Loading…

Diversification of forest management regimes secures tree microhabitats and bird abundance under climate change

The loss of biodiversity in temperate forests due to combined effect of climate change and forest management poses a major threat to the functioning of these ecosystems in the future. Climate change is expected to modify ecological processes and amplify disturbances, compromising the provisioning of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Science of the total environment 2019-02, Vol.650 (Pt 2), p.2717-2730
Main Authors: Augustynczik, Andrey Lessa Derci, Asbeck, Thomas, Basile, Marco, Bauhus, Jürgen, Storch, Ilse, Mikusiński, Grzegorz, Yousefpour, Rasoul, Hanewinkel, Marc
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The loss of biodiversity in temperate forests due to combined effect of climate change and forest management poses a major threat to the functioning of these ecosystems in the future. Climate change is expected to modify ecological processes and amplify disturbances, compromising the provisioning of multiple ecosystem services. Here we investigate the impacts of climate change and forest management on the abundance of tree microhabitats and forest birds as biodiversity proxies, using an integrated modelling approach. To perform our analysis, we calibrated tree microhabitat and bird abundance in a forest landscape in Southwestern Germany, and coupled them with a climate sensitive forest growth model. Our results show generally positive impacts of climate warming and higher harvesting intensity on bird abundance, with up to 30% increase. Conversely, climate change and wood removals above 5% of the standing volume led to a loss of tree microhabitats. A diversified set of management regimes with different harvesting intensities applied in a landscape scale was required to balance this trade-off. For example, to maximize the expected bird abundance (up to 11%) and to avoid tree microhabitat abundance loss of >20% necessitates setting aside 10.2% of the forest area aside and application of harvesting intensities 
ISSN:0048-9697
1879-1026
1879-1026
DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.366