Health-related quality of life by disease and socio-economic group in the general population in Sweden

Measuring health-related quality of life (HRQoL) on population level, is becoming increasingly important for priority setting in health policy. In the health economics field, it is common to measure HRQoL in terms of health-state utilities or QoL weights. This study investigates the feasibility of o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Health policy (Amsterdam) 2001, Vol.55 (1), p.51-69
Main Authors: Burström, Kristina, Johannesson, Magnus, Diderichsen, Finn
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Activities of Daily Living
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Diseases
Feasibility Studies
Female
General population
Health
Health administration
Health Status
Health-related quality of life
Health-state utilities
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Modified EQ-5D dimensions
Prevalence
Public health
Quality of Life
Regression Analysis
Social Class
Socio-economic group
Socioeconomic status
Sociological research
Statistical data
Surveys and Questionnaires
Sweden
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Measuring health-related quality of life (HRQoL) on population level, is becoming increasingly important for priority setting in health policy. In the health economics field, it is common to measure HRQoL in terms of health-state utilities or QoL weights. This study investigates the feasibility of obtaining mean QoL weights by mapping survey data to the generic HRQoL measure EQ-5D and to describe the HRQoL in terms of mean QoL weights in certain disease and socio-economic groups. Data from the 1996–1997 Survey of Living Conditions, interviews with a representative sample (16–84 years) of the Swedish population ( n=11 698) were used. The mean QoL weight decreased from 0.91 among the youngest to 0.61 among the oldest, and was lower for women than for men. The QoL weight was 0.88 in the highest socio-economic group and 0.78 in the lowest socio-economic group. The QoL weight was lowest (0.38) among persons with depression and highest among persons with hypertension (0.71). The QoL weight decreased from 0.95 for persons with very good global self-rated health to 0.20 for persons with very poor global self-rated health. The results support the feasibility and validity of the mapping approach. HRQoL varies greatly between socio-economic groups and different disease groups.
ISSN:0168-8510
1872-6054
1872-6054
DOI:10.1016/S0168-8510(00)00111-1