What Are the Long-term Outcomes of Mortality, Quality of Life, and Hip Function after Prosthetic Joint Infection of the Hip? A 10-year Follow-up from Sweden

• Published in: Clinical orthopaedics and related research 2021-10, Vol.479 (10), p.2203-2213
• Main Authors: Wildeman, Peter, Rolfson, Ola, Söderquist, Bo, Wretenberg, Per, Lindgren, Viktor
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Aged; Arthroplasty; Arthroplasty (hip); Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip; Comorbidity; deep; Disability Evaluation; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Gender; Hip; Hip Prosthesis; Humans; infection; Joint diseases; Joint surgery; Kirurgi; lateral approach; Long-term effects; Male; Medical records; Medicin och hälsovetenskap; Mortality; Orthopedics; oxford hip; Patient Reported Outcome Measures; patient-reported outcomes; Patients; posterior; prophylaxis; Prostheses; Prosthesis-Related Infections - mortality; Prosthesis-Related Infections - physiopathology; Quality of Life; Questionnaires; Registries; replacement; revision; Risk Factors; Selected Papers from the 9th International Congress of Arthroplasty Registries Guest Editor: Ola Rolfson Md, Phd; Surgery; surgical approach; Sweden
• ISSN: 0009-921X; 1528-1132; 1528-1132
• DOI: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001838

Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a complication after arthroplasty that negatively affects patient health. However, prior reports have not addressed the long-term consequences of hip PJI in terms of patient mortality, quality of life, and hip function. At a minimum of 10 years after PJI in patients undergoing primary THA, in the context of several large, national databases in Sweden, we asked: (1) Is mortality increased for patients with PJI after THA compared with patients with a noninfected THA? (2) Does PJI of the hip have a negative influence on quality of life as measured by the Euro-QoL-5D-5L (EQ-5D-5L), ambulatory aids, residential status, and hip function as measured by the Oxford Hip Score (OHS)? (3) Which factors are associated with poor patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for patients with PJI after primary THA? This study included 442 patients with a PJI after primary THA, from a previously published national study, including all patients with a THA performed from 2005 to 2008 in Sweden (n = 45,570) recruited from the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Registry (SHAR). Possible deep PJIs were identified in the Swedish Dispensed Drug Registry and verified by review of medical records. Mortality in patients with PJI was compared with the remaining cohort of 45,128 patients undergoing primary THA who did not have PJI. Mortality data were retrieved from the SHAR, which in turn is updated daily from the population registry. A subgroup analysis of patients who underwent primary THA in 2008 was performed to adjust for the effect of comorbidities on mortality, as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) scores became available in the SHAR at that time. For the PROM analysis, we identified three controls matched by age, gender, indication for surgery, and year of operation to each living PJI patient. A questionnaire including EQ-5D-5L, ambulatory aids, residential status, and OHS was collected from patients with PJI and controls at a mean of 11 years from the primary procedure. Apart from age and gender, we analyzed reoperation data (such as number of reoperations and surgical approach) and final prosthesis in situ to explore possible factors associated with poor PROM results. After controlling for differences in sex, age, and indication for surgery, we found the all-cause 10-year mortality higher for patients with PJI (45%) compared with patients undergoing THA without PJI (29%) (odds ratio 1.4 [95% CI 1.2 to 1.6]; p < 0.001). The questionnaire, with