The personal versus the institutional voice in an open photographic archive

In an open photographic archive where both archival institutions and the general public can upload images and provide them with descriptions, a noted difference can be perceived between the institutional voice and the personal voice. Private persons’ written descriptions of their photographs tend to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Archival Science 2017-09, Vol.17 (3), p.247-266
Main Author: Wagner, Karin
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Anthropology
Archival studies
Archives & records
Art History
Computer Appl. in Arts and Humanities
Cultural and Media Studies
Cultural Heritage
Deixis
Descriptions
Genre
Guidelines
Information Storage and Retrieval
Konstvetenskap
Library Science
Literature
Original Paper
Photography
Semiotics
Social media
Social networks
Voice
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In an open photographic archive where both archival institutions and the general public can upload images and provide them with descriptions, a noted difference can be perceived between the institutional voice and the personal voice. Private persons’ written descriptions of their photographs tend to have a more subjective style than the neutral, objective style of descriptions written by institutional staff influenced by archival guidelines. Seven examples from the site Historypin will be analysed using semiotics, rhetoric and genre theory as theoretical approaches. Deixis is a key concept in the analyses. In order to discern the institutional voice, meta-genre documents like archival guidelines have been studied. Regarding the personal voice, it is shown how genres that evolved long before the web serve as patterns for the contributions to Historypin, and at the same time how these genres undergo a renewal in this context. The article concludes by suggesting ways the personal voice could be strengthened and that institutions might benefit from creating fictional stories emulating the personal voice.
ISSN:1389-0166
1573-7519
1573-7519
1573-7500
DOI:10.1007/s10502-016-9273-9