Loading…
Effects of irrigation water quality on the recovery of 15N-fertilizer by Sorghum in field study
15N-labeled fertilizer was applied to Sorghum at different rates (0, 100 kg N.ha- 1) to 1m² microplots and with two kind of water (wel water “WW” and treated wastewater “TWW”) to Sorghum grown in field during 1997 and 1999. Increases in DM production, N uptake and 15NRF were observed with TWW. About...
Saved in:
Published in: | Asian journal of agriculture and rural development 2011-12, Vol.1 (4), p.90-97 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | 15N-labeled fertilizer was applied to Sorghum at different rates (0, 100 kg N.ha-
1) to 1m² microplots and with two kind of water (wel water “WW” and treated
wastewater “TWW”) to Sorghum grown in field during 1997 and 1999.
Increases in DM production, N uptake and 15NRF were observed with TWW.
About 17% and 36% of the 15N-fertilizer were recovered in the crop with
TWW in 1997 and 1999, respectively. Residual effect was higher in TWW
(3% vs 5%). Water irrigation quality had no effect on the 15N-labeled fertilizer
remaining in the 0-60 cm layer at final harvest. For both water qualities, the
major fraction of the residual 15N-fertilizer (about 60%) was recorded in the
surface layer. Losses of 15N-labaled fertilizer was unaffected by water
irrigation quality being approximately 35% of the applied 15N-fertilizer. TWW
irrigation can efficiently substitute WW for irrigation of Sorghum and,
simultaneously save nitrogen fertilizer. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2224-4433 2304-1455 2224-4433 |
DOI: | 10.22004/ag.econ.197934 |