models. The theory is complemented with simulation experiments on the finite sample behavior of the estimators. The results obtained are relevant for an analyst facing a choice between several plausible identifying assumptions and corresponding estimators. Our results show that this choice implies a trade-off between efficiency and robustness to misspecification of the nuisance models. </description><identifier>ISSN: 1533-7928</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1532-4435</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>back-door ; causal inference ; efficiency bound ; front-door ; robustness ; Statistics ; Statistik</subject><ispartof>Journal of machine learning research, 2023, Vol.24 (197), p.1</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,4022</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-190082$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-509114$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gorbach, Tetiana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Luna, Xavier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waernbaum, Ingeborg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karvanen, Juha</creatorcontrib><title>Contrasting identifying assumptions of average causal effects: robustness and semiparametric efficiency</title><title>Journal of machine learning research</title><description>Semiparametric inference on average causal effects from observational data is based on assumptions yielding identification of the effects. In practice, several distinct identifying assumptions may be plausible; an analyst has to make a delicate choice between these models. In this paper, we study three identifying assumptions based on the potential outcome framework: the back-door assumption, which uses pre-treatment covariates, the front-door assumption, which uses mediators, and the two-door assumption using pre-treatment covariates and mediators simultaneously. We provide the efficient influence functions and the corresponding semiparametric efficiency bounds that hold under these assumptions, and their combinations. We demonstrate that neither of the identification models provides uniformly the most efficient estimation and give conditions under which some bounds are lower than others. We show when semiparametric estimating equation estimators based on influence functions attain the bounds, and study the robustness of the estimators to misspecification of the nuisance models. The theory is complemented with simulation experiments on the finite sample behavior of the estimators. The results obtained are relevant for an analyst facing a choice between several plausible identifying assumptions and corresponding estimators. Our results show that this choice implies a trade-off between efficiency and robustness to misspecification of the nuisance models. </description><subject>back-door</subject><subject>causal inference</subject><subject>efficiency bound</subject><subject>front-door</subject><subject>robustness</subject><subject>Statistics</subject><subject>Statistik</subject><issn>1533-7928</issn><issn>1532-4435</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNjMtKxDAUQLNQcBz9h36AhZvcNG0XLob6hAE36jakyU2JTB80iTJ_r6IfMKtzFodzxja8QizrVjQX7DLGDwBeV0Jt2G03T2k1MYVpKIKjKQV__HUTYx6XFOYpFrMvzCetZqDCmhzNoSDvyaZ4xc69OUS6_ueWvT3cv3ZP5f7l8bnb7cvIFaRSOHJIjVeqAgKUIFEJiwhGqqZ3hOCs54itkorIGrC27YWsG3S9tNLilt38feMXLbnXyxpGsx71bIK-C-87Pa-DzllX0HIuf_LyhHzMmrcAjcBvb8RYWg</recordid><startdate>2023</startdate><enddate>2023</enddate><creator>Gorbach, Tetiana</creator><creator>de Luna, Xavier</creator><creator>Waernbaum, Ingeborg</creator><creator>Karvanen, Juha</creator><scope>ADHXS</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>D8T</scope><scope>D93</scope><scope>ZZAVC</scope><scope>ACNBI</scope><scope>DF2</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2023</creationdate><title>Contrasting identifying assumptions of average causal effects</title><author>Gorbach, Tetiana ; de Luna, Xavier ; Waernbaum, Ingeborg ; Karvanen, Juha</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-s160t-2ded3e8f6650e03404362c330a468bde30dcf1339646eeca0cc9b24783db4c4c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>back-door</topic><topic>causal inference</topic><topic>efficiency bound</topic><topic>front-door</topic><topic>robustness</topic><topic>Statistics</topic><topic>Statistik</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gorbach, Tetiana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Luna, Xavier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waernbaum, Ingeborg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karvanen, Juha</creatorcontrib><collection>SWEPUB Umeå universitet full text</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Freely available online</collection><collection>SWEPUB Umeå universitet</collection><collection>SwePub Articles full text</collection><collection>SWEPUB Uppsala universitet full text</collection><collection>SWEPUB Uppsala universitet</collection><jtitle>Journal of machine learning research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gorbach, Tetiana</au><au>de Luna, Xavier</au><au>Waernbaum, Ingeborg</au><au>Karvanen, Juha</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Contrasting identifying assumptions of average causal effects: robustness and semiparametric efficiency</atitle><jtitle>Journal of machine learning research</jtitle><date>2023</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>197</issue><spage>1</spage><pages>1-</pages><issn>1533-7928</issn><issn>1532-4435</issn><abstract>Semiparametric inference on average causal effects from observational data is based on assumptions yielding identification of the effects. In practice, several distinct identifying assumptions may be plausible; an analyst has to make a delicate choice between these models. In this paper, we study three identifying assumptions based on the potential outcome framework: the back-door assumption, which uses pre-treatment covariates, the front-door assumption, which uses mediators, and the two-door assumption using pre-treatment covariates and mediators simultaneously. We provide the efficient influence functions and the corresponding semiparametric efficiency bounds that hold under these assumptions, and their combinations. We demonstrate that neither of the identification models provides uniformly the most efficient estimation and give conditions under which some bounds are lower than others. We show when semiparametric estimating equation estimators based on influence functions attain the bounds, and study the robustness of the estimators to misspecification of the nuisance models. The theory is complemented with simulation experiments on the finite sample behavior of the estimators. The results obtained are relevant for an analyst facing a choice between several plausible identifying assumptions and corresponding estimators. Our results show that this choice implies a trade-off between efficiency and robustness to misspecification of the nuisance models. </abstract><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1533-7928 |
ispartof | Journal of machine learning research, 2023, Vol.24 (197), p.1 |
issn | 1533-7928 1532-4435 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_swepub_primary_oai_DiVA_org_uu_509114 |
source | Association for Computing Machinery:Jisc Collections:ACM OPEN Journals 2023-2025 (reading list) |
subjects | back-door causal inference efficiency bound front-door robustness Statistics Statistik |
title | Contrasting identifying assumptions of average causal effects: robustness and semiparametric efficiency |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T15%3A29%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-swepub&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Contrasting%20identifying%20assumptions%20of%20average%20causal%20effects:%20robustness%20and%20semiparametric%20efficiency&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20machine%20learning%20research&rft.au=Gorbach,%20Tetiana&rft.date=2023&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=197&rft.spage=1&rft.pages=1-&rft.issn=1533-7928&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cswepub%3Eoai_DiVA_org_umu_190082%3C/swepub%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-s160t-2ded3e8f6650e03404362c330a468bde30dcf1339646eeca0cc9b24783db4c4c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |