Loading…

Comparison of pedometer and accelerometer derived steps in older individuals with Parkinson's disease or osteoporosis under free-living conditions

To compare self-reported pedometer steps with accelerometer steps under free-living conditions in individuals with Parkinson's disease (PD) or osteoporosis (OP). Seventy-three individuals with PD and 71 individuals with OP wore a pedometer (Yamax LS2000) and an accelerometer (ActiGraph GT1M/GT3...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of aging and physical activity 2014-10, Vol.22 (4), p.550-556
Main Authors: Wallén, Martin Benka, Dohrn, Ing-Mari, Ståhle, Agneta, Franzén, Erika, Hagströmer, Maria
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-3bb0f01804b69a01da069943ab62b582811c184806f43e28e405c5c87f2251173
cites
container_end_page 556
container_issue 4
container_start_page 550
container_title Journal of aging and physical activity
container_volume 22
creator Wallén, Martin Benka
Dohrn, Ing-Mari
Ståhle, Agneta
Franzén, Erika
Hagströmer, Maria
description To compare self-reported pedometer steps with accelerometer steps under free-living conditions in individuals with Parkinson's disease (PD) or osteoporosis (OP). Seventy-three individuals with PD and 71 individuals with OP wore a pedometer (Yamax LS2000) and an accelerometer (ActiGraph GT1M/GT3X+) simultaneously for one week. Fifty-one individuals with PD (72.6 ± 5.3 years) and 61 with OP (75.6 ± 5.3 years) provided simultaneously recorded data for 3-7 consecutive days. Pedometer steps were significantly lower than accelerometer steps in the PD group (p = .002) but not in the OP group (p = .956). Bland-Altman plots demonstrated wide limits of agreement between the instruments in both PD (range = 6,911 steps) and OP (range = 6,794 steps). These results suggest that the ActiGraph GT1M/GT3X+ should be preferred over the Yamax LS2000 for the assessment of steps in both research and clinical evaluations, particularly in individuals with PD or altered gait.
doi_str_mv 10.1123/japa.2013-0052
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_swepu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_swepub_ki_se_525173</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1619315489</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-3bb0f01804b69a01da069943ab62b582811c184806f43e28e405c5c87f2251173</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkjuP1DAUhS0EYh_QUiJLFGyTwdeOHylHI55aiS1AorOc-AY8m8TBTnbF3-AX49EMW1BR-ejqO8f2vZeQF8A2AFy82bvZbTgDUTEm-SNyDrIWFVf62-OimRKVUZKfkYuc94yBlkw-JWe8Fkxppc_J710cZ5dCjhONPZ3RxxEXTNRNnrquwwHTqeIxhTv0NC84ZxoKP5RSET7cBb-6IdP7sPygNy7dhqkEvs7Uh4wuI42JxuKLc0wxh0zX6WDtE2I1FPf0nXax5CwhTvkZedKXMHx-Oi_J13dvv-w-VNef33_cba-rrhbNUom2ZT0Dw-pWNY6Bd0w1TS1cq3grDTcAHZjaMNXXArnBmslOdkb3nEsALS5JdczN9zivrZ1TGF36ZaML9lS6LQqtLLwWhb868nOKP1fMix1DLg0a3IRxzRaUkIxrruA_UGhEmZRpCvrqH3Qf1zSVj1sOGkCp492bI9WV_uWE_cNrgdnDIthP25utPSyCPSxCMbw8xa7tiP4B_zt58QccZq_7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2171166173</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of pedometer and accelerometer derived steps in older individuals with Parkinson's disease or osteoporosis under free-living conditions</title><source>Human Kinetics</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Wallén, Martin Benka ; Dohrn, Ing-Mari ; Ståhle, Agneta ; Franzén, Erika ; Hagströmer, Maria</creator><creatorcontrib>Wallén, Martin Benka ; Dohrn, Ing-Mari ; Ståhle, Agneta ; Franzén, Erika ; Hagströmer, Maria</creatorcontrib><description>To compare self-reported pedometer steps with accelerometer steps under free-living conditions in individuals with Parkinson's disease (PD) or osteoporosis (OP). Seventy-three individuals with PD and 71 individuals with OP wore a pedometer (Yamax LS2000) and an accelerometer (ActiGraph GT1M/GT3X+) simultaneously for one week. Fifty-one individuals with PD (72.6 ± 5.3 years) and 61 with OP (75.6 ± 5.3 years) provided simultaneously recorded data for 3-7 consecutive days. Pedometer steps were significantly lower than accelerometer steps in the PD group (p = .002) but not in the OP group (p = .956). Bland-Altman plots demonstrated wide limits of agreement between the instruments in both PD (range = 6,911 steps) and OP (range = 6,794 steps). These results suggest that the ActiGraph GT1M/GT3X+ should be preferred over the Yamax LS2000 for the assessment of steps in both research and clinical evaluations, particularly in individuals with PD or altered gait.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1063-8652</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1543-267X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1123/japa.2013-0052</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24306767</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Human Kinetics</publisher><subject>Accelerometers ; Accelerometry - instrumentation ; Accelerometry - methods ; Aged ; Clinical assessment ; Clinical research ; Densitometry - methods ; Diagnostic Equipment ; Exercise ; Female ; Gait ; Humans ; Independent Living ; Living conditions ; Male ; Motor Activity - physiology ; Movement - physiology ; Older people ; Osteoporosis ; Osteoporosis - diagnosis ; Osteoporosis - physiopathology ; Parkinson Disease - diagnosis ; Parkinson Disease - physiopathology ; Parkinson's disease ; Postural Balance - physiology ; Reproducibility of Results</subject><ispartof>Journal of aging and physical activity, 2014-10, Vol.22 (4), p.550-556</ispartof><rights>Copyright Human Kinetics Oct 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-3bb0f01804b69a01da069943ab62b582811c184806f43e28e405c5c87f2251173</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27915,27916,30990</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24306767$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://kipublications.ki.se/Default.aspx?queryparsed=id:130041225$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wallén, Martin Benka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dohrn, Ing-Mari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ståhle, Agneta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franzén, Erika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hagströmer, Maria</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of pedometer and accelerometer derived steps in older individuals with Parkinson's disease or osteoporosis under free-living conditions</title><title>Journal of aging and physical activity</title><addtitle>J Aging Phys Act</addtitle><description>To compare self-reported pedometer steps with accelerometer steps under free-living conditions in individuals with Parkinson's disease (PD) or osteoporosis (OP). Seventy-three individuals with PD and 71 individuals with OP wore a pedometer (Yamax LS2000) and an accelerometer (ActiGraph GT1M/GT3X+) simultaneously for one week. Fifty-one individuals with PD (72.6 ± 5.3 years) and 61 with OP (75.6 ± 5.3 years) provided simultaneously recorded data for 3-7 consecutive days. Pedometer steps were significantly lower than accelerometer steps in the PD group (p = .002) but not in the OP group (p = .956). Bland-Altman plots demonstrated wide limits of agreement between the instruments in both PD (range = 6,911 steps) and OP (range = 6,794 steps). These results suggest that the ActiGraph GT1M/GT3X+ should be preferred over the Yamax LS2000 for the assessment of steps in both research and clinical evaluations, particularly in individuals with PD or altered gait.</description><subject>Accelerometers</subject><subject>Accelerometry - instrumentation</subject><subject>Accelerometry - methods</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Clinical assessment</subject><subject>Clinical research</subject><subject>Densitometry - methods</subject><subject>Diagnostic Equipment</subject><subject>Exercise</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gait</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Independent Living</subject><subject>Living conditions</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Motor Activity - physiology</subject><subject>Movement - physiology</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Osteoporosis</subject><subject>Osteoporosis - diagnosis</subject><subject>Osteoporosis - physiopathology</subject><subject>Parkinson Disease - diagnosis</subject><subject>Parkinson Disease - physiopathology</subject><subject>Parkinson's disease</subject><subject>Postural Balance - physiology</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><issn>1063-8652</issn><issn>1543-267X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkjuP1DAUhS0EYh_QUiJLFGyTwdeOHylHI55aiS1AorOc-AY8m8TBTnbF3-AX49EMW1BR-ejqO8f2vZeQF8A2AFy82bvZbTgDUTEm-SNyDrIWFVf62-OimRKVUZKfkYuc94yBlkw-JWe8Fkxppc_J710cZ5dCjhONPZ3RxxEXTNRNnrquwwHTqeIxhTv0NC84ZxoKP5RSET7cBb-6IdP7sPygNy7dhqkEvs7Uh4wuI42JxuKLc0wxh0zX6WDtE2I1FPf0nXax5CwhTvkZedKXMHx-Oi_J13dvv-w-VNef33_cba-rrhbNUom2ZT0Dw-pWNY6Bd0w1TS1cq3grDTcAHZjaMNXXArnBmslOdkb3nEsALS5JdczN9zivrZ1TGF36ZaML9lS6LQqtLLwWhb868nOKP1fMix1DLg0a3IRxzRaUkIxrruA_UGhEmZRpCvrqH3Qf1zSVj1sOGkCp492bI9WV_uWE_cNrgdnDIthP25utPSyCPSxCMbw8xa7tiP4B_zt58QccZq_7</recordid><startdate>20141001</startdate><enddate>20141001</enddate><creator>Wallén, Martin Benka</creator><creator>Dohrn, Ing-Mari</creator><creator>Ståhle, Agneta</creator><creator>Franzén, Erika</creator><creator>Hagströmer, Maria</creator><general>Human Kinetics</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141001</creationdate><title>Comparison of pedometer and accelerometer derived steps in older individuals with Parkinson's disease or osteoporosis under free-living conditions</title><author>Wallén, Martin Benka ; Dohrn, Ing-Mari ; Ståhle, Agneta ; Franzén, Erika ; Hagströmer, Maria</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-3bb0f01804b69a01da069943ab62b582811c184806f43e28e405c5c87f2251173</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Accelerometers</topic><topic>Accelerometry - instrumentation</topic><topic>Accelerometry - methods</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Clinical assessment</topic><topic>Clinical research</topic><topic>Densitometry - methods</topic><topic>Diagnostic Equipment</topic><topic>Exercise</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gait</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Independent Living</topic><topic>Living conditions</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Motor Activity - physiology</topic><topic>Movement - physiology</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Osteoporosis</topic><topic>Osteoporosis - diagnosis</topic><topic>Osteoporosis - physiopathology</topic><topic>Parkinson Disease - diagnosis</topic><topic>Parkinson Disease - physiopathology</topic><topic>Parkinson's disease</topic><topic>Postural Balance - physiology</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wallén, Martin Benka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dohrn, Ing-Mari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ståhle, Agneta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franzén, Erika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hagströmer, Maria</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><jtitle>Journal of aging and physical activity</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wallén, Martin Benka</au><au>Dohrn, Ing-Mari</au><au>Ståhle, Agneta</au><au>Franzén, Erika</au><au>Hagströmer, Maria</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of pedometer and accelerometer derived steps in older individuals with Parkinson's disease or osteoporosis under free-living conditions</atitle><jtitle>Journal of aging and physical activity</jtitle><addtitle>J Aging Phys Act</addtitle><date>2014-10-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>550</spage><epage>556</epage><pages>550-556</pages><issn>1063-8652</issn><eissn>1543-267X</eissn><abstract>To compare self-reported pedometer steps with accelerometer steps under free-living conditions in individuals with Parkinson's disease (PD) or osteoporosis (OP). Seventy-three individuals with PD and 71 individuals with OP wore a pedometer (Yamax LS2000) and an accelerometer (ActiGraph GT1M/GT3X+) simultaneously for one week. Fifty-one individuals with PD (72.6 ± 5.3 years) and 61 with OP (75.6 ± 5.3 years) provided simultaneously recorded data for 3-7 consecutive days. Pedometer steps were significantly lower than accelerometer steps in the PD group (p = .002) but not in the OP group (p = .956). Bland-Altman plots demonstrated wide limits of agreement between the instruments in both PD (range = 6,911 steps) and OP (range = 6,794 steps). These results suggest that the ActiGraph GT1M/GT3X+ should be preferred over the Yamax LS2000 for the assessment of steps in both research and clinical evaluations, particularly in individuals with PD or altered gait.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Human Kinetics</pub><pmid>24306767</pmid><doi>10.1123/japa.2013-0052</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1063-8652
ispartof Journal of aging and physical activity, 2014-10, Vol.22 (4), p.550-556
issn 1063-8652
1543-267X
language eng
recordid cdi_swepub_primary_oai_swepub_ki_se_525173
source Human Kinetics; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)
subjects Accelerometers
Accelerometry - instrumentation
Accelerometry - methods
Aged
Clinical assessment
Clinical research
Densitometry - methods
Diagnostic Equipment
Exercise
Female
Gait
Humans
Independent Living
Living conditions
Male
Motor Activity - physiology
Movement - physiology
Older people
Osteoporosis
Osteoporosis - diagnosis
Osteoporosis - physiopathology
Parkinson Disease - diagnosis
Parkinson Disease - physiopathology
Parkinson's disease
Postural Balance - physiology
Reproducibility of Results
title Comparison of pedometer and accelerometer derived steps in older individuals with Parkinson's disease or osteoporosis under free-living conditions
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T06%3A02%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_swepu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20pedometer%20and%20accelerometer%20derived%20steps%20in%20older%20individuals%20with%20Parkinson's%20disease%20or%20osteoporosis%20under%20free-living%20conditions&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20aging%20and%20physical%20activity&rft.au=Wall%C3%A9n,%20Martin%20Benka&rft.date=2014-10-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=550&rft.epage=556&rft.pages=550-556&rft.issn=1063-8652&rft.eissn=1543-267X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1123/japa.2013-0052&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_swepu%3E1619315489%3C/proquest_swepu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-3bb0f01804b69a01da069943ab62b582811c184806f43e28e405c5c87f2251173%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2171166173&rft_id=info:pmid/24306767&rfr_iscdi=true