Preservation amenity, research laboratory, or mineral reserve? International perspectives on the values of Antarctica

Inspired by notions of interest of humankind and intergenerational equity, we explored Antarctic perceptions of a subset of future generations—university students. Students at three universities in Canada, the Netherlands, and the USA were surveyed to determine the relationships between nationality,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Polar record 2019-03, Vol.55 (2), p.61-71
Main Authors: Tin, Tina, Peden, John, O’Reilly, Jessica, Bastmeijer, Kees, Maher, Patrick T.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Antarctic Treaty
Attitudes
Climate change
Climate system
Construction
Dependent variables
Earth
Earth and Related Environmental Sciences
Economics
Environmental impact
environmental management
Environmental protection
Geovetenskap och miljövetenskap
Juridik
Laboratories
Law
Mineral resources
Natural resources
Preservation
public perception
Regression models
Researchers
Resource conservation
Resource development
Stations
Students
Studies
tourism
University students
Values
Wilderness
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Inspired by notions of interest of humankind and intergenerational equity, we explored Antarctic perceptions of a subset of future generations—university students. Students at three universities in Canada, the Netherlands, and the USA were surveyed to determine the relationships between nationality, academic major, opinions on values of Antarctica, and support for a range of human activities in Antarctica (n = 618). Logistic regression was used to model the relationship of these variables with support for designation of Antarctica as a wilderness reserve, construction of new research stations, and mining. Compared with business and economics majors, biological sciences and natural resources/conservation majors were more likely to support wilderness designation and less likely to support mineral resource development. Nationality was not significantly associated with support for construction of new research stations and mineral resource development. Opinions on the value of Antarctica and support for activities also exhibited significant influences on dependent variables. Consistent with earlier studies of Antarctic scientists, personnel, tourists, and other members of the general public, university students valued Antarctica as one of the world’s last great wildernesses (66%), an important component of the Earth’s climate system (66%), and a science laboratory for the benefit of mankind (62%).
ISSN:0032-2474
1475-3057
DOI:10.1017/S0032247419000214