Loading…
Buyer Engagement and Labour Conditions in Global Supply Chains: The Bangladesh Accord and Beyond
ABSTRACT The Accord on Fire and Building Safety in Bangladesh (‘the Accord’) has received both praise and criticism concerning its implications for corporate responsibility and power. This article contributes to the debate by situating the Accord within a broader set of activities that buyers are en...
Saved in:
Published in: | Development and change 2020-09, Vol.51 (5), p.1306-1330 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4705-e142cae4488396c2bf8ac294c09c0c9fed26352da4da83e09cd0f10804b889c23 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4705-e142cae4488396c2bf8ac294c09c0c9fed26352da4da83e09cd0f10804b889c23 |
container_end_page | 1330 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1306 |
container_title | Development and change |
container_volume | 51 |
creator | Oka, Chikako Egels‐Zandén, Niklas Alexander, Rachel |
description | ABSTRACT
The Accord on Fire and Building Safety in Bangladesh (‘the Accord’) has received both praise and criticism concerning its implications for corporate responsibility and power. This article contributes to the debate by situating the Accord within a broader set of activities that buyers are engaged in to promote better labour conditions in their supply chains. The authors identify three approaches of buyer engagement: auditing, capacity building and advocacy. Drawing on interviews conducted with European brands and retailers, the article shows how buyers perceive the merits and challenges of these approaches, and whether and how they discharge responsibility and power through these activities. The study shows that the Accord is seen primarily as part of the auditing approach with a key feature being its use of collective leverage as a means of enforcement. While greater buyer power has not necessarily been accompanied by greater responsibility, the article highlights heterogeneity among buyers in how they take up different approaches, painting a more nuanced picture of buyer responsibility and power. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/dech.12575 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_swepu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_gup_ub_gu_se_291104</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2586966357</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4705-e142cae4488396c2bf8ac294c09c0c9fed26352da4da83e09cd0f10804b889c23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90U1v1DAQBmALgcRSuPALLHECKe3YcRKb225YukgrcaBI3IxjTz6q1AnxplX-Pd4GIfVSXyy9emb8MYS8Z3DJ4rpyaNtLxrMie0E2TORFUuQ5vCQbAMYTlmW_XpM3IdwCAAeZbsjv3bzgRPe-MQ3eoT9R4x09mmqYJ1oO3nWnbvCBdp5e90NlevpjHsd-oWVrOh8-05sW6c74pjcOQ0u31g6Te2yywyXWvyWvatMHfPdvvyA_v-5vykNy_H79rdweEysKyBJkgluDQkiZqtzyqpbGciUsKAtW1eh4nmbcGeGMTDGmDmoGEkQlpbI8vSDJ2jc84DhXepy6OzMtejCdbuZRx6iZdUDNFWMgov-4-tb0T_Bhe9TnDLjKOGPinkX7YbXjNPyZMZz0bfweH5-jeSZzlcerFc8qkapCAZN5VJ9WZachhAnr_4cz0OcZ6vMM9eMMI2Yrfuh6XJ6R-su-PKw1fwF3YJw5</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2586966357</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Buyer Engagement and Labour Conditions in Global Supply Chains: The Bangladesh Accord and Beyond</title><source>EconLit s plnými texty</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Business Source Ultimate</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><creator>Oka, Chikako ; Egels‐Zandén, Niklas ; Alexander, Rachel</creator><creatorcontrib>Oka, Chikako ; Egels‐Zandén, Niklas ; Alexander, Rachel</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT
The Accord on Fire and Building Safety in Bangladesh (‘the Accord’) has received both praise and criticism concerning its implications for corporate responsibility and power. This article contributes to the debate by situating the Accord within a broader set of activities that buyers are engaged in to promote better labour conditions in their supply chains. The authors identify three approaches of buyer engagement: auditing, capacity building and advocacy. Drawing on interviews conducted with European brands and retailers, the article shows how buyers perceive the merits and challenges of these approaches, and whether and how they discharge responsibility and power through these activities. The study shows that the Accord is seen primarily as part of the auditing approach with a key feature being its use of collective leverage as a means of enforcement. While greater buyer power has not necessarily been accompanied by greater responsibility, the article highlights heterogeneity among buyers in how they take up different approaches, painting a more nuanced picture of buyer responsibility and power.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-155X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-7660</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/dech.12575</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Advocacy ; Audits ; Brands ; Business administration ; Buyers ; Capacity building approach ; Criticism ; Development Studies ; Economics and Business ; Ekonomi och näringsliv ; Enforcement ; firms ; governance ; Heterogeneity ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; industry ; Labor supply ; Leverage ; networks ; Power ; Praise ; Purchasing ; rise ; Safety ; Supply ; Supply chains</subject><ispartof>Development and change, 2020-09, Vol.51 (5), p.1306-1330</ispartof><rights>2020 International Institute of Social Studies</rights><rights>2020. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the associated terms available at https://research.stlouisfed.org/research_terms.html .</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4705-e142cae4488396c2bf8ac294c09c0c9fed26352da4da83e09cd0f10804b889c23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4705-e142cae4488396c2bf8ac294c09c0c9fed26352da4da83e09cd0f10804b889c23</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1884-6368</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27903,27904,33202</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-02952114$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://gup.ub.gu.se/publication/291104$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Oka, Chikako</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Egels‐Zandén, Niklas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alexander, Rachel</creatorcontrib><title>Buyer Engagement and Labour Conditions in Global Supply Chains: The Bangladesh Accord and Beyond</title><title>Development and change</title><description>ABSTRACT
The Accord on Fire and Building Safety in Bangladesh (‘the Accord’) has received both praise and criticism concerning its implications for corporate responsibility and power. This article contributes to the debate by situating the Accord within a broader set of activities that buyers are engaged in to promote better labour conditions in their supply chains. The authors identify three approaches of buyer engagement: auditing, capacity building and advocacy. Drawing on interviews conducted with European brands and retailers, the article shows how buyers perceive the merits and challenges of these approaches, and whether and how they discharge responsibility and power through these activities. The study shows that the Accord is seen primarily as part of the auditing approach with a key feature being its use of collective leverage as a means of enforcement. While greater buyer power has not necessarily been accompanied by greater responsibility, the article highlights heterogeneity among buyers in how they take up different approaches, painting a more nuanced picture of buyer responsibility and power.</description><subject>Advocacy</subject><subject>Audits</subject><subject>Brands</subject><subject>Business administration</subject><subject>Buyers</subject><subject>Capacity building approach</subject><subject>Criticism</subject><subject>Development Studies</subject><subject>Economics and Business</subject><subject>Ekonomi och näringsliv</subject><subject>Enforcement</subject><subject>firms</subject><subject>governance</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>industry</subject><subject>Labor supply</subject><subject>Leverage</subject><subject>networks</subject><subject>Power</subject><subject>Praise</subject><subject>Purchasing</subject><subject>rise</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Supply</subject><subject>Supply chains</subject><issn>0012-155X</issn><issn>1467-7660</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>ACIOU</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNp90U1v1DAQBmALgcRSuPALLHECKe3YcRKb225YukgrcaBI3IxjTz6q1AnxplX-Pd4GIfVSXyy9emb8MYS8Z3DJ4rpyaNtLxrMie0E2TORFUuQ5vCQbAMYTlmW_XpM3IdwCAAeZbsjv3bzgRPe-MQ3eoT9R4x09mmqYJ1oO3nWnbvCBdp5e90NlevpjHsd-oWVrOh8-05sW6c74pjcOQ0u31g6Te2yywyXWvyWvatMHfPdvvyA_v-5vykNy_H79rdweEysKyBJkgluDQkiZqtzyqpbGciUsKAtW1eh4nmbcGeGMTDGmDmoGEkQlpbI8vSDJ2jc84DhXepy6OzMtejCdbuZRx6iZdUDNFWMgov-4-tb0T_Bhe9TnDLjKOGPinkX7YbXjNPyZMZz0bfweH5-jeSZzlcerFc8qkapCAZN5VJ9WZachhAnr_4cz0OcZ6vMM9eMMI2Yrfuh6XJ6R-su-PKw1fwF3YJw5</recordid><startdate>202009</startdate><enddate>202009</enddate><creator>Oka, Chikako</creator><creator>Egels‐Zandén, Niklas</creator><creator>Alexander, Rachel</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>AAFGM</scope><scope>ABLUL</scope><scope>ABPUF</scope><scope>ABSSA</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>ACIOU</scope><scope>ADZZV</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AGAJT</scope><scope>AGSBL</scope><scope>AJNOY</scope><scope>AQTIP</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BOUDT</scope><scope>CBHQV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQCXX</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>BXJBU</scope><scope>IHQJB</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>F1U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1884-6368</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202009</creationdate><title>Buyer Engagement and Labour Conditions in Global Supply Chains: The Bangladesh Accord and Beyond</title><author>Oka, Chikako ; Egels‐Zandén, Niklas ; Alexander, Rachel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4705-e142cae4488396c2bf8ac294c09c0c9fed26352da4da83e09cd0f10804b889c23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Advocacy</topic><topic>Audits</topic><topic>Brands</topic><topic>Business administration</topic><topic>Buyers</topic><topic>Capacity building approach</topic><topic>Criticism</topic><topic>Development Studies</topic><topic>Economics and Business</topic><topic>Ekonomi och näringsliv</topic><topic>Enforcement</topic><topic>firms</topic><topic>governance</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>industry</topic><topic>Labor supply</topic><topic>Leverage</topic><topic>networks</topic><topic>Power</topic><topic>Praise</topic><topic>Purchasing</topic><topic>rise</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Supply</topic><topic>Supply chains</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Oka, Chikako</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Egels‐Zandén, Niklas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alexander, Rachel</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM global</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>HAL-SHS: Archive ouverte en Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société</collection><collection>HAL-SHS: Archive ouverte en Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société (Open Access)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Göteborgs universitet</collection><jtitle>Development and change</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Oka, Chikako</au><au>Egels‐Zandén, Niklas</au><au>Alexander, Rachel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Buyer Engagement and Labour Conditions in Global Supply Chains: The Bangladesh Accord and Beyond</atitle><jtitle>Development and change</jtitle><date>2020-09</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1306</spage><epage>1330</epage><pages>1306-1330</pages><issn>0012-155X</issn><eissn>1467-7660</eissn><abstract>ABSTRACT
The Accord on Fire and Building Safety in Bangladesh (‘the Accord’) has received both praise and criticism concerning its implications for corporate responsibility and power. This article contributes to the debate by situating the Accord within a broader set of activities that buyers are engaged in to promote better labour conditions in their supply chains. The authors identify three approaches of buyer engagement: auditing, capacity building and advocacy. Drawing on interviews conducted with European brands and retailers, the article shows how buyers perceive the merits and challenges of these approaches, and whether and how they discharge responsibility and power through these activities. The study shows that the Accord is seen primarily as part of the auditing approach with a key feature being its use of collective leverage as a means of enforcement. While greater buyer power has not necessarily been accompanied by greater responsibility, the article highlights heterogeneity among buyers in how they take up different approaches, painting a more nuanced picture of buyer responsibility and power.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/dech.12575</doi><tpages>25</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1884-6368</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0012-155X |
ispartof | Development and change, 2020-09, Vol.51 (5), p.1306-1330 |
issn | 0012-155X 1467-7660 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_swepub_primary_oai_gup_ub_gu_se_291104 |
source | EconLit s plnými texty; International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Business Source Ultimate; Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts |
subjects | Advocacy Audits Brands Business administration Buyers Capacity building approach Criticism Development Studies Economics and Business Ekonomi och näringsliv Enforcement firms governance Heterogeneity Humanities and Social Sciences industry Labor supply Leverage networks Power Praise Purchasing rise Safety Supply Supply chains |
title | Buyer Engagement and Labour Conditions in Global Supply Chains: The Bangladesh Accord and Beyond |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T01%3A46%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_swepu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Buyer%20Engagement%20and%20Labour%20Conditions%20in%20Global%20Supply%20Chains:%20The%20Bangladesh%20Accord%20and%20Beyond&rft.jtitle=Development%20and%20change&rft.au=Oka,%20Chikako&rft.date=2020-09&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1306&rft.epage=1330&rft.pages=1306-1330&rft.issn=0012-155X&rft.eissn=1467-7660&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/dech.12575&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_swepu%3E2586966357%3C/proquest_swepu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4705-e142cae4488396c2bf8ac294c09c0c9fed26352da4da83e09cd0f10804b889c23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2586966357&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |