Loading…

Resolving the Delusion Paradox

Background and Hypothesis The neurocomputational framework of predictive processing (PP) provides a promising approach to explaining delusions, a key symptom of psychotic disorders. According to PP, the brain makes inferences about the world by weighing prior beliefs against the available sensory da...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Schizophrenia bulletin 2023-11, Vol.49 (6), p.1425-1436
Main Authors: Petrovic, Predrag, Sterzer, Philipp
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-cedf5024818cc1a79a771be74b352bf3682db5111dfc26acaa4c6ddb2dcb7c873
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-cedf5024818cc1a79a771be74b352bf3682db5111dfc26acaa4c6ddb2dcb7c873
container_end_page 1436
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1425
container_title Schizophrenia bulletin
container_volume 49
creator Petrovic, Predrag
Sterzer, Philipp
description Background and Hypothesis The neurocomputational framework of predictive processing (PP) provides a promising approach to explaining delusions, a key symptom of psychotic disorders. According to PP, the brain makes inferences about the world by weighing prior beliefs against the available sensory data. Mismatches between prior beliefs and sensory data result in prediction errors that may update the brain’s model of the world. Psychosis has been associated with reduced weighting of priors relative to the sensory data. However, delusional beliefs are highly resistant to change, suggesting increased rather than decreased weighting of priors. We propose that this “delusion paradox” can be resolved within a hierarchical PP model: Reduced weighting of prior beliefs at low hierarchical levels may be compensated by an increased influence of higher-order beliefs represented at high hierarchical levels, including delusional beliefs. This may sculpt perceptual processing into conformity with delusions and foster their resistance to contradictory evidence. Study Design We review several lines of experimental evidence on low- and high-level processes, and their neurocognitive underpinnings in delusion-related phenotypes and link them to predicted processing. Study Results The reviewed evidence supports the notion of decreased weighting of low-level priors and increased weighting of high-level priors, in both delusional and delusion-prone individuals. Moreover, we highlight the role of prefrontal cortex as a neural basis for the increased weighting of high-level prior beliefs and discuss possible clinical implications of the proposed hierarchical predictive-processing model. Conclusions Our review suggests the delusion paradox can be resolved within a hierarchical PP model.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/schbul/sbad084
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_swepu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_swepub_primary_oai_swepub_ki_se_641059</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/schbul/sbad084</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2841026553</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-cedf5024818cc1a79a771be74b352bf3682db5111dfc26acaa4c6ddb2dcb7c873</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkctPwzAMxiMEYmNw5TjtCIduSZpXTwiNpzQJhOAc5dWt0DWjaQf89wR1TOzEyZb982fLHwCnCI4RzNJJMAvdlpOglYWC7IE-4oQmiEO0D_qQCpZwhkgPHIXwCiEiGcOHoJdywoXIYB8Mn1zw5bqo5qNm4UZXrmxD4avRo6qV9Z_H4CBXZXAnmzgALzfXz9O7ZPZwez-9nCWGsLRJjLM5hZgIJIxBimeKc6QdJzqlWOcpE9hqihCyucFMGaWIYdZqbI3mRvB0AJJON3y4Vavlqi6Wqv6SXhVyU3qLmZOMIEizyF90fOwsnTWuampV7oztdqpiIed-LRFkgqWURYWzjULt31sXGrksgnFlqSrn2yCxiJswozSN6LhDTe1DqF2-3YOg_HFBdi7IjQtxYPj3ui3--_YInHeAb1f_iX0DUbiU-Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2841026553</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Resolving the Delusion Paradox</title><source>PMC (PubMed Central)</source><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Petrovic, Predrag ; Sterzer, Philipp</creator><creatorcontrib>Petrovic, Predrag ; Sterzer, Philipp</creatorcontrib><description>Background and Hypothesis The neurocomputational framework of predictive processing (PP) provides a promising approach to explaining delusions, a key symptom of psychotic disorders. According to PP, the brain makes inferences about the world by weighing prior beliefs against the available sensory data. Mismatches between prior beliefs and sensory data result in prediction errors that may update the brain’s model of the world. Psychosis has been associated with reduced weighting of priors relative to the sensory data. However, delusional beliefs are highly resistant to change, suggesting increased rather than decreased weighting of priors. We propose that this “delusion paradox” can be resolved within a hierarchical PP model: Reduced weighting of prior beliefs at low hierarchical levels may be compensated by an increased influence of higher-order beliefs represented at high hierarchical levels, including delusional beliefs. This may sculpt perceptual processing into conformity with delusions and foster their resistance to contradictory evidence. Study Design We review several lines of experimental evidence on low- and high-level processes, and their neurocognitive underpinnings in delusion-related phenotypes and link them to predicted processing. Study Results The reviewed evidence supports the notion of decreased weighting of low-level priors and increased weighting of high-level priors, in both delusional and delusion-prone individuals. Moreover, we highlight the role of prefrontal cortex as a neural basis for the increased weighting of high-level prior beliefs and discuss possible clinical implications of the proposed hierarchical predictive-processing model. Conclusions Our review suggests the delusion paradox can be resolved within a hierarchical PP model.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0586-7614</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1745-1701</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1745-1701</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sbad084</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37478890</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>US: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Brain ; Delusions - diagnosis ; Humans ; Prefrontal Cortex ; Psychotic Disorders - psychology ; Regular</subject><ispartof>Schizophrenia bulletin, 2023-11, Vol.49 (6), p.1425-1436</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Maryland Psychiatric Research Center. 2023</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Maryland Psychiatric Research Center.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-cedf5024818cc1a79a771be74b352bf3682db5111dfc26acaa4c6ddb2dcb7c873</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-cedf5024818cc1a79a771be74b352bf3682db5111dfc26acaa4c6ddb2dcb7c873</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10686356/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10686356/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37478890$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://kipublications.ki.se/Default.aspx?queryparsed=id:153241674$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Petrovic, Predrag</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sterzer, Philipp</creatorcontrib><title>Resolving the Delusion Paradox</title><title>Schizophrenia bulletin</title><addtitle>Schizophr Bull</addtitle><description>Background and Hypothesis The neurocomputational framework of predictive processing (PP) provides a promising approach to explaining delusions, a key symptom of psychotic disorders. According to PP, the brain makes inferences about the world by weighing prior beliefs against the available sensory data. Mismatches between prior beliefs and sensory data result in prediction errors that may update the brain’s model of the world. Psychosis has been associated with reduced weighting of priors relative to the sensory data. However, delusional beliefs are highly resistant to change, suggesting increased rather than decreased weighting of priors. We propose that this “delusion paradox” can be resolved within a hierarchical PP model: Reduced weighting of prior beliefs at low hierarchical levels may be compensated by an increased influence of higher-order beliefs represented at high hierarchical levels, including delusional beliefs. This may sculpt perceptual processing into conformity with delusions and foster their resistance to contradictory evidence. Study Design We review several lines of experimental evidence on low- and high-level processes, and their neurocognitive underpinnings in delusion-related phenotypes and link them to predicted processing. Study Results The reviewed evidence supports the notion of decreased weighting of low-level priors and increased weighting of high-level priors, in both delusional and delusion-prone individuals. Moreover, we highlight the role of prefrontal cortex as a neural basis for the increased weighting of high-level prior beliefs and discuss possible clinical implications of the proposed hierarchical predictive-processing model. Conclusions Our review suggests the delusion paradox can be resolved within a hierarchical PP model.</description><subject>Brain</subject><subject>Delusions - diagnosis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Prefrontal Cortex</subject><subject>Psychotic Disorders - psychology</subject><subject>Regular</subject><issn>0586-7614</issn><issn>1745-1701</issn><issn>1745-1701</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>TOX</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkctPwzAMxiMEYmNw5TjtCIduSZpXTwiNpzQJhOAc5dWt0DWjaQf89wR1TOzEyZb982fLHwCnCI4RzNJJMAvdlpOglYWC7IE-4oQmiEO0D_qQCpZwhkgPHIXwCiEiGcOHoJdywoXIYB8Mn1zw5bqo5qNm4UZXrmxD4avRo6qV9Z_H4CBXZXAnmzgALzfXz9O7ZPZwez-9nCWGsLRJjLM5hZgIJIxBimeKc6QdJzqlWOcpE9hqihCyucFMGaWIYdZqbI3mRvB0AJJON3y4Vavlqi6Wqv6SXhVyU3qLmZOMIEizyF90fOwsnTWuampV7oztdqpiIed-LRFkgqWURYWzjULt31sXGrksgnFlqSrn2yCxiJswozSN6LhDTe1DqF2-3YOg_HFBdi7IjQtxYPj3ui3--_YInHeAb1f_iX0DUbiU-Q</recordid><startdate>20231129</startdate><enddate>20231129</enddate><creator>Petrovic, Predrag</creator><creator>Sterzer, Philipp</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>TOX</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>D8T</scope><scope>ZZAVC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20231129</creationdate><title>Resolving the Delusion Paradox</title><author>Petrovic, Predrag ; Sterzer, Philipp</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-cedf5024818cc1a79a771be74b352bf3682db5111dfc26acaa4c6ddb2dcb7c873</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Brain</topic><topic>Delusions - diagnosis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Prefrontal Cortex</topic><topic>Psychotic Disorders - psychology</topic><topic>Regular</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Petrovic, Predrag</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sterzer, Philipp</creatorcontrib><collection>Open Access: Oxford University Press Open Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Freely available online</collection><collection>SwePub Articles full text</collection><jtitle>Schizophrenia bulletin</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Petrovic, Predrag</au><au>Sterzer, Philipp</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Resolving the Delusion Paradox</atitle><jtitle>Schizophrenia bulletin</jtitle><addtitle>Schizophr Bull</addtitle><date>2023-11-29</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1425</spage><epage>1436</epage><pages>1425-1436</pages><issn>0586-7614</issn><issn>1745-1701</issn><eissn>1745-1701</eissn><abstract>Background and Hypothesis The neurocomputational framework of predictive processing (PP) provides a promising approach to explaining delusions, a key symptom of psychotic disorders. According to PP, the brain makes inferences about the world by weighing prior beliefs against the available sensory data. Mismatches between prior beliefs and sensory data result in prediction errors that may update the brain’s model of the world. Psychosis has been associated with reduced weighting of priors relative to the sensory data. However, delusional beliefs are highly resistant to change, suggesting increased rather than decreased weighting of priors. We propose that this “delusion paradox” can be resolved within a hierarchical PP model: Reduced weighting of prior beliefs at low hierarchical levels may be compensated by an increased influence of higher-order beliefs represented at high hierarchical levels, including delusional beliefs. This may sculpt perceptual processing into conformity with delusions and foster their resistance to contradictory evidence. Study Design We review several lines of experimental evidence on low- and high-level processes, and their neurocognitive underpinnings in delusion-related phenotypes and link them to predicted processing. Study Results The reviewed evidence supports the notion of decreased weighting of low-level priors and increased weighting of high-level priors, in both delusional and delusion-prone individuals. Moreover, we highlight the role of prefrontal cortex as a neural basis for the increased weighting of high-level prior beliefs and discuss possible clinical implications of the proposed hierarchical predictive-processing model. Conclusions Our review suggests the delusion paradox can be resolved within a hierarchical PP model.</abstract><cop>US</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>37478890</pmid><doi>10.1093/schbul/sbad084</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0586-7614
ispartof Schizophrenia bulletin, 2023-11, Vol.49 (6), p.1425-1436
issn 0586-7614
1745-1701
1745-1701
language eng
recordid cdi_swepub_primary_oai_swepub_ki_se_641059
source PMC (PubMed Central); Oxford Journals Online
subjects Brain
Delusions - diagnosis
Humans
Prefrontal Cortex
Psychotic Disorders - psychology
Regular
title Resolving the Delusion Paradox
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T18%3A35%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_swepu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Resolving%20the%20Delusion%20Paradox&rft.jtitle=Schizophrenia%20bulletin&rft.au=Petrovic,%20Predrag&rft.date=2023-11-29&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1425&rft.epage=1436&rft.pages=1425-1436&rft.issn=0586-7614&rft.eissn=1745-1701&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/schbul/sbad084&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_swepu%3E2841026553%3C/proquest_swepu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-cedf5024818cc1a79a771be74b352bf3682db5111dfc26acaa4c6ddb2dcb7c873%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2841026553&rft_id=info:pmid/37478890&rft_oup_id=10.1093/schbul/sbad084&rfr_iscdi=true