Characteristics of under- and over-reporters of energy intake among 18–20-year-old males: the Gothenburg Osteoporosis and Obesity Determinants (GOOD) study

To identify and describe characteristics of the bias of reported energy intake of participants in the Gothenburg Osteoporosis and Obesity Determinants (GOOD) study. A validated diet history with a detailed questionnaire and an interview was used. Body fat was analysed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiom...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Public health nutrition 2008-11, Vol.11 (11), p.1117-1123
Main Authors: Klingberg, S, Hallenberg, E, Lorentzon, M, Mellström, D, Ohlsson, C, Hulthén, L
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Absorptiometry, Photon - methods
Adipose Tissue - metabolism
Adolescent
adults
Basal Metabolism - physiology
Bias
Body fat
Body Mass Index
Bone mass
Diet
diet counseling
diet-related diseases
Dietary assessment
Dietary supplements
Dietitians
Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry
Energy
Energy intake
Energy Intake - physiology
Energy Metabolism - physiology
environmental factors
Epidemiologic Methods
Exercise
Food
food choices
food frequency questionnaires
Food intake
Genetic factors
Gothenburg Osteoporosis and Obesity Determinants Study
health effects assessments
human nutrition
Humans
interviews
Interviews as Topic
Male
Males
Meal pattern
Meals
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES
MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP
men
Nutrients
Nutrition
nutrition assessment
Obesity
Osteoporosis
Over-reporting
overweight
Physical activity
Population studies
Proteins
Public health
Questionnaires
Self Disclosure
Software packages
Surveys and Questionnaires
Sweden
Under-reporting
Young Adult
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:To identify and describe characteristics of the bias of reported energy intake of participants in the Gothenburg Osteoporosis and Obesity Determinants (GOOD) study. A validated diet history with a detailed questionnaire and an interview was used. Body fat was analysed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. The ratio of energy intake (EI) to BMR was used to define under-reporters (EI:BMRor= 1.30 to or= 2.64). Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden. A total of 695 males (18-20 years). Sixty-eight per cent were classed as acceptable reporters, 22% as over-reporters and 10% as under-reporters. The under-reporters had higher BMI and body fat percentage than acceptable reporters (P
ISSN:1368-9800
1475-2727
1475-2727
DOI:10.1017/S1368980007001474