Loading…

PSYCHO-ACOUSTIC CHARACTERS OF RELEVANCE FOR ANNOYANCE OF WIND TURBINE NOISE

The knowledge of annoyance and perception of wind turbine noise is limited, although some previous studies have found that the relationship between the equivalent noise level and annoyance was weak. The hypothesis for this study was that different sound characters in the noise not fully described by...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of sound and vibration 2002-02, Vol.250 (1), p.65-73
Main Authors: WAYE, K.PERSSON, ÖHRSTRÖM, E.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-ed82af02639af9aa06b9e7e28bcb2ce43d19d25a4ee9b7305b0da48b27d670693
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-ed82af02639af9aa06b9e7e28bcb2ce43d19d25a4ee9b7305b0da48b27d670693
container_end_page 73
container_issue 1
container_start_page 65
container_title Journal of sound and vibration
container_volume 250
creator WAYE, K.PERSSON
ÖHRSTRÖM, E.
description The knowledge of annoyance and perception of wind turbine noise is limited, although some previous studies have found that the relationship between the equivalent noise level and annoyance was weak. The hypothesis for this study was that different sound characters in the noise not fully described by the equivalent noise level, are of importance for annoyance and noise perception. In total, 25 subjects were exposed to five different wind turbine noises at the level of 40 dBLAeq . Subjective ratings of annoyance, relative annoyance and for how long they were aware of the noises were carried out after 10 min exposures. This was followed by 3 min exposures where perception and annoyance of 14 psycho-acoustic descriptors were evaluated. The results showed that the rating of annoyance, relative annoyance and awareness was different between the wind turbine noises, although they had the same equivalent noise level. A psycho-acoustic profile was obtained for each noise, which subjectively described the most and the least annoying sound parameters. None of the psycho-acoustic parameters, sharpness, loudness, roughness, fluctuation strength or modulation could explain the differences in annoyance response.
doi_str_mv 10.1006/jsvi.2001.3905
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_swepu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_gup_ub_gu_se_223486</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022460X01939057</els_id><sourcerecordid>27669827</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-ed82af02639af9aa06b9e7e28bcb2ce43d19d25a4ee9b7305b0da48b27d670693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUFv2zAMhYViBZq1u-7sy3pzRsuWLB0911mMBnbhJNt6EmSZLlSkcWbFHfrv6zRFdyrQE0HyeyTBR8jXAKYBAP9-7x7tlAIE01ACOyGTACTzBePiE5kAUOpHHP6ckc_O3QOAjMJoQq5vlrfpvPSTtFwvV3nqpfOkStJVVi29cuZV2SL7lRRp5s3KykuKorx9ycbW77y48lbr6kdeZF5R5svsgpy2euPwy2s8J-tZtkrn_qL8mafJwjcRi_c-NoLqFigPpW6l1sBriTFSUZuaGozCJpANZTpClHUcAquh0ZGoadzwGLgMz4l_nOv-4W6o1a63D7p_Up226m7YqbF0NyiHitIwEnzkL4_8ru_-Duj26sE6g5uN3mI3OEVjzqWg8UdAxigEIzg9gqbvnOuxfbshAHUwQx3MUAcz1MGMUfDtdbJ2Rm_aXm-Ndf9VIYOYCjpy4sjh-L9Hi71yxuLWYGN7NHvVdPa9Fc_9hpbp</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>27655201</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>PSYCHO-ACOUSTIC CHARACTERS OF RELEVANCE FOR ANNOYANCE OF WIND TURBINE NOISE</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>WAYE, K.PERSSON ; ÖHRSTRÖM, E.</creator><creatorcontrib>WAYE, K.PERSSON ; ÖHRSTRÖM, E.</creatorcontrib><description>The knowledge of annoyance and perception of wind turbine noise is limited, although some previous studies have found that the relationship between the equivalent noise level and annoyance was weak. The hypothesis for this study was that different sound characters in the noise not fully described by the equivalent noise level, are of importance for annoyance and noise perception. In total, 25 subjects were exposed to five different wind turbine noises at the level of 40 dBLAeq . Subjective ratings of annoyance, relative annoyance and for how long they were aware of the noises were carried out after 10 min exposures. This was followed by 3 min exposures where perception and annoyance of 14 psycho-acoustic descriptors were evaluated. The results showed that the rating of annoyance, relative annoyance and awareness was different between the wind turbine noises, although they had the same equivalent noise level. A psycho-acoustic profile was obtained for each noise, which subjectively described the most and the least annoying sound parameters. None of the psycho-acoustic parameters, sharpness, loudness, roughness, fluctuation strength or modulation could explain the differences in annoyance response.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-460X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-8568</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1006/jsvi.2001.3905</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JSVIAG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Acoustics ; Arbetsmedicin och miljömedicin ; Audition ; Biological and medical sciences ; Exact sciences and technology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications) ; Noise: its effects and control ; Occupational Health and Environmental Health ; Perception ; Physics ; Psychological acoustics ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><ispartof>Journal of sound and vibration, 2002-02, Vol.250 (1), p.65-73</ispartof><rights>2002 Elsevier Science Ltd</rights><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-ed82af02639af9aa06b9e7e28bcb2ce43d19d25a4ee9b7305b0da48b27d670693</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-ed82af02639af9aa06b9e7e28bcb2ce43d19d25a4ee9b7305b0da48b27d670693</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,309,310,314,776,780,785,786,881,23909,23910,25118,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=13507282$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://gup.ub.gu.se/publication/223486$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>WAYE, K.PERSSON</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ÖHRSTRÖM, E.</creatorcontrib><title>PSYCHO-ACOUSTIC CHARACTERS OF RELEVANCE FOR ANNOYANCE OF WIND TURBINE NOISE</title><title>Journal of sound and vibration</title><description>The knowledge of annoyance and perception of wind turbine noise is limited, although some previous studies have found that the relationship between the equivalent noise level and annoyance was weak. The hypothesis for this study was that different sound characters in the noise not fully described by the equivalent noise level, are of importance for annoyance and noise perception. In total, 25 subjects were exposed to five different wind turbine noises at the level of 40 dBLAeq . Subjective ratings of annoyance, relative annoyance and for how long they were aware of the noises were carried out after 10 min exposures. This was followed by 3 min exposures where perception and annoyance of 14 psycho-acoustic descriptors were evaluated. The results showed that the rating of annoyance, relative annoyance and awareness was different between the wind turbine noises, although they had the same equivalent noise level. A psycho-acoustic profile was obtained for each noise, which subjectively described the most and the least annoying sound parameters. None of the psycho-acoustic parameters, sharpness, loudness, roughness, fluctuation strength or modulation could explain the differences in annoyance response.</description><subject>Acoustics</subject><subject>Arbetsmedicin och miljömedicin</subject><subject>Audition</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications)</subject><subject>Noise: its effects and control</subject><subject>Occupational Health and Environmental Health</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Psychological acoustics</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><issn>0022-460X</issn><issn>1095-8568</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkUFv2zAMhYViBZq1u-7sy3pzRsuWLB0911mMBnbhJNt6EmSZLlSkcWbFHfrv6zRFdyrQE0HyeyTBR8jXAKYBAP9-7x7tlAIE01ACOyGTACTzBePiE5kAUOpHHP6ckc_O3QOAjMJoQq5vlrfpvPSTtFwvV3nqpfOkStJVVi29cuZV2SL7lRRp5s3KykuKorx9ycbW77y48lbr6kdeZF5R5svsgpy2euPwy2s8J-tZtkrn_qL8mafJwjcRi_c-NoLqFigPpW6l1sBriTFSUZuaGozCJpANZTpClHUcAquh0ZGoadzwGLgMz4l_nOv-4W6o1a63D7p_Up226m7YqbF0NyiHitIwEnzkL4_8ru_-Duj26sE6g5uN3mI3OEVjzqWg8UdAxigEIzg9gqbvnOuxfbshAHUwQx3MUAcz1MGMUfDtdbJ2Rm_aXm-Ndf9VIYOYCjpy4sjh-L9Hi71yxuLWYGN7NHvVdPa9Fc_9hpbp</recordid><startdate>20020207</startdate><enddate>20020207</enddate><creator>WAYE, K.PERSSON</creator><creator>ÖHRSTRÖM, E.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>F1U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020207</creationdate><title>PSYCHO-ACOUSTIC CHARACTERS OF RELEVANCE FOR ANNOYANCE OF WIND TURBINE NOISE</title><author>WAYE, K.PERSSON ; ÖHRSTRÖM, E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-ed82af02639af9aa06b9e7e28bcb2ce43d19d25a4ee9b7305b0da48b27d670693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Acoustics</topic><topic>Arbetsmedicin och miljömedicin</topic><topic>Audition</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications)</topic><topic>Noise: its effects and control</topic><topic>Occupational Health and Environmental Health</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Psychological acoustics</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>WAYE, K.PERSSON</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ÖHRSTRÖM, E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Göteborgs universitet</collection><jtitle>Journal of sound and vibration</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>WAYE, K.PERSSON</au><au>ÖHRSTRÖM, E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>PSYCHO-ACOUSTIC CHARACTERS OF RELEVANCE FOR ANNOYANCE OF WIND TURBINE NOISE</atitle><jtitle>Journal of sound and vibration</jtitle><date>2002-02-07</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>250</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>65</spage><epage>73</epage><pages>65-73</pages><issn>0022-460X</issn><eissn>1095-8568</eissn><coden>JSVIAG</coden><abstract>The knowledge of annoyance and perception of wind turbine noise is limited, although some previous studies have found that the relationship between the equivalent noise level and annoyance was weak. The hypothesis for this study was that different sound characters in the noise not fully described by the equivalent noise level, are of importance for annoyance and noise perception. In total, 25 subjects were exposed to five different wind turbine noises at the level of 40 dBLAeq . Subjective ratings of annoyance, relative annoyance and for how long they were aware of the noises were carried out after 10 min exposures. This was followed by 3 min exposures where perception and annoyance of 14 psycho-acoustic descriptors were evaluated. The results showed that the rating of annoyance, relative annoyance and awareness was different between the wind turbine noises, although they had the same equivalent noise level. A psycho-acoustic profile was obtained for each noise, which subjectively described the most and the least annoying sound parameters. None of the psycho-acoustic parameters, sharpness, loudness, roughness, fluctuation strength or modulation could explain the differences in annoyance response.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1006/jsvi.2001.3905</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-460X
ispartof Journal of sound and vibration, 2002-02, Vol.250 (1), p.65-73
issn 0022-460X
1095-8568
language eng
recordid cdi_swepub_primary_oai_gup_ub_gu_se_223486
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Acoustics
Arbetsmedicin och miljömedicin
Audition
Biological and medical sciences
Exact sciences and technology
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications)
Noise: its effects and control
Occupational Health and Environmental Health
Perception
Physics
Psychological acoustics
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
title PSYCHO-ACOUSTIC CHARACTERS OF RELEVANCE FOR ANNOYANCE OF WIND TURBINE NOISE
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T07%3A18%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_swepu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=PSYCHO-ACOUSTIC%20CHARACTERS%20OF%20RELEVANCE%20FOR%20ANNOYANCE%20OF%20WIND%20TURBINE%20NOISE&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20sound%20and%20vibration&rft.au=WAYE,%20K.PERSSON&rft.date=2002-02-07&rft.volume=250&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=65&rft.epage=73&rft.pages=65-73&rft.issn=0022-460X&rft.eissn=1095-8568&rft.coden=JSVIAG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1006/jsvi.2001.3905&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_swepu%3E27669827%3C/proquest_swepu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-ed82af02639af9aa06b9e7e28bcb2ce43d19d25a4ee9b7305b0da48b27d670693%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=27655201&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true