Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society Consensus Guidelines for Emergency Laparotomy Part 3: Organizational Aspects and General Considerations for Management of the Emergency Laparotomy Patient

• Published in: World journal of surgery 2023-08, Vol.47 (8), p.1881-1898
• Main Authors: Peden, Carol J., Aggarwal, Geeta, Aitken, Robert J., Anderson, Iain D., Balfour, Angie, Foss, Nicolai Bang, Cooper, Zara, Dhesi, Jugdeep K., French, W. Brenton, Grant, Michael C., Hammarqvist, Folke, Hare, Sarah P., Havens, Joaquim M., Holena, Daniel N., Hübner, Martin, Johnston, Carolyn, Kim, Jeniffer S., Lees, Nicholas P., Ljungqvist, Olle, Lobo, Dileep N., Mohseni, Shahin, Ordoñez, Carlos A., Quiney, Nial, Sharoky, Catherine, Urman, Richard D., Wick, Elizabeth, Wu, Christopher L., Young-Fadok, Tonia, Scott, Michael J.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Abdominal Surgery; Cardiac Surgery; Clinical trials; Delphi method; Elective Surgical Procedures; End of life; Enhanced Recovery After Surgery; Evaluation; General Surgery; Guidelines; Humans; Laparotomy; Medicin och hälsovetenskap; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Organizational aspects; Organizations; Patients; Perioperative Care - methods; Recovery; Recovery (Medical); Risk groups; Scientific Review; Surgery; Thoracic Surgery; Vascular Surgery
• ISSN: 0364-2313; 1432-2323; 1432-2323
• DOI: 10.1007/s00268-023-07039-9

Background This is Part 3 of the first consensus guidelines for optimal care of patients undergoing emergency laparotomy using an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) approach. This paper addresses organizational aspects of care. Methods Experts in management of the high-risk and emergency general surgical patient were invited to contribute by the International ERAS® Society. PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and MEDLINE database searches were performed for ERAS elements and relevant specific topics. Studies were selected with particular attention to randomized clinical trials, systematic reviews, meta-analyses and large cohort studies, and reviewed and graded using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. Recommendations were made on the best level of evidence, or extrapolation from studies on elective patients when appropriate. A modified Delphi method was used to validate final recommendations. Results Components of organizational aspects of care were considered. Consensus was reached after three rounds of a modified Delphi process. Conclusions These guidelines are based on best current available evidence for organizational aspects of an ERAS® approach to patients undergoing emergency laparotomy and include discussion of less common aspects of care for the surgical patient, including end-of-life issues. These guidelines are not exhaustive but pull together evidence on important components of care for this high-risk patient population. As much of the evidence is extrapolated from elective surgery or emergency general surgery (not specifically laparotomy), many of the components need further evaluation in future studies.