Loading…

Race for the surface between THP-1 macrophages and Staphylococcus aureus on various titanium implants with well-defined topography and wettability

Gristina et al. (1987) suggested that the fate of a biomaterial is decided in a “race for the surface” between pathogens and the host. To gain deeper insight into the mechanisms behind this concept, we investigated the “race for the surface” across three co-culture scenarios with THP-1 macrophages a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Acta biomaterialia 2024-11
Main Authors: Turner, Adam Benedict, Giraldo-Osorno, Paula Milena, Douest, Yohan, Morales-Laverde, Liliana Andrea, Bokinge, Carl Anton, Asa'ad, Farah, Courtois, Nicolas, Palmquist, Anders, Trobos, Margarita
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1941-671f4e10e37e1260af536c242a8b2f22463b0dc2f4087cd74fe6086bbd5094723
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title Acta biomaterialia
container_volume
creator Turner, Adam Benedict
Giraldo-Osorno, Paula Milena
Douest, Yohan
Morales-Laverde, Liliana Andrea
Bokinge, Carl Anton
Asa'ad, Farah
Courtois, Nicolas
Palmquist, Anders
Trobos, Margarita
description Gristina et al. (1987) suggested that the fate of a biomaterial is decided in a “race for the surface” between pathogens and the host. To gain deeper insight into the mechanisms behind this concept, we investigated the “race for the surface” across three co-culture scenarios with THP-1 macrophages and Staphylococcus aureus (1:1 ratio), varying the order of addition: (i) simultaneous, (ii) macrophages first, and (iii) S. aureus first, on six Ti6Al4V-ELI surfaces modified with specific topographies and wettability. The outcome of the race for the surface was not influenced by these biomaterials but by the chronological introduction of macrophages and S. aureus. When macrophages and S. aureus arrived simultaneously, macrophages won the race, leading to the lowest number of viable S. aureus through rapid phagocytosis and killing. When macrophages arrived and established first, macrophages still prevailed but under greater challenge resulting from the lower bacterial killing efficiency of adherent macrophages and numerous viable intracellular bacteria, supporting the concept of the so-called immunocompromised zone around implants (upregulation of TLR-2 receptor and pro-inflammatory IL-1β). When S. aureus arrived first establishing a biofilm, bacteria won the race, leading to macrophage dysfunction and cell death (upregulation of FcγR and TLR-2 receptors, NF-κB signaling, NOX2 mediated reactive oxygen species), contributing to a persistent biofilm phenotype (upregulation of clfA, icaA, sarA, downregulation of agrA, hld, lukAB) and intracellular survival of S. aureus (lipA upregulation). The clinical implications are bacterial colonization of the implant and persistence of intracellular bacteria in periprosthetic tissues, which can lead to infection chronicity. Gristina et al. (1987) suggested that the fate of a biomaterial is decided in a “race for the surface” between bacterial pathogens and host cells. There is a lack of in vitro co-culture models and knowledge on macrophage-S. aureus interactions on biomaterial surfaces, and no studies have evaluated the expression of virulence factors in S. aureus biofilms. We have successfully developed co-culture models and molecular panels, and elucidated important cellular and molecular interactions between macrophages and S. aureus on a broad range of titanium biomaterials with well-defined surface topography and wettability. Our findings highlight the critical role of biofilm formation and the chronological order of ba
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.actbio.2024.11.013
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_swepu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_gup_ub_gu_se_343151</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1742706124006664</els_id><sourcerecordid>3128755489</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1941-671f4e10e37e1260af536c242a8b2f22463b0dc2f4087cd74fe6086bbd5094723</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhiMEoqXwDxDykUuCv2J7L0ioAopUCQTlbDnOeNerJA6202j_Br8YLyk9cpoPPfOOZt6qek1wQzAR746NsbnzoaGY8oaQBhP2pLokSqpatkI9LbnktJZYkIvqRUpHjJkiVD2vLtiupQoLfFn9_m4sIBciygdAaYnuXHeQV4AJ3d18qwkajY1hPpg9JGSmHv3IZj6chmCDtUtpLRFKCBO6N9GHkmafzeSXEflxHsyUE1p9PqAVhqHuwfkJepTDHPbxLPRXc4WcTecHn08vq2fODAlePcSr6uenj3fXN_Xt189frj_c1pbsOKmFJI4DwcAkECqwcS0TlnJqVEcdpVywDveWOo6VtL3kDgRWouv6Fu-4pOyqqjfdtMK8dHqOfjTxpIPxer_MurT2i06gGWekJYV_u_FzDL8WSFmPPtlyk5mgXK1Z-a1sW652BeUbWh6XUgT3KE6wPrunj3pzT5_d04To4l4Ze_OwYelG6B-H_tlVgPcbAOUv9x6iTtbDZKH3EWzWffD_3_AHGrKv0Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3128755489</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Race for the surface between THP-1 macrophages and Staphylococcus aureus on various titanium implants with well-defined topography and wettability</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Turner, Adam Benedict ; Giraldo-Osorno, Paula Milena ; Douest, Yohan ; Morales-Laverde, Liliana Andrea ; Bokinge, Carl Anton ; Asa'ad, Farah ; Courtois, Nicolas ; Palmquist, Anders ; Trobos, Margarita</creator><creatorcontrib>Turner, Adam Benedict ; Giraldo-Osorno, Paula Milena ; Douest, Yohan ; Morales-Laverde, Liliana Andrea ; Bokinge, Carl Anton ; Asa'ad, Farah ; Courtois, Nicolas ; Palmquist, Anders ; Trobos, Margarita</creatorcontrib><description>Gristina et al. (1987) suggested that the fate of a biomaterial is decided in a “race for the surface” between pathogens and the host. To gain deeper insight into the mechanisms behind this concept, we investigated the “race for the surface” across three co-culture scenarios with THP-1 macrophages and Staphylococcus aureus (1:1 ratio), varying the order of addition: (i) simultaneous, (ii) macrophages first, and (iii) S. aureus first, on six Ti6Al4V-ELI surfaces modified with specific topographies and wettability. The outcome of the race for the surface was not influenced by these biomaterials but by the chronological introduction of macrophages and S. aureus. When macrophages and S. aureus arrived simultaneously, macrophages won the race, leading to the lowest number of viable S. aureus through rapid phagocytosis and killing. When macrophages arrived and established first, macrophages still prevailed but under greater challenge resulting from the lower bacterial killing efficiency of adherent macrophages and numerous viable intracellular bacteria, supporting the concept of the so-called immunocompromised zone around implants (upregulation of TLR-2 receptor and pro-inflammatory IL-1β). When S. aureus arrived first establishing a biofilm, bacteria won the race, leading to macrophage dysfunction and cell death (upregulation of FcγR and TLR-2 receptors, NF-κB signaling, NOX2 mediated reactive oxygen species), contributing to a persistent biofilm phenotype (upregulation of clfA, icaA, sarA, downregulation of agrA, hld, lukAB) and intracellular survival of S. aureus (lipA upregulation). The clinical implications are bacterial colonization of the implant and persistence of intracellular bacteria in periprosthetic tissues, which can lead to infection chronicity. Gristina et al. (1987) suggested that the fate of a biomaterial is decided in a “race for the surface” between bacterial pathogens and host cells. There is a lack of in vitro co-culture models and knowledge on macrophage-S. aureus interactions on biomaterial surfaces, and no studies have evaluated the expression of virulence factors in S. aureus biofilms. We have successfully developed co-culture models and molecular panels, and elucidated important cellular and molecular interactions between macrophages and S. aureus on a broad range of titanium biomaterials with well-defined surface topography and wettability. Our findings highlight the critical role of biofilm formation and the chronological order of bacteria or macrophage arrival in determining the fate of the race for the surface. [Display omitted]</description><identifier>ISSN: 1742-7061</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1878-7568</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-7568</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2024.11.013</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39528060</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Biofilm ; Biomaterials Science ; Biomaterialvetenskap ; Co-culture ; Macrophage ; Race for the surface ; Staphylococcus aureus ; Titanium</subject><ispartof>Acta biomaterialia, 2024-11</ispartof><rights>2024</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1941-671f4e10e37e1260af536c242a8b2f22463b0dc2f4087cd74fe6086bbd5094723</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4485-6738 ; 0000-0002-6974-2577 ; 0000-0001-5080-3133 ; 0009-0003-1801-7134 ; 0000-0002-7966-9940 ; 0000-0002-9253-6771</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39528060$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://gup.ub.gu.se/publication/343151$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Turner, Adam Benedict</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giraldo-Osorno, Paula Milena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Douest, Yohan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morales-Laverde, Liliana Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bokinge, Carl Anton</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asa'ad, Farah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Courtois, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palmquist, Anders</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trobos, Margarita</creatorcontrib><title>Race for the surface between THP-1 macrophages and Staphylococcus aureus on various titanium implants with well-defined topography and wettability</title><title>Acta biomaterialia</title><addtitle>Acta Biomater</addtitle><description>Gristina et al. (1987) suggested that the fate of a biomaterial is decided in a “race for the surface” between pathogens and the host. To gain deeper insight into the mechanisms behind this concept, we investigated the “race for the surface” across three co-culture scenarios with THP-1 macrophages and Staphylococcus aureus (1:1 ratio), varying the order of addition: (i) simultaneous, (ii) macrophages first, and (iii) S. aureus first, on six Ti6Al4V-ELI surfaces modified with specific topographies and wettability. The outcome of the race for the surface was not influenced by these biomaterials but by the chronological introduction of macrophages and S. aureus. When macrophages and S. aureus arrived simultaneously, macrophages won the race, leading to the lowest number of viable S. aureus through rapid phagocytosis and killing. When macrophages arrived and established first, macrophages still prevailed but under greater challenge resulting from the lower bacterial killing efficiency of adherent macrophages and numerous viable intracellular bacteria, supporting the concept of the so-called immunocompromised zone around implants (upregulation of TLR-2 receptor and pro-inflammatory IL-1β). When S. aureus arrived first establishing a biofilm, bacteria won the race, leading to macrophage dysfunction and cell death (upregulation of FcγR and TLR-2 receptors, NF-κB signaling, NOX2 mediated reactive oxygen species), contributing to a persistent biofilm phenotype (upregulation of clfA, icaA, sarA, downregulation of agrA, hld, lukAB) and intracellular survival of S. aureus (lipA upregulation). The clinical implications are bacterial colonization of the implant and persistence of intracellular bacteria in periprosthetic tissues, which can lead to infection chronicity. Gristina et al. (1987) suggested that the fate of a biomaterial is decided in a “race for the surface” between bacterial pathogens and host cells. There is a lack of in vitro co-culture models and knowledge on macrophage-S. aureus interactions on biomaterial surfaces, and no studies have evaluated the expression of virulence factors in S. aureus biofilms. We have successfully developed co-culture models and molecular panels, and elucidated important cellular and molecular interactions between macrophages and S. aureus on a broad range of titanium biomaterials with well-defined surface topography and wettability. Our findings highlight the critical role of biofilm formation and the chronological order of bacteria or macrophage arrival in determining the fate of the race for the surface. [Display omitted]</description><subject>Biofilm</subject><subject>Biomaterials Science</subject><subject>Biomaterialvetenskap</subject><subject>Co-culture</subject><subject>Macrophage</subject><subject>Race for the surface</subject><subject>Staphylococcus aureus</subject><subject>Titanium</subject><issn>1742-7061</issn><issn>1878-7568</issn><issn>1878-7568</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhiMEoqXwDxDykUuCv2J7L0ioAopUCQTlbDnOeNerJA6202j_Br8YLyk9cpoPPfOOZt6qek1wQzAR746NsbnzoaGY8oaQBhP2pLokSqpatkI9LbnktJZYkIvqRUpHjJkiVD2vLtiupQoLfFn9_m4sIBciygdAaYnuXHeQV4AJ3d18qwkajY1hPpg9JGSmHv3IZj6chmCDtUtpLRFKCBO6N9GHkmafzeSXEflxHsyUE1p9PqAVhqHuwfkJepTDHPbxLPRXc4WcTecHn08vq2fODAlePcSr6uenj3fXN_Xt189frj_c1pbsOKmFJI4DwcAkECqwcS0TlnJqVEcdpVywDveWOo6VtL3kDgRWouv6Fu-4pOyqqjfdtMK8dHqOfjTxpIPxer_MurT2i06gGWekJYV_u_FzDL8WSFmPPtlyk5mgXK1Z-a1sW652BeUbWh6XUgT3KE6wPrunj3pzT5_d04To4l4Ze_OwYelG6B-H_tlVgPcbAOUv9x6iTtbDZKH3EWzWffD_3_AHGrKv0Q</recordid><startdate>20241110</startdate><enddate>20241110</enddate><creator>Turner, Adam Benedict</creator><creator>Giraldo-Osorno, Paula Milena</creator><creator>Douest, Yohan</creator><creator>Morales-Laverde, Liliana Andrea</creator><creator>Bokinge, Carl Anton</creator><creator>Asa'ad, Farah</creator><creator>Courtois, Nicolas</creator><creator>Palmquist, Anders</creator><creator>Trobos, Margarita</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>F1U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4485-6738</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6974-2577</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5080-3133</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0003-1801-7134</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7966-9940</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9253-6771</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241110</creationdate><title>Race for the surface between THP-1 macrophages and Staphylococcus aureus on various titanium implants with well-defined topography and wettability</title><author>Turner, Adam Benedict ; Giraldo-Osorno, Paula Milena ; Douest, Yohan ; Morales-Laverde, Liliana Andrea ; Bokinge, Carl Anton ; Asa'ad, Farah ; Courtois, Nicolas ; Palmquist, Anders ; Trobos, Margarita</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1941-671f4e10e37e1260af536c242a8b2f22463b0dc2f4087cd74fe6086bbd5094723</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Biofilm</topic><topic>Biomaterials Science</topic><topic>Biomaterialvetenskap</topic><topic>Co-culture</topic><topic>Macrophage</topic><topic>Race for the surface</topic><topic>Staphylococcus aureus</topic><topic>Titanium</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Turner, Adam Benedict</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giraldo-Osorno, Paula Milena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Douest, Yohan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morales-Laverde, Liliana Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bokinge, Carl Anton</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asa'ad, Farah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Courtois, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palmquist, Anders</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trobos, Margarita</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Göteborgs universitet</collection><jtitle>Acta biomaterialia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Turner, Adam Benedict</au><au>Giraldo-Osorno, Paula Milena</au><au>Douest, Yohan</au><au>Morales-Laverde, Liliana Andrea</au><au>Bokinge, Carl Anton</au><au>Asa'ad, Farah</au><au>Courtois, Nicolas</au><au>Palmquist, Anders</au><au>Trobos, Margarita</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Race for the surface between THP-1 macrophages and Staphylococcus aureus on various titanium implants with well-defined topography and wettability</atitle><jtitle>Acta biomaterialia</jtitle><addtitle>Acta Biomater</addtitle><date>2024-11-10</date><risdate>2024</risdate><issn>1742-7061</issn><issn>1878-7568</issn><eissn>1878-7568</eissn><abstract>Gristina et al. (1987) suggested that the fate of a biomaterial is decided in a “race for the surface” between pathogens and the host. To gain deeper insight into the mechanisms behind this concept, we investigated the “race for the surface” across three co-culture scenarios with THP-1 macrophages and Staphylococcus aureus (1:1 ratio), varying the order of addition: (i) simultaneous, (ii) macrophages first, and (iii) S. aureus first, on six Ti6Al4V-ELI surfaces modified with specific topographies and wettability. The outcome of the race for the surface was not influenced by these biomaterials but by the chronological introduction of macrophages and S. aureus. When macrophages and S. aureus arrived simultaneously, macrophages won the race, leading to the lowest number of viable S. aureus through rapid phagocytosis and killing. When macrophages arrived and established first, macrophages still prevailed but under greater challenge resulting from the lower bacterial killing efficiency of adherent macrophages and numerous viable intracellular bacteria, supporting the concept of the so-called immunocompromised zone around implants (upregulation of TLR-2 receptor and pro-inflammatory IL-1β). When S. aureus arrived first establishing a biofilm, bacteria won the race, leading to macrophage dysfunction and cell death (upregulation of FcγR and TLR-2 receptors, NF-κB signaling, NOX2 mediated reactive oxygen species), contributing to a persistent biofilm phenotype (upregulation of clfA, icaA, sarA, downregulation of agrA, hld, lukAB) and intracellular survival of S. aureus (lipA upregulation). The clinical implications are bacterial colonization of the implant and persistence of intracellular bacteria in periprosthetic tissues, which can lead to infection chronicity. Gristina et al. (1987) suggested that the fate of a biomaterial is decided in a “race for the surface” between bacterial pathogens and host cells. There is a lack of in vitro co-culture models and knowledge on macrophage-S. aureus interactions on biomaterial surfaces, and no studies have evaluated the expression of virulence factors in S. aureus biofilms. We have successfully developed co-culture models and molecular panels, and elucidated important cellular and molecular interactions between macrophages and S. aureus on a broad range of titanium biomaterials with well-defined surface topography and wettability. Our findings highlight the critical role of biofilm formation and the chronological order of bacteria or macrophage arrival in determining the fate of the race for the surface. [Display omitted]</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>39528060</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.actbio.2024.11.013</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4485-6738</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6974-2577</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5080-3133</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0003-1801-7134</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7966-9940</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9253-6771</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1742-7061
ispartof Acta biomaterialia, 2024-11
issn 1742-7061
1878-7568
1878-7568
language eng
recordid cdi_swepub_primary_oai_gup_ub_gu_se_343151
source ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Biofilm
Biomaterials Science
Biomaterialvetenskap
Co-culture
Macrophage
Race for the surface
Staphylococcus aureus
Titanium
title Race for the surface between THP-1 macrophages and Staphylococcus aureus on various titanium implants with well-defined topography and wettability
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T19%3A03%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_swepu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Race%20for%20the%20surface%20between%20THP-1%20macrophages%20and%20Staphylococcus%20aureus%20on%20various%20titanium%20implants%20with%20well-defined%20topography%20and%20wettability&rft.jtitle=Acta%20biomaterialia&rft.au=Turner,%20Adam%20Benedict&rft.date=2024-11-10&rft.issn=1742-7061&rft.eissn=1878-7568&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.actbio.2024.11.013&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_swepu%3E3128755489%3C/proquest_swepu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1941-671f4e10e37e1260af536c242a8b2f22463b0dc2f4087cd74fe6086bbd5094723%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3128755489&rft_id=info:pmid/39528060&rfr_iscdi=true