Loading…

Evaluating the accuracy of twoin situoptical sensors to estimate DOC concentrations for drinking water production

Twoin situoptical sensors, a single-excitation fluorescence-based sensor (fDOM) mounted on a multi-parameter EXO2 sonde (YSI), and a stand-alone, multispectral absorbance-based instrument (spectro::lyser, scan Messtechnik GmbH), were evaluated for their capability to (i) estimate river dissolved org...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Environmental science water research & technology 2020-10, Vol.6, p.2891
Main Authors: Hoffmeister, Svenja, Ledesma, Jose, Köhler, Stephan, Cascone, Claudia
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 2891
container_title Environmental science water research & technology
container_volume 6
creator Hoffmeister, Svenja
Ledesma, Jose
Köhler, Stephan
Cascone, Claudia
description Twoin situoptical sensors, a single-excitation fluorescence-based sensor (fDOM) mounted on a multi-parameter EXO2 sonde (YSI), and a stand-alone, multispectral absorbance-based instrument (spectro::lyser, scan Messtechnik GmbH), were evaluated for their capability to (i) estimate river dissolved organic carbon (DOC) concentrations and (ii) provide oversight of drinking water production. The sensors were deployed between March and November 2017 in the river Fyris, which drains a mixed forested and agricultural 2003 km(2)catchment and serves as a drinking water source by managed aquifer recharge. Grab samples were collected every 2 to 3 weeks and compared with logged sensor data collected at 15 minute intervals. The fDOM probe signal was used to estimate DOC concentrations in the range of 10.4 to 24.4 mg L(-1)using linear regression (R-2= 0.71, RMSE = 2.5 mg L-1), after correction for temperature, turbidity and inner-filter effects. Temporal changes in DOC character associated with the mixed land use landscape, as indicated by optical indices, reduced this sensor accuracy for estimating DOC concentration. Nevertheless, humic substance concentrations, the fraction of DOC that is preferentially removed during artificial infiltration, were well captured. The spectrolyser signal was used to establish a 2-component partial least square model that captured DOC fluctuations from 10.2 to 29.4 mg L-1(R-2= 0.92; RMSE = 1.3 mg L-1). This multiple-wavelength model (220 to 720 nm) effectively handled the changes in DOC composition while accurately estimating DOC concentrations. This study explores the advantages and limitations of optical sensors for their use in managed aquifer recharge and drinking water production in relation to DOC levels.
doi_str_mv 10.1039/d0ew00150c
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>swepub</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_slubar_slu_se_108165</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>oai_slubar_slu_se_108165</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-s124t-cc13b036fabaa3d3dfda7fe2a6bdb045901cde92bb006f1af0ec4fe404e64c663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjstOwzAURL0Aiap0wxf4B1KuY8eQJQrlIVXqBtbR9QsMwQ62Q9S_JxWsRqMzOhpCrhhsGfD22oCdAVgD-oysamh4xQRrL8gm5w9YgORL5SvyvfvBYcLiwxst75ai1lNCfaTR0TJHH2j2ZYpj8RoHmm3IMWVaIrW5-C8slt4fOqpj0DaUtHhiyNTFRE3y4fNknZdRomOKZtInfEnOHQ7Zbv5zTV4fdi_dU7U_PD53d_sqs1qUSmvGFXDpUCFyw40zeONsjVIZBaJpgWlj21opAOkYOrBaOCtAWCm0lHxNtn_ePNtxUv2Ylr_p2Ef0fR4mhekUfbY9g1smG_4L6P9jdQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluating the accuracy of twoin situoptical sensors to estimate DOC concentrations for drinking water production</title><source>Royal Society of Chemistry Journals</source><creator>Hoffmeister, Svenja ; Ledesma, Jose ; Köhler, Stephan ; Cascone, Claudia</creator><creatorcontrib>Hoffmeister, Svenja ; Ledesma, Jose ; Köhler, Stephan ; Cascone, Claudia ; Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</creatorcontrib><description>Twoin situoptical sensors, a single-excitation fluorescence-based sensor (fDOM) mounted on a multi-parameter EXO2 sonde (YSI), and a stand-alone, multispectral absorbance-based instrument (spectro::lyser, scan Messtechnik GmbH), were evaluated for their capability to (i) estimate river dissolved organic carbon (DOC) concentrations and (ii) provide oversight of drinking water production. The sensors were deployed between March and November 2017 in the river Fyris, which drains a mixed forested and agricultural 2003 km(2)catchment and serves as a drinking water source by managed aquifer recharge. Grab samples were collected every 2 to 3 weeks and compared with logged sensor data collected at 15 minute intervals. The fDOM probe signal was used to estimate DOC concentrations in the range of 10.4 to 24.4 mg L(-1)using linear regression (R-2= 0.71, RMSE = 2.5 mg L-1), after correction for temperature, turbidity and inner-filter effects. Temporal changes in DOC character associated with the mixed land use landscape, as indicated by optical indices, reduced this sensor accuracy for estimating DOC concentration. Nevertheless, humic substance concentrations, the fraction of DOC that is preferentially removed during artificial infiltration, were well captured. The spectrolyser signal was used to establish a 2-component partial least square model that captured DOC fluctuations from 10.2 to 29.4 mg L-1(R-2= 0.92; RMSE = 1.3 mg L-1). This multiple-wavelength model (220 to 720 nm) effectively handled the changes in DOC composition while accurately estimating DOC concentrations. This study explores the advantages and limitations of optical sensors for their use in managed aquifer recharge and drinking water production in relation to DOC levels.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2053-1419</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2053-1400</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1039/d0ew00150c</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Vattenteknik ; Water Engineering</subject><ispartof>Environmental science water research &amp; technology, 2020-10, Vol.6, p.2891</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,777,781,882,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://res.slu.se/id/publ/108165$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hoffmeister, Svenja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ledesma, Jose</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Köhler, Stephan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cascone, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluating the accuracy of twoin situoptical sensors to estimate DOC concentrations for drinking water production</title><title>Environmental science water research &amp; technology</title><description>Twoin situoptical sensors, a single-excitation fluorescence-based sensor (fDOM) mounted on a multi-parameter EXO2 sonde (YSI), and a stand-alone, multispectral absorbance-based instrument (spectro::lyser, scan Messtechnik GmbH), were evaluated for their capability to (i) estimate river dissolved organic carbon (DOC) concentrations and (ii) provide oversight of drinking water production. The sensors were deployed between March and November 2017 in the river Fyris, which drains a mixed forested and agricultural 2003 km(2)catchment and serves as a drinking water source by managed aquifer recharge. Grab samples were collected every 2 to 3 weeks and compared with logged sensor data collected at 15 minute intervals. The fDOM probe signal was used to estimate DOC concentrations in the range of 10.4 to 24.4 mg L(-1)using linear regression (R-2= 0.71, RMSE = 2.5 mg L-1), after correction for temperature, turbidity and inner-filter effects. Temporal changes in DOC character associated with the mixed land use landscape, as indicated by optical indices, reduced this sensor accuracy for estimating DOC concentration. Nevertheless, humic substance concentrations, the fraction of DOC that is preferentially removed during artificial infiltration, were well captured. The spectrolyser signal was used to establish a 2-component partial least square model that captured DOC fluctuations from 10.2 to 29.4 mg L-1(R-2= 0.92; RMSE = 1.3 mg L-1). This multiple-wavelength model (220 to 720 nm) effectively handled the changes in DOC composition while accurately estimating DOC concentrations. This study explores the advantages and limitations of optical sensors for their use in managed aquifer recharge and drinking water production in relation to DOC levels.</description><subject>Vattenteknik</subject><subject>Water Engineering</subject><issn>2053-1419</issn><issn>2053-1400</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotjstOwzAURL0Aiap0wxf4B1KuY8eQJQrlIVXqBtbR9QsMwQ62Q9S_JxWsRqMzOhpCrhhsGfD22oCdAVgD-oysamh4xQRrL8gm5w9YgORL5SvyvfvBYcLiwxst75ai1lNCfaTR0TJHH2j2ZYpj8RoHmm3IMWVaIrW5-C8slt4fOqpj0DaUtHhiyNTFRE3y4fNknZdRomOKZtInfEnOHQ7Zbv5zTV4fdi_dU7U_PD53d_sqs1qUSmvGFXDpUCFyw40zeONsjVIZBaJpgWlj21opAOkYOrBaOCtAWCm0lHxNtn_ePNtxUv2Ylr_p2Ef0fR4mhekUfbY9g1smG_4L6P9jdQ</recordid><startdate>20201001</startdate><enddate>20201001</enddate><creator>Hoffmeister, Svenja</creator><creator>Ledesma, Jose</creator><creator>Köhler, Stephan</creator><creator>Cascone, Claudia</creator><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>D8T</scope><scope>ZZAVC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201001</creationdate><title>Evaluating the accuracy of twoin situoptical sensors to estimate DOC concentrations for drinking water production</title><author>Hoffmeister, Svenja ; Ledesma, Jose ; Köhler, Stephan ; Cascone, Claudia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-s124t-cc13b036fabaa3d3dfda7fe2a6bdb045901cde92bb006f1af0ec4fe404e64c663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Vattenteknik</topic><topic>Water Engineering</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hoffmeister, Svenja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ledesma, Jose</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Köhler, Stephan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cascone, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</creatorcontrib><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Freely available online</collection><collection>SwePub Articles full text</collection><jtitle>Environmental science water research &amp; technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hoffmeister, Svenja</au><au>Ledesma, Jose</au><au>Köhler, Stephan</au><au>Cascone, Claudia</au><aucorp>Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluating the accuracy of twoin situoptical sensors to estimate DOC concentrations for drinking water production</atitle><jtitle>Environmental science water research &amp; technology</jtitle><date>2020-10-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>6</volume><spage>2891</spage><pages>2891-</pages><issn>2053-1419</issn><issn>2053-1400</issn><abstract>Twoin situoptical sensors, a single-excitation fluorescence-based sensor (fDOM) mounted on a multi-parameter EXO2 sonde (YSI), and a stand-alone, multispectral absorbance-based instrument (spectro::lyser, scan Messtechnik GmbH), were evaluated for their capability to (i) estimate river dissolved organic carbon (DOC) concentrations and (ii) provide oversight of drinking water production. The sensors were deployed between March and November 2017 in the river Fyris, which drains a mixed forested and agricultural 2003 km(2)catchment and serves as a drinking water source by managed aquifer recharge. Grab samples were collected every 2 to 3 weeks and compared with logged sensor data collected at 15 minute intervals. The fDOM probe signal was used to estimate DOC concentrations in the range of 10.4 to 24.4 mg L(-1)using linear regression (R-2= 0.71, RMSE = 2.5 mg L-1), after correction for temperature, turbidity and inner-filter effects. Temporal changes in DOC character associated with the mixed land use landscape, as indicated by optical indices, reduced this sensor accuracy for estimating DOC concentration. Nevertheless, humic substance concentrations, the fraction of DOC that is preferentially removed during artificial infiltration, were well captured. The spectrolyser signal was used to establish a 2-component partial least square model that captured DOC fluctuations from 10.2 to 29.4 mg L-1(R-2= 0.92; RMSE = 1.3 mg L-1). This multiple-wavelength model (220 to 720 nm) effectively handled the changes in DOC composition while accurately estimating DOC concentrations. This study explores the advantages and limitations of optical sensors for their use in managed aquifer recharge and drinking water production in relation to DOC levels.</abstract><doi>10.1039/d0ew00150c</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2053-1419
ispartof Environmental science water research & technology, 2020-10, Vol.6, p.2891
issn 2053-1419
2053-1400
language eng
recordid cdi_swepub_primary_oai_slubar_slu_se_108165
source Royal Society of Chemistry Journals
subjects Vattenteknik
Water Engineering
title Evaluating the accuracy of twoin situoptical sensors to estimate DOC concentrations for drinking water production
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T22%3A12%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-swepub&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluating%20the%20accuracy%20of%20twoin%20situoptical%20sensors%20to%20estimate%20DOC%20concentrations%20for%20drinking%20water%20production&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20science%20water%20research%20&%20technology&rft.au=Hoffmeister,%20Svenja&rft.aucorp=Sveriges%20lantbruksuniversitet&rft.date=2020-10-01&rft.volume=6&rft.spage=2891&rft.pages=2891-&rft.issn=2053-1419&rft_id=info:doi/10.1039/d0ew00150c&rft_dat=%3Cswepub%3Eoai_slubar_slu_se_108165%3C/swepub%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-s124t-cc13b036fabaa3d3dfda7fe2a6bdb045901cde92bb006f1af0ec4fe404e64c663%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true