Toward a Critical Anthropology of Security

• Published in: Current anthropology 2010-08, Vol.51 (4), p.487-517
• Main Author: Goldstein, Daniel M.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Anthropology; Bolivia; Communities; Critical theory; Cultural anthropology; Discourse; Economic liberalism; Ethnography; Fear; General studies; Human rights; Latin America; Neoliberalism; Political anthropology; Political security; Risk and disasters sociology; Security; Social Anthropology; Social organization. Social system. Social structure; Sociology; Sociology of knowledge and sociology of culture; Sociology of leisure and mass culture; Terrorism; Victimology; Violent crimes
• ISSN: 0011-3204; 1537-5382
• DOI: 10.1086/655393

While matters of security have appeared as paramount themes in a post-9/11 world, anthropology has not developed a critical comparative ethnography of security and its contemporary problematics. In this article I call for the emergence of a critical “security anthropology,” one that recognizes the significance of security discourses and practices to the global and local contexts in which cultural anthropology operates. Many issues that have historically preoccupied anthropology are today inextricably linked to security themes, and anthropology expresses a characteristic approach to topics that today must be considered within a security rubric. A focus on security is particularly important to an understanding of human rights in contemporary neoliberal society. Drawing on examples from Latin America and my own work in Bolivia, I track the decline of neoliberalism and the rise of the security paradigm as a framework for organizing contemporary social life. I suggest that security, rather than a reaction to a terrorist attack that “changed everything,” is characteristic of a neoliberalism that predates the events of 9/11, affecting the subjects of anthropological work and shaping the contexts within which that work is conducted.