Constraints to nitrogen acquisition of terrestrial plants under elevated CO2

• Published in: Global change biology 2015-08, Vol.21 (8), p.3152-3168
• Main Authors: Feng, Zhaozhong, Rütting, Tobias, Pleijel, Håkan, Wallin, Göran, Reich, Peter B, Kammann, Claudia I, Newton, Paul C.D, Kobayashi, Kazuhiko, Luo, Yunjian, Uddling, Johan
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: adverse effects; Agriculture; Botanik; Botany; carbon dioxide; Carbon Dioxide - pharmacology; Climate Change; cropland; crops; diversity; Ecology; Ecosystem; Ecosystems; Ekologi; FACE; fertilization; Flowers & plants; forest; forest ecosystems; Forests; free air carbon dioxide enrichment; grassland; grasslands; Greenhouse gases; growth dilution; meta-analysis; Nitrogen; Nitrogen - metabolism; nitrogen content; plant response; plants (botany); Plants - metabolism; Poaceae; uncertainty
• ISSN: 1354-1013; 1365-2486; 1365-2486
• DOI: 10.1111/gcb.12938

A key part of the uncertainty in terrestrial feedbacks on climate change is related to how and to what extent nitrogen (N) availability constrains the stimulation of terrestrial productivity by elevated CO₂ (eCO₂), and whether or not this constraint will become stronger over time. We explored the ecosystem‐scale relationship between responses of plant productivity and N acquisition to eCO₂ in free‐air CO₂ enrichment (FACE) experiments in grassland, cropland and forest ecosystems and found that: (i) in all three ecosystem types, this relationship was positive, linear and strong (r² = 0.68), but exhibited a negative intercept such that plant N acquisition was decreased by 10% when eCO₂ caused neutral or modest changes in productivity. As the ecosystems were markedly N limited, plants with minimal productivity responses to eCO₂ likely acquired less N than ambient CO₂‐grown counterparts because access was decreased, and not because demand was lower. (ii) Plant N concentration was lower under eCO₂, and this decrease was independent of the presence or magnitude of eCO₂‐induced productivity enhancement, refuting the long‐held hypothesis that this effect results from growth dilution. (iii) Effects of eCO₂ on productivity and N acquisition did not diminish over time, while the typical eCO₂‐induced decrease in plant N concentration did. Our results suggest that, at the decennial timescale covered by FACE studies, N limitation of eCO₂‐induced terrestrial productivity enhancement is associated with negative effects of eCO₂ on plant N acquisition rather than with growth dilution of plant N or processes leading to progressive N limitation.