People get ready! A new generation of Alzheimer's therapies may require new ways to deliver and pay for healthcare

• Published in: Journal of internal medicine 2024-03, Vol.295 (3), p.281-291
• Main Authors: Wahlberg, Karin, Winblad, Bengt, Cole, Amanda, Herring, William L., Ramsberg, Joakim, Torontali, Ilona, Visser, Pieter‐Jelle, Wimo, Anders, Wollaert, Lieve, Jönsson, Linus
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: aducanumab; Alzheimer Disease - diagnosis; Alzheimer Disease - drug therapy; Alzheimer's disease; Cost-Benefit Analysis; cost‐effectiveness; Delivery of Health Care; Dementia disorders; disease‐modifying therapies; Health care; Health services; Humans; lecanemab; Medicin och hälsovetenskap; Neurodegenerative diseases; Patients; performance‐based payment models; United States
• ISSN: 0954-6820; 1365-2796; 1365-2796
• DOI: 10.1111/joim.13759

The development of disease‐modifying therapies (DMTs) for Alzheimer's disease (AD) has progressed over the last decade, and the first‐ever therapies with potential to slow the progression of disease are approved in the United States. AD DMTs could provide life‐changing opportunities for people living with this disease, as well as for their caregivers. They could also ease some of the immense societal and economic burden of dementia. However, AD DMTs also come with major challenges due to the large unmet medical need, high prevalence of AD, new costs related to diagnosis, treatment and monitoring, and uncertainty in the therapies’ actual clinical value. This perspective article discusses, from the broad perspective of various health systems and stakeholders, how we can overcome these challenges and improve society's readiness for AD DMTs. We propose that innovative payment models such as performance‐based payments, in combination with learning healthcare systems, could be the way forward to enable timely patient access to treatments, improve accuracy of cost‐effectiveness evaluations and overcome budgetary barriers. Other important considerations include the need for identification of key drivers of patient value, the relevance of different economic perspectives (i.e. healthcare vs. societal) and ethical questions in terms of treatment eligibility criteria.