Loading…
PSYCHO-ACOUSTIC CHARACTERS OF RELEVANCE FOR ANNOYANCE OF WIND TURBINE NOISE
The knowledge of annoyance and perception of wind turbine noise is limited, although some previous studies have found that the relationship between the equivalent noise level and annoyance was weak. The hypothesis for this study was that different sound characters in the noise not fully described by...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of sound and vibration 2002-02, Vol.250 (1), p.65-73 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-ed82af02639af9aa06b9e7e28bcb2ce43d19d25a4ee9b7305b0da48b27d670693 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-ed82af02639af9aa06b9e7e28bcb2ce43d19d25a4ee9b7305b0da48b27d670693 |
container_end_page | 73 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 65 |
container_title | Journal of sound and vibration |
container_volume | 250 |
creator | WAYE, K.PERSSON ÖHRSTRÖM, E. |
description | The knowledge of annoyance and perception of wind turbine noise is limited, although some previous studies have found that the relationship between the equivalent noise level and annoyance was weak. The hypothesis for this study was that different sound characters in the noise not fully described by the equivalent noise level, are of importance for annoyance and noise perception. In total, 25 subjects were exposed to five different wind turbine noises at the level of 40 dBLAeq . Subjective ratings of annoyance, relative annoyance and for how long they were aware of the noises were carried out after 10 min exposures. This was followed by 3 min exposures where perception and annoyance of 14 psycho-acoustic descriptors were evaluated. The results showed that the rating of annoyance, relative annoyance and awareness was different between the wind turbine noises, although they had the same equivalent noise level. A psycho-acoustic profile was obtained for each noise, which subjectively described the most and the least annoying sound parameters. None of the psycho-acoustic parameters, sharpness, loudness, roughness, fluctuation strength or modulation could explain the differences in annoyance response. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1006/jsvi.2001.3905 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_swepu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_gup_ub_gu_se_223486</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022460X01939057</els_id><sourcerecordid>27669827</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-ed82af02639af9aa06b9e7e28bcb2ce43d19d25a4ee9b7305b0da48b27d670693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUFv2zAMhYViBZq1u-7sy3pzRsuWLB0911mMBnbhJNt6EmSZLlSkcWbFHfrv6zRFdyrQE0HyeyTBR8jXAKYBAP9-7x7tlAIE01ACOyGTACTzBePiE5kAUOpHHP6ckc_O3QOAjMJoQq5vlrfpvPSTtFwvV3nqpfOkStJVVi29cuZV2SL7lRRp5s3KykuKorx9ycbW77y48lbr6kdeZF5R5svsgpy2euPwy2s8J-tZtkrn_qL8mafJwjcRi_c-NoLqFigPpW6l1sBriTFSUZuaGozCJpANZTpClHUcAquh0ZGoadzwGLgMz4l_nOv-4W6o1a63D7p_Up226m7YqbF0NyiHitIwEnzkL4_8ru_-Duj26sE6g5uN3mI3OEVjzqWg8UdAxigEIzg9gqbvnOuxfbshAHUwQx3MUAcz1MGMUfDtdbJ2Rm_aXm-Ndf9VIYOYCjpy4sjh-L9Hi71yxuLWYGN7NHvVdPa9Fc_9hpbp</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>27655201</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>PSYCHO-ACOUSTIC CHARACTERS OF RELEVANCE FOR ANNOYANCE OF WIND TURBINE NOISE</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>WAYE, K.PERSSON ; ÖHRSTRÖM, E.</creator><creatorcontrib>WAYE, K.PERSSON ; ÖHRSTRÖM, E.</creatorcontrib><description>The knowledge of annoyance and perception of wind turbine noise is limited, although some previous studies have found that the relationship between the equivalent noise level and annoyance was weak. The hypothesis for this study was that different sound characters in the noise not fully described by the equivalent noise level, are of importance for annoyance and noise perception. In total, 25 subjects were exposed to five different wind turbine noises at the level of 40 dBLAeq . Subjective ratings of annoyance, relative annoyance and for how long they were aware of the noises were carried out after 10 min exposures. This was followed by 3 min exposures where perception and annoyance of 14 psycho-acoustic descriptors were evaluated. The results showed that the rating of annoyance, relative annoyance and awareness was different between the wind turbine noises, although they had the same equivalent noise level. A psycho-acoustic profile was obtained for each noise, which subjectively described the most and the least annoying sound parameters. None of the psycho-acoustic parameters, sharpness, loudness, roughness, fluctuation strength or modulation could explain the differences in annoyance response.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-460X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-8568</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1006/jsvi.2001.3905</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JSVIAG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Acoustics ; Arbetsmedicin och miljömedicin ; Audition ; Biological and medical sciences ; Exact sciences and technology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications) ; Noise: its effects and control ; Occupational Health and Environmental Health ; Perception ; Physics ; Psychological acoustics ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><ispartof>Journal of sound and vibration, 2002-02, Vol.250 (1), p.65-73</ispartof><rights>2002 Elsevier Science Ltd</rights><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-ed82af02639af9aa06b9e7e28bcb2ce43d19d25a4ee9b7305b0da48b27d670693</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-ed82af02639af9aa06b9e7e28bcb2ce43d19d25a4ee9b7305b0da48b27d670693</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,309,310,314,776,780,785,786,881,23909,23910,25118,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=13507282$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://gup.ub.gu.se/publication/223486$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>WAYE, K.PERSSON</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ÖHRSTRÖM, E.</creatorcontrib><title>PSYCHO-ACOUSTIC CHARACTERS OF RELEVANCE FOR ANNOYANCE OF WIND TURBINE NOISE</title><title>Journal of sound and vibration</title><description>The knowledge of annoyance and perception of wind turbine noise is limited, although some previous studies have found that the relationship between the equivalent noise level and annoyance was weak. The hypothesis for this study was that different sound characters in the noise not fully described by the equivalent noise level, are of importance for annoyance and noise perception. In total, 25 subjects were exposed to five different wind turbine noises at the level of 40 dBLAeq . Subjective ratings of annoyance, relative annoyance and for how long they were aware of the noises were carried out after 10 min exposures. This was followed by 3 min exposures where perception and annoyance of 14 psycho-acoustic descriptors were evaluated. The results showed that the rating of annoyance, relative annoyance and awareness was different between the wind turbine noises, although they had the same equivalent noise level. A psycho-acoustic profile was obtained for each noise, which subjectively described the most and the least annoying sound parameters. None of the psycho-acoustic parameters, sharpness, loudness, roughness, fluctuation strength or modulation could explain the differences in annoyance response.</description><subject>Acoustics</subject><subject>Arbetsmedicin och miljömedicin</subject><subject>Audition</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications)</subject><subject>Noise: its effects and control</subject><subject>Occupational Health and Environmental Health</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Psychological acoustics</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><issn>0022-460X</issn><issn>1095-8568</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkUFv2zAMhYViBZq1u-7sy3pzRsuWLB0911mMBnbhJNt6EmSZLlSkcWbFHfrv6zRFdyrQE0HyeyTBR8jXAKYBAP9-7x7tlAIE01ACOyGTACTzBePiE5kAUOpHHP6ckc_O3QOAjMJoQq5vlrfpvPSTtFwvV3nqpfOkStJVVi29cuZV2SL7lRRp5s3KykuKorx9ycbW77y48lbr6kdeZF5R5svsgpy2euPwy2s8J-tZtkrn_qL8mafJwjcRi_c-NoLqFigPpW6l1sBriTFSUZuaGozCJpANZTpClHUcAquh0ZGoadzwGLgMz4l_nOv-4W6o1a63D7p_Up226m7YqbF0NyiHitIwEnzkL4_8ru_-Duj26sE6g5uN3mI3OEVjzqWg8UdAxigEIzg9gqbvnOuxfbshAHUwQx3MUAcz1MGMUfDtdbJ2Rm_aXm-Ndf9VIYOYCjpy4sjh-L9Hi71yxuLWYGN7NHvVdPa9Fc_9hpbp</recordid><startdate>20020207</startdate><enddate>20020207</enddate><creator>WAYE, K.PERSSON</creator><creator>ÖHRSTRÖM, E.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>F1U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020207</creationdate><title>PSYCHO-ACOUSTIC CHARACTERS OF RELEVANCE FOR ANNOYANCE OF WIND TURBINE NOISE</title><author>WAYE, K.PERSSON ; ÖHRSTRÖM, E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-ed82af02639af9aa06b9e7e28bcb2ce43d19d25a4ee9b7305b0da48b27d670693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Acoustics</topic><topic>Arbetsmedicin och miljömedicin</topic><topic>Audition</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications)</topic><topic>Noise: its effects and control</topic><topic>Occupational Health and Environmental Health</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Psychological acoustics</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>WAYE, K.PERSSON</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ÖHRSTRÖM, E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Göteborgs universitet</collection><jtitle>Journal of sound and vibration</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>WAYE, K.PERSSON</au><au>ÖHRSTRÖM, E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>PSYCHO-ACOUSTIC CHARACTERS OF RELEVANCE FOR ANNOYANCE OF WIND TURBINE NOISE</atitle><jtitle>Journal of sound and vibration</jtitle><date>2002-02-07</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>250</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>65</spage><epage>73</epage><pages>65-73</pages><issn>0022-460X</issn><eissn>1095-8568</eissn><coden>JSVIAG</coden><abstract>The knowledge of annoyance and perception of wind turbine noise is limited, although some previous studies have found that the relationship between the equivalent noise level and annoyance was weak. The hypothesis for this study was that different sound characters in the noise not fully described by the equivalent noise level, are of importance for annoyance and noise perception. In total, 25 subjects were exposed to five different wind turbine noises at the level of 40 dBLAeq . Subjective ratings of annoyance, relative annoyance and for how long they were aware of the noises were carried out after 10 min exposures. This was followed by 3 min exposures where perception and annoyance of 14 psycho-acoustic descriptors were evaluated. The results showed that the rating of annoyance, relative annoyance and awareness was different between the wind turbine noises, although they had the same equivalent noise level. A psycho-acoustic profile was obtained for each noise, which subjectively described the most and the least annoying sound parameters. None of the psycho-acoustic parameters, sharpness, loudness, roughness, fluctuation strength or modulation could explain the differences in annoyance response.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1006/jsvi.2001.3905</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-460X |
ispartof | Journal of sound and vibration, 2002-02, Vol.250 (1), p.65-73 |
issn | 0022-460X 1095-8568 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_swepub_primary_oai_gup_ub_gu_se_223486 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection |
subjects | Acoustics Arbetsmedicin och miljömedicin Audition Biological and medical sciences Exact sciences and technology Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications) Noise: its effects and control Occupational Health and Environmental Health Perception Physics Psychological acoustics Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology |
title | PSYCHO-ACOUSTIC CHARACTERS OF RELEVANCE FOR ANNOYANCE OF WIND TURBINE NOISE |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T07%3A18%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_swepu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=PSYCHO-ACOUSTIC%20CHARACTERS%20OF%20RELEVANCE%20FOR%20ANNOYANCE%20OF%20WIND%20TURBINE%20NOISE&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20sound%20and%20vibration&rft.au=WAYE,%20K.PERSSON&rft.date=2002-02-07&rft.volume=250&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=65&rft.epage=73&rft.pages=65-73&rft.issn=0022-460X&rft.eissn=1095-8568&rft.coden=JSVIAG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1006/jsvi.2001.3905&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_swepu%3E27669827%3C/proquest_swepu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-ed82af02639af9aa06b9e7e28bcb2ce43d19d25a4ee9b7305b0da48b27d670693%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=27655201&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |