Coupled exposure to ingredients of cosmetic products: I. Fragrances

• Published in: Contact dermatitis 2013-12, Vol.69 (6), p.335-341
• Main Authors: Uter, Wolfgang, Yazar, Kerem, Kratz, Eva-Maria, Mildau, Gerd, Lidén, Carola
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Allergens - adverse effects; Allergens - analysis; Allergic diseases; Biological and medical sciences; Cosmetics; Cyclohexenes - analysis; Dermatitis, Allergic Contact - etiology; Domestic and cosmetic products toxicology; Environmental Exposure - adverse effects; Environmental Exposure - analysis; exposure analysis; fragrances; Germany; Humans; Immunopathology; ingredient label; Medical sciences; Medicin och hälsovetenskap; Monoterpenes - analysis; Perfume - adverse effects; Perfume - analysis; Perfume - chemistry; Product Labeling; Risk Assessment; Skin allergic diseases. Stinging insect allergies; Terpenes - analysis; Toxicology
• ISSN: 0105-1873; 1600-0536; 1600-0536
• DOI: 10.1111/cod.12125

Summary Background The use of cosmetics exposes consumers to mixtures of ingredients, many of which are contact allergens. Fragrances in particular are mostly used in combination; combinations of fragrances have been shown to enhance sensitization and elicitation. Objective To examine the pattern of co‐exposure to fragrances in different categories of cosmetics, addressing the 26 fragrances that need to be identified on the label according to the Cosmetics Directive 76/768/EEC amended by 2003/15/EC. Methods A survey of products marketed in Germany, conducted in 2006–2009 by the Chemical and Veterinary Investigation Office in Karlsruhe, identified 4991 products with information on the presence of fragrances. The products were categorized according to Annex I to the Cosmetics Directive. The occurrence and co‐occurrence of fragrances were analysed in tabular form and as social network diagrams. Results The median number of fragrances in products varied greatly between categories, ranging up to nine in perfumes. Limonene and linalool were the most commonly identified fragrances, often used together, but also with other fragrances. Thirty per cent of all products were not declared to contain any fragrances. Conclusions For the first time, the pattern of co‐exposure to fragrance ingredients in important categories of cosmetic products has been described. The observations illustrate and quantify the ‘cocktail’ of fragrance allergens that may facilitate sensitization.