Loading…
Aβ status assessment in a hypothetical scenario prior to treatment with disease‐modifying therapies: Evidence from 10‐year real‐world experience at university memory clinics
INTRODUCTION With the advent of disease‐modifying therapies, accurate assessment of biomarkers indicating the presence of disease‐associated amyloid beta (Aβ) pathology becomes crucial in patients with clinically suspected Alzheimer's disease (AD). We evaluated Aβ levels in cerebrospinal fluid...
Saved in:
Published in: | Alzheimer's & dementia : diagnosis, assessment & disease monitoring assessment & disease monitoring, 2024-10, Vol.16 (4), p.e70031-n/a |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3861-f9a8fdee9db17113ef8872ce92d54b609d8433ec0e53bf357ed48ec785766873 |
container_end_page | n/a |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | e70031 |
container_title | Alzheimer's & dementia : diagnosis, assessment & disease monitoring |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Brendel, Matthias Parvizi, Tandis Gnörich, Johannes Topfstedt, Christof Elias Buerger, Katharina Janowitz, Daniel Rauchmann, Boris‐Stephan Perneczky, Robert Kurz, Carolin Mehrens, Dirk Kunz, Wolfgang G. Kusche‐Palenga, Julia Kling, Agnes Bernadette Buchal, Antonia Nestorova, Elizabet Silvaieh, Sara Wurm, Raphael Traub‐Weidinger, Tatjana Klotz, Sigrid Regelsberger, Günther Rominger, Axel Drzezga, Alexander Levin, Johannes Stögmann, Elisabeth Franzmeier, Nicolai Höglinger, Günter U. |
description | INTRODUCTION
With the advent of disease‐modifying therapies, accurate assessment of biomarkers indicating the presence of disease‐associated amyloid beta (Aβ) pathology becomes crucial in patients with clinically suspected Alzheimer's disease (AD). We evaluated Aβ levels in cerebrospinal fluid (Aβ CSF) and Aβ levels in positron emission tomography (Aβ PET) biomarkers in a real‐world memory‐clinic setting to develop an efficient algorithm for clinical use.
METHODS
Patients were evaluated for AD‐related Aβ pathology from two independent cohorts (Ludwig Maximilian University [LMU], n = 402, and Medical University of Vienna [MUV], n = 144). Optimal thresholds of CSF biomarkers were deduced from receiver operating characteristic curves and validated against Aβ PET positivity.
RESULTS
In both cohorts, a CSF Aβ42/40 ratio ≥ 7.1% was associated with a low risk of a positive Aβ PET scan (negative predictive value: 94.3%). Implementing two cutoffs revealed 14% to 16% of patients with intermediate results (CSF Aβ42/40 ratio: 5.5%–7.1%), which had a strong benefit from Aβ PET imaging (44%–52% Aβ PET positivity).
DISCUSSION
A two‐cutoff approach for CSF Aβ42/40 including Aβ PET imaging at intermediate results provides an effective assessment of Aβ pathology in real‐world settings.
Highlights
We evaluated cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and positron emission tomography (PET) amyloid beta (Aβ) biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease in real‐world cohorts.
A CSF Aβ 42/40 ratio between 5.5% and 7.1% defines patients at borderline levels.
Patients at borderline levels strongly benefit from additional Aβ PET imaging.
Two‐cutoff CSF Aβ 42/40 and PET will allow effective treatment stratification. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/dad2.70031 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_gup_ub_gu_se_345017</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_7fb30f95958a481fb8b2ea89e020010b</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>3132609902</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3861-f9a8fdee9db17113ef8872ce92d54b609d8433ec0e53bf357ed48ec785766873</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9ks1u1DAUhSMEolXphgdAltggpBT_5MdmN2oLVKrEpnvLia9nPEriYDsdsuMReJaqz8FD8CR4JqUCFmzsq6vPx77HJ8teEnxGMKbvtNL0rMaYkSfZMWUlzXlNxdM_6qPsNIQtxpgUghYEP8-OmCg5q0pynN2vftyhEFWcAlIhQAg9DBHZASm0mUcXNxBtqzoUWhiUtw6NafEoOhQ9qHigdzZukLYBVICf3773Tlsz22GN0mmvRgvhPbq8tRqGFpDxrkcEJ24G5VES6VK9c77TCL6O4O0BUxFNg70FH2ycUQ-98zNqOzvYNrzInhnVBTh92E-ymw-XN-ef8uvPH6_OV9d5y3hFciMUNxpA6IbUhDAwPPnRgqC6LJoKC80LxqDFULLGsLIGXXBoa17WVcVrdpJdLbLaqa1Mc_fKz9IpKw8N59dS-eROB7I2DcNGlMlXVXBiGt5QUFwApsl33CStfNEKOxin5i-19TTK1FpPMoBkRYnJ_u43Cz9692WCEGVv0xd0nRrATUEywmiaQGCa0Nf_oFs3-SEZk6hCFHVdiSpRbxeq9S4ED-bxCQTLfZLkPknykKQEv3qQnJoe9CP6OzcJIAuwsx3M_5GSF6sLuoj-AgTM2ZE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3149477696</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Aβ status assessment in a hypothetical scenario prior to treatment with disease‐modifying therapies: Evidence from 10‐year real‐world experience at university memory clinics</title><source>Wiley Online Library</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central (PMC)</source><creator>Brendel, Matthias ; Parvizi, Tandis ; Gnörich, Johannes ; Topfstedt, Christof Elias ; Buerger, Katharina ; Janowitz, Daniel ; Rauchmann, Boris‐Stephan ; Perneczky, Robert ; Kurz, Carolin ; Mehrens, Dirk ; Kunz, Wolfgang G. ; Kusche‐Palenga, Julia ; Kling, Agnes Bernadette ; Buchal, Antonia ; Nestorova, Elizabet ; Silvaieh, Sara ; Wurm, Raphael ; Traub‐Weidinger, Tatjana ; Klotz, Sigrid ; Regelsberger, Günther ; Rominger, Axel ; Drzezga, Alexander ; Levin, Johannes ; Stögmann, Elisabeth ; Franzmeier, Nicolai ; Höglinger, Günter U.</creator><creatorcontrib>Brendel, Matthias ; Parvizi, Tandis ; Gnörich, Johannes ; Topfstedt, Christof Elias ; Buerger, Katharina ; Janowitz, Daniel ; Rauchmann, Boris‐Stephan ; Perneczky, Robert ; Kurz, Carolin ; Mehrens, Dirk ; Kunz, Wolfgang G. ; Kusche‐Palenga, Julia ; Kling, Agnes Bernadette ; Buchal, Antonia ; Nestorova, Elizabet ; Silvaieh, Sara ; Wurm, Raphael ; Traub‐Weidinger, Tatjana ; Klotz, Sigrid ; Regelsberger, Günther ; Rominger, Axel ; Drzezga, Alexander ; Levin, Johannes ; Stögmann, Elisabeth ; Franzmeier, Nicolai ; Höglinger, Günter U.</creatorcontrib><description>INTRODUCTION
With the advent of disease‐modifying therapies, accurate assessment of biomarkers indicating the presence of disease‐associated amyloid beta (Aβ) pathology becomes crucial in patients with clinically suspected Alzheimer's disease (AD). We evaluated Aβ levels in cerebrospinal fluid (Aβ CSF) and Aβ levels in positron emission tomography (Aβ PET) biomarkers in a real‐world memory‐clinic setting to develop an efficient algorithm for clinical use.
METHODS
Patients were evaluated for AD‐related Aβ pathology from two independent cohorts (Ludwig Maximilian University [LMU], n = 402, and Medical University of Vienna [MUV], n = 144). Optimal thresholds of CSF biomarkers were deduced from receiver operating characteristic curves and validated against Aβ PET positivity.
RESULTS
In both cohorts, a CSF Aβ42/40 ratio ≥ 7.1% was associated with a low risk of a positive Aβ PET scan (negative predictive value: 94.3%). Implementing two cutoffs revealed 14% to 16% of patients with intermediate results (CSF Aβ42/40 ratio: 5.5%–7.1%), which had a strong benefit from Aβ PET imaging (44%–52% Aβ PET positivity).
DISCUSSION
A two‐cutoff approach for CSF Aβ42/40 including Aβ PET imaging at intermediate results provides an effective assessment of Aβ pathology in real‐world settings.
Highlights
We evaluated cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and positron emission tomography (PET) amyloid beta (Aβ) biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease in real‐world cohorts.
A CSF Aβ 42/40 ratio between 5.5% and 7.1% defines patients at borderline levels.
Patients at borderline levels strongly benefit from additional Aβ PET imaging.
Two‐cutoff CSF Aβ 42/40 and PET will allow effective treatment stratification.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2352-8729</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2352-8729</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/dad2.70031</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39583651</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Alzheimer's disease ; Biomarkers ; Cerebrospinal fluid ; Cognitive ability ; Dementia ; Drug dosages ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Memory ; Neurology ; Neuropsychology ; Neurosciences ; Neurovetenskaper ; Nuclear medicine ; Patients ; positron emission tomography ; Psychotherapy ; real world ; Tomography</subject><ispartof>Alzheimer's & dementia : diagnosis, assessment & disease monitoring, 2024-10, Vol.16 (4), p.e70031-n/a</ispartof><rights>2024 The Author(s). Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Alzheimer's Association.</rights><rights>2024. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the "License"). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3861-f9a8fdee9db17113ef8872ce92d54b609d8433ec0e53bf357ed48ec785766873</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3149477696/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3149477696?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,11560,25751,27922,27923,37010,37011,44588,46050,46474,74896</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39583651$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://gup.ub.gu.se/publication/345017$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brendel, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parvizi, Tandis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gnörich, Johannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Topfstedt, Christof Elias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buerger, Katharina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janowitz, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rauchmann, Boris‐Stephan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perneczky, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurz, Carolin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mehrens, Dirk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kunz, Wolfgang G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kusche‐Palenga, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kling, Agnes Bernadette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buchal, Antonia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nestorova, Elizabet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silvaieh, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wurm, Raphael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Traub‐Weidinger, Tatjana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klotz, Sigrid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Regelsberger, Günther</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rominger, Axel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drzezga, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levin, Johannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stögmann, Elisabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franzmeier, Nicolai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Höglinger, Günter U.</creatorcontrib><title>Aβ status assessment in a hypothetical scenario prior to treatment with disease‐modifying therapies: Evidence from 10‐year real‐world experience at university memory clinics</title><title>Alzheimer's & dementia : diagnosis, assessment & disease monitoring</title><addtitle>Alzheimers Dement (Amst)</addtitle><description>INTRODUCTION
With the advent of disease‐modifying therapies, accurate assessment of biomarkers indicating the presence of disease‐associated amyloid beta (Aβ) pathology becomes crucial in patients with clinically suspected Alzheimer's disease (AD). We evaluated Aβ levels in cerebrospinal fluid (Aβ CSF) and Aβ levels in positron emission tomography (Aβ PET) biomarkers in a real‐world memory‐clinic setting to develop an efficient algorithm for clinical use.
METHODS
Patients were evaluated for AD‐related Aβ pathology from two independent cohorts (Ludwig Maximilian University [LMU], n = 402, and Medical University of Vienna [MUV], n = 144). Optimal thresholds of CSF biomarkers were deduced from receiver operating characteristic curves and validated against Aβ PET positivity.
RESULTS
In both cohorts, a CSF Aβ42/40 ratio ≥ 7.1% was associated with a low risk of a positive Aβ PET scan (negative predictive value: 94.3%). Implementing two cutoffs revealed 14% to 16% of patients with intermediate results (CSF Aβ42/40 ratio: 5.5%–7.1%), which had a strong benefit from Aβ PET imaging (44%–52% Aβ PET positivity).
DISCUSSION
A two‐cutoff approach for CSF Aβ42/40 including Aβ PET imaging at intermediate results provides an effective assessment of Aβ pathology in real‐world settings.
Highlights
We evaluated cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and positron emission tomography (PET) amyloid beta (Aβ) biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease in real‐world cohorts.
A CSF Aβ 42/40 ratio between 5.5% and 7.1% defines patients at borderline levels.
Patients at borderline levels strongly benefit from additional Aβ PET imaging.
Two‐cutoff CSF Aβ 42/40 and PET will allow effective treatment stratification.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Alzheimer's disease</subject><subject>Biomarkers</subject><subject>Cerebrospinal fluid</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>Dementia</subject><subject>Drug dosages</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Neuropsychology</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>Neurovetenskaper</subject><subject>Nuclear medicine</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>positron emission tomography</subject><subject>Psychotherapy</subject><subject>real world</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><issn>2352-8729</issn><issn>2352-8729</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9ks1u1DAUhSMEolXphgdAltggpBT_5MdmN2oLVKrEpnvLia9nPEriYDsdsuMReJaqz8FD8CR4JqUCFmzsq6vPx77HJ8teEnxGMKbvtNL0rMaYkSfZMWUlzXlNxdM_6qPsNIQtxpgUghYEP8-OmCg5q0pynN2vftyhEFWcAlIhQAg9DBHZASm0mUcXNxBtqzoUWhiUtw6NafEoOhQ9qHigdzZukLYBVICf3773Tlsz22GN0mmvRgvhPbq8tRqGFpDxrkcEJ24G5VES6VK9c77TCL6O4O0BUxFNg70FH2ycUQ-98zNqOzvYNrzInhnVBTh92E-ymw-XN-ef8uvPH6_OV9d5y3hFciMUNxpA6IbUhDAwPPnRgqC6LJoKC80LxqDFULLGsLIGXXBoa17WVcVrdpJdLbLaqa1Mc_fKz9IpKw8N59dS-eROB7I2DcNGlMlXVXBiGt5QUFwApsl33CStfNEKOxin5i-19TTK1FpPMoBkRYnJ_u43Cz9692WCEGVv0xd0nRrATUEywmiaQGCa0Nf_oFs3-SEZk6hCFHVdiSpRbxeq9S4ED-bxCQTLfZLkPknykKQEv3qQnJoe9CP6OzcJIAuwsx3M_5GSF6sLuoj-AgTM2ZE</recordid><startdate>202410</startdate><enddate>202410</enddate><creator>Brendel, Matthias</creator><creator>Parvizi, Tandis</creator><creator>Gnörich, Johannes</creator><creator>Topfstedt, Christof Elias</creator><creator>Buerger, Katharina</creator><creator>Janowitz, Daniel</creator><creator>Rauchmann, Boris‐Stephan</creator><creator>Perneczky, Robert</creator><creator>Kurz, Carolin</creator><creator>Mehrens, Dirk</creator><creator>Kunz, Wolfgang G.</creator><creator>Kusche‐Palenga, Julia</creator><creator>Kling, Agnes Bernadette</creator><creator>Buchal, Antonia</creator><creator>Nestorova, Elizabet</creator><creator>Silvaieh, Sara</creator><creator>Wurm, Raphael</creator><creator>Traub‐Weidinger, Tatjana</creator><creator>Klotz, Sigrid</creator><creator>Regelsberger, Günther</creator><creator>Rominger, Axel</creator><creator>Drzezga, Alexander</creator><creator>Levin, Johannes</creator><creator>Stögmann, Elisabeth</creator><creator>Franzmeier, Nicolai</creator><creator>Höglinger, Günter U.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>F1U</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202410</creationdate><title>Aβ status assessment in a hypothetical scenario prior to treatment with disease‐modifying therapies: Evidence from 10‐year real‐world experience at university memory clinics</title><author>Brendel, Matthias ; Parvizi, Tandis ; Gnörich, Johannes ; Topfstedt, Christof Elias ; Buerger, Katharina ; Janowitz, Daniel ; Rauchmann, Boris‐Stephan ; Perneczky, Robert ; Kurz, Carolin ; Mehrens, Dirk ; Kunz, Wolfgang G. ; Kusche‐Palenga, Julia ; Kling, Agnes Bernadette ; Buchal, Antonia ; Nestorova, Elizabet ; Silvaieh, Sara ; Wurm, Raphael ; Traub‐Weidinger, Tatjana ; Klotz, Sigrid ; Regelsberger, Günther ; Rominger, Axel ; Drzezga, Alexander ; Levin, Johannes ; Stögmann, Elisabeth ; Franzmeier, Nicolai ; Höglinger, Günter U.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3861-f9a8fdee9db17113ef8872ce92d54b609d8433ec0e53bf357ed48ec785766873</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Alzheimer's disease</topic><topic>Biomarkers</topic><topic>Cerebrospinal fluid</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>Dementia</topic><topic>Drug dosages</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Neuropsychology</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>Neurovetenskaper</topic><topic>Nuclear medicine</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>positron emission tomography</topic><topic>Psychotherapy</topic><topic>real world</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brendel, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parvizi, Tandis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gnörich, Johannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Topfstedt, Christof Elias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buerger, Katharina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janowitz, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rauchmann, Boris‐Stephan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perneczky, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurz, Carolin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mehrens, Dirk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kunz, Wolfgang G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kusche‐Palenga, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kling, Agnes Bernadette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buchal, Antonia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nestorova, Elizabet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silvaieh, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wurm, Raphael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Traub‐Weidinger, Tatjana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klotz, Sigrid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Regelsberger, Günther</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rominger, Axel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drzezga, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levin, Johannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stögmann, Elisabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franzmeier, Nicolai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Höglinger, Günter U.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest_Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Göteborgs universitet</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Alzheimer's & dementia : diagnosis, assessment & disease monitoring</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brendel, Matthias</au><au>Parvizi, Tandis</au><au>Gnörich, Johannes</au><au>Topfstedt, Christof Elias</au><au>Buerger, Katharina</au><au>Janowitz, Daniel</au><au>Rauchmann, Boris‐Stephan</au><au>Perneczky, Robert</au><au>Kurz, Carolin</au><au>Mehrens, Dirk</au><au>Kunz, Wolfgang G.</au><au>Kusche‐Palenga, Julia</au><au>Kling, Agnes Bernadette</au><au>Buchal, Antonia</au><au>Nestorova, Elizabet</au><au>Silvaieh, Sara</au><au>Wurm, Raphael</au><au>Traub‐Weidinger, Tatjana</au><au>Klotz, Sigrid</au><au>Regelsberger, Günther</au><au>Rominger, Axel</au><au>Drzezga, Alexander</au><au>Levin, Johannes</au><au>Stögmann, Elisabeth</au><au>Franzmeier, Nicolai</au><au>Höglinger, Günter U.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Aβ status assessment in a hypothetical scenario prior to treatment with disease‐modifying therapies: Evidence from 10‐year real‐world experience at university memory clinics</atitle><jtitle>Alzheimer's & dementia : diagnosis, assessment & disease monitoring</jtitle><addtitle>Alzheimers Dement (Amst)</addtitle><date>2024-10</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>e70031</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e70031-n/a</pages><issn>2352-8729</issn><eissn>2352-8729</eissn><abstract>INTRODUCTION
With the advent of disease‐modifying therapies, accurate assessment of biomarkers indicating the presence of disease‐associated amyloid beta (Aβ) pathology becomes crucial in patients with clinically suspected Alzheimer's disease (AD). We evaluated Aβ levels in cerebrospinal fluid (Aβ CSF) and Aβ levels in positron emission tomography (Aβ PET) biomarkers in a real‐world memory‐clinic setting to develop an efficient algorithm for clinical use.
METHODS
Patients were evaluated for AD‐related Aβ pathology from two independent cohorts (Ludwig Maximilian University [LMU], n = 402, and Medical University of Vienna [MUV], n = 144). Optimal thresholds of CSF biomarkers were deduced from receiver operating characteristic curves and validated against Aβ PET positivity.
RESULTS
In both cohorts, a CSF Aβ42/40 ratio ≥ 7.1% was associated with a low risk of a positive Aβ PET scan (negative predictive value: 94.3%). Implementing two cutoffs revealed 14% to 16% of patients with intermediate results (CSF Aβ42/40 ratio: 5.5%–7.1%), which had a strong benefit from Aβ PET imaging (44%–52% Aβ PET positivity).
DISCUSSION
A two‐cutoff approach for CSF Aβ42/40 including Aβ PET imaging at intermediate results provides an effective assessment of Aβ pathology in real‐world settings.
Highlights
We evaluated cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and positron emission tomography (PET) amyloid beta (Aβ) biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease in real‐world cohorts.
A CSF Aβ 42/40 ratio between 5.5% and 7.1% defines patients at borderline levels.
Patients at borderline levels strongly benefit from additional Aβ PET imaging.
Two‐cutoff CSF Aβ 42/40 and PET will allow effective treatment stratification.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>39583651</pmid><doi>10.1002/dad2.70031</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2352-8729 |
ispartof | Alzheimer's & dementia : diagnosis, assessment & disease monitoring, 2024-10, Vol.16 (4), p.e70031-n/a |
issn | 2352-8729 2352-8729 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_swepub_primary_oai_gup_ub_gu_se_345017 |
source | Wiley Online Library; Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central (PMC) |
subjects | Algorithms Alzheimer's disease Biomarkers Cerebrospinal fluid Cognitive ability Dementia Drug dosages Magnetic resonance imaging Memory Neurology Neuropsychology Neurosciences Neurovetenskaper Nuclear medicine Patients positron emission tomography Psychotherapy real world Tomography |
title | Aβ status assessment in a hypothetical scenario prior to treatment with disease‐modifying therapies: Evidence from 10‐year real‐world experience at university memory clinics |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T08%3A41%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%CE%B2%20status%20assessment%20in%20a%20hypothetical%20scenario%20prior%20to%20treatment%20with%20disease%E2%80%90modifying%20therapies:%20Evidence%20from%2010%E2%80%90year%20real%E2%80%90world%20experience%20at%20university%20memory%20clinics&rft.jtitle=Alzheimer's%20&%20dementia%20:%20diagnosis,%20assessment%20&%20disease%20monitoring&rft.au=Brendel,%20Matthias&rft.date=2024-10&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=e70031&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e70031-n/a&rft.issn=2352-8729&rft.eissn=2352-8729&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/dad2.70031&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E3132609902%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3861-f9a8fdee9db17113ef8872ce92d54b609d8433ec0e53bf357ed48ec785766873%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3149477696&rft_id=info:pmid/39583651&rfr_iscdi=true |