Can personality predict longitudinal study attrition? Evidence from a population-based sample of older adults

•We studied associations between personality traits and longitudinal study attrition.•Higher extraversion and neuroticism were related to an increased risk for attrition.•Higher agreeableness was associated with a decreased attrition risk. Participation attrition is a major problem in longitudinal s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of research in personality 2018-12, Vol.77, p.133-136
Main Authors: Hansson, Isabelle, Berg, Anne Ingeborg, Thorvaldsson, Valgeir
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Big Five
Longitudinal study attrition
Personality
Psychology
Psykologi
Survey participation
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•We studied associations between personality traits and longitudinal study attrition.•Higher extraversion and neuroticism were related to an increased risk for attrition.•Higher agreeableness was associated with a decreased attrition risk. Participation attrition is a major problem in longitudinal studies. Systematic attrition can lead to selection biases, incorrect inferences, and erroneous conclusions. The aim of this study was to investigate systematic attrition related to personality traits in the longitudinal population-based HEalth, Ageing and Retirement Transitions in Sweden (HEARTS) study (N = 5913). Longitudinal study attrition was predicted by the Big Five personality traits, i.e., openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism, using logistic regression. Results revealed that higher extraversion and neuroticism, and lower agreeableness were independently associated with an increased risk for attrition at one and two year follow-up. Our findings suggest that personality can be a valuable source of information when accounting for systematic attrition in analyzes of longitudinal studies.
ISSN:0092-6566
1095-7251
DOI:10.1016/j.jrp.2018.10.002