Loading…
EU animal welfare policy: Developing a comprehensive policy framework
► Animal welfare policy becomes a supranational policy issue (EU-level). ► A “one size fits all” solution is unlikely to be effective in the EU. ► Although policy options are diverse, they are all inter-linked. ► A market-based policy approach should be central. Many EU citizens are concerned about...
Saved in:
Published in: | Food policy 2012-12, Vol.37 (6), p.690-699 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c727t-23fe690c3ecb541d8f8ae44e4ac6961d26e716ec4cf7c40b00f1748b8b577b6f3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c727t-23fe690c3ecb541d8f8ae44e4ac6961d26e716ec4cf7c40b00f1748b8b577b6f3 |
container_end_page | 699 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 690 |
container_title | Food policy |
container_volume | 37 |
creator | Ingenbleek, Paul T.M. Immink, Victor M. Spoolder, Hans A.M. Bokma, Martien H. Keeling, Linda J. |
description | ► Animal welfare policy becomes a supranational policy issue (EU-level). ► A “one size fits all” solution is unlikely to be effective in the EU. ► Although policy options are diverse, they are all inter-linked. ► A market-based policy approach should be central.
Many EU citizens are concerned about animal welfare. The policy literature has responded to these concerns by suggesting a variety of policy instruments to policy makers. However, a gap in knowledge exists regarding which instrument should be applied under which conditions in the policy environment. This article presents the results of multiple inductive case studies of eight European countries to better understand the contingencies to animal welfare policy instruments and to further complement the framework of policy instruments available to policy makers. The qualitative evidence from this study is presented in the form of a policy decision tree indicating instruments likely to be effective under given conditions. The findings suggest that a “one size fits all” solution for animal welfare in the EU is unlikely to be effective and that although a market-based policy within the current EU context is in many cases inevitable, the barriers are numerous and require policy instruments tailored to the specific context. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.foodpol.2012.07.001 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_swepu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_slubar_slu_se_74256</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0306919212000759</els_id><sourcerecordid>1448771674</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c727t-23fe690c3ecb541d8f8ae44e4ac6961d26e716ec4cf7c40b00f1748b8b577b6f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkkuv0zAQRiMEEqXwExCR2LBJGb8dNghdykO6Egvo2nKc8cUljYPdh-6_x1UuLNi0q9mcGY-_OVX1ksCKAJFvtysfYz_FYUWB0BWoFQB5VC2IVqwRUqjH1QIYyKYlLX1aPct5CwAUOCyq9XpT2zHs7FCfcPA2YV0GBXf_rv6IRxziFMa72tYu7qaEP3HM4fgXqX2yOzzF9Ot59cTbIeOLh7qsNp_WP26-NLffPn-9-XDbOEXVvqHMo2zBMXSd4KTXXlvkHLl1spWkpxIVkei488px6AA8UVx3uhNKddKzZdXMc_MJp0NnplQ2T_cm2mDycOhsOheT0ShOhSz8m5mfUvx9wLw3u5AdDoMdMR6yIYqVxIhk_DIqFRFMMKWuQDmlSjNGLqOCA2WKcXoFCoLxlgh9GeVcq5KkuuJbnLZaSwlXhEVBKEp1WWNZvf4P3cZDGsvpDSGUc8KoOOckZsqlmHNC_-9eBMzZXLM1D-aas7kGlCnmlr5Xc5-30di7FLLZfC-AKNZKQSUrxPuZwCLbMWA5uws4OuxDQrc3fQwX3vgDx9H-4A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1124413257</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>EU animal welfare policy: Developing a comprehensive policy framework</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>Ingenbleek, Paul T.M. ; Immink, Victor M. ; Spoolder, Hans A.M. ; Bokma, Martien H. ; Keeling, Linda J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ingenbleek, Paul T.M. ; Immink, Victor M. ; Spoolder, Hans A.M. ; Bokma, Martien H. ; Keeling, Linda J. ; Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</creatorcontrib><description>► Animal welfare policy becomes a supranational policy issue (EU-level). ► A “one size fits all” solution is unlikely to be effective in the EU. ► Although policy options are diverse, they are all inter-linked. ► A market-based policy approach should be central.
Many EU citizens are concerned about animal welfare. The policy literature has responded to these concerns by suggesting a variety of policy instruments to policy makers. However, a gap in knowledge exists regarding which instrument should be applied under which conditions in the policy environment. This article presents the results of multiple inductive case studies of eight European countries to better understand the contingencies to animal welfare policy instruments and to further complement the framework of policy instruments available to policy makers. The qualitative evidence from this study is presented in the form of a policy decision tree indicating instruments likely to be effective under given conditions. The findings suggest that a “one size fits all” solution for animal welfare in the EU is unlikely to be effective and that although a market-based policy within the current EU context is in many cases inevitable, the barriers are numerous and require policy instruments tailored to the specific context.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0306-9192</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1873-5657</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5657</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2012.07.001</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Agricultural Science ; Animal and Dairy Science ; Animal care ; Animal rights ; Animal welfare ; Animals ; Barriers ; Byggproduktion ; case studies ; Citizens ; Complement ; Construction Management ; Contingency ; decision support systems ; Decision trees ; Environmental policy ; EU policy ; Europe ; European Union ; Evidence ; Foods ; Free enterprise ; Husdjursvetenskap ; Indicating instruments ; issues and policy ; Jordbruksvetenskap ; Policies ; Policy making ; Public policy ; Qualitative analysis ; Qualitative research ; Trees ; Welfare economics</subject><ispartof>Food policy, 2012-12, Vol.37 (6), p.690-699</ispartof><rights>2012 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Dec 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c727t-23fe690c3ecb541d8f8ae44e4ac6961d26e716ec4cf7c40b00f1748b8b577b6f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c727t-23fe690c3ecb541d8f8ae44e4ac6961d26e716ec4cf7c40b00f1748b8b577b6f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27865,27866,27924,27925,33223,33224</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://res.slu.se/id/publ/74256$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ingenbleek, Paul T.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Immink, Victor M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spoolder, Hans A.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bokma, Martien H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keeling, Linda J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</creatorcontrib><title>EU animal welfare policy: Developing a comprehensive policy framework</title><title>Food policy</title><description>► Animal welfare policy becomes a supranational policy issue (EU-level). ► A “one size fits all” solution is unlikely to be effective in the EU. ► Although policy options are diverse, they are all inter-linked. ► A market-based policy approach should be central.
Many EU citizens are concerned about animal welfare. The policy literature has responded to these concerns by suggesting a variety of policy instruments to policy makers. However, a gap in knowledge exists regarding which instrument should be applied under which conditions in the policy environment. This article presents the results of multiple inductive case studies of eight European countries to better understand the contingencies to animal welfare policy instruments and to further complement the framework of policy instruments available to policy makers. The qualitative evidence from this study is presented in the form of a policy decision tree indicating instruments likely to be effective under given conditions. The findings suggest that a “one size fits all” solution for animal welfare in the EU is unlikely to be effective and that although a market-based policy within the current EU context is in many cases inevitable, the barriers are numerous and require policy instruments tailored to the specific context.</description><subject>Agricultural Science</subject><subject>Animal and Dairy Science</subject><subject>Animal care</subject><subject>Animal rights</subject><subject>Animal welfare</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Barriers</subject><subject>Byggproduktion</subject><subject>case studies</subject><subject>Citizens</subject><subject>Complement</subject><subject>Construction Management</subject><subject>Contingency</subject><subject>decision support systems</subject><subject>Decision trees</subject><subject>Environmental policy</subject><subject>EU policy</subject><subject>Europe</subject><subject>European Union</subject><subject>Evidence</subject><subject>Foods</subject><subject>Free enterprise</subject><subject>Husdjursvetenskap</subject><subject>Indicating instruments</subject><subject>issues and policy</subject><subject>Jordbruksvetenskap</subject><subject>Policies</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>Public policy</subject><subject>Qualitative analysis</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><subject>Trees</subject><subject>Welfare economics</subject><issn>0306-9192</issn><issn>1873-5657</issn><issn>1873-5657</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkkuv0zAQRiMEEqXwExCR2LBJGb8dNghdykO6Egvo2nKc8cUljYPdh-6_x1UuLNi0q9mcGY-_OVX1ksCKAJFvtysfYz_FYUWB0BWoFQB5VC2IVqwRUqjH1QIYyKYlLX1aPct5CwAUOCyq9XpT2zHs7FCfcPA2YV0GBXf_rv6IRxziFMa72tYu7qaEP3HM4fgXqX2yOzzF9Ot59cTbIeOLh7qsNp_WP26-NLffPn-9-XDbOEXVvqHMo2zBMXSd4KTXXlvkHLl1spWkpxIVkei488px6AA8UVx3uhNKddKzZdXMc_MJp0NnplQ2T_cm2mDycOhsOheT0ShOhSz8m5mfUvx9wLw3u5AdDoMdMR6yIYqVxIhk_DIqFRFMMKWuQDmlSjNGLqOCA2WKcXoFCoLxlgh9GeVcq5KkuuJbnLZaSwlXhEVBKEp1WWNZvf4P3cZDGsvpDSGUc8KoOOckZsqlmHNC_-9eBMzZXLM1D-aas7kGlCnmlr5Xc5-30di7FLLZfC-AKNZKQSUrxPuZwCLbMWA5uws4OuxDQrc3fQwX3vgDx9H-4A</recordid><startdate>20121201</startdate><enddate>20121201</enddate><creator>Ingenbleek, Paul T.M.</creator><creator>Immink, Victor M.</creator><creator>Spoolder, Hans A.M.</creator><creator>Bokma, Martien H.</creator><creator>Keeling, Linda J.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H98</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121201</creationdate><title>EU animal welfare policy: Developing a comprehensive policy framework</title><author>Ingenbleek, Paul T.M. ; Immink, Victor M. ; Spoolder, Hans A.M. ; Bokma, Martien H. ; Keeling, Linda J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c727t-23fe690c3ecb541d8f8ae44e4ac6961d26e716ec4cf7c40b00f1748b8b577b6f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Agricultural Science</topic><topic>Animal and Dairy Science</topic><topic>Animal care</topic><topic>Animal rights</topic><topic>Animal welfare</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Barriers</topic><topic>Byggproduktion</topic><topic>case studies</topic><topic>Citizens</topic><topic>Complement</topic><topic>Construction Management</topic><topic>Contingency</topic><topic>decision support systems</topic><topic>Decision trees</topic><topic>Environmental policy</topic><topic>EU policy</topic><topic>Europe</topic><topic>European Union</topic><topic>Evidence</topic><topic>Foods</topic><topic>Free enterprise</topic><topic>Husdjursvetenskap</topic><topic>Indicating instruments</topic><topic>issues and policy</topic><topic>Jordbruksvetenskap</topic><topic>Policies</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>Public policy</topic><topic>Qualitative analysis</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><topic>Trees</topic><topic>Welfare economics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ingenbleek, Paul T.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Immink, Victor M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spoolder, Hans A.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bokma, Martien H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keeling, Linda J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Aquaculture Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><jtitle>Food policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ingenbleek, Paul T.M.</au><au>Immink, Victor M.</au><au>Spoolder, Hans A.M.</au><au>Bokma, Martien H.</au><au>Keeling, Linda J.</au><aucorp>Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>EU animal welfare policy: Developing a comprehensive policy framework</atitle><jtitle>Food policy</jtitle><date>2012-12-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>690</spage><epage>699</epage><pages>690-699</pages><issn>0306-9192</issn><issn>1873-5657</issn><eissn>1873-5657</eissn><abstract>► Animal welfare policy becomes a supranational policy issue (EU-level). ► A “one size fits all” solution is unlikely to be effective in the EU. ► Although policy options are diverse, they are all inter-linked. ► A market-based policy approach should be central.
Many EU citizens are concerned about animal welfare. The policy literature has responded to these concerns by suggesting a variety of policy instruments to policy makers. However, a gap in knowledge exists regarding which instrument should be applied under which conditions in the policy environment. This article presents the results of multiple inductive case studies of eight European countries to better understand the contingencies to animal welfare policy instruments and to further complement the framework of policy instruments available to policy makers. The qualitative evidence from this study is presented in the form of a policy decision tree indicating instruments likely to be effective under given conditions. The findings suggest that a “one size fits all” solution for animal welfare in the EU is unlikely to be effective and that although a market-based policy within the current EU context is in many cases inevitable, the barriers are numerous and require policy instruments tailored to the specific context.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.foodpol.2012.07.001</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0306-9192 |
ispartof | Food policy, 2012-12, Vol.37 (6), p.690-699 |
issn | 0306-9192 1873-5657 1873-5657 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_swepub_primary_oai_slubar_slu_se_74256 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); ScienceDirect Journals; PAIS Index |
subjects | Agricultural Science Animal and Dairy Science Animal care Animal rights Animal welfare Animals Barriers Byggproduktion case studies Citizens Complement Construction Management Contingency decision support systems Decision trees Environmental policy EU policy Europe European Union Evidence Foods Free enterprise Husdjursvetenskap Indicating instruments issues and policy Jordbruksvetenskap Policies Policy making Public policy Qualitative analysis Qualitative research Trees Welfare economics |
title | EU animal welfare policy: Developing a comprehensive policy framework |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T01%3A08%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_swepu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=EU%20animal%20welfare%20policy:%20Developing%20a%20comprehensive%20policy%20framework&rft.jtitle=Food%20policy&rft.au=Ingenbleek,%20Paul%20T.M.&rft.aucorp=Sveriges%20lantbruksuniversitet&rft.date=2012-12-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=690&rft.epage=699&rft.pages=690-699&rft.issn=0306-9192&rft.eissn=1873-5657&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.foodpol.2012.07.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_swepu%3E1448771674%3C/proquest_swepu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c727t-23fe690c3ecb541d8f8ae44e4ac6961d26e716ec4cf7c40b00f1748b8b577b6f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1124413257&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |