Loading…

Toward More Efficient Surveillance of Barrett’s Esophagus: Identification and Exclusion of Patients at Low Risk of Cancer

Background Endoscopic surveillance of Barrett’s esophagus (BE) is probably not cost-effective. A sub-population with BE at increased risk of high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) who could be targeted for cost-effective surveillance was sought. Methods The outcome for BE surv...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:World journal of surgery 2017-04, Vol.41 (4), p.1023-1034
Main Authors: Lindblad, Mats, Bright, Tim, Schloithe, Ann, Mayne, George C., Chen, Gang, Bull, Jeff, Bampton, Peter A., Fraser, Robert J. L., Gatenby, Piers A., Gordon, Louisa G., Watson, David I.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5438-71991e3f83537e598cc7c65dfef6949cea40f61c067ccd74b5065fc812d06f953
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5438-71991e3f83537e598cc7c65dfef6949cea40f61c067ccd74b5065fc812d06f953
container_end_page 1034
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1023
container_title World journal of surgery
container_volume 41
creator Lindblad, Mats
Bright, Tim
Schloithe, Ann
Mayne, George C.
Chen, Gang
Bull, Jeff
Bampton, Peter A.
Fraser, Robert J. L.
Gatenby, Piers A.
Gordon, Louisa G.
Watson, David I.
description Background Endoscopic surveillance of Barrett’s esophagus (BE) is probably not cost-effective. A sub-population with BE at increased risk of high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) who could be targeted for cost-effective surveillance was sought. Methods The outcome for BE surveillance from 2003 to 2012 in a structured program was reviewed. Incidence rates and incidence rate ratios for developing HGD or EAC were calculated. Risk stratification identified individuals who could be considered for exclusion from surveillance. A health-state transition Markov cohort model evaluated the cost-effectiveness of focusing on higher-risk individuals. Results During 2067 person-years of follow-up of 640 patients, 17 individuals progressed to HGD or EAC (annual IR 0.8%). Individuals with columnar-lined esophagus (CLE) ≥2 cm had an annual IR of 1.2% and >8-fold increased relative risk of HGD or EAC, compared to CLE
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00268-016-3819-0
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_swepu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_swepub_ki_se_500864</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4319889651</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5438-71991e3f83537e598cc7c65dfef6949cea40f61c067ccd74b5065fc812d06f953</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNks1uEzEURi0EoqHwAGyQJTZsBq7H4z92NEqhKAhEi1hajscubpNxas8QKja8Bq_Hk-BR0hYhVbAaz9U5V1efPoQeE3hOAMSLDFBzWQHhFZVEVXAHTUhD66qmNb2LJkB5U96E7qEHOZ8BEMGB30d7tZCybgifoO8ncWNSi9_F5PDM-2CD63p8PKSvLiyXprMOR48PTEqu73_9-JnxLMf1F3M65Jf4qC1wKJLpQ-yw6Vo8-2aXQx7_ivahzAuRsenxPG7wx5DPx_l03JseonveLLN7tPvuo0-Hs5Ppm2r-_vXR9NW8sqyhshJEKeKol5RR4ZiS1grLWeud56pR1pkGPCcWuLC2Fc2CAWfeSlK3wL1idB9V271549bDQq9TWJl0qaMJejc6Ly-nGYDkTeHVrfw6xfZGuhIJZZwAYaK4z7ZuAS8Gl3u9Ctm6MUkXh6yJlEQwIhr-H2hDFeeSj-jTv9CzOKSuhFYowbiCEkShyJayKeacnL--nIAeC6O3hdGlMHosjIbiPNltHhYr114bVw25CWMTlu7y3xv157fHB4cga5DFrXdBFq07demPs2-96DcM4d2N</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1875690949</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Toward More Efficient Surveillance of Barrett’s Esophagus: Identification and Exclusion of Patients at Low Risk of Cancer</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Lindblad, Mats ; Bright, Tim ; Schloithe, Ann ; Mayne, George C. ; Chen, Gang ; Bull, Jeff ; Bampton, Peter A. ; Fraser, Robert J. L. ; Gatenby, Piers A. ; Gordon, Louisa G. ; Watson, David I.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lindblad, Mats ; Bright, Tim ; Schloithe, Ann ; Mayne, George C. ; Chen, Gang ; Bull, Jeff ; Bampton, Peter A. ; Fraser, Robert J. L. ; Gatenby, Piers A. ; Gordon, Louisa G. ; Watson, David I.</creatorcontrib><description>Background Endoscopic surveillance of Barrett’s esophagus (BE) is probably not cost-effective. A sub-population with BE at increased risk of high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) who could be targeted for cost-effective surveillance was sought. Methods The outcome for BE surveillance from 2003 to 2012 in a structured program was reviewed. Incidence rates and incidence rate ratios for developing HGD or EAC were calculated. Risk stratification identified individuals who could be considered for exclusion from surveillance. A health-state transition Markov cohort model evaluated the cost-effectiveness of focusing on higher-risk individuals. Results During 2067 person-years of follow-up of 640 patients, 17 individuals progressed to HGD or EAC (annual IR 0.8%). Individuals with columnar-lined esophagus (CLE) ≥2 cm had an annual IR of 1.2% and &gt;8-fold increased relative risk of HGD or EAC, compared to CLE &lt;2 cm [IR—0.14% (IRR 8.6, 95% CIs 4.5–12.8)]. Limiting the surveillance cohort after the first endoscopy to individuals with CLE ≥2 cm, or dysplasia, followed by a further restriction after the second endoscopy—exclusion of patients without intestinal metaplasia—removed 296 (46%) patients, and 767 (37%) person-years from surveillance. Limiting surveillance to the remaining individuals reduced the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio from US$60,858 to US$33,807 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY). Further restrictions were tested but failed to improve cost-effectiveness. Conclusions Based on stratification of risk, the number of patients requiring surveillance can be reduced by at least a third. At a willingness-to-pay threshold of US$50,000 per QALY, surveillance of higher-risk individuals becomes cost-effective.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0364-2313</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1432-2323</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-2323</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00268-016-3819-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27882416</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Abdominal Surgery ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Australia ; Barrett Esophagus - pathology ; Cardiac Surgery ; Cell Transformation, Neoplastic ; Cohort Studies ; Cost-Benefit Analysis ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; General Surgery ; Health risks ; Humans ; Index Endoscopy ; Intestinal Metaplasia ; Male ; Medicin och hälsovetenskap ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Original Scientific Report ; Precancerous Conditions - pathology ; QALY Gain ; Quality-Adjusted Life Years ; Risk Assessment ; Surgery ; Surveillance Interval ; Surveillance Program ; Thoracic Surgery ; Vascular Surgery ; Watchful Waiting - economics</subject><ispartof>World journal of surgery, 2017-04, Vol.41 (4), p.1023-1034</ispartof><rights>Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2016</rights><rights>2017 The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Société Internationale de Chirurgie</rights><rights>World Journal of Surgery is a copyright of Springer, 2017.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5438-71991e3f83537e598cc7c65dfef6949cea40f61c067ccd74b5065fc812d06f953</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5438-71991e3f83537e598cc7c65dfef6949cea40f61c067ccd74b5065fc812d06f953</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27882416$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://kipublications.ki.se/Default.aspx?queryparsed=id:135610157$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lindblad, Mats</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bright, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schloithe, Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mayne, George C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Gang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bull, Jeff</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bampton, Peter A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fraser, Robert J. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gatenby, Piers A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gordon, Louisa G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watson, David I.</creatorcontrib><title>Toward More Efficient Surveillance of Barrett’s Esophagus: Identification and Exclusion of Patients at Low Risk of Cancer</title><title>World journal of surgery</title><addtitle>World J Surg</addtitle><addtitle>World J Surg</addtitle><description>Background Endoscopic surveillance of Barrett’s esophagus (BE) is probably not cost-effective. A sub-population with BE at increased risk of high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) who could be targeted for cost-effective surveillance was sought. Methods The outcome for BE surveillance from 2003 to 2012 in a structured program was reviewed. Incidence rates and incidence rate ratios for developing HGD or EAC were calculated. Risk stratification identified individuals who could be considered for exclusion from surveillance. A health-state transition Markov cohort model evaluated the cost-effectiveness of focusing on higher-risk individuals. Results During 2067 person-years of follow-up of 640 patients, 17 individuals progressed to HGD or EAC (annual IR 0.8%). Individuals with columnar-lined esophagus (CLE) ≥2 cm had an annual IR of 1.2% and &gt;8-fold increased relative risk of HGD or EAC, compared to CLE &lt;2 cm [IR—0.14% (IRR 8.6, 95% CIs 4.5–12.8)]. Limiting the surveillance cohort after the first endoscopy to individuals with CLE ≥2 cm, or dysplasia, followed by a further restriction after the second endoscopy—exclusion of patients without intestinal metaplasia—removed 296 (46%) patients, and 767 (37%) person-years from surveillance. Limiting surveillance to the remaining individuals reduced the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio from US$60,858 to US$33,807 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY). Further restrictions were tested but failed to improve cost-effectiveness. Conclusions Based on stratification of risk, the number of patients requiring surveillance can be reduced by at least a third. At a willingness-to-pay threshold of US$50,000 per QALY, surveillance of higher-risk individuals becomes cost-effective.</description><subject>Abdominal Surgery</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Barrett Esophagus - pathology</subject><subject>Cardiac Surgery</subject><subject>Cell Transformation, Neoplastic</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Cost-Benefit Analysis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>General Surgery</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Index Endoscopy</subject><subject>Intestinal Metaplasia</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicin och hälsovetenskap</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Original Scientific Report</subject><subject>Precancerous Conditions - pathology</subject><subject>QALY Gain</subject><subject>Quality-Adjusted Life Years</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surveillance Interval</subject><subject>Surveillance Program</subject><subject>Thoracic Surgery</subject><subject>Vascular Surgery</subject><subject>Watchful Waiting - economics</subject><issn>0364-2313</issn><issn>1432-2323</issn><issn>1432-2323</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNks1uEzEURi0EoqHwAGyQJTZsBq7H4z92NEqhKAhEi1hajscubpNxas8QKja8Bq_Hk-BR0hYhVbAaz9U5V1efPoQeE3hOAMSLDFBzWQHhFZVEVXAHTUhD66qmNb2LJkB5U96E7qEHOZ8BEMGB30d7tZCybgifoO8ncWNSi9_F5PDM-2CD63p8PKSvLiyXprMOR48PTEqu73_9-JnxLMf1F3M65Jf4qC1wKJLpQ-yw6Vo8-2aXQx7_ivahzAuRsenxPG7wx5DPx_l03JseonveLLN7tPvuo0-Hs5Ppm2r-_vXR9NW8sqyhshJEKeKol5RR4ZiS1grLWeud56pR1pkGPCcWuLC2Fc2CAWfeSlK3wL1idB9V271549bDQq9TWJl0qaMJejc6Ly-nGYDkTeHVrfw6xfZGuhIJZZwAYaK4z7ZuAS8Gl3u9Ctm6MUkXh6yJlEQwIhr-H2hDFeeSj-jTv9CzOKSuhFYowbiCEkShyJayKeacnL--nIAeC6O3hdGlMHosjIbiPNltHhYr114bVw25CWMTlu7y3xv157fHB4cga5DFrXdBFq07demPs2-96DcM4d2N</recordid><startdate>201704</startdate><enddate>201704</enddate><creator>Lindblad, Mats</creator><creator>Bright, Tim</creator><creator>Schloithe, Ann</creator><creator>Mayne, George C.</creator><creator>Chen, Gang</creator><creator>Bull, Jeff</creator><creator>Bampton, Peter A.</creator><creator>Fraser, Robert J. L.</creator><creator>Gatenby, Piers A.</creator><creator>Gordon, Louisa G.</creator><creator>Watson, David I.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201704</creationdate><title>Toward More Efficient Surveillance of Barrett’s Esophagus: Identification and Exclusion of Patients at Low Risk of Cancer</title><author>Lindblad, Mats ; Bright, Tim ; Schloithe, Ann ; Mayne, George C. ; Chen, Gang ; Bull, Jeff ; Bampton, Peter A. ; Fraser, Robert J. L. ; Gatenby, Piers A. ; Gordon, Louisa G. ; Watson, David I.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5438-71991e3f83537e598cc7c65dfef6949cea40f61c067ccd74b5065fc812d06f953</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Abdominal Surgery</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Barrett Esophagus - pathology</topic><topic>Cardiac Surgery</topic><topic>Cell Transformation, Neoplastic</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Cost-Benefit Analysis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>General Surgery</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Index Endoscopy</topic><topic>Intestinal Metaplasia</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicin och hälsovetenskap</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Original Scientific Report</topic><topic>Precancerous Conditions - pathology</topic><topic>QALY Gain</topic><topic>Quality-Adjusted Life Years</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surveillance Interval</topic><topic>Surveillance Program</topic><topic>Thoracic Surgery</topic><topic>Vascular Surgery</topic><topic>Watchful Waiting - economics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lindblad, Mats</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bright, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schloithe, Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mayne, George C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Gang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bull, Jeff</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bampton, Peter A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fraser, Robert J. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gatenby, Piers A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gordon, Louisa G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watson, David I.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><jtitle>World journal of surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lindblad, Mats</au><au>Bright, Tim</au><au>Schloithe, Ann</au><au>Mayne, George C.</au><au>Chen, Gang</au><au>Bull, Jeff</au><au>Bampton, Peter A.</au><au>Fraser, Robert J. L.</au><au>Gatenby, Piers A.</au><au>Gordon, Louisa G.</au><au>Watson, David I.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Toward More Efficient Surveillance of Barrett’s Esophagus: Identification and Exclusion of Patients at Low Risk of Cancer</atitle><jtitle>World journal of surgery</jtitle><stitle>World J Surg</stitle><addtitle>World J Surg</addtitle><date>2017-04</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1023</spage><epage>1034</epage><pages>1023-1034</pages><issn>0364-2313</issn><issn>1432-2323</issn><eissn>1432-2323</eissn><abstract>Background Endoscopic surveillance of Barrett’s esophagus (BE) is probably not cost-effective. A sub-population with BE at increased risk of high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) who could be targeted for cost-effective surveillance was sought. Methods The outcome for BE surveillance from 2003 to 2012 in a structured program was reviewed. Incidence rates and incidence rate ratios for developing HGD or EAC were calculated. Risk stratification identified individuals who could be considered for exclusion from surveillance. A health-state transition Markov cohort model evaluated the cost-effectiveness of focusing on higher-risk individuals. Results During 2067 person-years of follow-up of 640 patients, 17 individuals progressed to HGD or EAC (annual IR 0.8%). Individuals with columnar-lined esophagus (CLE) ≥2 cm had an annual IR of 1.2% and &gt;8-fold increased relative risk of HGD or EAC, compared to CLE &lt;2 cm [IR—0.14% (IRR 8.6, 95% CIs 4.5–12.8)]. Limiting the surveillance cohort after the first endoscopy to individuals with CLE ≥2 cm, or dysplasia, followed by a further restriction after the second endoscopy—exclusion of patients without intestinal metaplasia—removed 296 (46%) patients, and 767 (37%) person-years from surveillance. Limiting surveillance to the remaining individuals reduced the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio from US$60,858 to US$33,807 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY). Further restrictions were tested but failed to improve cost-effectiveness. Conclusions Based on stratification of risk, the number of patients requiring surveillance can be reduced by at least a third. At a willingness-to-pay threshold of US$50,000 per QALY, surveillance of higher-risk individuals becomes cost-effective.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>27882416</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00268-016-3819-0</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0364-2313
ispartof World journal of surgery, 2017-04, Vol.41 (4), p.1023-1034
issn 0364-2313
1432-2323
1432-2323
language eng
recordid cdi_swepub_primary_oai_swepub_ki_se_500864
source Springer Nature
subjects Abdominal Surgery
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Australia
Barrett Esophagus - pathology
Cardiac Surgery
Cell Transformation, Neoplastic
Cohort Studies
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Female
Follow-Up Studies
General Surgery
Health risks
Humans
Index Endoscopy
Intestinal Metaplasia
Male
Medicin och hälsovetenskap
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Middle Aged
Original Scientific Report
Precancerous Conditions - pathology
QALY Gain
Quality-Adjusted Life Years
Risk Assessment
Surgery
Surveillance Interval
Surveillance Program
Thoracic Surgery
Vascular Surgery
Watchful Waiting - economics
title Toward More Efficient Surveillance of Barrett’s Esophagus: Identification and Exclusion of Patients at Low Risk of Cancer
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T23%3A47%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_swepu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Toward%20More%20Efficient%20Surveillance%20of%20Barrett%E2%80%99s%20Esophagus:%20Identification%20and%20Exclusion%20of%20Patients%20at%20Low%20Risk%20of%20Cancer&rft.jtitle=World%20journal%20of%20surgery&rft.au=Lindblad,%20Mats&rft.date=2017-04&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1023&rft.epage=1034&rft.pages=1023-1034&rft.issn=0364-2313&rft.eissn=1432-2323&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00268-016-3819-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_swepu%3E4319889651%3C/proquest_swepu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5438-71991e3f83537e598cc7c65dfef6949cea40f61c067ccd74b5065fc812d06f953%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1875690949&rft_id=info:pmid/27882416&rfr_iscdi=true