Loading…
Effective Radiation Dose in the Wrist Resulting from a Radiographic Device, Two CBCT Devices and One MSCT Device: A Comparative Study
The objective of the present study was to assess and compare the effective doses in the wrist region resulting from conventional radiography device, multislice computed tomography (MSCT) device and two cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) devices using MOSFET dosemeters and a custom made anthropomor...
Saved in:
Published in: | Radiation protection dosimetry 2018-04, Vol.179 (1), p.58-68 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-6078b5628b083491a4a3a2a21496e130d0397899068c87d87001aeafecf514173 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-6078b5628b083491a4a3a2a21496e130d0397899068c87d87001aeafecf514173 |
container_end_page | 68 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 58 |
container_title | Radiation protection dosimetry |
container_volume | 179 |
creator | Koivisto, Juha van Eijnatten, Maureen Kiljunen, Timo Shi, Xie-Qi Wolff, Jan |
description | The objective of the present study was to assess and compare the effective doses in the wrist region resulting from conventional radiography device, multislice computed tomography (MSCT) device and two cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) devices using MOSFET dosemeters and a custom made anthropomorphic RANDO phantom according to the ICRP 103 recommendation. The effective dose for the conventional radiography was 1.0 μSv. The effective doses for the NewTom 5 G CBCT ranged between 0.7 μSv and 1.6 μSv, for the Planmed Verity CBCT 2.4 μSv and for the MSCT 8.6 μSv. When compared with the effective dose for AP- and LAT projections of a conventional radiographic device, this study showed an 8.6-fold effective dose for standard MSCT protocol and between 0.7 and 2.4-fold effective dose for standard CBCT protocols. When compared to the MSCT device, the CBCT devices offer a 3D view of the wrist at significantly lower effective doses. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/rpd/ncx210 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_swepu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_swepub_ki_se_493264</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1952524991</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-6078b5628b083491a4a3a2a21496e130d0397899068c87d87001aeafecf514173</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU9P3DAQxa2KCrbApR-g8hFVDYz_JLZ7o4GWSlRIsKhHy5tMwLCJg51A-QD93k3ZZXvqaUZPv_dGo0fIewaHDIw4in191FW_OIM3ZMaU5JmQUGyRGTApMy057JB3Kd0BcGVyuU12uAEJCtSM_D5tGqwG_4j00tXeDT509CQkpL6jwy3Sn9GngV5iGpeD725oE0NL3QscbqLrb31FT_DRV_iJzp8CLb-U87WQqOtqetEh_XG1ET_TY1qGtnfRvVy9Gsb6eY-8bdwy4f567pLrr6fz8iw7v_j2vTw-zyqh8iErQOlFXnC9AC2kYU464bjjTJoCmYAahFHaGCh0pVWtFQBz6KYHm5xJpsQuyVa56Qn7cWH76FsXn21w3q6l-2lDK43ghZx481--j6H-Z3o1MqFBScj55D1YeSfwYcQ02NanCpdL12EYk2Um5zmXxrAJ_bhCqxhSithsDjGwfyu2U8V2VfEEf1jnjosW6w362qn4A2bpogo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1952524991</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effective Radiation Dose in the Wrist Resulting from a Radiographic Device, Two CBCT Devices and One MSCT Device: A Comparative Study</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Koivisto, Juha ; van Eijnatten, Maureen ; Kiljunen, Timo ; Shi, Xie-Qi ; Wolff, Jan</creator><creatorcontrib>Koivisto, Juha ; van Eijnatten, Maureen ; Kiljunen, Timo ; Shi, Xie-Qi ; Wolff, Jan</creatorcontrib><description>The objective of the present study was to assess and compare the effective doses in the wrist region resulting from conventional radiography device, multislice computed tomography (MSCT) device and two cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) devices using MOSFET dosemeters and a custom made anthropomorphic RANDO phantom according to the ICRP 103 recommendation. The effective dose for the conventional radiography was 1.0 μSv. The effective doses for the NewTom 5 G CBCT ranged between 0.7 μSv and 1.6 μSv, for the Planmed Verity CBCT 2.4 μSv and for the MSCT 8.6 μSv. When compared with the effective dose for AP- and LAT projections of a conventional radiographic device, this study showed an 8.6-fold effective dose for standard MSCT protocol and between 0.7 and 2.4-fold effective dose for standard CBCT protocols. When compared to the MSCT device, the CBCT devices offer a 3D view of the wrist at significantly lower effective doses.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0144-8420</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1742-3406</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1742-3406</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncx210</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29040707</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Cone-Beam Computed Tomography - instrumentation ; Humans ; Medicin och hälsovetenskap ; Multidetector Computed Tomography - instrumentation ; Phantoms, Imaging ; Radiation Dosage ; Wrist - radiation effects</subject><ispartof>Radiation protection dosimetry, 2018-04, Vol.179 (1), p.58-68</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-6078b5628b083491a4a3a2a21496e130d0397899068c87d87001aeafecf514173</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-6078b5628b083491a4a3a2a21496e130d0397899068c87d87001aeafecf514173</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29040707$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://kipublications.ki.se/Default.aspx?queryparsed=id:138074052$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Koivisto, Juha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Eijnatten, Maureen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiljunen, Timo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, Xie-Qi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolff, Jan</creatorcontrib><title>Effective Radiation Dose in the Wrist Resulting from a Radiographic Device, Two CBCT Devices and One MSCT Device: A Comparative Study</title><title>Radiation protection dosimetry</title><addtitle>Radiat Prot Dosimetry</addtitle><description>The objective of the present study was to assess and compare the effective doses in the wrist region resulting from conventional radiography device, multislice computed tomography (MSCT) device and two cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) devices using MOSFET dosemeters and a custom made anthropomorphic RANDO phantom according to the ICRP 103 recommendation. The effective dose for the conventional radiography was 1.0 μSv. The effective doses for the NewTom 5 G CBCT ranged between 0.7 μSv and 1.6 μSv, for the Planmed Verity CBCT 2.4 μSv and for the MSCT 8.6 μSv. When compared with the effective dose for AP- and LAT projections of a conventional radiographic device, this study showed an 8.6-fold effective dose for standard MSCT protocol and between 0.7 and 2.4-fold effective dose for standard CBCT protocols. When compared to the MSCT device, the CBCT devices offer a 3D view of the wrist at significantly lower effective doses.</description><subject>Cone-Beam Computed Tomography - instrumentation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medicin och hälsovetenskap</subject><subject>Multidetector Computed Tomography - instrumentation</subject><subject>Phantoms, Imaging</subject><subject>Radiation Dosage</subject><subject>Wrist - radiation effects</subject><issn>0144-8420</issn><issn>1742-3406</issn><issn>1742-3406</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kU9P3DAQxa2KCrbApR-g8hFVDYz_JLZ7o4GWSlRIsKhHy5tMwLCJg51A-QD93k3ZZXvqaUZPv_dGo0fIewaHDIw4in191FW_OIM3ZMaU5JmQUGyRGTApMy057JB3Kd0BcGVyuU12uAEJCtSM_D5tGqwG_4j00tXeDT509CQkpL6jwy3Sn9GngV5iGpeD725oE0NL3QscbqLrb31FT_DRV_iJzp8CLb-U87WQqOtqetEh_XG1ET_TY1qGtnfRvVy9Gsb6eY-8bdwy4f567pLrr6fz8iw7v_j2vTw-zyqh8iErQOlFXnC9AC2kYU464bjjTJoCmYAahFHaGCh0pVWtFQBz6KYHm5xJpsQuyVa56Qn7cWH76FsXn21w3q6l-2lDK43ghZx481--j6H-Z3o1MqFBScj55D1YeSfwYcQ02NanCpdL12EYk2Um5zmXxrAJ_bhCqxhSithsDjGwfyu2U8V2VfEEf1jnjosW6w362qn4A2bpogo</recordid><startdate>20180401</startdate><enddate>20180401</enddate><creator>Koivisto, Juha</creator><creator>van Eijnatten, Maureen</creator><creator>Kiljunen, Timo</creator><creator>Shi, Xie-Qi</creator><creator>Wolff, Jan</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180401</creationdate><title>Effective Radiation Dose in the Wrist Resulting from a Radiographic Device, Two CBCT Devices and One MSCT Device: A Comparative Study</title><author>Koivisto, Juha ; van Eijnatten, Maureen ; Kiljunen, Timo ; Shi, Xie-Qi ; Wolff, Jan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-6078b5628b083491a4a3a2a21496e130d0397899068c87d87001aeafecf514173</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Cone-Beam Computed Tomography - instrumentation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medicin och hälsovetenskap</topic><topic>Multidetector Computed Tomography - instrumentation</topic><topic>Phantoms, Imaging</topic><topic>Radiation Dosage</topic><topic>Wrist - radiation effects</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Koivisto, Juha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Eijnatten, Maureen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiljunen, Timo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, Xie-Qi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolff, Jan</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><jtitle>Radiation protection dosimetry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Koivisto, Juha</au><au>van Eijnatten, Maureen</au><au>Kiljunen, Timo</au><au>Shi, Xie-Qi</au><au>Wolff, Jan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effective Radiation Dose in the Wrist Resulting from a Radiographic Device, Two CBCT Devices and One MSCT Device: A Comparative Study</atitle><jtitle>Radiation protection dosimetry</jtitle><addtitle>Radiat Prot Dosimetry</addtitle><date>2018-04-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>179</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>58</spage><epage>68</epage><pages>58-68</pages><issn>0144-8420</issn><issn>1742-3406</issn><eissn>1742-3406</eissn><abstract>The objective of the present study was to assess and compare the effective doses in the wrist region resulting from conventional radiography device, multislice computed tomography (MSCT) device and two cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) devices using MOSFET dosemeters and a custom made anthropomorphic RANDO phantom according to the ICRP 103 recommendation. The effective dose for the conventional radiography was 1.0 μSv. The effective doses for the NewTom 5 G CBCT ranged between 0.7 μSv and 1.6 μSv, for the Planmed Verity CBCT 2.4 μSv and for the MSCT 8.6 μSv. When compared with the effective dose for AP- and LAT projections of a conventional radiographic device, this study showed an 8.6-fold effective dose for standard MSCT protocol and between 0.7 and 2.4-fold effective dose for standard CBCT protocols. When compared to the MSCT device, the CBCT devices offer a 3D view of the wrist at significantly lower effective doses.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>29040707</pmid><doi>10.1093/rpd/ncx210</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0144-8420 |
ispartof | Radiation protection dosimetry, 2018-04, Vol.179 (1), p.58-68 |
issn | 0144-8420 1742-3406 1742-3406 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_swepub_primary_oai_swepub_ki_se_493264 |
source | Oxford Journals Online |
subjects | Cone-Beam Computed Tomography - instrumentation Humans Medicin och hälsovetenskap Multidetector Computed Tomography - instrumentation Phantoms, Imaging Radiation Dosage Wrist - radiation effects |
title | Effective Radiation Dose in the Wrist Resulting from a Radiographic Device, Two CBCT Devices and One MSCT Device: A Comparative Study |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T00%3A33%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_swepu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effective%20Radiation%20Dose%20in%20the%20Wrist%20Resulting%20from%20a%20Radiographic%20Device,%20Two%20CBCT%20Devices%20and%20One%20MSCT%20Device:%20A%20Comparative%20Study&rft.jtitle=Radiation%20protection%20dosimetry&rft.au=Koivisto,%20Juha&rft.date=2018-04-01&rft.volume=179&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=58&rft.epage=68&rft.pages=58-68&rft.issn=0144-8420&rft.eissn=1742-3406&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/rpd/ncx210&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_swepu%3E1952524991%3C/proquest_swepu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-6078b5628b083491a4a3a2a21496e130d0397899068c87d87001aeafecf514173%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1952524991&rft_id=info:pmid/29040707&rfr_iscdi=true |