Loading…

Assessing reliability of precipitation data over the Mekong River Basin: A comparison of ground‐based, satellite, and reanalysis datasets

Accurate precipitation data are the basis for hydro‐climatological studies. As a highly populated river basin, with the biggest inland fishery in Southeast Asia, freshwater dynamics is extremely important for the Mekong River Basin (MB). This study focuses on evaluating the reliability of existing g...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of climatology 2018-09, Vol.38 (11), p.4314-4334
Main Authors: Chen, Aifang, Chen, Deliang, Azorin‐Molina, Cesar
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3310-51733711aa79670e04bd8ab770518197f59bd805d170ab0fb9ee8ff776ed5fa53
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3310-51733711aa79670e04bd8ab770518197f59bd805d170ab0fb9ee8ff776ed5fa53
container_end_page 4334
container_issue 11
container_start_page 4314
container_title International journal of climatology
container_volume 38
creator Chen, Aifang
Chen, Deliang
Azorin‐Molina, Cesar
description Accurate precipitation data are the basis for hydro‐climatological studies. As a highly populated river basin, with the biggest inland fishery in Southeast Asia, freshwater dynamics is extremely important for the Mekong River Basin (MB). This study focuses on evaluating the reliability of existing gridded precipitation datasets both from satellite and reanalysis, with a ground observations‐based gridded precipitation dataset as the reference. Two satellite products (Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission [TRMM] and the Precipitation Estimation from Remote Sensing Information using an Artificial Neural Network—Climate Data Record [PERSIANN‐CDR]), as well as three reanalysis products (Modern‐Era Retrospective analysis for Research and Applications [MERRA2], the European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts interim reanalysis [ERA‐Interim], and the Climate Forecast System Reanalysis [CFSR]) were compared with the Asian Precipitation—Highly Resolved Observational Data Integration Towards Evaluation of Water Resources (APHRODITE) over the MB. The APHRODITE was chosen as the reference for the comparison because it was developed based on ground observations and has also been selected as reference data in previous studies. Results show that most of the assessed datasets are able to capture the major climatological characteristics of precipitation in the MB for the 10‐year study period (1998–2007). Generally, both satellite data (TRMM and PERSIANN‐CDR) show higher reliability than reanalysis products at both spatial and temporal scales across the MB, with the TRMM outperforming when compared to the PERSIANN‐CDR. For the reanalysis products, MERRA2 is more reliable in terms of temporal variability, but with some underestimation of precipitation. The other two reanalysis products CFSR and ERA‐Interim are relatively unreliable due to large overestimations. CFSR is better positioned to capture the spatial variability of precipitation, while ERA‐Interim shows inconsistent spatial patterns but more realistically resembles the daily precipitation probability. These findings have practical implications for future hydro‐climatological studies. This study focuses on evaluating the reliability of existing gridded precipitation datasets both from satellite (Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission [TRMM] and the Precipitation Estimation from Remote Sensing Information using an Artificial Neural Network—Climate Data Record [PERSIANN‐CDR]) and reanalysis (Modern‐Era Retrospective a
doi_str_mv 10.1002/joc.5670
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_swepu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_gup_ub_gu_se_271337</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2098955857</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3310-51733711aa79670e04bd8ab770518197f59bd805d170ab0fb9ee8ff776ed5fa53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU9v1DAQxS0EUpeC1I9giQuHph1v6rXNbVlB_6ioUgVna5JMFi9pHDwJ1d6498Jn7CfB20Vw4jTS0--9mdET4kjBiQKYn25ifaIXBp6JmQJnCgBrn4sZWOcKe6bsgXjJvAEA59RiJh6WzMQc-rVM1AWsQhfGrYytHBLVYQgjjiH2ssERZfxBSY5fSX6ibzE7bsNOeI_Z_k4uZR3vBkyBM5796xSnvnn8-atCpuZYMo7U5XA6ltg3eRv22G058FM208ivxIsWO6bXf-ah-PLxw-fVRXF9c365Wl4XdVkqKLQyZWmUQjQuP0pwVjUWK2NAK6ucabXLAuhGGcAK2soR2bY1ZkGNblGXh6LY5_I9DVPlhxTuMG19xODX0-CztJ48k58blTdl_s2eH1L8PhGPfhOnlK9nPwdnndZW76i3e6pOkTlR-zdXgd9Vk12131Xz74D70NH2v5y_ulk98b8BeaiSyg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2098955857</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessing reliability of precipitation data over the Mekong River Basin: A comparison of ground‐based, satellite, and reanalysis datasets</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Chen, Aifang ; Chen, Deliang ; Azorin‐Molina, Cesar</creator><creatorcontrib>Chen, Aifang ; Chen, Deliang ; Azorin‐Molina, Cesar</creatorcontrib><description>Accurate precipitation data are the basis for hydro‐climatological studies. As a highly populated river basin, with the biggest inland fishery in Southeast Asia, freshwater dynamics is extremely important for the Mekong River Basin (MB). This study focuses on evaluating the reliability of existing gridded precipitation datasets both from satellite and reanalysis, with a ground observations‐based gridded precipitation dataset as the reference. Two satellite products (Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission [TRMM] and the Precipitation Estimation from Remote Sensing Information using an Artificial Neural Network—Climate Data Record [PERSIANN‐CDR]), as well as three reanalysis products (Modern‐Era Retrospective analysis for Research and Applications [MERRA2], the European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts interim reanalysis [ERA‐Interim], and the Climate Forecast System Reanalysis [CFSR]) were compared with the Asian Precipitation—Highly Resolved Observational Data Integration Towards Evaluation of Water Resources (APHRODITE) over the MB. The APHRODITE was chosen as the reference for the comparison because it was developed based on ground observations and has also been selected as reference data in previous studies. Results show that most of the assessed datasets are able to capture the major climatological characteristics of precipitation in the MB for the 10‐year study period (1998–2007). Generally, both satellite data (TRMM and PERSIANN‐CDR) show higher reliability than reanalysis products at both spatial and temporal scales across the MB, with the TRMM outperforming when compared to the PERSIANN‐CDR. For the reanalysis products, MERRA2 is more reliable in terms of temporal variability, but with some underestimation of precipitation. The other two reanalysis products CFSR and ERA‐Interim are relatively unreliable due to large overestimations. CFSR is better positioned to capture the spatial variability of precipitation, while ERA‐Interim shows inconsistent spatial patterns but more realistically resembles the daily precipitation probability. These findings have practical implications for future hydro‐climatological studies. This study focuses on evaluating the reliability of existing gridded precipitation datasets both from satellite (Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission [TRMM] and the Precipitation Estimation from Remote Sensing Information using an Artificial Neural Network—Climate Data Record [PERSIANN‐CDR]) and reanalysis (Modern‐Era Retrospective analysis for Research and Applications, the European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts interim reanalysis, and the Climate Forecast System Reanalysis), with ground based observations as the reference (the Asian Precipitation—Highly Resolved Observational Data Integration Towards Evaluation of Water Resources). Results show that most of the assessed datasets are able to capture the major climatological characteristics of precipitation in the Mekong River Basin (MB) for the 10‐year study period (1998–2007); and both satellite data (TRMM and PERSIANN‐CDR) show higher reliability than reanalysis products at both spatial and temporal scales across the MB, with the TRMM outperforming when compared to the PERSIANN‐CDR. These findings have practical implications for future hydro‐climatological studies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0899-8418</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0088</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/joc.5670</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>2017 ; analysis tmpa ; Artificial neural networks ; Atmospheric precipitations ; climate ; Climate studies ; Climatic data ; Climatology ; Daily precipitation ; Data integration ; Datasets ; dense network ; Dynamics ; Evaluation ; Fisheries ; Freshwater ; Freshwater fish ; Ground-based observation ; Hydrologic data ; hydrological cycle ; Inland fisheries ; Inland water environment ; Mekong River Basin ; Meteorologi och atmosfärsvetenskap ; Meteorology &amp; Atmospheric Sciences ; Meteorology and Atmospheric Sciences ; n ml ; Neural networks ; plateau ; Precipitation ; Precipitation data ; Precipitation estimation ; precipitation evaluation ; Precipitation probability ; Probability theory ; Products ; Rain ; rain gauge observations ; Rainfall ; reanalysis data ; Reliability ; Reliability analysis ; Remote sensing ; River basins ; Rivers ; Satellite data ; Satellite observation ; Satellites ; Spatial variability ; Spatial variations ; Temporal variability ; Temporal variations ; tibetan ; time-series ; Tropical climate ; Tropical rainfall ; Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) ; Variability ; Water resources ; water-sui ; wavelet analysis ; Weather forecasting</subject><ispartof>International journal of climatology, 2018-09, Vol.38 (11), p.4314-4334</ispartof><rights>2018 Royal Meteorological Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3310-51733711aa79670e04bd8ab770518197f59bd805d170ab0fb9ee8ff776ed5fa53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3310-51733711aa79670e04bd8ab770518197f59bd805d170ab0fb9ee8ff776ed5fa53</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5913-7026 ; 0000-0003-0288-5618</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://gup.ub.gu.se/publication/271337$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chen, Aifang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Deliang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Azorin‐Molina, Cesar</creatorcontrib><title>Assessing reliability of precipitation data over the Mekong River Basin: A comparison of ground‐based, satellite, and reanalysis datasets</title><title>International journal of climatology</title><description>Accurate precipitation data are the basis for hydro‐climatological studies. As a highly populated river basin, with the biggest inland fishery in Southeast Asia, freshwater dynamics is extremely important for the Mekong River Basin (MB). This study focuses on evaluating the reliability of existing gridded precipitation datasets both from satellite and reanalysis, with a ground observations‐based gridded precipitation dataset as the reference. Two satellite products (Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission [TRMM] and the Precipitation Estimation from Remote Sensing Information using an Artificial Neural Network—Climate Data Record [PERSIANN‐CDR]), as well as three reanalysis products (Modern‐Era Retrospective analysis for Research and Applications [MERRA2], the European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts interim reanalysis [ERA‐Interim], and the Climate Forecast System Reanalysis [CFSR]) were compared with the Asian Precipitation—Highly Resolved Observational Data Integration Towards Evaluation of Water Resources (APHRODITE) over the MB. The APHRODITE was chosen as the reference for the comparison because it was developed based on ground observations and has also been selected as reference data in previous studies. Results show that most of the assessed datasets are able to capture the major climatological characteristics of precipitation in the MB for the 10‐year study period (1998–2007). Generally, both satellite data (TRMM and PERSIANN‐CDR) show higher reliability than reanalysis products at both spatial and temporal scales across the MB, with the TRMM outperforming when compared to the PERSIANN‐CDR. For the reanalysis products, MERRA2 is more reliable in terms of temporal variability, but with some underestimation of precipitation. The other two reanalysis products CFSR and ERA‐Interim are relatively unreliable due to large overestimations. CFSR is better positioned to capture the spatial variability of precipitation, while ERA‐Interim shows inconsistent spatial patterns but more realistically resembles the daily precipitation probability. These findings have practical implications for future hydro‐climatological studies. This study focuses on evaluating the reliability of existing gridded precipitation datasets both from satellite (Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission [TRMM] and the Precipitation Estimation from Remote Sensing Information using an Artificial Neural Network—Climate Data Record [PERSIANN‐CDR]) and reanalysis (Modern‐Era Retrospective analysis for Research and Applications, the European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts interim reanalysis, and the Climate Forecast System Reanalysis), with ground based observations as the reference (the Asian Precipitation—Highly Resolved Observational Data Integration Towards Evaluation of Water Resources). Results show that most of the assessed datasets are able to capture the major climatological characteristics of precipitation in the Mekong River Basin (MB) for the 10‐year study period (1998–2007); and both satellite data (TRMM and PERSIANN‐CDR) show higher reliability than reanalysis products at both spatial and temporal scales across the MB, with the TRMM outperforming when compared to the PERSIANN‐CDR. These findings have practical implications for future hydro‐climatological studies.</description><subject>2017</subject><subject>analysis tmpa</subject><subject>Artificial neural networks</subject><subject>Atmospheric precipitations</subject><subject>climate</subject><subject>Climate studies</subject><subject>Climatic data</subject><subject>Climatology</subject><subject>Daily precipitation</subject><subject>Data integration</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>dense network</subject><subject>Dynamics</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Fisheries</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Freshwater fish</subject><subject>Ground-based observation</subject><subject>Hydrologic data</subject><subject>hydrological cycle</subject><subject>Inland fisheries</subject><subject>Inland water environment</subject><subject>Mekong River Basin</subject><subject>Meteorologi och atmosfärsvetenskap</subject><subject>Meteorology &amp; Atmospheric Sciences</subject><subject>Meteorology and Atmospheric Sciences</subject><subject>n ml</subject><subject>Neural networks</subject><subject>plateau</subject><subject>Precipitation</subject><subject>Precipitation data</subject><subject>Precipitation estimation</subject><subject>precipitation evaluation</subject><subject>Precipitation probability</subject><subject>Probability theory</subject><subject>Products</subject><subject>Rain</subject><subject>rain gauge observations</subject><subject>Rainfall</subject><subject>reanalysis data</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Reliability analysis</subject><subject>Remote sensing</subject><subject>River basins</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Satellite data</subject><subject>Satellite observation</subject><subject>Satellites</subject><subject>Spatial variability</subject><subject>Spatial variations</subject><subject>Temporal variability</subject><subject>Temporal variations</subject><subject>tibetan</subject><subject>time-series</subject><subject>Tropical climate</subject><subject>Tropical rainfall</subject><subject>Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM)</subject><subject>Variability</subject><subject>Water resources</subject><subject>water-sui</subject><subject>wavelet analysis</subject><subject>Weather forecasting</subject><issn>0899-8418</issn><issn>1097-0088</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kU9v1DAQxS0EUpeC1I9giQuHph1v6rXNbVlB_6ioUgVna5JMFi9pHDwJ1d6498Jn7CfB20Vw4jTS0--9mdET4kjBiQKYn25ifaIXBp6JmQJnCgBrn4sZWOcKe6bsgXjJvAEA59RiJh6WzMQc-rVM1AWsQhfGrYytHBLVYQgjjiH2ssERZfxBSY5fSX6ibzE7bsNOeI_Z_k4uZR3vBkyBM5796xSnvnn8-atCpuZYMo7U5XA6ltg3eRv22G058FM208ivxIsWO6bXf-ah-PLxw-fVRXF9c365Wl4XdVkqKLQyZWmUQjQuP0pwVjUWK2NAK6ucabXLAuhGGcAK2soR2bY1ZkGNblGXh6LY5_I9DVPlhxTuMG19xODX0-CztJ48k58blTdl_s2eH1L8PhGPfhOnlK9nPwdnndZW76i3e6pOkTlR-zdXgd9Vk12131Xz74D70NH2v5y_ulk98b8BeaiSyg</recordid><startdate>201809</startdate><enddate>201809</enddate><creator>Chen, Aifang</creator><creator>Chen, Deliang</creator><creator>Azorin‐Molina, Cesar</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>F1U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5913-7026</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0288-5618</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201809</creationdate><title>Assessing reliability of precipitation data over the Mekong River Basin: A comparison of ground‐based, satellite, and reanalysis datasets</title><author>Chen, Aifang ; Chen, Deliang ; Azorin‐Molina, Cesar</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3310-51733711aa79670e04bd8ab770518197f59bd805d170ab0fb9ee8ff776ed5fa53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>2017</topic><topic>analysis tmpa</topic><topic>Artificial neural networks</topic><topic>Atmospheric precipitations</topic><topic>climate</topic><topic>Climate studies</topic><topic>Climatic data</topic><topic>Climatology</topic><topic>Daily precipitation</topic><topic>Data integration</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>dense network</topic><topic>Dynamics</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Fisheries</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Freshwater fish</topic><topic>Ground-based observation</topic><topic>Hydrologic data</topic><topic>hydrological cycle</topic><topic>Inland fisheries</topic><topic>Inland water environment</topic><topic>Mekong River Basin</topic><topic>Meteorologi och atmosfärsvetenskap</topic><topic>Meteorology &amp; Atmospheric Sciences</topic><topic>Meteorology and Atmospheric Sciences</topic><topic>n ml</topic><topic>Neural networks</topic><topic>plateau</topic><topic>Precipitation</topic><topic>Precipitation data</topic><topic>Precipitation estimation</topic><topic>precipitation evaluation</topic><topic>Precipitation probability</topic><topic>Probability theory</topic><topic>Products</topic><topic>Rain</topic><topic>rain gauge observations</topic><topic>Rainfall</topic><topic>reanalysis data</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Reliability analysis</topic><topic>Remote sensing</topic><topic>River basins</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Satellite data</topic><topic>Satellite observation</topic><topic>Satellites</topic><topic>Spatial variability</topic><topic>Spatial variations</topic><topic>Temporal variability</topic><topic>Temporal variations</topic><topic>tibetan</topic><topic>time-series</topic><topic>Tropical climate</topic><topic>Tropical rainfall</topic><topic>Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM)</topic><topic>Variability</topic><topic>Water resources</topic><topic>water-sui</topic><topic>wavelet analysis</topic><topic>Weather forecasting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chen, Aifang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Deliang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Azorin‐Molina, Cesar</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Göteborgs universitet</collection><jtitle>International journal of climatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chen, Aifang</au><au>Chen, Deliang</au><au>Azorin‐Molina, Cesar</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessing reliability of precipitation data over the Mekong River Basin: A comparison of ground‐based, satellite, and reanalysis datasets</atitle><jtitle>International journal of climatology</jtitle><date>2018-09</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>4314</spage><epage>4334</epage><pages>4314-4334</pages><issn>0899-8418</issn><eissn>1097-0088</eissn><abstract>Accurate precipitation data are the basis for hydro‐climatological studies. As a highly populated river basin, with the biggest inland fishery in Southeast Asia, freshwater dynamics is extremely important for the Mekong River Basin (MB). This study focuses on evaluating the reliability of existing gridded precipitation datasets both from satellite and reanalysis, with a ground observations‐based gridded precipitation dataset as the reference. Two satellite products (Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission [TRMM] and the Precipitation Estimation from Remote Sensing Information using an Artificial Neural Network—Climate Data Record [PERSIANN‐CDR]), as well as three reanalysis products (Modern‐Era Retrospective analysis for Research and Applications [MERRA2], the European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts interim reanalysis [ERA‐Interim], and the Climate Forecast System Reanalysis [CFSR]) were compared with the Asian Precipitation—Highly Resolved Observational Data Integration Towards Evaluation of Water Resources (APHRODITE) over the MB. The APHRODITE was chosen as the reference for the comparison because it was developed based on ground observations and has also been selected as reference data in previous studies. Results show that most of the assessed datasets are able to capture the major climatological characteristics of precipitation in the MB for the 10‐year study period (1998–2007). Generally, both satellite data (TRMM and PERSIANN‐CDR) show higher reliability than reanalysis products at both spatial and temporal scales across the MB, with the TRMM outperforming when compared to the PERSIANN‐CDR. For the reanalysis products, MERRA2 is more reliable in terms of temporal variability, but with some underestimation of precipitation. The other two reanalysis products CFSR and ERA‐Interim are relatively unreliable due to large overestimations. CFSR is better positioned to capture the spatial variability of precipitation, while ERA‐Interim shows inconsistent spatial patterns but more realistically resembles the daily precipitation probability. These findings have practical implications for future hydro‐climatological studies. This study focuses on evaluating the reliability of existing gridded precipitation datasets both from satellite (Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission [TRMM] and the Precipitation Estimation from Remote Sensing Information using an Artificial Neural Network—Climate Data Record [PERSIANN‐CDR]) and reanalysis (Modern‐Era Retrospective analysis for Research and Applications, the European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts interim reanalysis, and the Climate Forecast System Reanalysis), with ground based observations as the reference (the Asian Precipitation—Highly Resolved Observational Data Integration Towards Evaluation of Water Resources). Results show that most of the assessed datasets are able to capture the major climatological characteristics of precipitation in the Mekong River Basin (MB) for the 10‐year study period (1998–2007); and both satellite data (TRMM and PERSIANN‐CDR) show higher reliability than reanalysis products at both spatial and temporal scales across the MB, with the TRMM outperforming when compared to the PERSIANN‐CDR. These findings have practical implications for future hydro‐climatological studies.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/joc.5670</doi><tpages>22</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5913-7026</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0288-5618</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0899-8418
ispartof International journal of climatology, 2018-09, Vol.38 (11), p.4314-4334
issn 0899-8418
1097-0088
language eng
recordid cdi_swepub_primary_oai_gup_ub_gu_se_271337
source Wiley
subjects 2017
analysis tmpa
Artificial neural networks
Atmospheric precipitations
climate
Climate studies
Climatic data
Climatology
Daily precipitation
Data integration
Datasets
dense network
Dynamics
Evaluation
Fisheries
Freshwater
Freshwater fish
Ground-based observation
Hydrologic data
hydrological cycle
Inland fisheries
Inland water environment
Mekong River Basin
Meteorologi och atmosfärsvetenskap
Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
Meteorology and Atmospheric Sciences
n ml
Neural networks
plateau
Precipitation
Precipitation data
Precipitation estimation
precipitation evaluation
Precipitation probability
Probability theory
Products
Rain
rain gauge observations
Rainfall
reanalysis data
Reliability
Reliability analysis
Remote sensing
River basins
Rivers
Satellite data
Satellite observation
Satellites
Spatial variability
Spatial variations
Temporal variability
Temporal variations
tibetan
time-series
Tropical climate
Tropical rainfall
Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM)
Variability
Water resources
water-sui
wavelet analysis
Weather forecasting
title Assessing reliability of precipitation data over the Mekong River Basin: A comparison of ground‐based, satellite, and reanalysis datasets
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T18%3A00%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_swepu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing%20reliability%20of%20precipitation%20data%20over%20the%20Mekong%20River%20Basin:%20A%20comparison%20of%20ground%E2%80%90based,%20satellite,%20and%20reanalysis%20datasets&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20climatology&rft.au=Chen,%20Aifang&rft.date=2018-09&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=4314&rft.epage=4334&rft.pages=4314-4334&rft.issn=0899-8418&rft.eissn=1097-0088&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/joc.5670&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_swepu%3E2098955857%3C/proquest_swepu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3310-51733711aa79670e04bd8ab770518197f59bd805d170ab0fb9ee8ff776ed5fa53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2098955857&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true