Diagnostic disagreement between clinical standard histopathological‐ and retrospective assessment of histopathology‐based gastrointestinal graft‐versus‐host disease in children

Background No previous paediatric study has evaluated the frequency of diagnostic disagreement between clinical standard histopathological assessment (CSHA) and retrospective, independent, histopathological assessment (RIHA) of gastrointestinal Graft‐Versus‐Host Disease (GI‐GVHD) Methods In a retros...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Pediatric transplantation 2020-12, Vol.24 (8), p.e13824-n/a
Main Authors: Mårtensson, Thomas, Szakos, Attila, Mellgren, Karin, Toporski, Jacek, Arvidson, Johan, Mattsson, Jonas, Gustafsson, Britt, Casswall, Thomas H.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Children
Diagnosis
Endoscopy
gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease
Graft versus host disease
Graft-versus-host reaction
hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
Histopathology
Medical diagnosis
Medicin och hälsovetenskap
Stem cell transplantation
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background No previous paediatric study has evaluated the frequency of diagnostic disagreement between clinical standard histopathological assessment (CSHA) and retrospective, independent, histopathological assessment (RIHA) of gastrointestinal Graft‐Versus‐Host Disease (GI‐GVHD) Methods In a retrospective cohort study, based on gastrointestinal biopsies collected from allogeneic HSCT‐treated children (
ISSN:1397-3142
1399-3046
1399-3046
DOI:10.1111/petr.13824