Loading…

Buyer Engagement and Labour Conditions in Global Supply Chains: The Bangladesh Accord and Beyond

ABSTRACT The Accord on Fire and Building Safety in Bangladesh (‘the Accord’) has received both praise and criticism concerning its implications for corporate responsibility and power. This article contributes to the debate by situating the Accord within a broader set of activities that buyers are en...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Development and change 2020-09, Vol.51 (5), p.1306-1330
Main Authors: Oka, Chikako, Egels‐Zandén, Niklas, Alexander, Rachel
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4705-e142cae4488396c2bf8ac294c09c0c9fed26352da4da83e09cd0f10804b889c23
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4705-e142cae4488396c2bf8ac294c09c0c9fed26352da4da83e09cd0f10804b889c23
container_end_page 1330
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1306
container_title Development and change
container_volume 51
creator Oka, Chikako
Egels‐Zandén, Niklas
Alexander, Rachel
description ABSTRACT The Accord on Fire and Building Safety in Bangladesh (‘the Accord’) has received both praise and criticism concerning its implications for corporate responsibility and power. This article contributes to the debate by situating the Accord within a broader set of activities that buyers are engaged in to promote better labour conditions in their supply chains. The authors identify three approaches of buyer engagement: auditing, capacity building and advocacy. Drawing on interviews conducted with European brands and retailers, the article shows how buyers perceive the merits and challenges of these approaches, and whether and how they discharge responsibility and power through these activities. The study shows that the Accord is seen primarily as part of the auditing approach with a key feature being its use of collective leverage as a means of enforcement. While greater buyer power has not necessarily been accompanied by greater responsibility, the article highlights heterogeneity among buyers in how they take up different approaches, painting a more nuanced picture of buyer responsibility and power.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/dech.12575
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_swepu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_gup_ub_gu_se_291104</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2586966357</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4705-e142cae4488396c2bf8ac294c09c0c9fed26352da4da83e09cd0f10804b889c23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90U1v1DAQBmALgcRSuPALLHECKe3YcRKb225YukgrcaBI3IxjTz6q1AnxplX-Pd4GIfVSXyy9emb8MYS8Z3DJ4rpyaNtLxrMie0E2TORFUuQ5vCQbAMYTlmW_XpM3IdwCAAeZbsjv3bzgRPe-MQ3eoT9R4x09mmqYJ1oO3nWnbvCBdp5e90NlevpjHsd-oWVrOh8-05sW6c74pjcOQ0u31g6Te2yywyXWvyWvatMHfPdvvyA_v-5vykNy_H79rdweEysKyBJkgluDQkiZqtzyqpbGciUsKAtW1eh4nmbcGeGMTDGmDmoGEkQlpbI8vSDJ2jc84DhXepy6OzMtejCdbuZRx6iZdUDNFWMgov-4-tb0T_Bhe9TnDLjKOGPinkX7YbXjNPyZMZz0bfweH5-jeSZzlcerFc8qkapCAZN5VJ9WZachhAnr_4cz0OcZ6vMM9eMMI2Yrfuh6XJ6R-su-PKw1fwF3YJw5</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2586966357</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Buyer Engagement and Labour Conditions in Global Supply Chains: The Bangladesh Accord and Beyond</title><source>EconLit s plnými texty</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Business Source Ultimate</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><creator>Oka, Chikako ; Egels‐Zandén, Niklas ; Alexander, Rachel</creator><creatorcontrib>Oka, Chikako ; Egels‐Zandén, Niklas ; Alexander, Rachel</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT The Accord on Fire and Building Safety in Bangladesh (‘the Accord’) has received both praise and criticism concerning its implications for corporate responsibility and power. This article contributes to the debate by situating the Accord within a broader set of activities that buyers are engaged in to promote better labour conditions in their supply chains. The authors identify three approaches of buyer engagement: auditing, capacity building and advocacy. Drawing on interviews conducted with European brands and retailers, the article shows how buyers perceive the merits and challenges of these approaches, and whether and how they discharge responsibility and power through these activities. The study shows that the Accord is seen primarily as part of the auditing approach with a key feature being its use of collective leverage as a means of enforcement. While greater buyer power has not necessarily been accompanied by greater responsibility, the article highlights heterogeneity among buyers in how they take up different approaches, painting a more nuanced picture of buyer responsibility and power.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-155X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-7660</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/dech.12575</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Advocacy ; Audits ; Brands ; Business administration ; Buyers ; Capacity building approach ; Criticism ; Development Studies ; Economics and Business ; Ekonomi och näringsliv ; Enforcement ; firms ; governance ; Heterogeneity ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; industry ; Labor supply ; Leverage ; networks ; Power ; Praise ; Purchasing ; rise ; Safety ; Supply ; Supply chains</subject><ispartof>Development and change, 2020-09, Vol.51 (5), p.1306-1330</ispartof><rights>2020 International Institute of Social Studies</rights><rights>2020. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the associated terms available at https://research.stlouisfed.org/research_terms.html .</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4705-e142cae4488396c2bf8ac294c09c0c9fed26352da4da83e09cd0f10804b889c23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4705-e142cae4488396c2bf8ac294c09c0c9fed26352da4da83e09cd0f10804b889c23</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1884-6368</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27903,27904,33202</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-02952114$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://gup.ub.gu.se/publication/291104$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Oka, Chikako</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Egels‐Zandén, Niklas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alexander, Rachel</creatorcontrib><title>Buyer Engagement and Labour Conditions in Global Supply Chains: The Bangladesh Accord and Beyond</title><title>Development and change</title><description>ABSTRACT The Accord on Fire and Building Safety in Bangladesh (‘the Accord’) has received both praise and criticism concerning its implications for corporate responsibility and power. This article contributes to the debate by situating the Accord within a broader set of activities that buyers are engaged in to promote better labour conditions in their supply chains. The authors identify three approaches of buyer engagement: auditing, capacity building and advocacy. Drawing on interviews conducted with European brands and retailers, the article shows how buyers perceive the merits and challenges of these approaches, and whether and how they discharge responsibility and power through these activities. The study shows that the Accord is seen primarily as part of the auditing approach with a key feature being its use of collective leverage as a means of enforcement. While greater buyer power has not necessarily been accompanied by greater responsibility, the article highlights heterogeneity among buyers in how they take up different approaches, painting a more nuanced picture of buyer responsibility and power.</description><subject>Advocacy</subject><subject>Audits</subject><subject>Brands</subject><subject>Business administration</subject><subject>Buyers</subject><subject>Capacity building approach</subject><subject>Criticism</subject><subject>Development Studies</subject><subject>Economics and Business</subject><subject>Ekonomi och näringsliv</subject><subject>Enforcement</subject><subject>firms</subject><subject>governance</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>industry</subject><subject>Labor supply</subject><subject>Leverage</subject><subject>networks</subject><subject>Power</subject><subject>Praise</subject><subject>Purchasing</subject><subject>rise</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Supply</subject><subject>Supply chains</subject><issn>0012-155X</issn><issn>1467-7660</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>ACIOU</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNp90U1v1DAQBmALgcRSuPALLHECKe3YcRKb225YukgrcaBI3IxjTz6q1AnxplX-Pd4GIfVSXyy9emb8MYS8Z3DJ4rpyaNtLxrMie0E2TORFUuQ5vCQbAMYTlmW_XpM3IdwCAAeZbsjv3bzgRPe-MQ3eoT9R4x09mmqYJ1oO3nWnbvCBdp5e90NlevpjHsd-oWVrOh8-05sW6c74pjcOQ0u31g6Te2yywyXWvyWvatMHfPdvvyA_v-5vykNy_H79rdweEysKyBJkgluDQkiZqtzyqpbGciUsKAtW1eh4nmbcGeGMTDGmDmoGEkQlpbI8vSDJ2jc84DhXepy6OzMtejCdbuZRx6iZdUDNFWMgov-4-tb0T_Bhe9TnDLjKOGPinkX7YbXjNPyZMZz0bfweH5-jeSZzlcerFc8qkapCAZN5VJ9WZachhAnr_4cz0OcZ6vMM9eMMI2Yrfuh6XJ6R-su-PKw1fwF3YJw5</recordid><startdate>202009</startdate><enddate>202009</enddate><creator>Oka, Chikako</creator><creator>Egels‐Zandén, Niklas</creator><creator>Alexander, Rachel</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>AAFGM</scope><scope>ABLUL</scope><scope>ABPUF</scope><scope>ABSSA</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>ACIOU</scope><scope>ADZZV</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AGAJT</scope><scope>AGSBL</scope><scope>AJNOY</scope><scope>AQTIP</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BOUDT</scope><scope>CBHQV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQCXX</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>BXJBU</scope><scope>IHQJB</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>F1U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1884-6368</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202009</creationdate><title>Buyer Engagement and Labour Conditions in Global Supply Chains: The Bangladesh Accord and Beyond</title><author>Oka, Chikako ; Egels‐Zandén, Niklas ; Alexander, Rachel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4705-e142cae4488396c2bf8ac294c09c0c9fed26352da4da83e09cd0f10804b889c23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Advocacy</topic><topic>Audits</topic><topic>Brands</topic><topic>Business administration</topic><topic>Buyers</topic><topic>Capacity building approach</topic><topic>Criticism</topic><topic>Development Studies</topic><topic>Economics and Business</topic><topic>Ekonomi och näringsliv</topic><topic>Enforcement</topic><topic>firms</topic><topic>governance</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>industry</topic><topic>Labor supply</topic><topic>Leverage</topic><topic>networks</topic><topic>Power</topic><topic>Praise</topic><topic>Purchasing</topic><topic>rise</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Supply</topic><topic>Supply chains</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Oka, Chikako</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Egels‐Zandén, Niklas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alexander, Rachel</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM global</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>HAL-SHS: Archive ouverte en Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société</collection><collection>HAL-SHS: Archive ouverte en Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société (Open Access)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Göteborgs universitet</collection><jtitle>Development and change</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Oka, Chikako</au><au>Egels‐Zandén, Niklas</au><au>Alexander, Rachel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Buyer Engagement and Labour Conditions in Global Supply Chains: The Bangladesh Accord and Beyond</atitle><jtitle>Development and change</jtitle><date>2020-09</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1306</spage><epage>1330</epage><pages>1306-1330</pages><issn>0012-155X</issn><eissn>1467-7660</eissn><abstract>ABSTRACT The Accord on Fire and Building Safety in Bangladesh (‘the Accord’) has received both praise and criticism concerning its implications for corporate responsibility and power. This article contributes to the debate by situating the Accord within a broader set of activities that buyers are engaged in to promote better labour conditions in their supply chains. The authors identify three approaches of buyer engagement: auditing, capacity building and advocacy. Drawing on interviews conducted with European brands and retailers, the article shows how buyers perceive the merits and challenges of these approaches, and whether and how they discharge responsibility and power through these activities. The study shows that the Accord is seen primarily as part of the auditing approach with a key feature being its use of collective leverage as a means of enforcement. While greater buyer power has not necessarily been accompanied by greater responsibility, the article highlights heterogeneity among buyers in how they take up different approaches, painting a more nuanced picture of buyer responsibility and power.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/dech.12575</doi><tpages>25</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1884-6368</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0012-155X
ispartof Development and change, 2020-09, Vol.51 (5), p.1306-1330
issn 0012-155X
1467-7660
language eng
recordid cdi_swepub_primary_oai_gup_ub_gu_se_291104
source EconLit s plnými texty; International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Business Source Ultimate; Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts
subjects Advocacy
Audits
Brands
Business administration
Buyers
Capacity building approach
Criticism
Development Studies
Economics and Business
Ekonomi och näringsliv
Enforcement
firms
governance
Heterogeneity
Humanities and Social Sciences
industry
Labor supply
Leverage
networks
Power
Praise
Purchasing
rise
Safety
Supply
Supply chains
title Buyer Engagement and Labour Conditions in Global Supply Chains: The Bangladesh Accord and Beyond
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T01%3A46%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_swepu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Buyer%20Engagement%20and%20Labour%20Conditions%20in%20Global%20Supply%20Chains:%20The%20Bangladesh%20Accord%20and%20Beyond&rft.jtitle=Development%20and%20change&rft.au=Oka,%20Chikako&rft.date=2020-09&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1306&rft.epage=1330&rft.pages=1306-1330&rft.issn=0012-155X&rft.eissn=1467-7660&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/dech.12575&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_swepu%3E2586966357%3C/proquest_swepu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4705-e142cae4488396c2bf8ac294c09c0c9fed26352da4da83e09cd0f10804b889c23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2586966357&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true