Rationales for home safety promotion in the Iranian primary healthcare system: results from a pilot study

• Published in: Public health (London) 2006, Vol.120 (1), p.58-64
• Main Authors: Mohammadi, R., Ekman, R., Svanström, L., Gooya, M.M.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Accidents, Home - prevention & control; Community safety promotion; Cross-Sectional Studies; Health Promotion - organization & administration; Home safety; Housing - standards; Humans; Injury prevention; Iran; Medicin och hälsovetenskap; National programme; Pilot Projects; Program Development; Public Health Administration; Retrospective Studies; Safety Management; Wounds and Injuries - prevention & control
• ISSN: 0033-3506; 1476-5616
• DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2005.03.003

To analyse the prerequisites for a nationwide primary healthcare (PHC) home safety promotion programme in Iran. Injury is a major public health problem throughout the world, currently accounting for one-seventh of all premature deaths and disabilities. Within 20 years, it is estimated that the proportion will increase to one-fifth. The present healthcare system in Iran was started in 1979, with a major focus on easy access to services and prevention. The system is based on the ‘health house’, which is run by community health workers. A survey shows that 36% of injuries occur in the home environment. A pilot phase of the Home Safety Promotion Programme was initiated in 1994, and included safety checking at home for fences, kitchens, drugs and poisons, heaters, electricity, and stairs and ladders. The pilot study covered 478,551 households out of the 12 million (approximately) in Iran. Sixty-nine supervisors were involved individually, assembled into eight focus groups. Household safety increased by 10–20% over the 4 years of the study. The frequency of home visits changed from annual to seasonal, since all participants agreed that there were seasonal differences in safety problems. The supervisors showed a high level of knowledge of injury as a public health problem, and also positive attitudes towards doing something about safety on the basis of a PHC scheme. The role of a surveillance system was highlighted, and it was suggested that such a system should be added to the programme. Based on our preliminary findings, there were reasons to obtain a policy decision concerning a national programme for safety promotion before extending the pilot scheme to the whole country. A national safety programme was decided upon following completion of the pilot study. It includes a home-related-injury surveillance system that is mandatory in rural areas and voluntary in some cities.