Loading…
DNA marker-assisted evaluation of fruit firmness at harvest and post-harvest fruit softening in a diverse apple germplasm
Several different genes have been proposed as responsible for fruit texture variability at harvest and/or after storage. We have analysed 127 apple cultivars for allelic composition in two key genes that are directly involved in the ethylene biosynthesis pathway, Md-ACS1 and Md-ACO1, and two other g...
Saved in:
Published in: | Tree genetics & genomes 2013-02, Vol.9 (1), p.279-290 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Several different genes have been proposed as responsible for fruit texture variability at harvest and/or after storage. We have analysed 127 apple cultivars for allelic composition in two key genes that are directly involved in the ethylene biosynthesis pathway, Md-ACS1 and Md-ACO1, and two other genes that are involved in cell wall degradation, Md-Exp7 and Md-PG1. Firmness was measured with a penetrometer at harvest and after 6 or 12 weeks (early- and late-maturing cultivars, respectively) of cold storage. Maturation time was positively correlated with firmness at harvest and negatively correlated with fruit softening rate (difference between firmness at harvest and after storage, divided by number of weeks in storage). Polyploid cultivars showed significantly higher firmness at harvest compared to diploids. Alleles previously described as responsible for good texture were associated with significantly lower softening for Md-ACS1 and Md-PG1, but the opposite was noted for Md-EXP7. Results were nonsignificant for Md-ACO1. Allele frequencies were very uneven in all four loci, with the three most common multi-locus configurations accounting for 64 % of the entire material. The predictive power of these genes was calculated with a partial least squares discriminant analysis, and these accounted for 15 % of the observed variation in initial firmness and 18 % for softening rate. Inclusion of maturation time, storage time (i.e. 6 or 12 weeks) and initial firmness into the model however increased the predictability of softening rate to 38 %. Dividing the material in modern (released after 1960) and old cultivars did not change the outcome of our analyses. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1614-2942 1614-2950 1614-2950 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s11295-012-0554-z |