Loading…

Atrazine and cancer: a review of the epidemiologic evidence

The aim of this study was to evaluate the conflicting reports from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Scientific Advisory Panel (Panel) on the carcinogenicity of atrazine in order to determine whether the results from epidemiologic studies support a causal relationship between atrazine and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European journal of cancer prevention 2013-03, Vol.22 (2), p.169-180
Main Authors: Boffetta, Paolo, Adami, Hans-Olov, Berry, Colin, Mandel, Jack S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-27eeabcb315554e43e23089e324ae3bb1bfd13fc3c85440d117585e154967f3b3
container_end_page 180
container_issue 2
container_start_page 169
container_title European journal of cancer prevention
container_volume 22
creator Boffetta, Paolo
Adami, Hans-Olov
Berry, Colin
Mandel, Jack S.
description The aim of this study was to evaluate the conflicting reports from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Scientific Advisory Panel (Panel) on the carcinogenicity of atrazine in order to determine whether the results from epidemiologic studies support a causal relationship between atrazine and any specific cancer. We reviewed the Environmental Protection Agency and Panel reports in the context of all the epidemiologic studies on the specific cancers of interest. A weight-of-evidence approach leads to the conclusion that there is no causal association between atrazine and cancer and that occasional positive results can be attributed to bias or chance. Atrazine appears to be a good candidate for a category of herbicides with a probable absence of cancer risk. Atrazine should be treated for regulatory and public health purposes as an agent unlikely to pose a cancer risk to humans.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/CEJ.0b013e32835849ca
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_swepu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_swepub_ki_se_535122</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>48504267</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>48504267</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-27eeabcb315554e43e23089e324ae3bb1bfd13fc3c85440d117585e154967f3b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LAzEURYMotlZXblW6cTk1Ly-ZJMtS6hcFN7oOSSYDU9tOSSqiv96UqS0IrhKSe-57HEKugI6Aank3mT6PqKOAAZlCobj29oj0gUsshKT6mPSpFrpQTKoeOUtpTilIhPKU9BjTwHNJn1yON9F-N6swtKtq6O3Kh3hOTmq7SOFidw7I2_30dfJYzF4enibjWeFRl5uCyRCs8w5BCMEDx8CQKp3X4Tagc-DqCrD26JXgnFYAUigRQHBdyhodDkjR9abPsP5wZh2bpY1fprWN2T2951swAgUwlvP63_w6ttUB-gWBlQAqy8gs71gf25RiqPc0ULP1abJP89dnxm46LPcuQ7WHfgXmwO0uYJO3izpmg0065PJsCuV29-suN0-bNu7_uRKUs1LiD9cRh0k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Atrazine and cancer: a review of the epidemiologic evidence</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><creator>Boffetta, Paolo ; Adami, Hans-Olov ; Berry, Colin ; Mandel, Jack S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Boffetta, Paolo ; Adami, Hans-Olov ; Berry, Colin ; Mandel, Jack S.</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study was to evaluate the conflicting reports from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Scientific Advisory Panel (Panel) on the carcinogenicity of atrazine in order to determine whether the results from epidemiologic studies support a causal relationship between atrazine and any specific cancer. We reviewed the Environmental Protection Agency and Panel reports in the context of all the epidemiologic studies on the specific cancers of interest. A weight-of-evidence approach leads to the conclusion that there is no causal association between atrazine and cancer and that occasional positive results can be attributed to bias or chance. Atrazine appears to be a good candidate for a category of herbicides with a probable absence of cancer risk. Atrazine should be treated for regulatory and public health purposes as an agent unlikely to pose a cancer risk to humans.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0959-8278</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1473-5709</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1473-5709</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/CEJ.0b013e32835849ca</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22914097</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, a business of Wolters Kluwer Health</publisher><subject>Animals ; Atrazine - administration &amp; dosage ; Atrazine - toxicity ; Biological and medical sciences ; Case-Control Studies ; Environmental Exposure - adverse effects ; Epidemiologic Studies ; Evidence-Based Medicine ; Herbicides - administration &amp; dosage ; Herbicides - toxicity ; Humans ; Medical sciences ; Medicin och hälsovetenskap ; Neoplasms - chemically induced ; Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Review article ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>European journal of cancer prevention, 2013-03, Vol.22 (2), p.169-180</ispartof><rights>2013 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</rights><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-27eeabcb315554e43e23089e324ae3bb1bfd13fc3c85440d117585e154967f3b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/48504267$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/48504267$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925,58238,58471</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=27090162$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22914097$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://kipublications.ki.se/Default.aspx?queryparsed=id:126118709$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Boffetta, Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adami, Hans-Olov</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berry, Colin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mandel, Jack S.</creatorcontrib><title>Atrazine and cancer: a review of the epidemiologic evidence</title><title>European journal of cancer prevention</title><addtitle>Eur J Cancer Prev</addtitle><description>The aim of this study was to evaluate the conflicting reports from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Scientific Advisory Panel (Panel) on the carcinogenicity of atrazine in order to determine whether the results from epidemiologic studies support a causal relationship between atrazine and any specific cancer. We reviewed the Environmental Protection Agency and Panel reports in the context of all the epidemiologic studies on the specific cancers of interest. A weight-of-evidence approach leads to the conclusion that there is no causal association between atrazine and cancer and that occasional positive results can be attributed to bias or chance. Atrazine appears to be a good candidate for a category of herbicides with a probable absence of cancer risk. Atrazine should be treated for regulatory and public health purposes as an agent unlikely to pose a cancer risk to humans.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Atrazine - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Atrazine - toxicity</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Environmental Exposure - adverse effects</subject><subject>Epidemiologic Studies</subject><subject>Evidence-Based Medicine</subject><subject>Herbicides - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Herbicides - toxicity</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Medicin och hälsovetenskap</subject><subject>Neoplasms - chemically induced</subject><subject>Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Review article</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>0959-8278</issn><issn>1473-5709</issn><issn>1473-5709</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE1LAzEURYMotlZXblW6cTk1Ly-ZJMtS6hcFN7oOSSYDU9tOSSqiv96UqS0IrhKSe-57HEKugI6Aank3mT6PqKOAAZlCobj29oj0gUsshKT6mPSpFrpQTKoeOUtpTilIhPKU9BjTwHNJn1yON9F-N6swtKtq6O3Kh3hOTmq7SOFidw7I2_30dfJYzF4enibjWeFRl5uCyRCs8w5BCMEDx8CQKp3X4Tagc-DqCrD26JXgnFYAUigRQHBdyhodDkjR9abPsP5wZh2bpY1fprWN2T2951swAgUwlvP63_w6ttUB-gWBlQAqy8gs71gf25RiqPc0ULP1abJP89dnxm46LPcuQ7WHfgXmwO0uYJO3izpmg0065PJsCuV29-suN0-bNu7_uRKUs1LiD9cRh0k</recordid><startdate>20130301</startdate><enddate>20130301</enddate><creator>Boffetta, Paolo</creator><creator>Adami, Hans-Olov</creator><creator>Berry, Colin</creator><creator>Mandel, Jack S.</creator><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, a business of Wolters Kluwer Health</general><general>Lippincott Williams and Wilkins</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130301</creationdate><title>Atrazine and cancer</title><author>Boffetta, Paolo ; Adami, Hans-Olov ; Berry, Colin ; Mandel, Jack S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-27eeabcb315554e43e23089e324ae3bb1bfd13fc3c85440d117585e154967f3b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Atrazine - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Atrazine - toxicity</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Environmental Exposure - adverse effects</topic><topic>Epidemiologic Studies</topic><topic>Evidence-Based Medicine</topic><topic>Herbicides - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Herbicides - toxicity</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Medicin och hälsovetenskap</topic><topic>Neoplasms - chemically induced</topic><topic>Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Review article</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Boffetta, Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adami, Hans-Olov</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berry, Colin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mandel, Jack S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><jtitle>European journal of cancer prevention</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Boffetta, Paolo</au><au>Adami, Hans-Olov</au><au>Berry, Colin</au><au>Mandel, Jack S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Atrazine and cancer: a review of the epidemiologic evidence</atitle><jtitle>European journal of cancer prevention</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Cancer Prev</addtitle><date>2013-03-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>169</spage><epage>180</epage><pages>169-180</pages><issn>0959-8278</issn><issn>1473-5709</issn><eissn>1473-5709</eissn><abstract>The aim of this study was to evaluate the conflicting reports from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Scientific Advisory Panel (Panel) on the carcinogenicity of atrazine in order to determine whether the results from epidemiologic studies support a causal relationship between atrazine and any specific cancer. We reviewed the Environmental Protection Agency and Panel reports in the context of all the epidemiologic studies on the specific cancers of interest. A weight-of-evidence approach leads to the conclusion that there is no causal association between atrazine and cancer and that occasional positive results can be attributed to bias or chance. Atrazine appears to be a good candidate for a category of herbicides with a probable absence of cancer risk. Atrazine should be treated for regulatory and public health purposes as an agent unlikely to pose a cancer risk to humans.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, a business of Wolters Kluwer Health</pub><pmid>22914097</pmid><doi>10.1097/CEJ.0b013e32835849ca</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0959-8278
ispartof European journal of cancer prevention, 2013-03, Vol.22 (2), p.169-180
issn 0959-8278
1473-5709
1473-5709
language eng
recordid cdi_swepub_primary_oai_swepub_ki_se_535122
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection
subjects Animals
Atrazine - administration & dosage
Atrazine - toxicity
Biological and medical sciences
Case-Control Studies
Environmental Exposure - adverse effects
Epidemiologic Studies
Evidence-Based Medicine
Herbicides - administration & dosage
Herbicides - toxicity
Humans
Medical sciences
Medicin och hälsovetenskap
Neoplasms - chemically induced
Neoplasms - diagnosis
Neoplasms - epidemiology
Review article
Tumors
title Atrazine and cancer: a review of the epidemiologic evidence
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T06%3A30%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_swepu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Atrazine%20and%20cancer:%20a%20review%20of%20the%20epidemiologic%20evidence&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20cancer%20prevention&rft.au=Boffetta,%20Paolo&rft.date=2013-03-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=169&rft.epage=180&rft.pages=169-180&rft.issn=0959-8278&rft.eissn=1473-5709&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/CEJ.0b013e32835849ca&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_swepu%3E48504267%3C/jstor_swepu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-27eeabcb315554e43e23089e324ae3bb1bfd13fc3c85440d117585e154967f3b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/22914097&rft_jstor_id=48504267&rfr_iscdi=true