Loading…

Aβ status assessment in a hypothetical scenario prior to treatment with disease‐modifying therapies: Evidence from 10‐year real‐world experience at university memory clinics

INTRODUCTION With the advent of disease‐modifying therapies, accurate assessment of biomarkers indicating the presence of disease‐associated amyloid beta (Aβ) pathology becomes crucial in patients with clinically suspected Alzheimer's disease (AD). We evaluated Aβ levels in cerebrospinal fluid...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Alzheimer's & dementia : diagnosis, assessment & disease monitoring assessment & disease monitoring, 2024-10, Vol.16 (4), p.e70031-n/a
Main Authors: Brendel, Matthias, Parvizi, Tandis, Gnörich, Johannes, Topfstedt, Christof Elias, Buerger, Katharina, Janowitz, Daniel, Rauchmann, Boris‐Stephan, Perneczky, Robert, Kurz, Carolin, Mehrens, Dirk, Kunz, Wolfgang G., Kusche‐Palenga, Julia, Kling, Agnes Bernadette, Buchal, Antonia, Nestorova, Elizabet, Silvaieh, Sara, Wurm, Raphael, Traub‐Weidinger, Tatjana, Klotz, Sigrid, Regelsberger, Günther, Rominger, Axel, Drzezga, Alexander, Levin, Johannes, Stögmann, Elisabeth, Franzmeier, Nicolai, Höglinger, Günter U.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3861-f9a8fdee9db17113ef8872ce92d54b609d8433ec0e53bf357ed48ec785766873
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 4
container_start_page e70031
container_title Alzheimer's & dementia : diagnosis, assessment & disease monitoring
container_volume 16
creator Brendel, Matthias
Parvizi, Tandis
Gnörich, Johannes
Topfstedt, Christof Elias
Buerger, Katharina
Janowitz, Daniel
Rauchmann, Boris‐Stephan
Perneczky, Robert
Kurz, Carolin
Mehrens, Dirk
Kunz, Wolfgang G.
Kusche‐Palenga, Julia
Kling, Agnes Bernadette
Buchal, Antonia
Nestorova, Elizabet
Silvaieh, Sara
Wurm, Raphael
Traub‐Weidinger, Tatjana
Klotz, Sigrid
Regelsberger, Günther
Rominger, Axel
Drzezga, Alexander
Levin, Johannes
Stögmann, Elisabeth
Franzmeier, Nicolai
Höglinger, Günter U.
description INTRODUCTION With the advent of disease‐modifying therapies, accurate assessment of biomarkers indicating the presence of disease‐associated amyloid beta (Aβ) pathology becomes crucial in patients with clinically suspected Alzheimer's disease (AD). We evaluated Aβ levels in cerebrospinal fluid (Aβ CSF) and Aβ levels in positron emission tomography (Aβ PET) biomarkers in a real‐world memory‐clinic setting to develop an efficient algorithm for clinical use. METHODS Patients were evaluated for AD‐related Aβ pathology from two independent cohorts (Ludwig Maximilian University [LMU], n = 402, and Medical University of Vienna [MUV], n = 144). Optimal thresholds of CSF biomarkers were deduced from receiver operating characteristic curves and validated against Aβ PET positivity. RESULTS In both cohorts, a CSF Aβ42/40 ratio ≥ 7.1% was associated with a low risk of a positive Aβ PET scan (negative predictive value: 94.3%). Implementing two cutoffs revealed 14% to 16% of patients with intermediate results (CSF Aβ42/40 ratio: 5.5%–7.1%), which had a strong benefit from Aβ PET imaging (44%–52% Aβ PET positivity). DISCUSSION A two‐cutoff approach for CSF Aβ42/40 including Aβ PET imaging at intermediate results provides an effective assessment of Aβ pathology in real‐world settings. Highlights We evaluated cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and positron emission tomography (PET) amyloid beta (Aβ) biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease in real‐world cohorts. A CSF Aβ 42/40 ratio between 5.5% and 7.1% defines patients at borderline levels. Patients at borderline levels strongly benefit from additional Aβ PET imaging. Two‐cutoff CSF Aβ 42/40 and PET will allow effective treatment stratification.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/dad2.70031
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_gup_ub_gu_se_345017</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_7fb30f95958a481fb8b2ea89e020010b</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>3132609902</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3861-f9a8fdee9db17113ef8872ce92d54b609d8433ec0e53bf357ed48ec785766873</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9ks1u1DAUhSMEolXphgdAltggpBT_5MdmN2oLVKrEpnvLia9nPEriYDsdsuMReJaqz8FD8CR4JqUCFmzsq6vPx77HJ8teEnxGMKbvtNL0rMaYkSfZMWUlzXlNxdM_6qPsNIQtxpgUghYEP8-OmCg5q0pynN2vftyhEFWcAlIhQAg9DBHZASm0mUcXNxBtqzoUWhiUtw6NafEoOhQ9qHigdzZukLYBVICf3773Tlsz22GN0mmvRgvhPbq8tRqGFpDxrkcEJ24G5VES6VK9c77TCL6O4O0BUxFNg70FH2ycUQ-98zNqOzvYNrzInhnVBTh92E-ymw-XN-ef8uvPH6_OV9d5y3hFciMUNxpA6IbUhDAwPPnRgqC6LJoKC80LxqDFULLGsLIGXXBoa17WVcVrdpJdLbLaqa1Mc_fKz9IpKw8N59dS-eROB7I2DcNGlMlXVXBiGt5QUFwApsl33CStfNEKOxin5i-19TTK1FpPMoBkRYnJ_u43Cz9692WCEGVv0xd0nRrATUEywmiaQGCa0Nf_oFs3-SEZk6hCFHVdiSpRbxeq9S4ED-bxCQTLfZLkPknykKQEv3qQnJoe9CP6OzcJIAuwsx3M_5GSF6sLuoj-AgTM2ZE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3149477696</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Aβ status assessment in a hypothetical scenario prior to treatment with disease‐modifying therapies: Evidence from 10‐year real‐world experience at university memory clinics</title><source>Wiley Online Library</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central (PMC)</source><creator>Brendel, Matthias ; Parvizi, Tandis ; Gnörich, Johannes ; Topfstedt, Christof Elias ; Buerger, Katharina ; Janowitz, Daniel ; Rauchmann, Boris‐Stephan ; Perneczky, Robert ; Kurz, Carolin ; Mehrens, Dirk ; Kunz, Wolfgang G. ; Kusche‐Palenga, Julia ; Kling, Agnes Bernadette ; Buchal, Antonia ; Nestorova, Elizabet ; Silvaieh, Sara ; Wurm, Raphael ; Traub‐Weidinger, Tatjana ; Klotz, Sigrid ; Regelsberger, Günther ; Rominger, Axel ; Drzezga, Alexander ; Levin, Johannes ; Stögmann, Elisabeth ; Franzmeier, Nicolai ; Höglinger, Günter U.</creator><creatorcontrib>Brendel, Matthias ; Parvizi, Tandis ; Gnörich, Johannes ; Topfstedt, Christof Elias ; Buerger, Katharina ; Janowitz, Daniel ; Rauchmann, Boris‐Stephan ; Perneczky, Robert ; Kurz, Carolin ; Mehrens, Dirk ; Kunz, Wolfgang G. ; Kusche‐Palenga, Julia ; Kling, Agnes Bernadette ; Buchal, Antonia ; Nestorova, Elizabet ; Silvaieh, Sara ; Wurm, Raphael ; Traub‐Weidinger, Tatjana ; Klotz, Sigrid ; Regelsberger, Günther ; Rominger, Axel ; Drzezga, Alexander ; Levin, Johannes ; Stögmann, Elisabeth ; Franzmeier, Nicolai ; Höglinger, Günter U.</creatorcontrib><description>INTRODUCTION With the advent of disease‐modifying therapies, accurate assessment of biomarkers indicating the presence of disease‐associated amyloid beta (Aβ) pathology becomes crucial in patients with clinically suspected Alzheimer's disease (AD). We evaluated Aβ levels in cerebrospinal fluid (Aβ CSF) and Aβ levels in positron emission tomography (Aβ PET) biomarkers in a real‐world memory‐clinic setting to develop an efficient algorithm for clinical use. METHODS Patients were evaluated for AD‐related Aβ pathology from two independent cohorts (Ludwig Maximilian University [LMU], n = 402, and Medical University of Vienna [MUV], n = 144). Optimal thresholds of CSF biomarkers were deduced from receiver operating characteristic curves and validated against Aβ PET positivity. RESULTS In both cohorts, a CSF Aβ42/40 ratio ≥ 7.1% was associated with a low risk of a positive Aβ PET scan (negative predictive value: 94.3%). Implementing two cutoffs revealed 14% to 16% of patients with intermediate results (CSF Aβ42/40 ratio: 5.5%–7.1%), which had a strong benefit from Aβ PET imaging (44%–52% Aβ PET positivity). DISCUSSION A two‐cutoff approach for CSF Aβ42/40 including Aβ PET imaging at intermediate results provides an effective assessment of Aβ pathology in real‐world settings. Highlights We evaluated cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and positron emission tomography (PET) amyloid beta (Aβ) biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease in real‐world cohorts. A CSF Aβ 42/40 ratio between 5.5% and 7.1% defines patients at borderline levels. Patients at borderline levels strongly benefit from additional Aβ PET imaging. Two‐cutoff CSF Aβ 42/40 and PET will allow effective treatment stratification.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2352-8729</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2352-8729</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/dad2.70031</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39583651</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Alzheimer's disease ; Biomarkers ; Cerebrospinal fluid ; Cognitive ability ; Dementia ; Drug dosages ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Memory ; Neurology ; Neuropsychology ; Neurosciences ; Neurovetenskaper ; Nuclear medicine ; Patients ; positron emission tomography ; Psychotherapy ; real world ; Tomography</subject><ispartof>Alzheimer's &amp; dementia : diagnosis, assessment &amp; disease monitoring, 2024-10, Vol.16 (4), p.e70031-n/a</ispartof><rights>2024 The Author(s). Alzheimer's &amp; Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment &amp; Disease Monitoring published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Alzheimer's Association.</rights><rights>2024. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the "License"). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3861-f9a8fdee9db17113ef8872ce92d54b609d8433ec0e53bf357ed48ec785766873</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3149477696/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3149477696?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,11560,25751,27922,27923,37010,37011,44588,46050,46474,74896</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39583651$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://gup.ub.gu.se/publication/345017$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brendel, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parvizi, Tandis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gnörich, Johannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Topfstedt, Christof Elias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buerger, Katharina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janowitz, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rauchmann, Boris‐Stephan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perneczky, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurz, Carolin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mehrens, Dirk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kunz, Wolfgang G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kusche‐Palenga, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kling, Agnes Bernadette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buchal, Antonia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nestorova, Elizabet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silvaieh, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wurm, Raphael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Traub‐Weidinger, Tatjana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klotz, Sigrid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Regelsberger, Günther</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rominger, Axel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drzezga, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levin, Johannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stögmann, Elisabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franzmeier, Nicolai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Höglinger, Günter U.</creatorcontrib><title>Aβ status assessment in a hypothetical scenario prior to treatment with disease‐modifying therapies: Evidence from 10‐year real‐world experience at university memory clinics</title><title>Alzheimer's &amp; dementia : diagnosis, assessment &amp; disease monitoring</title><addtitle>Alzheimers Dement (Amst)</addtitle><description>INTRODUCTION With the advent of disease‐modifying therapies, accurate assessment of biomarkers indicating the presence of disease‐associated amyloid beta (Aβ) pathology becomes crucial in patients with clinically suspected Alzheimer's disease (AD). We evaluated Aβ levels in cerebrospinal fluid (Aβ CSF) and Aβ levels in positron emission tomography (Aβ PET) biomarkers in a real‐world memory‐clinic setting to develop an efficient algorithm for clinical use. METHODS Patients were evaluated for AD‐related Aβ pathology from two independent cohorts (Ludwig Maximilian University [LMU], n = 402, and Medical University of Vienna [MUV], n = 144). Optimal thresholds of CSF biomarkers were deduced from receiver operating characteristic curves and validated against Aβ PET positivity. RESULTS In both cohorts, a CSF Aβ42/40 ratio ≥ 7.1% was associated with a low risk of a positive Aβ PET scan (negative predictive value: 94.3%). Implementing two cutoffs revealed 14% to 16% of patients with intermediate results (CSF Aβ42/40 ratio: 5.5%–7.1%), which had a strong benefit from Aβ PET imaging (44%–52% Aβ PET positivity). DISCUSSION A two‐cutoff approach for CSF Aβ42/40 including Aβ PET imaging at intermediate results provides an effective assessment of Aβ pathology in real‐world settings. Highlights We evaluated cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and positron emission tomography (PET) amyloid beta (Aβ) biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease in real‐world cohorts. A CSF Aβ 42/40 ratio between 5.5% and 7.1% defines patients at borderline levels. Patients at borderline levels strongly benefit from additional Aβ PET imaging. Two‐cutoff CSF Aβ 42/40 and PET will allow effective treatment stratification.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Alzheimer's disease</subject><subject>Biomarkers</subject><subject>Cerebrospinal fluid</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>Dementia</subject><subject>Drug dosages</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Neuropsychology</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>Neurovetenskaper</subject><subject>Nuclear medicine</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>positron emission tomography</subject><subject>Psychotherapy</subject><subject>real world</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><issn>2352-8729</issn><issn>2352-8729</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9ks1u1DAUhSMEolXphgdAltggpBT_5MdmN2oLVKrEpnvLia9nPEriYDsdsuMReJaqz8FD8CR4JqUCFmzsq6vPx77HJ8teEnxGMKbvtNL0rMaYkSfZMWUlzXlNxdM_6qPsNIQtxpgUghYEP8-OmCg5q0pynN2vftyhEFWcAlIhQAg9DBHZASm0mUcXNxBtqzoUWhiUtw6NafEoOhQ9qHigdzZukLYBVICf3773Tlsz22GN0mmvRgvhPbq8tRqGFpDxrkcEJ24G5VES6VK9c77TCL6O4O0BUxFNg70FH2ycUQ-98zNqOzvYNrzInhnVBTh92E-ymw-XN-ef8uvPH6_OV9d5y3hFciMUNxpA6IbUhDAwPPnRgqC6LJoKC80LxqDFULLGsLIGXXBoa17WVcVrdpJdLbLaqa1Mc_fKz9IpKw8N59dS-eROB7I2DcNGlMlXVXBiGt5QUFwApsl33CStfNEKOxin5i-19TTK1FpPMoBkRYnJ_u43Cz9692WCEGVv0xd0nRrATUEywmiaQGCa0Nf_oFs3-SEZk6hCFHVdiSpRbxeq9S4ED-bxCQTLfZLkPknykKQEv3qQnJoe9CP6OzcJIAuwsx3M_5GSF6sLuoj-AgTM2ZE</recordid><startdate>202410</startdate><enddate>202410</enddate><creator>Brendel, Matthias</creator><creator>Parvizi, Tandis</creator><creator>Gnörich, Johannes</creator><creator>Topfstedt, Christof Elias</creator><creator>Buerger, Katharina</creator><creator>Janowitz, Daniel</creator><creator>Rauchmann, Boris‐Stephan</creator><creator>Perneczky, Robert</creator><creator>Kurz, Carolin</creator><creator>Mehrens, Dirk</creator><creator>Kunz, Wolfgang G.</creator><creator>Kusche‐Palenga, Julia</creator><creator>Kling, Agnes Bernadette</creator><creator>Buchal, Antonia</creator><creator>Nestorova, Elizabet</creator><creator>Silvaieh, Sara</creator><creator>Wurm, Raphael</creator><creator>Traub‐Weidinger, Tatjana</creator><creator>Klotz, Sigrid</creator><creator>Regelsberger, Günther</creator><creator>Rominger, Axel</creator><creator>Drzezga, Alexander</creator><creator>Levin, Johannes</creator><creator>Stögmann, Elisabeth</creator><creator>Franzmeier, Nicolai</creator><creator>Höglinger, Günter U.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>F1U</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202410</creationdate><title>Aβ status assessment in a hypothetical scenario prior to treatment with disease‐modifying therapies: Evidence from 10‐year real‐world experience at university memory clinics</title><author>Brendel, Matthias ; Parvizi, Tandis ; Gnörich, Johannes ; Topfstedt, Christof Elias ; Buerger, Katharina ; Janowitz, Daniel ; Rauchmann, Boris‐Stephan ; Perneczky, Robert ; Kurz, Carolin ; Mehrens, Dirk ; Kunz, Wolfgang G. ; Kusche‐Palenga, Julia ; Kling, Agnes Bernadette ; Buchal, Antonia ; Nestorova, Elizabet ; Silvaieh, Sara ; Wurm, Raphael ; Traub‐Weidinger, Tatjana ; Klotz, Sigrid ; Regelsberger, Günther ; Rominger, Axel ; Drzezga, Alexander ; Levin, Johannes ; Stögmann, Elisabeth ; Franzmeier, Nicolai ; Höglinger, Günter U.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3861-f9a8fdee9db17113ef8872ce92d54b609d8433ec0e53bf357ed48ec785766873</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Alzheimer's disease</topic><topic>Biomarkers</topic><topic>Cerebrospinal fluid</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>Dementia</topic><topic>Drug dosages</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Neuropsychology</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>Neurovetenskaper</topic><topic>Nuclear medicine</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>positron emission tomography</topic><topic>Psychotherapy</topic><topic>real world</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brendel, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parvizi, Tandis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gnörich, Johannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Topfstedt, Christof Elias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buerger, Katharina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janowitz, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rauchmann, Boris‐Stephan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perneczky, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurz, Carolin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mehrens, Dirk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kunz, Wolfgang G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kusche‐Palenga, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kling, Agnes Bernadette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buchal, Antonia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nestorova, Elizabet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silvaieh, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wurm, Raphael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Traub‐Weidinger, Tatjana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klotz, Sigrid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Regelsberger, Günther</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rominger, Axel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drzezga, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levin, Johannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stögmann, Elisabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franzmeier, Nicolai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Höglinger, Günter U.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest_Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Göteborgs universitet</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Alzheimer's &amp; dementia : diagnosis, assessment &amp; disease monitoring</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brendel, Matthias</au><au>Parvizi, Tandis</au><au>Gnörich, Johannes</au><au>Topfstedt, Christof Elias</au><au>Buerger, Katharina</au><au>Janowitz, Daniel</au><au>Rauchmann, Boris‐Stephan</au><au>Perneczky, Robert</au><au>Kurz, Carolin</au><au>Mehrens, Dirk</au><au>Kunz, Wolfgang G.</au><au>Kusche‐Palenga, Julia</au><au>Kling, Agnes Bernadette</au><au>Buchal, Antonia</au><au>Nestorova, Elizabet</au><au>Silvaieh, Sara</au><au>Wurm, Raphael</au><au>Traub‐Weidinger, Tatjana</au><au>Klotz, Sigrid</au><au>Regelsberger, Günther</au><au>Rominger, Axel</au><au>Drzezga, Alexander</au><au>Levin, Johannes</au><au>Stögmann, Elisabeth</au><au>Franzmeier, Nicolai</au><au>Höglinger, Günter U.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Aβ status assessment in a hypothetical scenario prior to treatment with disease‐modifying therapies: Evidence from 10‐year real‐world experience at university memory clinics</atitle><jtitle>Alzheimer's &amp; dementia : diagnosis, assessment &amp; disease monitoring</jtitle><addtitle>Alzheimers Dement (Amst)</addtitle><date>2024-10</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>e70031</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e70031-n/a</pages><issn>2352-8729</issn><eissn>2352-8729</eissn><abstract>INTRODUCTION With the advent of disease‐modifying therapies, accurate assessment of biomarkers indicating the presence of disease‐associated amyloid beta (Aβ) pathology becomes crucial in patients with clinically suspected Alzheimer's disease (AD). We evaluated Aβ levels in cerebrospinal fluid (Aβ CSF) and Aβ levels in positron emission tomography (Aβ PET) biomarkers in a real‐world memory‐clinic setting to develop an efficient algorithm for clinical use. METHODS Patients were evaluated for AD‐related Aβ pathology from two independent cohorts (Ludwig Maximilian University [LMU], n = 402, and Medical University of Vienna [MUV], n = 144). Optimal thresholds of CSF biomarkers were deduced from receiver operating characteristic curves and validated against Aβ PET positivity. RESULTS In both cohorts, a CSF Aβ42/40 ratio ≥ 7.1% was associated with a low risk of a positive Aβ PET scan (negative predictive value: 94.3%). Implementing two cutoffs revealed 14% to 16% of patients with intermediate results (CSF Aβ42/40 ratio: 5.5%–7.1%), which had a strong benefit from Aβ PET imaging (44%–52% Aβ PET positivity). DISCUSSION A two‐cutoff approach for CSF Aβ42/40 including Aβ PET imaging at intermediate results provides an effective assessment of Aβ pathology in real‐world settings. Highlights We evaluated cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and positron emission tomography (PET) amyloid beta (Aβ) biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease in real‐world cohorts. A CSF Aβ 42/40 ratio between 5.5% and 7.1% defines patients at borderline levels. Patients at borderline levels strongly benefit from additional Aβ PET imaging. Two‐cutoff CSF Aβ 42/40 and PET will allow effective treatment stratification.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>39583651</pmid><doi>10.1002/dad2.70031</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2352-8729
ispartof Alzheimer's & dementia : diagnosis, assessment & disease monitoring, 2024-10, Vol.16 (4), p.e70031-n/a
issn 2352-8729
2352-8729
language eng
recordid cdi_swepub_primary_oai_gup_ub_gu_se_345017
source Wiley Online Library; Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central (PMC)
subjects Algorithms
Alzheimer's disease
Biomarkers
Cerebrospinal fluid
Cognitive ability
Dementia
Drug dosages
Magnetic resonance imaging
Memory
Neurology
Neuropsychology
Neurosciences
Neurovetenskaper
Nuclear medicine
Patients
positron emission tomography
Psychotherapy
real world
Tomography
title Aβ status assessment in a hypothetical scenario prior to treatment with disease‐modifying therapies: Evidence from 10‐year real‐world experience at university memory clinics
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T08%3A41%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%CE%B2%20status%20assessment%20in%20a%20hypothetical%20scenario%20prior%20to%20treatment%20with%20disease%E2%80%90modifying%20therapies:%20Evidence%20from%2010%E2%80%90year%20real%E2%80%90world%20experience%20at%20university%20memory%20clinics&rft.jtitle=Alzheimer's%20&%20dementia%20:%20diagnosis,%20assessment%20&%20disease%20monitoring&rft.au=Brendel,%20Matthias&rft.date=2024-10&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=e70031&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e70031-n/a&rft.issn=2352-8729&rft.eissn=2352-8729&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/dad2.70031&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E3132609902%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3861-f9a8fdee9db17113ef8872ce92d54b609d8433ec0e53bf357ed48ec785766873%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3149477696&rft_id=info:pmid/39583651&rfr_iscdi=true