Loading…
Dimensional Approaches to Scaling Experimental Ecosystems: Designing Mousetraps to Catch Elephants
Enclosed experimental ecosystems (mesocosms) are small relative to their natural counterparts, are typically operated for short durations relative to the timescales of a number of important ecological processes, and also often have reduced biological and physical complexity relative to nature. These...
Saved in:
Published in: | The American naturalist 2001-03, Vol.157 (3), p.324-333 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-a84c30ee4d15546618a6db72b088d4e885522ad75cd82b0e62d24f4eb9652fae3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-a84c30ee4d15546618a6db72b088d4e885522ad75cd82b0e62d24f4eb9652fae3 |
container_end_page | 333 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 324 |
container_title | The American naturalist |
container_volume | 157 |
creator | Petersen, John E. Hastings, Alan |
description | Enclosed experimental ecosystems (mesocosms) are small relative to their natural counterparts, are typically operated for short durations relative to the timescales of a number of important ecological processes, and also often have reduced biological and physical complexity relative to nature. These reductions in time, space, and complexity scales have been cited as sources of unrealistic ecological behavior within mesocosms and raise questions about extrapolating results from mesocosms to nature. Dimensional analysis, a technique widely used by engineers to create scale models, uses compensatory distortion as a means of maintaining dynamic similarity in properties and relationships of interest. Although biological parameters are generally less controllable than physical ones, a variety of dimensional approaches can be taken to maintain such key ecological properties as effective habitat size, environmental variability, vertical and horizontal gradients, interactions among habitats, and control of experimental artifacts. To date, application of dimensional approaches to mesocosm design has been largely intuitive and idiosyncratic. We argue that a more explicit, systematic, and quantitative approach will increase realism and may also provide a critical means of developing, testing, and advancing our understanding of scaling relationships in nature. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1086/319197 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_uchic</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_uchicagopress_journals_319197</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>10.1086/319197</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>10.1086/319197</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-a84c30ee4d15546618a6db72b088d4e885522ad75cd82b0e62d24f4eb9652fae3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0ctuEzEUBmALgWha4AkQGiHEbsD3S3dVGi5SEQtgPfJ4TpKJJuPBxyPRt8dpokZiw8qy_fm3fQ4hrxj9wKjVHwVzzJknZMGUMLUSXDwlC0qpqCmT5oJcIu7K1EmnnpMLZg013IkFaW_7PYzYx9EP1c00pejDFrDKsfoR_NCPm2r1Z4J0ULmQVYh4jxn2eF3dAvab8UC-xRkhJz89HFz6HLbVaoBp68eML8iztR8QXp7GK_Lr0-rn8kt99_3z1-XNXR2EFbn2VgZBAWTHlJJaM-t11xreUms7CdYqxbnvjAqdLYugecflWkLrtOJrD-KKvD_mlk_8ngFzs-8xwDD4Ecr7GsOEK6n8v5AZq42jrsC3_8BdnFOpVDHOauq4Vue0kCJignUzlWr5dN8w2hx60xx7U-CbU9rc7qE7s1MzCnh3BHPY9sFv4pQA8XznY87rI9thjukxRlBTtqX4CzJHnow</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>198609265</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dimensional Approaches to Scaling Experimental Ecosystems: Designing Mousetraps to Catch Elephants</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><creator>Petersen, John E. ; Hastings, Alan</creator><contributor>Peter J. Morin</contributor><creatorcontrib>Petersen, John E. ; Hastings, Alan ; Peter J. Morin</creatorcontrib><description>Enclosed experimental ecosystems (mesocosms) are small relative to their natural counterparts, are typically operated for short durations relative to the timescales of a number of important ecological processes, and also often have reduced biological and physical complexity relative to nature. These reductions in time, space, and complexity scales have been cited as sources of unrealistic ecological behavior within mesocosms and raise questions about extrapolating results from mesocosms to nature. Dimensional analysis, a technique widely used by engineers to create scale models, uses compensatory distortion as a means of maintaining dynamic similarity in properties and relationships of interest. Although biological parameters are generally less controllable than physical ones, a variety of dimensional approaches can be taken to maintain such key ecological properties as effective habitat size, environmental variability, vertical and horizontal gradients, interactions among habitats, and control of experimental artifacts. To date, application of dimensional approaches to mesocosm design has been largely intuitive and idiosyncratic. We argue that a more explicit, systematic, and quantitative approach will increase realism and may also provide a critical means of developing, testing, and advancing our understanding of scaling relationships in nature.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-0147</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-5323</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/319197</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18707293</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AMNTA4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: The University of Chicago Press</publisher><subject>Aquatic ecosystems ; Design ; Design analysis ; Dimensional analysis ; Ecological modeling ; Ecology ; Ecosystem dynamics ; Ecosystem models ; Ecosystems ; Experiment design ; Experiments ; Mathematical extrapolation</subject><ispartof>The American naturalist, 2001-03, Vol.157 (3), p.324-333</ispartof><rights>2001 by The University of Chicago.</rights><rights>Copyright University of Chicago, acting through its Press Mar 2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-a84c30ee4d15546618a6db72b088d4e885522ad75cd82b0e62d24f4eb9652fae3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-a84c30ee4d15546618a6db72b088d4e885522ad75cd82b0e62d24f4eb9652fae3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18707293$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Peter J. Morin</contributor><creatorcontrib>Petersen, John E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hastings, Alan</creatorcontrib><title>Dimensional Approaches to Scaling Experimental Ecosystems: Designing Mousetraps to Catch Elephants</title><title>The American naturalist</title><addtitle>Am Nat</addtitle><description>Enclosed experimental ecosystems (mesocosms) are small relative to their natural counterparts, are typically operated for short durations relative to the timescales of a number of important ecological processes, and also often have reduced biological and physical complexity relative to nature. These reductions in time, space, and complexity scales have been cited as sources of unrealistic ecological behavior within mesocosms and raise questions about extrapolating results from mesocosms to nature. Dimensional analysis, a technique widely used by engineers to create scale models, uses compensatory distortion as a means of maintaining dynamic similarity in properties and relationships of interest. Although biological parameters are generally less controllable than physical ones, a variety of dimensional approaches can be taken to maintain such key ecological properties as effective habitat size, environmental variability, vertical and horizontal gradients, interactions among habitats, and control of experimental artifacts. To date, application of dimensional approaches to mesocosm design has been largely intuitive and idiosyncratic. We argue that a more explicit, systematic, and quantitative approach will increase realism and may also provide a critical means of developing, testing, and advancing our understanding of scaling relationships in nature.</description><subject>Aquatic ecosystems</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Design analysis</subject><subject>Dimensional analysis</subject><subject>Ecological modeling</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecosystem dynamics</subject><subject>Ecosystem models</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Experiment design</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Mathematical extrapolation</subject><issn>0003-0147</issn><issn>1537-5323</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqF0ctuEzEUBmALgWha4AkQGiHEbsD3S3dVGi5SEQtgPfJ4TpKJJuPBxyPRt8dpokZiw8qy_fm3fQ4hrxj9wKjVHwVzzJknZMGUMLUSXDwlC0qpqCmT5oJcIu7K1EmnnpMLZg013IkFaW_7PYzYx9EP1c00pejDFrDKsfoR_NCPm2r1Z4J0ULmQVYh4jxn2eF3dAvab8UC-xRkhJz89HFz6HLbVaoBp68eML8iztR8QXp7GK_Lr0-rn8kt99_3z1-XNXR2EFbn2VgZBAWTHlJJaM-t11xreUms7CdYqxbnvjAqdLYugecflWkLrtOJrD-KKvD_mlk_8ngFzs-8xwDD4Ecr7GsOEK6n8v5AZq42jrsC3_8BdnFOpVDHOauq4Vue0kCJignUzlWr5dN8w2hx60xx7U-CbU9rc7qE7s1MzCnh3BHPY9sFv4pQA8XznY87rI9thjukxRlBTtqX4CzJHnow</recordid><startdate>20010301</startdate><enddate>20010301</enddate><creator>Petersen, John E.</creator><creator>Hastings, Alan</creator><general>The University of Chicago Press</general><general>University of Chicago, acting through its Press</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010301</creationdate><title>Dimensional Approaches to Scaling Experimental Ecosystems: Designing Mousetraps to Catch Elephants</title><author>Petersen, John E. ; Hastings, Alan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-a84c30ee4d15546618a6db72b088d4e885522ad75cd82b0e62d24f4eb9652fae3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Aquatic ecosystems</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Design analysis</topic><topic>Dimensional analysis</topic><topic>Ecological modeling</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecosystem dynamics</topic><topic>Ecosystem models</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Experiment design</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Mathematical extrapolation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Petersen, John E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hastings, Alan</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American naturalist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Petersen, John E.</au><au>Hastings, Alan</au><au>Peter J. Morin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dimensional Approaches to Scaling Experimental Ecosystems: Designing Mousetraps to Catch Elephants</atitle><jtitle>The American naturalist</jtitle><addtitle>Am Nat</addtitle><date>2001-03-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>157</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>324</spage><epage>333</epage><pages>324-333</pages><issn>0003-0147</issn><eissn>1537-5323</eissn><coden>AMNTA4</coden><abstract>Enclosed experimental ecosystems (mesocosms) are small relative to their natural counterparts, are typically operated for short durations relative to the timescales of a number of important ecological processes, and also often have reduced biological and physical complexity relative to nature. These reductions in time, space, and complexity scales have been cited as sources of unrealistic ecological behavior within mesocosms and raise questions about extrapolating results from mesocosms to nature. Dimensional analysis, a technique widely used by engineers to create scale models, uses compensatory distortion as a means of maintaining dynamic similarity in properties and relationships of interest. Although biological parameters are generally less controllable than physical ones, a variety of dimensional approaches can be taken to maintain such key ecological properties as effective habitat size, environmental variability, vertical and horizontal gradients, interactions among habitats, and control of experimental artifacts. To date, application of dimensional approaches to mesocosm design has been largely intuitive and idiosyncratic. We argue that a more explicit, systematic, and quantitative approach will increase realism and may also provide a critical means of developing, testing, and advancing our understanding of scaling relationships in nature.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>The University of Chicago Press</pub><pmid>18707293</pmid><doi>10.1086/319197</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-0147 |
ispartof | The American naturalist, 2001-03, Vol.157 (3), p.324-333 |
issn | 0003-0147 1537-5323 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_uchicagopress_journals_319197 |
source | JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection |
subjects | Aquatic ecosystems Design Design analysis Dimensional analysis Ecological modeling Ecology Ecosystem dynamics Ecosystem models Ecosystems Experiment design Experiments Mathematical extrapolation |
title | Dimensional Approaches to Scaling Experimental Ecosystems: Designing Mousetraps to Catch Elephants |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T20%3A10%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_uchic&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dimensional%20Approaches%20to%20Scaling%20Experimental%20Ecosystems:%20Designing%20Mousetraps%20to%20Catch%20Elephants&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20naturalist&rft.au=Petersen,%20John%20E.&rft.date=2001-03-01&rft.volume=157&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=324&rft.epage=333&rft.pages=324-333&rft.issn=0003-0147&rft.eissn=1537-5323&rft.coden=AMNTA4&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/319197&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_uchic%3E10.1086/319197%3C/jstor_uchic%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-a84c30ee4d15546618a6db72b088d4e885522ad75cd82b0e62d24f4eb9652fae3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=198609265&rft_id=info:pmid/18707293&rft_jstor_id=10.1086/319197&rfr_iscdi=true |