Multi-objective optimization of mixed-model assembly lines incorporating musculoskeletal risks assessment using digital human modeling

In line with Industry 5.0, ergonomic factors have recently received more attention in balancing assembly lines to enhance the human-centric aspect. Meanwhile, today’s mass-customized trend yields manufacturers to offset the assembly lines for different product variants. Thus, this study addresses th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:CIRP journal of manufacturing science and technology 2023-12, Vol.47, p.71-85
Main Authors: Nourmohammadi, Amir, Ng, Amos H.C., Fathi, Masood, Vollebregt, Janneke, Hanson, Lars
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Användarcentrerad produktdesign
Digital human modeling
lNSGA-II
Mathematical mode
Mathematical model
Mixed-model assembly line balancing
Multi-objective optimization
Musculoskeletal risks
NSGA-II
User Centred Product Design
VF-KDO
Virtual Production Development (VPD)
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In line with Industry 5.0, ergonomic factors have recently received more attention in balancing assembly lines to enhance the human-centric aspect. Meanwhile, today’s mass-customized trend yields manufacturers to offset the assembly lines for different product variants. Thus, this study addresses the mixed-model assembly line balancing problem (MMALBP) by considering worker posture. Digital human modeling and posture assessment technologies are utilized to assess the risks of work-related musculoskeletal disorders using a method known as rapid entire body analysis (REBA). The resulting MMALBP is formulated as a mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) model while considering three objectives: cycle time, maximum ergonomic risk of workstations, and total ergonomic risks. An enhanced non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm (E-NSGA-II) is developed by incorporating a local search procedure that generates neighborhood solutions and a multi-criteria decision-making mechanism that ensures the selection of promising solutions. The E-NSGA-II is benchmarked against Epsilon-constraint, MOGA, and NSGA-II while solving a case study and also test problems taken from the literature. The computational results show that E-NSGA-II can find promising Pareto front solutions while dominating the considered methods in terms of performance metrics. The robustness of E-NSGA-II results is evaluated through one-way ANOVA statistical tests. The analysis of results shows that a smooth distribution of time and ergonomic loads among the workstations can be achieved when all three objectives are simultaneously considered.
ISSN:1755-5817
1878-0016
DOI:10.1016/j.cirpj.2023.09.002