Nasal mucosal histamine reactivity among young students and teachers, having no or prolonged exposure to a deteriorated indoor climate

• Published in: Allergy (Copenhagen) 2002-11, Vol.57 (11), p.1029-1035
• Main Authors: Rudblad, S., Andersson, K., Bodin, L., Stridh, G., Juto, J. E.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adolescent; Adult; Air Pollution, Indoor; Allergens - administration & dosage; Allergens - adverse effects; Allergens - immunology; atopy; Climate; Dose-Response Relationship, Immunologic; Environmental Exposure; Faculty; Female; Histamine - administration & dosage; Histamine - adverse effects; Histamine - immunology; histamine provocation; Humans; Hypersensitivity, Immediate - epidemiology; Hypersensitivity, Immediate - etiology; indoor environment; Male; Medicin och hälsovetenskap; Middle Aged; mucosal reactivity; nasal mucosa; Nasal Mucosa - drug effects; Nasal Mucosa - immunology; Nasal Mucosa - metabolism; Nasal Provocation Tests; Pollen - adverse effects; Pollen - immunology; Prevalence; rhinostereometry; School Health Services; Skin Tests; Students; Surveys and Questionnaires; Sweden - epidemiology
• ISSN: 0105-4538; 1398-9995
• DOI: 10.1034/j.1398-9995.2002.23682.x

Background: In a study performed in the spring of 1995, we found a significantly greater nasal mucosal histamine reactivity among teachers, who had worked for several years in a recently renovated moisture‐damaged school, than in those in a control school. In the present study we investigated the students who begun their high‐school studies at both schools in the autumn of 1995 and compared them with the teachers as regards mucosal reactivity, atopy and symptoms. Methods: Twenty‐eight teachers in the target school, 18 teachers in the control school and 45 students from each school underwent a nasal histamine provocation test and a skin‐prick test. They also answered a standardized questionnaire. Results: The teachers in both schools had more marked nasal mucosal histamine reactivity at the lowest provocation concentrations than the students. The histamine provocation curve of the target school teachers had consistently higher values than that of the students (P = 0.0001), but its slope and shape were similar (P = 0.15), while the slope of the provocation curve of the control school teachers was flatter. However, there was only a borderline significance in this respect compared to the students (P = 0.07). Teachers with a dry and crusty appearance of the nasal mucosa on anterior rhinoscopy reacted more strongly to histamine provocation than those without this finding (P = 0.0004). There was a significantly higher frequency of skin‐prick test positivity (SPT+) among the students (P = 0.03). There were no significant differences in nasal mucosal histamine reactivity between atopic and non‐atopic subjects out of pollen season. Conclusions: Teachers had a significantly greater mucosal histamine reactivity than the students, whereas the latter had a significantly higher frequency of atopy. These results are compatible with an age‐related pattern of mucosal reactivity. A crusty appearance of the nasal mucosa seems to predispose to an increase in histamine reactivity. There were no significant differences according to histamine reactivity between atopic and non‐atopic subjects.