Loading…

Effective Radiation Dose in the Wrist Resulting from a Radiographic Device, Two CBCT Devices and One MSCT Device: A Comparative Study

The objective of the present study was to assess and compare the effective doses in the wrist region resulting from conventional radiography device, multislice computed tomography (MSCT) device and two cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) devices using MOSFET dosemeters and a custom made anthropomor...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Radiation protection dosimetry 2018-04, Vol.179 (1), p.58-68
Main Authors: Koivisto, Juha, van Eijnatten, Maureen, Kiljunen, Timo, Shi, Xie-Qi, Wolff, Jan
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-6078b5628b083491a4a3a2a21496e130d0397899068c87d87001aeafecf514173
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-6078b5628b083491a4a3a2a21496e130d0397899068c87d87001aeafecf514173
container_end_page 68
container_issue 1
container_start_page 58
container_title Radiation protection dosimetry
container_volume 179
creator Koivisto, Juha
van Eijnatten, Maureen
Kiljunen, Timo
Shi, Xie-Qi
Wolff, Jan
description The objective of the present study was to assess and compare the effective doses in the wrist region resulting from conventional radiography device, multislice computed tomography (MSCT) device and two cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) devices using MOSFET dosemeters and a custom made anthropomorphic RANDO phantom according to the ICRP 103 recommendation. The effective dose for the conventional radiography was 1.0 μSv. The effective doses for the NewTom 5 G CBCT ranged between 0.7 μSv and 1.6 μSv, for the Planmed Verity CBCT 2.4 μSv and for the MSCT 8.6 μSv. When compared with the effective dose for AP- and LAT projections of a conventional radiographic device, this study showed an 8.6-fold effective dose for standard MSCT protocol and between 0.7 and 2.4-fold effective dose for standard CBCT protocols. When compared to the MSCT device, the CBCT devices offer a 3D view of the wrist at significantly lower effective doses.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/rpd/ncx210
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_swepu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_swepub_ki_se_493264</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1952524991</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-6078b5628b083491a4a3a2a21496e130d0397899068c87d87001aeafecf514173</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU9P3DAQxa2KCrbApR-g8hFVDYz_JLZ7o4GWSlRIsKhHy5tMwLCJg51A-QD93k3ZZXvqaUZPv_dGo0fIewaHDIw4in191FW_OIM3ZMaU5JmQUGyRGTApMy057JB3Kd0BcGVyuU12uAEJCtSM_D5tGqwG_4j00tXeDT509CQkpL6jwy3Sn9GngV5iGpeD725oE0NL3QscbqLrb31FT_DRV_iJzp8CLb-U87WQqOtqetEh_XG1ET_TY1qGtnfRvVy9Gsb6eY-8bdwy4f567pLrr6fz8iw7v_j2vTw-zyqh8iErQOlFXnC9AC2kYU464bjjTJoCmYAahFHaGCh0pVWtFQBz6KYHm5xJpsQuyVa56Qn7cWH76FsXn21w3q6l-2lDK43ghZx481--j6H-Z3o1MqFBScj55D1YeSfwYcQ02NanCpdL12EYk2Um5zmXxrAJ_bhCqxhSithsDjGwfyu2U8V2VfEEf1jnjosW6w362qn4A2bpogo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1952524991</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effective Radiation Dose in the Wrist Resulting from a Radiographic Device, Two CBCT Devices and One MSCT Device: A Comparative Study</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Koivisto, Juha ; van Eijnatten, Maureen ; Kiljunen, Timo ; Shi, Xie-Qi ; Wolff, Jan</creator><creatorcontrib>Koivisto, Juha ; van Eijnatten, Maureen ; Kiljunen, Timo ; Shi, Xie-Qi ; Wolff, Jan</creatorcontrib><description>The objective of the present study was to assess and compare the effective doses in the wrist region resulting from conventional radiography device, multislice computed tomography (MSCT) device and two cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) devices using MOSFET dosemeters and a custom made anthropomorphic RANDO phantom according to the ICRP 103 recommendation. The effective dose for the conventional radiography was 1.0 μSv. The effective doses for the NewTom 5 G CBCT ranged between 0.7 μSv and 1.6 μSv, for the Planmed Verity CBCT 2.4 μSv and for the MSCT 8.6 μSv. When compared with the effective dose for AP- and LAT projections of a conventional radiographic device, this study showed an 8.6-fold effective dose for standard MSCT protocol and between 0.7 and 2.4-fold effective dose for standard CBCT protocols. When compared to the MSCT device, the CBCT devices offer a 3D view of the wrist at significantly lower effective doses.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0144-8420</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1742-3406</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1742-3406</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncx210</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29040707</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Cone-Beam Computed Tomography - instrumentation ; Humans ; Medicin och hälsovetenskap ; Multidetector Computed Tomography - instrumentation ; Phantoms, Imaging ; Radiation Dosage ; Wrist - radiation effects</subject><ispartof>Radiation protection dosimetry, 2018-04, Vol.179 (1), p.58-68</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-6078b5628b083491a4a3a2a21496e130d0397899068c87d87001aeafecf514173</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-6078b5628b083491a4a3a2a21496e130d0397899068c87d87001aeafecf514173</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29040707$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://kipublications.ki.se/Default.aspx?queryparsed=id:138074052$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Koivisto, Juha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Eijnatten, Maureen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiljunen, Timo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, Xie-Qi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolff, Jan</creatorcontrib><title>Effective Radiation Dose in the Wrist Resulting from a Radiographic Device, Two CBCT Devices and One MSCT Device: A Comparative Study</title><title>Radiation protection dosimetry</title><addtitle>Radiat Prot Dosimetry</addtitle><description>The objective of the present study was to assess and compare the effective doses in the wrist region resulting from conventional radiography device, multislice computed tomography (MSCT) device and two cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) devices using MOSFET dosemeters and a custom made anthropomorphic RANDO phantom according to the ICRP 103 recommendation. The effective dose for the conventional radiography was 1.0 μSv. The effective doses for the NewTom 5 G CBCT ranged between 0.7 μSv and 1.6 μSv, for the Planmed Verity CBCT 2.4 μSv and for the MSCT 8.6 μSv. When compared with the effective dose for AP- and LAT projections of a conventional radiographic device, this study showed an 8.6-fold effective dose for standard MSCT protocol and between 0.7 and 2.4-fold effective dose for standard CBCT protocols. When compared to the MSCT device, the CBCT devices offer a 3D view of the wrist at significantly lower effective doses.</description><subject>Cone-Beam Computed Tomography - instrumentation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medicin och hälsovetenskap</subject><subject>Multidetector Computed Tomography - instrumentation</subject><subject>Phantoms, Imaging</subject><subject>Radiation Dosage</subject><subject>Wrist - radiation effects</subject><issn>0144-8420</issn><issn>1742-3406</issn><issn>1742-3406</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kU9P3DAQxa2KCrbApR-g8hFVDYz_JLZ7o4GWSlRIsKhHy5tMwLCJg51A-QD93k3ZZXvqaUZPv_dGo0fIewaHDIw4in191FW_OIM3ZMaU5JmQUGyRGTApMy057JB3Kd0BcGVyuU12uAEJCtSM_D5tGqwG_4j00tXeDT509CQkpL6jwy3Sn9GngV5iGpeD725oE0NL3QscbqLrb31FT_DRV_iJzp8CLb-U87WQqOtqetEh_XG1ET_TY1qGtnfRvVy9Gsb6eY-8bdwy4f567pLrr6fz8iw7v_j2vTw-zyqh8iErQOlFXnC9AC2kYU464bjjTJoCmYAahFHaGCh0pVWtFQBz6KYHm5xJpsQuyVa56Qn7cWH76FsXn21w3q6l-2lDK43ghZx481--j6H-Z3o1MqFBScj55D1YeSfwYcQ02NanCpdL12EYk2Um5zmXxrAJ_bhCqxhSithsDjGwfyu2U8V2VfEEf1jnjosW6w362qn4A2bpogo</recordid><startdate>20180401</startdate><enddate>20180401</enddate><creator>Koivisto, Juha</creator><creator>van Eijnatten, Maureen</creator><creator>Kiljunen, Timo</creator><creator>Shi, Xie-Qi</creator><creator>Wolff, Jan</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180401</creationdate><title>Effective Radiation Dose in the Wrist Resulting from a Radiographic Device, Two CBCT Devices and One MSCT Device: A Comparative Study</title><author>Koivisto, Juha ; van Eijnatten, Maureen ; Kiljunen, Timo ; Shi, Xie-Qi ; Wolff, Jan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-6078b5628b083491a4a3a2a21496e130d0397899068c87d87001aeafecf514173</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Cone-Beam Computed Tomography - instrumentation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medicin och hälsovetenskap</topic><topic>Multidetector Computed Tomography - instrumentation</topic><topic>Phantoms, Imaging</topic><topic>Radiation Dosage</topic><topic>Wrist - radiation effects</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Koivisto, Juha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Eijnatten, Maureen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiljunen, Timo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, Xie-Qi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolff, Jan</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><jtitle>Radiation protection dosimetry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Koivisto, Juha</au><au>van Eijnatten, Maureen</au><au>Kiljunen, Timo</au><au>Shi, Xie-Qi</au><au>Wolff, Jan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effective Radiation Dose in the Wrist Resulting from a Radiographic Device, Two CBCT Devices and One MSCT Device: A Comparative Study</atitle><jtitle>Radiation protection dosimetry</jtitle><addtitle>Radiat Prot Dosimetry</addtitle><date>2018-04-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>179</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>58</spage><epage>68</epage><pages>58-68</pages><issn>0144-8420</issn><issn>1742-3406</issn><eissn>1742-3406</eissn><abstract>The objective of the present study was to assess and compare the effective doses in the wrist region resulting from conventional radiography device, multislice computed tomography (MSCT) device and two cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) devices using MOSFET dosemeters and a custom made anthropomorphic RANDO phantom according to the ICRP 103 recommendation. The effective dose for the conventional radiography was 1.0 μSv. The effective doses for the NewTom 5 G CBCT ranged between 0.7 μSv and 1.6 μSv, for the Planmed Verity CBCT 2.4 μSv and for the MSCT 8.6 μSv. When compared with the effective dose for AP- and LAT projections of a conventional radiographic device, this study showed an 8.6-fold effective dose for standard MSCT protocol and between 0.7 and 2.4-fold effective dose for standard CBCT protocols. When compared to the MSCT device, the CBCT devices offer a 3D view of the wrist at significantly lower effective doses.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>29040707</pmid><doi>10.1093/rpd/ncx210</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0144-8420
ispartof Radiation protection dosimetry, 2018-04, Vol.179 (1), p.58-68
issn 0144-8420
1742-3406
1742-3406
language eng
recordid cdi_swepub_primary_oai_swepub_ki_se_493264
source Oxford Journals Online
subjects Cone-Beam Computed Tomography - instrumentation
Humans
Medicin och hälsovetenskap
Multidetector Computed Tomography - instrumentation
Phantoms, Imaging
Radiation Dosage
Wrist - radiation effects
title Effective Radiation Dose in the Wrist Resulting from a Radiographic Device, Two CBCT Devices and One MSCT Device: A Comparative Study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T00%3A33%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_swepu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effective%20Radiation%20Dose%20in%20the%20Wrist%20Resulting%20from%20a%20Radiographic%20Device,%20Two%20CBCT%20Devices%20and%20One%20MSCT%20Device:%20A%20Comparative%20Study&rft.jtitle=Radiation%20protection%20dosimetry&rft.au=Koivisto,%20Juha&rft.date=2018-04-01&rft.volume=179&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=58&rft.epage=68&rft.pages=58-68&rft.issn=0144-8420&rft.eissn=1742-3406&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/rpd/ncx210&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_swepu%3E1952524991%3C/proquest_swepu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-6078b5628b083491a4a3a2a21496e130d0397899068c87d87001aeafecf514173%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1952524991&rft_id=info:pmid/29040707&rfr_iscdi=true