Loading…
Estimating Divergence Times in Large Phylogenetic Trees
A new method, PATHd8, for estimating ultrametric trees from trees with edge (branch) lengths proportional to the number of substitutions is proposed. The method allows for an arbitrary number of reference nodes for time calibration, each defined either as absolute age, minimum age, or maximum age, a...
Saved in:
Published in: | Systematic biology 2007-10, Vol.56 (5), p.741-752 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-62549e72e9118a3ceb7095241fa94273411b5f82e072ac6ec150fb6d6c5f2fab3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-62549e72e9118a3ceb7095241fa94273411b5f82e072ac6ec150fb6d6c5f2fab3 |
container_end_page | 752 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 741 |
container_title | Systematic biology |
container_volume | 56 |
creator | Britton, Tom Anderson, Cajsa Lisa Jacquet, David Lundqvist, Samuel Bremer, Kåre |
description | A new method, PATHd8, for estimating ultrametric trees from trees with edge (branch) lengths proportional to the number of substitutions is proposed. The method allows for an arbitrary number of reference nodes for time calibration, each defined either as absolute age, minimum age, or maximum age, and the tree need not be fully resolved. The method is based on estimating node ages by mean path lengths from the node to the leaves but correcting for deviations from a molecular clock suggested by reference nodes. As opposed to most existing methods allowing substitution rate variation, the new method smoothes substitution rates locally, rather than simultaneously over the whole tree, thus allowing for analysis of very large trees. The performance of PATHd8 is compared with other frequently used methods for estimating divergence times. In analyses of three separate data sets, PATHd8 gives similar divergence times to other methods, the largest difference being between crown group ages, where unconstrained nodes get younger ages when analyzed with PATHd8. Overall, chronograms obtained from other methods appear smoother, whereas PATHd8 preserves more of the heterogeneity seen in the original edge lengths. Divergence times are most evenly spread over the chronograms obtained from the Bayesian implementation and the clock-based Langley-Fitch method, and these two methods produce very similar ages for most nodes. Evaluations of PATHd8 using simulated data suggest that PATHd8 is slightly less precise compared with penalized likelihood, but it gives more sensible answers for extreme data sets. A clear advantage with PATHd8 is that it is more or less instantaneous even with trees having several thousand leaves, whereas other programs often run into problems when analyzing trees with hundreds of leaves. PATHd8 is implemented in freely available software. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/10635150701613783 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_swepu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_DiVA_org_uu_96061</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>20143084</jstor_id><oup_id>10.1080/10635150701613783</oup_id><sourcerecordid>20143084</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-62549e72e9118a3ceb7095241fa94273411b5f82e072ac6ec150fb6d6c5f2fab3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU9vEzEQxS0EoiXwATiAVhy4wILH_30sbaFIQYAUoOrF8m5ng0OyDvYu0G-Po42CBBdOtvx-741nhpCHQF8ANfQlUMUlSKopKODa8FvkGKhWteHq8vburnhdAH1E7uW8ohRASbhLjkAbo0CIY6LP8xA2fgj9sjoLPzAtsW-xWoQN5ir01dyXl-rD15t1LAoOoa0WCTHfJ3c6v874YH_OyKfX54vTi3r-_s3b05N53UrKhloxKSxqhhbAeN5io6mVTEDnrWCaC4BGdoYh1cy3CtvSTdeoa9XKjnW-4TPybMrNP3E7Nm6bym_TjYs-uLPw-cTFtHTj6KyiZQQz8nSityl-HzEPbhNyi-u17zGO2SnDrGFcFvDJX-AqjqkvnTiwQltrpSgQTFCbYs4Ju0N1oG63APfPAorn8T54bDZ4_cexn3gBnk9AHLf_lfdowld5iOlgYBQEp2YXV096yAP-Oug-fXNKcy3dxeWV-_LRvHp3xYQz_DcJEKNU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>194799954</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Estimating Divergence Times in Large Phylogenetic Trees</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Oxford University Press:Jisc Collections:OUP Read and Publish 2024-2025 (2024 collection) (Reading list)</source><creator>Britton, Tom ; Anderson, Cajsa Lisa ; Jacquet, David ; Lundqvist, Samuel ; Bremer, Kåre</creator><contributor>Anderson, Frank ; Anderson, Frank</contributor><creatorcontrib>Britton, Tom ; Anderson, Cajsa Lisa ; Jacquet, David ; Lundqvist, Samuel ; Bremer, Kåre ; Anderson, Frank ; Anderson, Frank</creatorcontrib><description>A new method, PATHd8, for estimating ultrametric trees from trees with edge (branch) lengths proportional to the number of substitutions is proposed. The method allows for an arbitrary number of reference nodes for time calibration, each defined either as absolute age, minimum age, or maximum age, and the tree need not be fully resolved. The method is based on estimating node ages by mean path lengths from the node to the leaves but correcting for deviations from a molecular clock suggested by reference nodes. As opposed to most existing methods allowing substitution rate variation, the new method smoothes substitution rates locally, rather than simultaneously over the whole tree, thus allowing for analysis of very large trees. The performance of PATHd8 is compared with other frequently used methods for estimating divergence times. In analyses of three separate data sets, PATHd8 gives similar divergence times to other methods, the largest difference being between crown group ages, where unconstrained nodes get younger ages when analyzed with PATHd8. Overall, chronograms obtained from other methods appear smoother, whereas PATHd8 preserves more of the heterogeneity seen in the original edge lengths. Divergence times are most evenly spread over the chronograms obtained from the Bayesian implementation and the clock-based Langley-Fitch method, and these two methods produce very similar ages for most nodes. Evaluations of PATHd8 using simulated data suggest that PATHd8 is slightly less precise compared with penalized likelihood, but it gives more sensible answers for extreme data sets. A clear advantage with PATHd8 is that it is more or less instantaneous even with trees having several thousand leaves, whereas other programs often run into problems when analyzing trees with hundreds of leaves. PATHd8 is implemented in freely available software.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1063-5157</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1076-836X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1076-836X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/10635150701613783</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17886144</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Society of Systematic Zoology</publisher><subject>Analytical estimating ; Bayesian analysis ; Biologi ; Biology ; Chronograms ; Computer Simulation ; Data smoothing ; Datasets ; Divergence times ; Estimated taxes ; Estimates ; estimation ; Estimation methods ; Evolution ; Fossils ; Leaves ; Likelihood Functions ; Methods ; Models, Biological ; molecular clock ; NATURAL SCIENCES ; NATURVETENSKAP ; Operating systems ; Parameter estimation ; phylogenetic trees ; Phylogenetics ; Phylogeny ; Plants - classification ; Software ; substitution rates ; Taxa</subject><ispartof>Systematic biology, 2007-10, Vol.56 (5), p.741-752</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2007 Society of Systematic Biologists</rights><rights>2007 Society of Systematic Biologists 2007</rights><rights>Copyright Society of Systematic Biologists Oct 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-62549e72e9118a3ceb7095241fa94273411b5f82e072ac6ec150fb6d6c5f2fab3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-62549e72e9118a3ceb7095241fa94273411b5f82e072ac6ec150fb6d6c5f2fab3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/20143084$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/20143084$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27922,27923,58236,58469</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17886144$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-96061$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Anderson, Frank</contributor><contributor>Anderson, Frank</contributor><creatorcontrib>Britton, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Cajsa Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacquet, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lundqvist, Samuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bremer, Kåre</creatorcontrib><title>Estimating Divergence Times in Large Phylogenetic Trees</title><title>Systematic biology</title><addtitle>Syst Biol</addtitle><description>A new method, PATHd8, for estimating ultrametric trees from trees with edge (branch) lengths proportional to the number of substitutions is proposed. The method allows for an arbitrary number of reference nodes for time calibration, each defined either as absolute age, minimum age, or maximum age, and the tree need not be fully resolved. The method is based on estimating node ages by mean path lengths from the node to the leaves but correcting for deviations from a molecular clock suggested by reference nodes. As opposed to most existing methods allowing substitution rate variation, the new method smoothes substitution rates locally, rather than simultaneously over the whole tree, thus allowing for analysis of very large trees. The performance of PATHd8 is compared with other frequently used methods for estimating divergence times. In analyses of three separate data sets, PATHd8 gives similar divergence times to other methods, the largest difference being between crown group ages, where unconstrained nodes get younger ages when analyzed with PATHd8. Overall, chronograms obtained from other methods appear smoother, whereas PATHd8 preserves more of the heterogeneity seen in the original edge lengths. Divergence times are most evenly spread over the chronograms obtained from the Bayesian implementation and the clock-based Langley-Fitch method, and these two methods produce very similar ages for most nodes. Evaluations of PATHd8 using simulated data suggest that PATHd8 is slightly less precise compared with penalized likelihood, but it gives more sensible answers for extreme data sets. A clear advantage with PATHd8 is that it is more or less instantaneous even with trees having several thousand leaves, whereas other programs often run into problems when analyzing trees with hundreds of leaves. PATHd8 is implemented in freely available software.</description><subject>Analytical estimating</subject><subject>Bayesian analysis</subject><subject>Biologi</subject><subject>Biology</subject><subject>Chronograms</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Data smoothing</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Divergence times</subject><subject>Estimated taxes</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>estimation</subject><subject>Estimation methods</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Fossils</subject><subject>Leaves</subject><subject>Likelihood Functions</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>molecular clock</subject><subject>NATURAL SCIENCES</subject><subject>NATURVETENSKAP</subject><subject>Operating systems</subject><subject>Parameter estimation</subject><subject>phylogenetic trees</subject><subject>Phylogenetics</subject><subject>Phylogeny</subject><subject>Plants - classification</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>substitution rates</subject><subject>Taxa</subject><issn>1063-5157</issn><issn>1076-836X</issn><issn>1076-836X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkU9vEzEQxS0EoiXwATiAVhy4wILH_30sbaFIQYAUoOrF8m5ng0OyDvYu0G-Po42CBBdOtvx-741nhpCHQF8ANfQlUMUlSKopKODa8FvkGKhWteHq8vburnhdAH1E7uW8ohRASbhLjkAbo0CIY6LP8xA2fgj9sjoLPzAtsW-xWoQN5ir01dyXl-rD15t1LAoOoa0WCTHfJ3c6v874YH_OyKfX54vTi3r-_s3b05N53UrKhloxKSxqhhbAeN5io6mVTEDnrWCaC4BGdoYh1cy3CtvSTdeoa9XKjnW-4TPybMrNP3E7Nm6bym_TjYs-uLPw-cTFtHTj6KyiZQQz8nSityl-HzEPbhNyi-u17zGO2SnDrGFcFvDJX-AqjqkvnTiwQltrpSgQTFCbYs4Ju0N1oG63APfPAorn8T54bDZ4_cexn3gBnk9AHLf_lfdowld5iOlgYBQEp2YXV096yAP-Oug-fXNKcy3dxeWV-_LRvHp3xYQz_DcJEKNU</recordid><startdate>20071001</startdate><enddate>20071001</enddate><creator>Britton, Tom</creator><creator>Anderson, Cajsa Lisa</creator><creator>Jacquet, David</creator><creator>Lundqvist, Samuel</creator><creator>Bremer, Kåre</creator><general>Society of Systematic Zoology</general><general>Taylor & Francis</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>DF2</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20071001</creationdate><title>Estimating Divergence Times in Large Phylogenetic Trees</title><author>Britton, Tom ; Anderson, Cajsa Lisa ; Jacquet, David ; Lundqvist, Samuel ; Bremer, Kåre</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-62549e72e9118a3ceb7095241fa94273411b5f82e072ac6ec150fb6d6c5f2fab3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Analytical estimating</topic><topic>Bayesian analysis</topic><topic>Biologi</topic><topic>Biology</topic><topic>Chronograms</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Data smoothing</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Divergence times</topic><topic>Estimated taxes</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>estimation</topic><topic>Estimation methods</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Fossils</topic><topic>Leaves</topic><topic>Likelihood Functions</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>molecular clock</topic><topic>NATURAL SCIENCES</topic><topic>NATURVETENSKAP</topic><topic>Operating systems</topic><topic>Parameter estimation</topic><topic>phylogenetic trees</topic><topic>Phylogenetics</topic><topic>Phylogeny</topic><topic>Plants - classification</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>substitution rates</topic><topic>Taxa</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Britton, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Cajsa Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacquet, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lundqvist, Samuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bremer, Kåre</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Uppsala universitet</collection><jtitle>Systematic biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Britton, Tom</au><au>Anderson, Cajsa Lisa</au><au>Jacquet, David</au><au>Lundqvist, Samuel</au><au>Bremer, Kåre</au><au>Anderson, Frank</au><au>Anderson, Frank</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Estimating Divergence Times in Large Phylogenetic Trees</atitle><jtitle>Systematic biology</jtitle><addtitle>Syst Biol</addtitle><date>2007-10-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>741</spage><epage>752</epage><pages>741-752</pages><issn>1063-5157</issn><issn>1076-836X</issn><eissn>1076-836X</eissn><abstract>A new method, PATHd8, for estimating ultrametric trees from trees with edge (branch) lengths proportional to the number of substitutions is proposed. The method allows for an arbitrary number of reference nodes for time calibration, each defined either as absolute age, minimum age, or maximum age, and the tree need not be fully resolved. The method is based on estimating node ages by mean path lengths from the node to the leaves but correcting for deviations from a molecular clock suggested by reference nodes. As opposed to most existing methods allowing substitution rate variation, the new method smoothes substitution rates locally, rather than simultaneously over the whole tree, thus allowing for analysis of very large trees. The performance of PATHd8 is compared with other frequently used methods for estimating divergence times. In analyses of three separate data sets, PATHd8 gives similar divergence times to other methods, the largest difference being between crown group ages, where unconstrained nodes get younger ages when analyzed with PATHd8. Overall, chronograms obtained from other methods appear smoother, whereas PATHd8 preserves more of the heterogeneity seen in the original edge lengths. Divergence times are most evenly spread over the chronograms obtained from the Bayesian implementation and the clock-based Langley-Fitch method, and these two methods produce very similar ages for most nodes. Evaluations of PATHd8 using simulated data suggest that PATHd8 is slightly less precise compared with penalized likelihood, but it gives more sensible answers for extreme data sets. A clear advantage with PATHd8 is that it is more or less instantaneous even with trees having several thousand leaves, whereas other programs often run into problems when analyzing trees with hundreds of leaves. PATHd8 is implemented in freely available software.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Society of Systematic Zoology</pub><pmid>17886144</pmid><doi>10.1080/10635150701613783</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1063-5157 |
ispartof | Systematic biology, 2007-10, Vol.56 (5), p.741-752 |
issn | 1063-5157 1076-836X 1076-836X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_swepub_primary_oai_DiVA_org_uu_96061 |
source | JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Oxford University Press:Jisc Collections:OUP Read and Publish 2024-2025 (2024 collection) (Reading list) |
subjects | Analytical estimating Bayesian analysis Biologi Biology Chronograms Computer Simulation Data smoothing Datasets Divergence times Estimated taxes Estimates estimation Estimation methods Evolution Fossils Leaves Likelihood Functions Methods Models, Biological molecular clock NATURAL SCIENCES NATURVETENSKAP Operating systems Parameter estimation phylogenetic trees Phylogenetics Phylogeny Plants - classification Software substitution rates Taxa |
title | Estimating Divergence Times in Large Phylogenetic Trees |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T12%3A29%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_swepu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Estimating%20Divergence%20Times%20in%20Large%20Phylogenetic%20Trees&rft.jtitle=Systematic%20biology&rft.au=Britton,%20Tom&rft.date=2007-10-01&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=741&rft.epage=752&rft.pages=741-752&rft.issn=1063-5157&rft.eissn=1076-836X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/10635150701613783&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_swepu%3E20143084%3C/jstor_swepu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-62549e72e9118a3ceb7095241fa94273411b5f82e072ac6ec150fb6d6c5f2fab3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=194799954&rft_id=info:pmid/17886144&rft_jstor_id=20143084&rft_oup_id=10.1080/10635150701613783&rfr_iscdi=true |