Loading…
Addition of terpenoids to pear ester plus acetic acid increases catches of codling moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae)
Field studies were conducted to evaluate new kairomone blends in combination with pear ester (E,Z)‐2,4‐ethyl decadienoate (PE) and acetic acid (AA) for their attraction of male and female codling moth, Cydia pomonella (L.), in apple, Malus domestica Borkhausen. The addition of decanal to either AA o...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of applied entomology (1986) 2019-09, Vol.143 (8), p.813-821 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3986-a2d795ecc1dee7f78b6239914a8d77a41d1c0634bc4780ec4d60d1a5b187dbca3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3986-a2d795ecc1dee7f78b6239914a8d77a41d1c0634bc4780ec4d60d1a5b187dbca3 |
container_end_page | 821 |
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 813 |
container_title | Journal of applied entomology (1986) |
container_volume | 143 |
creator | Knight, Alan L. Mujica, Valentina Herrera, Sebastian Larsson Tasin, Marco |
description | Field studies were conducted to evaluate new kairomone blends in combination with pear ester (E,Z)‐2,4‐ethyl decadienoate (PE) and acetic acid (AA) for their attraction of male and female codling moth, Cydia pomonella (L.), in apple, Malus domestica Borkhausen. The addition of decanal to either AA or PE alone significantly increased total and female moth catches. However, the addition of decanal did not improve the attraction of PE + AA. The addition of either the pyranoid (PyrLOX) or furanoid (FurLOX) linalool oxide but not linalool (LOL) increased moth catches with PE but did not increase catches with PE + AA. Similarly, the addition of PyrLOX plus decanal did not improve PE + AA. The addition of (E)‐4,8‐dimethyl‐1,3,7‐nonatriene (DMNT) to either AA, PE + AA or PE + AA+decanal did not significantly increase moth catches. However, the addition of PyrLOX to traps with PE + AA and DMNT (4‐component lure) significantly increased moth catches compared with PE + AA alone or any of the ternary blends of these volatiles. Females accounted for 60%–80% of the total catch with this 4‐component lure. The 4‐component blend with PyrLOX was a more attractive lure than similar blends that substituted LOL, or a binary blend of LOL and FurLOX for PyrLOX. The 4‐component blend caught nearly fourfold more total and female moths than the purported attractant N‐butyl sulphide when it was used in combination with PE + AA. These results indicate that significant improvements in monitoring, mating disruption and mass trapping of codling moth are possible. Further studies are needed to assess the new attractive blend's effectiveness in combination with sex pheromone lures and to evaluate whether other host plant volatiles can be added or substitute for DMNT or LOX when used in combination with PE + AA. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/jen.12646 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_swepu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_slubar_slu_se_101519</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2278887025</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3986-a2d795ecc1dee7f78b6239914a8d77a41d1c0634bc4780ec4d60d1a5b187dbca3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1v3CAQhlHUStkmPfQfoPbSHLxhbGxwb1GUfkSr9pKeER5mu6wc4wJWlH8ftq56K5dXQs8zI3gZewdiC-VcH2naQt3J7oxtQDZ9JSToV2wj-gaqWkh9zt6kdBQCOtmKDYs3zvnsw8TDnmeKM03Bu8Rz4DPZyCmVSz6PS-IWKXss4R33E0ayiRJHm_FQsugY3OinX_wx5AP_uKPZuzAX3X7iDyHm6Itp6eqSvd7bMdHbv3nBfn6-e7j9Wu1-fPl2e7OrsOl1V9naqb4lRHBEaq_00NVN34O02illJThA0TVyQKm0IJSuEw5sO4BWbkDbXLDtOjc90bwMZo7-0cZnE6w3aVwGG09hEhkQ0EJfhPerEFIuCPpMeMAwTYTZFKIRbVugDys0x_B7Kd9jjmGJU3mIqWultVaiPlFXK4UxpBRp_287CHMqypSizJ-iCnu9sk9-pOf_g-b-7vtqvAD4tpWq</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2278887025</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Addition of terpenoids to pear ester plus acetic acid increases catches of codling moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae)</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Knight, Alan L. ; Mujica, Valentina ; Herrera, Sebastian Larsson ; Tasin, Marco</creator><creatorcontrib>Knight, Alan L. ; Mujica, Valentina ; Herrera, Sebastian Larsson ; Tasin, Marco ; Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</creatorcontrib><description>Field studies were conducted to evaluate new kairomone blends in combination with pear ester (E,Z)‐2,4‐ethyl decadienoate (PE) and acetic acid (AA) for their attraction of male and female codling moth, Cydia pomonella (L.), in apple, Malus domestica Borkhausen. The addition of decanal to either AA or PE alone significantly increased total and female moth catches. However, the addition of decanal did not improve the attraction of PE + AA. The addition of either the pyranoid (PyrLOX) or furanoid (FurLOX) linalool oxide but not linalool (LOL) increased moth catches with PE but did not increase catches with PE + AA. Similarly, the addition of PyrLOX plus decanal did not improve PE + AA. The addition of (E)‐4,8‐dimethyl‐1,3,7‐nonatriene (DMNT) to either AA, PE + AA or PE + AA+decanal did not significantly increase moth catches. However, the addition of PyrLOX to traps with PE + AA and DMNT (4‐component lure) significantly increased moth catches compared with PE + AA alone or any of the ternary blends of these volatiles. Females accounted for 60%–80% of the total catch with this 4‐component lure. The 4‐component blend with PyrLOX was a more attractive lure than similar blends that substituted LOL, or a binary blend of LOL and FurLOX for PyrLOX. The 4‐component blend caught nearly fourfold more total and female moths than the purported attractant N‐butyl sulphide when it was used in combination with PE + AA. These results indicate that significant improvements in monitoring, mating disruption and mass trapping of codling moth are possible. Further studies are needed to assess the new attractive blend's effectiveness in combination with sex pheromone lures and to evaluate whether other host plant volatiles can be added or substitute for DMNT or LOX when used in combination with PE + AA.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0931-2048</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1439-0418</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1439-0418</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jen.12646</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>(E)‐4,8‐dimethyl‐1,3,7‐nonatriene ; (E,Z)‐2,4‐ethyl decadienoate ; Acetic acid ; Agricultural Science ; Attraction ; Butterflies & moths ; Cydia pomonella (L.) ; Disruption ; Females ; Host plants ; integrated pest management ; Jordbruksvetenskap ; Linalool ; linalool oxide ; Liquid oxygen ; Mating disruption ; Pheromone traps ; Polymer blends ; Sex pheromone ; Substitutes ; Sulfides ; Terpenes ; Volatiles ; Zoologi ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Journal of applied entomology (1986), 2019-09, Vol.143 (8), p.813-821</ispartof><rights>2019 Blackwell Verlag GmbH</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 Blackwell Verlag GmbH</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3986-a2d795ecc1dee7f78b6239914a8d77a41d1c0634bc4780ec4d60d1a5b187dbca3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3986-a2d795ecc1dee7f78b6239914a8d77a41d1c0634bc4780ec4d60d1a5b187dbca3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4496-9000 ; 0000000344969000</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/1513055$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://res.slu.se/id/publ/101519$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Knight, Alan L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mujica, Valentina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herrera, Sebastian Larsson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tasin, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</creatorcontrib><title>Addition of terpenoids to pear ester plus acetic acid increases catches of codling moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae)</title><title>Journal of applied entomology (1986)</title><description>Field studies were conducted to evaluate new kairomone blends in combination with pear ester (E,Z)‐2,4‐ethyl decadienoate (PE) and acetic acid (AA) for their attraction of male and female codling moth, Cydia pomonella (L.), in apple, Malus domestica Borkhausen. The addition of decanal to either AA or PE alone significantly increased total and female moth catches. However, the addition of decanal did not improve the attraction of PE + AA. The addition of either the pyranoid (PyrLOX) or furanoid (FurLOX) linalool oxide but not linalool (LOL) increased moth catches with PE but did not increase catches with PE + AA. Similarly, the addition of PyrLOX plus decanal did not improve PE + AA. The addition of (E)‐4,8‐dimethyl‐1,3,7‐nonatriene (DMNT) to either AA, PE + AA or PE + AA+decanal did not significantly increase moth catches. However, the addition of PyrLOX to traps with PE + AA and DMNT (4‐component lure) significantly increased moth catches compared with PE + AA alone or any of the ternary blends of these volatiles. Females accounted for 60%–80% of the total catch with this 4‐component lure. The 4‐component blend with PyrLOX was a more attractive lure than similar blends that substituted LOL, or a binary blend of LOL and FurLOX for PyrLOX. The 4‐component blend caught nearly fourfold more total and female moths than the purported attractant N‐butyl sulphide when it was used in combination with PE + AA. These results indicate that significant improvements in monitoring, mating disruption and mass trapping of codling moth are possible. Further studies are needed to assess the new attractive blend's effectiveness in combination with sex pheromone lures and to evaluate whether other host plant volatiles can be added or substitute for DMNT or LOX when used in combination with PE + AA.</description><subject>(E)‐4,8‐dimethyl‐1,3,7‐nonatriene</subject><subject>(E,Z)‐2,4‐ethyl decadienoate</subject><subject>Acetic acid</subject><subject>Agricultural Science</subject><subject>Attraction</subject><subject>Butterflies & moths</subject><subject>Cydia pomonella (L.)</subject><subject>Disruption</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Host plants</subject><subject>integrated pest management</subject><subject>Jordbruksvetenskap</subject><subject>Linalool</subject><subject>linalool oxide</subject><subject>Liquid oxygen</subject><subject>Mating disruption</subject><subject>Pheromone traps</subject><subject>Polymer blends</subject><subject>Sex pheromone</subject><subject>Substitutes</subject><subject>Sulfides</subject><subject>Terpenes</subject><subject>Volatiles</subject><subject>Zoologi</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>0931-2048</issn><issn>1439-0418</issn><issn>1439-0418</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kU1v3CAQhlHUStkmPfQfoPbSHLxhbGxwb1GUfkSr9pKeER5mu6wc4wJWlH8ftq56K5dXQs8zI3gZewdiC-VcH2naQt3J7oxtQDZ9JSToV2wj-gaqWkh9zt6kdBQCOtmKDYs3zvnsw8TDnmeKM03Bu8Rz4DPZyCmVSz6PS-IWKXss4R33E0ayiRJHm_FQsugY3OinX_wx5AP_uKPZuzAX3X7iDyHm6Itp6eqSvd7bMdHbv3nBfn6-e7j9Wu1-fPl2e7OrsOl1V9naqb4lRHBEaq_00NVN34O02illJThA0TVyQKm0IJSuEw5sO4BWbkDbXLDtOjc90bwMZo7-0cZnE6w3aVwGG09hEhkQ0EJfhPerEFIuCPpMeMAwTYTZFKIRbVugDys0x_B7Kd9jjmGJU3mIqWultVaiPlFXK4UxpBRp_287CHMqypSizJ-iCnu9sk9-pOf_g-b-7vtqvAD4tpWq</recordid><startdate>201909</startdate><enddate>201909</enddate><creator>Knight, Alan L.</creator><creator>Mujica, Valentina</creator><creator>Herrera, Sebastian Larsson</creator><creator>Tasin, Marco</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>Wiley-Blackwell</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4496-9000</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000344969000</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201909</creationdate><title>Addition of terpenoids to pear ester plus acetic acid increases catches of codling moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae)</title><author>Knight, Alan L. ; Mujica, Valentina ; Herrera, Sebastian Larsson ; Tasin, Marco</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3986-a2d795ecc1dee7f78b6239914a8d77a41d1c0634bc4780ec4d60d1a5b187dbca3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>(E)‐4,8‐dimethyl‐1,3,7‐nonatriene</topic><topic>(E,Z)‐2,4‐ethyl decadienoate</topic><topic>Acetic acid</topic><topic>Agricultural Science</topic><topic>Attraction</topic><topic>Butterflies & moths</topic><topic>Cydia pomonella (L.)</topic><topic>Disruption</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Host plants</topic><topic>integrated pest management</topic><topic>Jordbruksvetenskap</topic><topic>Linalool</topic><topic>linalool oxide</topic><topic>Liquid oxygen</topic><topic>Mating disruption</topic><topic>Pheromone traps</topic><topic>Polymer blends</topic><topic>Sex pheromone</topic><topic>Substitutes</topic><topic>Sulfides</topic><topic>Terpenes</topic><topic>Volatiles</topic><topic>Zoologi</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Knight, Alan L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mujica, Valentina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herrera, Sebastian Larsson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tasin, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><jtitle>Journal of applied entomology (1986)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Knight, Alan L.</au><au>Mujica, Valentina</au><au>Herrera, Sebastian Larsson</au><au>Tasin, Marco</au><aucorp>Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Addition of terpenoids to pear ester plus acetic acid increases catches of codling moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae)</atitle><jtitle>Journal of applied entomology (1986)</jtitle><date>2019-09</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>143</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>813</spage><epage>821</epage><pages>813-821</pages><issn>0931-2048</issn><issn>1439-0418</issn><eissn>1439-0418</eissn><abstract>Field studies were conducted to evaluate new kairomone blends in combination with pear ester (E,Z)‐2,4‐ethyl decadienoate (PE) and acetic acid (AA) for their attraction of male and female codling moth, Cydia pomonella (L.), in apple, Malus domestica Borkhausen. The addition of decanal to either AA or PE alone significantly increased total and female moth catches. However, the addition of decanal did not improve the attraction of PE + AA. The addition of either the pyranoid (PyrLOX) or furanoid (FurLOX) linalool oxide but not linalool (LOL) increased moth catches with PE but did not increase catches with PE + AA. Similarly, the addition of PyrLOX plus decanal did not improve PE + AA. The addition of (E)‐4,8‐dimethyl‐1,3,7‐nonatriene (DMNT) to either AA, PE + AA or PE + AA+decanal did not significantly increase moth catches. However, the addition of PyrLOX to traps with PE + AA and DMNT (4‐component lure) significantly increased moth catches compared with PE + AA alone or any of the ternary blends of these volatiles. Females accounted for 60%–80% of the total catch with this 4‐component lure. The 4‐component blend with PyrLOX was a more attractive lure than similar blends that substituted LOL, or a binary blend of LOL and FurLOX for PyrLOX. The 4‐component blend caught nearly fourfold more total and female moths than the purported attractant N‐butyl sulphide when it was used in combination with PE + AA. These results indicate that significant improvements in monitoring, mating disruption and mass trapping of codling moth are possible. Further studies are needed to assess the new attractive blend's effectiveness in combination with sex pheromone lures and to evaluate whether other host plant volatiles can be added or substitute for DMNT or LOX when used in combination with PE + AA.</abstract><cop>Berlin</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/jen.12646</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4496-9000</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000344969000</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0931-2048 |
ispartof | Journal of applied entomology (1986), 2019-09, Vol.143 (8), p.813-821 |
issn | 0931-2048 1439-0418 1439-0418 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_swepub_primary_oai_slubar_slu_se_101519 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | (E)‐4,8‐dimethyl‐1,3,7‐nonatriene (E,Z)‐2,4‐ethyl decadienoate Acetic acid Agricultural Science Attraction Butterflies & moths Cydia pomonella (L.) Disruption Females Host plants integrated pest management Jordbruksvetenskap Linalool linalool oxide Liquid oxygen Mating disruption Pheromone traps Polymer blends Sex pheromone Substitutes Sulfides Terpenes Volatiles Zoologi Zoology |
title | Addition of terpenoids to pear ester plus acetic acid increases catches of codling moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T21%3A13%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_swepu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Addition%20of%20terpenoids%20to%20pear%20ester%20plus%20acetic%20acid%20increases%20catches%20of%20codling%20moth%20(Lepidoptera:%20Tortricidae)&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20applied%20entomology%20(1986)&rft.au=Knight,%20Alan%20L.&rft.aucorp=Sveriges%20lantbruksuniversitet&rft.date=2019-09&rft.volume=143&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=813&rft.epage=821&rft.pages=813-821&rft.issn=0931-2048&rft.eissn=1439-0418&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jen.12646&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_swepu%3E2278887025%3C/proquest_swepu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3986-a2d795ecc1dee7f78b6239914a8d77a41d1c0634bc4780ec4d60d1a5b187dbca3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2278887025&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |