Loading…

Addition of terpenoids to pear ester plus acetic acid increases catches of codling moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae)

Field studies were conducted to evaluate new kairomone blends in combination with pear ester (E,Z)‐2,4‐ethyl decadienoate (PE) and acetic acid (AA) for their attraction of male and female codling moth, Cydia pomonella (L.), in apple, Malus domestica Borkhausen. The addition of decanal to either AA o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of applied entomology (1986) 2019-09, Vol.143 (8), p.813-821
Main Authors: Knight, Alan L., Mujica, Valentina, Herrera, Sebastian Larsson, Tasin, Marco
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3986-a2d795ecc1dee7f78b6239914a8d77a41d1c0634bc4780ec4d60d1a5b187dbca3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3986-a2d795ecc1dee7f78b6239914a8d77a41d1c0634bc4780ec4d60d1a5b187dbca3
container_end_page 821
container_issue 8
container_start_page 813
container_title Journal of applied entomology (1986)
container_volume 143
creator Knight, Alan L.
Mujica, Valentina
Herrera, Sebastian Larsson
Tasin, Marco
description Field studies were conducted to evaluate new kairomone blends in combination with pear ester (E,Z)‐2,4‐ethyl decadienoate (PE) and acetic acid (AA) for their attraction of male and female codling moth, Cydia pomonella (L.), in apple, Malus domestica Borkhausen. The addition of decanal to either AA or PE alone significantly increased total and female moth catches. However, the addition of decanal did not improve the attraction of PE + AA. The addition of either the pyranoid (PyrLOX) or furanoid (FurLOX) linalool oxide but not linalool (LOL) increased moth catches with PE but did not increase catches with PE + AA. Similarly, the addition of PyrLOX plus decanal did not improve PE + AA. The addition of (E)‐4,8‐dimethyl‐1,3,7‐nonatriene (DMNT) to either AA, PE + AA or PE + AA+decanal did not significantly increase moth catches. However, the addition of PyrLOX to traps with PE + AA and DMNT (4‐component lure) significantly increased moth catches compared with PE + AA alone or any of the ternary blends of these volatiles. Females accounted for 60%–80% of the total catch with this 4‐component lure. The 4‐component blend with PyrLOX was a more attractive lure than similar blends that substituted LOL, or a binary blend of LOL and FurLOX for PyrLOX. The 4‐component blend caught nearly fourfold more total and female moths than the purported attractant N‐butyl sulphide when it was used in combination with PE + AA. These results indicate that significant improvements in monitoring, mating disruption and mass trapping of codling moth are possible. Further studies are needed to assess the new attractive blend's effectiveness in combination with sex pheromone lures and to evaluate whether other host plant volatiles can be added or substitute for DMNT or LOX when used in combination with PE + AA.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jen.12646
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_swepu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_slubar_slu_se_101519</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2278887025</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3986-a2d795ecc1dee7f78b6239914a8d77a41d1c0634bc4780ec4d60d1a5b187dbca3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1v3CAQhlHUStkmPfQfoPbSHLxhbGxwb1GUfkSr9pKeER5mu6wc4wJWlH8ftq56K5dXQs8zI3gZewdiC-VcH2naQt3J7oxtQDZ9JSToV2wj-gaqWkh9zt6kdBQCOtmKDYs3zvnsw8TDnmeKM03Bu8Rz4DPZyCmVSz6PS-IWKXss4R33E0ayiRJHm_FQsugY3OinX_wx5AP_uKPZuzAX3X7iDyHm6Itp6eqSvd7bMdHbv3nBfn6-e7j9Wu1-fPl2e7OrsOl1V9naqb4lRHBEaq_00NVN34O02illJThA0TVyQKm0IJSuEw5sO4BWbkDbXLDtOjc90bwMZo7-0cZnE6w3aVwGG09hEhkQ0EJfhPerEFIuCPpMeMAwTYTZFKIRbVugDys0x_B7Kd9jjmGJU3mIqWultVaiPlFXK4UxpBRp_287CHMqypSizJ-iCnu9sk9-pOf_g-b-7vtqvAD4tpWq</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2278887025</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Addition of terpenoids to pear ester plus acetic acid increases catches of codling moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae)</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Knight, Alan L. ; Mujica, Valentina ; Herrera, Sebastian Larsson ; Tasin, Marco</creator><creatorcontrib>Knight, Alan L. ; Mujica, Valentina ; Herrera, Sebastian Larsson ; Tasin, Marco ; Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</creatorcontrib><description>Field studies were conducted to evaluate new kairomone blends in combination with pear ester (E,Z)‐2,4‐ethyl decadienoate (PE) and acetic acid (AA) for their attraction of male and female codling moth, Cydia pomonella (L.), in apple, Malus domestica Borkhausen. The addition of decanal to either AA or PE alone significantly increased total and female moth catches. However, the addition of decanal did not improve the attraction of PE + AA. The addition of either the pyranoid (PyrLOX) or furanoid (FurLOX) linalool oxide but not linalool (LOL) increased moth catches with PE but did not increase catches with PE + AA. Similarly, the addition of PyrLOX plus decanal did not improve PE + AA. The addition of (E)‐4,8‐dimethyl‐1,3,7‐nonatriene (DMNT) to either AA, PE + AA or PE + AA+decanal did not significantly increase moth catches. However, the addition of PyrLOX to traps with PE + AA and DMNT (4‐component lure) significantly increased moth catches compared with PE + AA alone or any of the ternary blends of these volatiles. Females accounted for 60%–80% of the total catch with this 4‐component lure. The 4‐component blend with PyrLOX was a more attractive lure than similar blends that substituted LOL, or a binary blend of LOL and FurLOX for PyrLOX. The 4‐component blend caught nearly fourfold more total and female moths than the purported attractant N‐butyl sulphide when it was used in combination with PE + AA. These results indicate that significant improvements in monitoring, mating disruption and mass trapping of codling moth are possible. Further studies are needed to assess the new attractive blend's effectiveness in combination with sex pheromone lures and to evaluate whether other host plant volatiles can be added or substitute for DMNT or LOX when used in combination with PE + AA.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0931-2048</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1439-0418</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1439-0418</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jen.12646</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>(E)‐4,8‐dimethyl‐1,3,7‐nonatriene ; (E,Z)‐2,4‐ethyl decadienoate ; Acetic acid ; Agricultural Science ; Attraction ; Butterflies &amp; moths ; Cydia pomonella (L.) ; Disruption ; Females ; Host plants ; integrated pest management ; Jordbruksvetenskap ; Linalool ; linalool oxide ; Liquid oxygen ; Mating disruption ; Pheromone traps ; Polymer blends ; Sex pheromone ; Substitutes ; Sulfides ; Terpenes ; Volatiles ; Zoologi ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Journal of applied entomology (1986), 2019-09, Vol.143 (8), p.813-821</ispartof><rights>2019 Blackwell Verlag GmbH</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 Blackwell Verlag GmbH</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3986-a2d795ecc1dee7f78b6239914a8d77a41d1c0634bc4780ec4d60d1a5b187dbca3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3986-a2d795ecc1dee7f78b6239914a8d77a41d1c0634bc4780ec4d60d1a5b187dbca3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4496-9000 ; 0000000344969000</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/1513055$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://res.slu.se/id/publ/101519$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Knight, Alan L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mujica, Valentina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herrera, Sebastian Larsson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tasin, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</creatorcontrib><title>Addition of terpenoids to pear ester plus acetic acid increases catches of codling moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae)</title><title>Journal of applied entomology (1986)</title><description>Field studies were conducted to evaluate new kairomone blends in combination with pear ester (E,Z)‐2,4‐ethyl decadienoate (PE) and acetic acid (AA) for their attraction of male and female codling moth, Cydia pomonella (L.), in apple, Malus domestica Borkhausen. The addition of decanal to either AA or PE alone significantly increased total and female moth catches. However, the addition of decanal did not improve the attraction of PE + AA. The addition of either the pyranoid (PyrLOX) or furanoid (FurLOX) linalool oxide but not linalool (LOL) increased moth catches with PE but did not increase catches with PE + AA. Similarly, the addition of PyrLOX plus decanal did not improve PE + AA. The addition of (E)‐4,8‐dimethyl‐1,3,7‐nonatriene (DMNT) to either AA, PE + AA or PE + AA+decanal did not significantly increase moth catches. However, the addition of PyrLOX to traps with PE + AA and DMNT (4‐component lure) significantly increased moth catches compared with PE + AA alone or any of the ternary blends of these volatiles. Females accounted for 60%–80% of the total catch with this 4‐component lure. The 4‐component blend with PyrLOX was a more attractive lure than similar blends that substituted LOL, or a binary blend of LOL and FurLOX for PyrLOX. The 4‐component blend caught nearly fourfold more total and female moths than the purported attractant N‐butyl sulphide when it was used in combination with PE + AA. These results indicate that significant improvements in monitoring, mating disruption and mass trapping of codling moth are possible. Further studies are needed to assess the new attractive blend's effectiveness in combination with sex pheromone lures and to evaluate whether other host plant volatiles can be added or substitute for DMNT or LOX when used in combination with PE + AA.</description><subject>(E)‐4,8‐dimethyl‐1,3,7‐nonatriene</subject><subject>(E,Z)‐2,4‐ethyl decadienoate</subject><subject>Acetic acid</subject><subject>Agricultural Science</subject><subject>Attraction</subject><subject>Butterflies &amp; moths</subject><subject>Cydia pomonella (L.)</subject><subject>Disruption</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Host plants</subject><subject>integrated pest management</subject><subject>Jordbruksvetenskap</subject><subject>Linalool</subject><subject>linalool oxide</subject><subject>Liquid oxygen</subject><subject>Mating disruption</subject><subject>Pheromone traps</subject><subject>Polymer blends</subject><subject>Sex pheromone</subject><subject>Substitutes</subject><subject>Sulfides</subject><subject>Terpenes</subject><subject>Volatiles</subject><subject>Zoologi</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>0931-2048</issn><issn>1439-0418</issn><issn>1439-0418</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kU1v3CAQhlHUStkmPfQfoPbSHLxhbGxwb1GUfkSr9pKeER5mu6wc4wJWlH8ftq56K5dXQs8zI3gZewdiC-VcH2naQt3J7oxtQDZ9JSToV2wj-gaqWkh9zt6kdBQCOtmKDYs3zvnsw8TDnmeKM03Bu8Rz4DPZyCmVSz6PS-IWKXss4R33E0ayiRJHm_FQsugY3OinX_wx5AP_uKPZuzAX3X7iDyHm6Itp6eqSvd7bMdHbv3nBfn6-e7j9Wu1-fPl2e7OrsOl1V9naqb4lRHBEaq_00NVN34O02illJThA0TVyQKm0IJSuEw5sO4BWbkDbXLDtOjc90bwMZo7-0cZnE6w3aVwGG09hEhkQ0EJfhPerEFIuCPpMeMAwTYTZFKIRbVugDys0x_B7Kd9jjmGJU3mIqWultVaiPlFXK4UxpBRp_287CHMqypSizJ-iCnu9sk9-pOf_g-b-7vtqvAD4tpWq</recordid><startdate>201909</startdate><enddate>201909</enddate><creator>Knight, Alan L.</creator><creator>Mujica, Valentina</creator><creator>Herrera, Sebastian Larsson</creator><creator>Tasin, Marco</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>Wiley-Blackwell</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4496-9000</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000344969000</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201909</creationdate><title>Addition of terpenoids to pear ester plus acetic acid increases catches of codling moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae)</title><author>Knight, Alan L. ; Mujica, Valentina ; Herrera, Sebastian Larsson ; Tasin, Marco</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3986-a2d795ecc1dee7f78b6239914a8d77a41d1c0634bc4780ec4d60d1a5b187dbca3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>(E)‐4,8‐dimethyl‐1,3,7‐nonatriene</topic><topic>(E,Z)‐2,4‐ethyl decadienoate</topic><topic>Acetic acid</topic><topic>Agricultural Science</topic><topic>Attraction</topic><topic>Butterflies &amp; moths</topic><topic>Cydia pomonella (L.)</topic><topic>Disruption</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Host plants</topic><topic>integrated pest management</topic><topic>Jordbruksvetenskap</topic><topic>Linalool</topic><topic>linalool oxide</topic><topic>Liquid oxygen</topic><topic>Mating disruption</topic><topic>Pheromone traps</topic><topic>Polymer blends</topic><topic>Sex pheromone</topic><topic>Substitutes</topic><topic>Sulfides</topic><topic>Terpenes</topic><topic>Volatiles</topic><topic>Zoologi</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Knight, Alan L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mujica, Valentina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herrera, Sebastian Larsson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tasin, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><jtitle>Journal of applied entomology (1986)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Knight, Alan L.</au><au>Mujica, Valentina</au><au>Herrera, Sebastian Larsson</au><au>Tasin, Marco</au><aucorp>Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Addition of terpenoids to pear ester plus acetic acid increases catches of codling moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae)</atitle><jtitle>Journal of applied entomology (1986)</jtitle><date>2019-09</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>143</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>813</spage><epage>821</epage><pages>813-821</pages><issn>0931-2048</issn><issn>1439-0418</issn><eissn>1439-0418</eissn><abstract>Field studies were conducted to evaluate new kairomone blends in combination with pear ester (E,Z)‐2,4‐ethyl decadienoate (PE) and acetic acid (AA) for their attraction of male and female codling moth, Cydia pomonella (L.), in apple, Malus domestica Borkhausen. The addition of decanal to either AA or PE alone significantly increased total and female moth catches. However, the addition of decanal did not improve the attraction of PE + AA. The addition of either the pyranoid (PyrLOX) or furanoid (FurLOX) linalool oxide but not linalool (LOL) increased moth catches with PE but did not increase catches with PE + AA. Similarly, the addition of PyrLOX plus decanal did not improve PE + AA. The addition of (E)‐4,8‐dimethyl‐1,3,7‐nonatriene (DMNT) to either AA, PE + AA or PE + AA+decanal did not significantly increase moth catches. However, the addition of PyrLOX to traps with PE + AA and DMNT (4‐component lure) significantly increased moth catches compared with PE + AA alone or any of the ternary blends of these volatiles. Females accounted for 60%–80% of the total catch with this 4‐component lure. The 4‐component blend with PyrLOX was a more attractive lure than similar blends that substituted LOL, or a binary blend of LOL and FurLOX for PyrLOX. The 4‐component blend caught nearly fourfold more total and female moths than the purported attractant N‐butyl sulphide when it was used in combination with PE + AA. These results indicate that significant improvements in monitoring, mating disruption and mass trapping of codling moth are possible. Further studies are needed to assess the new attractive blend's effectiveness in combination with sex pheromone lures and to evaluate whether other host plant volatiles can be added or substitute for DMNT or LOX when used in combination with PE + AA.</abstract><cop>Berlin</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/jen.12646</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4496-9000</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000344969000</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0931-2048
ispartof Journal of applied entomology (1986), 2019-09, Vol.143 (8), p.813-821
issn 0931-2048
1439-0418
1439-0418
language eng
recordid cdi_swepub_primary_oai_slubar_slu_se_101519
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects (E)‐4,8‐dimethyl‐1,3,7‐nonatriene
(E,Z)‐2,4‐ethyl decadienoate
Acetic acid
Agricultural Science
Attraction
Butterflies & moths
Cydia pomonella (L.)
Disruption
Females
Host plants
integrated pest management
Jordbruksvetenskap
Linalool
linalool oxide
Liquid oxygen
Mating disruption
Pheromone traps
Polymer blends
Sex pheromone
Substitutes
Sulfides
Terpenes
Volatiles
Zoologi
Zoology
title Addition of terpenoids to pear ester plus acetic acid increases catches of codling moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae)
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T21%3A13%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_swepu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Addition%20of%20terpenoids%20to%20pear%20ester%20plus%20acetic%20acid%20increases%20catches%20of%20codling%20moth%20(Lepidoptera:%20Tortricidae)&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20applied%20entomology%20(1986)&rft.au=Knight,%20Alan%20L.&rft.aucorp=Sveriges%20lantbruksuniversitet&rft.date=2019-09&rft.volume=143&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=813&rft.epage=821&rft.pages=813-821&rft.issn=0931-2048&rft.eissn=1439-0418&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jen.12646&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_swepu%3E2278887025%3C/proquest_swepu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3986-a2d795ecc1dee7f78b6239914a8d77a41d1c0634bc4780ec4d60d1a5b187dbca3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2278887025&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true