Loading…

Dimensional Approaches to Scaling Experimental Ecosystems: Designing Mousetraps to Catch Elephants

Enclosed experimental ecosystems (mesocosms) are small relative to their natural counterparts, are typically operated for short durations relative to the timescales of a number of important ecological processes, and also often have reduced biological and physical complexity relative to nature. These...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The American naturalist 2001-03, Vol.157 (3), p.324-333
Main Authors: Petersen, John E., Hastings, Alan
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-a84c30ee4d15546618a6db72b088d4e885522ad75cd82b0e62d24f4eb9652fae3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-a84c30ee4d15546618a6db72b088d4e885522ad75cd82b0e62d24f4eb9652fae3
container_end_page 333
container_issue 3
container_start_page 324
container_title The American naturalist
container_volume 157
creator Petersen, John E.
Hastings, Alan
description Enclosed experimental ecosystems (mesocosms) are small relative to their natural counterparts, are typically operated for short durations relative to the timescales of a number of important ecological processes, and also often have reduced biological and physical complexity relative to nature. These reductions in time, space, and complexity scales have been cited as sources of unrealistic ecological behavior within mesocosms and raise questions about extrapolating results from mesocosms to nature. Dimensional analysis, a technique widely used by engineers to create scale models, uses compensatory distortion as a means of maintaining dynamic similarity in properties and relationships of interest. Although biological parameters are generally less controllable than physical ones, a variety of dimensional approaches can be taken to maintain such key ecological properties as effective habitat size, environmental variability, vertical and horizontal gradients, interactions among habitats, and control of experimental artifacts. To date, application of dimensional approaches to mesocosm design has been largely intuitive and idiosyncratic. We argue that a more explicit, systematic, and quantitative approach will increase realism and may also provide a critical means of developing, testing, and advancing our understanding of scaling relationships in nature.
doi_str_mv 10.1086/319197
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_uchic</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_uchicagopress_journals_319197</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>10.1086/319197</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>10.1086/319197</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-a84c30ee4d15546618a6db72b088d4e885522ad75cd82b0e62d24f4eb9652fae3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0ctuEzEUBmALgWha4AkQGiHEbsD3S3dVGi5SEQtgPfJ4TpKJJuPBxyPRt8dpokZiw8qy_fm3fQ4hrxj9wKjVHwVzzJknZMGUMLUSXDwlC0qpqCmT5oJcIu7K1EmnnpMLZg013IkFaW_7PYzYx9EP1c00pejDFrDKsfoR_NCPm2r1Z4J0ULmQVYh4jxn2eF3dAvab8UC-xRkhJz89HFz6HLbVaoBp68eML8iztR8QXp7GK_Lr0-rn8kt99_3z1-XNXR2EFbn2VgZBAWTHlJJaM-t11xreUms7CdYqxbnvjAqdLYugecflWkLrtOJrD-KKvD_mlk_8ngFzs-8xwDD4Ecr7GsOEK6n8v5AZq42jrsC3_8BdnFOpVDHOauq4Vue0kCJignUzlWr5dN8w2hx60xx7U-CbU9rc7qE7s1MzCnh3BHPY9sFv4pQA8XznY87rI9thjukxRlBTtqX4CzJHnow</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>198609265</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dimensional Approaches to Scaling Experimental Ecosystems: Designing Mousetraps to Catch Elephants</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><creator>Petersen, John E. ; Hastings, Alan</creator><contributor>Peter J. Morin</contributor><creatorcontrib>Petersen, John E. ; Hastings, Alan ; Peter J. Morin</creatorcontrib><description>Enclosed experimental ecosystems (mesocosms) are small relative to their natural counterparts, are typically operated for short durations relative to the timescales of a number of important ecological processes, and also often have reduced biological and physical complexity relative to nature. These reductions in time, space, and complexity scales have been cited as sources of unrealistic ecological behavior within mesocosms and raise questions about extrapolating results from mesocosms to nature. Dimensional analysis, a technique widely used by engineers to create scale models, uses compensatory distortion as a means of maintaining dynamic similarity in properties and relationships of interest. Although biological parameters are generally less controllable than physical ones, a variety of dimensional approaches can be taken to maintain such key ecological properties as effective habitat size, environmental variability, vertical and horizontal gradients, interactions among habitats, and control of experimental artifacts. To date, application of dimensional approaches to mesocosm design has been largely intuitive and idiosyncratic. We argue that a more explicit, systematic, and quantitative approach will increase realism and may also provide a critical means of developing, testing, and advancing our understanding of scaling relationships in nature.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-0147</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-5323</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/319197</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18707293</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AMNTA4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: The University of Chicago Press</publisher><subject>Aquatic ecosystems ; Design ; Design analysis ; Dimensional analysis ; Ecological modeling ; Ecology ; Ecosystem dynamics ; Ecosystem models ; Ecosystems ; Experiment design ; Experiments ; Mathematical extrapolation</subject><ispartof>The American naturalist, 2001-03, Vol.157 (3), p.324-333</ispartof><rights>2001 by The University of Chicago.</rights><rights>Copyright University of Chicago, acting through its Press Mar 2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-a84c30ee4d15546618a6db72b088d4e885522ad75cd82b0e62d24f4eb9652fae3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-a84c30ee4d15546618a6db72b088d4e885522ad75cd82b0e62d24f4eb9652fae3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18707293$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Peter J. Morin</contributor><creatorcontrib>Petersen, John E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hastings, Alan</creatorcontrib><title>Dimensional Approaches to Scaling Experimental Ecosystems: Designing Mousetraps to Catch Elephants</title><title>The American naturalist</title><addtitle>Am Nat</addtitle><description>Enclosed experimental ecosystems (mesocosms) are small relative to their natural counterparts, are typically operated for short durations relative to the timescales of a number of important ecological processes, and also often have reduced biological and physical complexity relative to nature. These reductions in time, space, and complexity scales have been cited as sources of unrealistic ecological behavior within mesocosms and raise questions about extrapolating results from mesocosms to nature. Dimensional analysis, a technique widely used by engineers to create scale models, uses compensatory distortion as a means of maintaining dynamic similarity in properties and relationships of interest. Although biological parameters are generally less controllable than physical ones, a variety of dimensional approaches can be taken to maintain such key ecological properties as effective habitat size, environmental variability, vertical and horizontal gradients, interactions among habitats, and control of experimental artifacts. To date, application of dimensional approaches to mesocosm design has been largely intuitive and idiosyncratic. We argue that a more explicit, systematic, and quantitative approach will increase realism and may also provide a critical means of developing, testing, and advancing our understanding of scaling relationships in nature.</description><subject>Aquatic ecosystems</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Design analysis</subject><subject>Dimensional analysis</subject><subject>Ecological modeling</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecosystem dynamics</subject><subject>Ecosystem models</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Experiment design</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Mathematical extrapolation</subject><issn>0003-0147</issn><issn>1537-5323</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqF0ctuEzEUBmALgWha4AkQGiHEbsD3S3dVGi5SEQtgPfJ4TpKJJuPBxyPRt8dpokZiw8qy_fm3fQ4hrxj9wKjVHwVzzJknZMGUMLUSXDwlC0qpqCmT5oJcIu7K1EmnnpMLZg013IkFaW_7PYzYx9EP1c00pejDFrDKsfoR_NCPm2r1Z4J0ULmQVYh4jxn2eF3dAvab8UC-xRkhJz89HFz6HLbVaoBp68eML8iztR8QXp7GK_Lr0-rn8kt99_3z1-XNXR2EFbn2VgZBAWTHlJJaM-t11xreUms7CdYqxbnvjAqdLYugecflWkLrtOJrD-KKvD_mlk_8ngFzs-8xwDD4Ecr7GsOEK6n8v5AZq42jrsC3_8BdnFOpVDHOauq4Vue0kCJignUzlWr5dN8w2hx60xx7U-CbU9rc7qE7s1MzCnh3BHPY9sFv4pQA8XznY87rI9thjukxRlBTtqX4CzJHnow</recordid><startdate>20010301</startdate><enddate>20010301</enddate><creator>Petersen, John E.</creator><creator>Hastings, Alan</creator><general>The University of Chicago Press</general><general>University of Chicago, acting through its Press</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010301</creationdate><title>Dimensional Approaches to Scaling Experimental Ecosystems: Designing Mousetraps to Catch Elephants</title><author>Petersen, John E. ; Hastings, Alan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-a84c30ee4d15546618a6db72b088d4e885522ad75cd82b0e62d24f4eb9652fae3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Aquatic ecosystems</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Design analysis</topic><topic>Dimensional analysis</topic><topic>Ecological modeling</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecosystem dynamics</topic><topic>Ecosystem models</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Experiment design</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Mathematical extrapolation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Petersen, John E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hastings, Alan</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American naturalist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Petersen, John E.</au><au>Hastings, Alan</au><au>Peter J. Morin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dimensional Approaches to Scaling Experimental Ecosystems: Designing Mousetraps to Catch Elephants</atitle><jtitle>The American naturalist</jtitle><addtitle>Am Nat</addtitle><date>2001-03-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>157</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>324</spage><epage>333</epage><pages>324-333</pages><issn>0003-0147</issn><eissn>1537-5323</eissn><coden>AMNTA4</coden><abstract>Enclosed experimental ecosystems (mesocosms) are small relative to their natural counterparts, are typically operated for short durations relative to the timescales of a number of important ecological processes, and also often have reduced biological and physical complexity relative to nature. These reductions in time, space, and complexity scales have been cited as sources of unrealistic ecological behavior within mesocosms and raise questions about extrapolating results from mesocosms to nature. Dimensional analysis, a technique widely used by engineers to create scale models, uses compensatory distortion as a means of maintaining dynamic similarity in properties and relationships of interest. Although biological parameters are generally less controllable than physical ones, a variety of dimensional approaches can be taken to maintain such key ecological properties as effective habitat size, environmental variability, vertical and horizontal gradients, interactions among habitats, and control of experimental artifacts. To date, application of dimensional approaches to mesocosm design has been largely intuitive and idiosyncratic. We argue that a more explicit, systematic, and quantitative approach will increase realism and may also provide a critical means of developing, testing, and advancing our understanding of scaling relationships in nature.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>The University of Chicago Press</pub><pmid>18707293</pmid><doi>10.1086/319197</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-0147
ispartof The American naturalist, 2001-03, Vol.157 (3), p.324-333
issn 0003-0147
1537-5323
language eng
recordid cdi_uchicagopress_journals_319197
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection
subjects Aquatic ecosystems
Design
Design analysis
Dimensional analysis
Ecological modeling
Ecology
Ecosystem dynamics
Ecosystem models
Ecosystems
Experiment design
Experiments
Mathematical extrapolation
title Dimensional Approaches to Scaling Experimental Ecosystems: Designing Mousetraps to Catch Elephants
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T20%3A10%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_uchic&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dimensional%20Approaches%20to%20Scaling%20Experimental%20Ecosystems:%20Designing%20Mousetraps%20to%20Catch%20Elephants&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20naturalist&rft.au=Petersen,%20John%20E.&rft.date=2001-03-01&rft.volume=157&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=324&rft.epage=333&rft.pages=324-333&rft.issn=0003-0147&rft.eissn=1537-5323&rft.coden=AMNTA4&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/319197&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_uchic%3E10.1086/319197%3C/jstor_uchic%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-a84c30ee4d15546618a6db72b088d4e885522ad75cd82b0e62d24f4eb9652fae3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=198609265&rft_id=info:pmid/18707293&rft_jstor_id=10.1086/319197&rfr_iscdi=true