Loading…

Assessment and Grouping of Occupational Magnetic Field Exposure in Five Electric Utility Companies

Objectives Occupational exposure to 60-Hz magnetic fields was surveyed among randomly selected workers in five electric power companies. Methods The study facilitated the examination of exposure variability and provided the base for a job-exposure matrix linking health outcomes and occupational magn...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health Environment & Health, 1995-02, Vol.21 (1), p.43-50
Main Authors: Kromhout, Hans, Loomis, Dana P, Mihlan, Gary J, Peipins, Lucy A, Kleckner, Robert C, Iriye, Richard, Savitz, David A
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a4923-f0b9b9f63b80e79be08a2f0831b72aed8479211e2fb10bae5ddaf51c03ba447e3
cites
container_end_page 50
container_issue 1
container_start_page 43
container_title Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health
container_volume 21
creator Kromhout, Hans
Loomis, Dana P
Mihlan, Gary J
Peipins, Lucy A
Kleckner, Robert C
Iriye, Richard
Savitz, David A
description Objectives Occupational exposure to 60-Hz magnetic fields was surveyed among randomly selected workers in five electric power companies. Methods The study facilitated the examination of exposure variability and provided the base for a job-exposure matrix linking health outcomes and occupational magnetic field exposures. Results Average exposures ranged from 0.11 to 1.50 μT. The differences among the five companies were small, the more urban companies showing somewhat higher averages. The day-to-day component of variance exceeded the within-and between-group components of variance. The final job-exposure matrix consisted of five groups with average exposure levels of 0.12,0.21,0.39,0.62, and 1.27 μT. Given the variance in exposure, even this optimal grouping considerably overlapped. Conclusions The job-exposure matrix used in this study efficiently incorporated the differences in exposure within occupational categories between companies and provided an objective and statistically based method for estimating cumulative magnetic field exposure.
doi_str_mv 10.5271/sjweh.7
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_wagen</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_wageningen_narcis_oai_library_wur_nl_wurpubs_30623</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><airiti_id>03553140_199501_201011220042_201011220042_43_50</airiti_id><jstor_id>40966324</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>40966324</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4923-f0b9b9f63b80e79be08a2f0831b72aed8479211e2fb10bae5ddaf51c03ba447e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkk9v1DAQxSMEKktBfAKkHBCcUsb_4vhYrXYLUlEvVOJm2clk8cprBzth6bcnYZcKbpxG9vvN04zeFMVrAleCSvIh74_47Uo-KVZEKlEpBV-fFitgQlSMcHhevMh5D0DVTF8UF1I2vKn5qrDXOWPOBwxjaUJX3qQ4DS7sytiXd207DWZ0MRhffja7gKNry61D35Wbn0PMU8LShfnnB5Ybj-2YZv1-dN6ND-U6HgYTHOaXxbPe-IyvzvWyuN9uvqw_Vrd3N5_W17eV4YqyqgerrOprZhtAqSxCY2gPDSNWUoNdw6WihCDtLQFrUHSd6QVpgVnDuUR2WaiT79HsMMw7YNDBpNZlHY3T3tlk0oM-TkkHv5RhslkzqCmbe9-deocUv0-YR31wuUXvTcA4ZU3qWkrJ_gPkrGYNETP4_gS2KeacsNdDcodlAAJ6iUz_jkzLmXxztpzsAbtH7pzRrL896ya3xvfJhGWnPxjjgtTiL5t9HmN6lDmoumZ0sdmedOOSG53exynNwWa9HMlyI5ooJYBoCgQIoRSA038fnGkB7Bfgdr4E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14363815</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment and Grouping of Occupational Magnetic Field Exposure in Five Electric Utility Companies</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><creator>Kromhout, Hans ; Loomis, Dana P ; Mihlan, Gary J ; Peipins, Lucy A ; Kleckner, Robert C ; Iriye, Richard ; Savitz, David A</creator><creatorcontrib>Kromhout, Hans ; Loomis, Dana P ; Mihlan, Gary J ; Peipins, Lucy A ; Kleckner, Robert C ; Iriye, Richard ; Savitz, David A</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives Occupational exposure to 60-Hz magnetic fields was surveyed among randomly selected workers in five electric power companies. Methods The study facilitated the examination of exposure variability and provided the base for a job-exposure matrix linking health outcomes and occupational magnetic field exposures. Results Average exposures ranged from 0.11 to 1.50 μT. The differences among the five companies were small, the more urban companies showing somewhat higher averages. The day-to-day component of variance exceeded the within-and between-group components of variance. The final job-exposure matrix consisted of five groups with average exposure levels of 0.12,0.21,0.39,0.62, and 1.27 μT. Given the variance in exposure, even this optimal grouping considerably overlapped. Conclusions The job-exposure matrix used in this study efficiently incorporated the differences in exposure within occupational categories between companies and provided an objective and statistically based method for estimating cumulative magnetic field exposure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0355-3140</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1795-990X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 7784864</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Helsinki: Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health</publisher><subject>Adult ; Air Quality ; Analysis of Variance ; Arithmetic mean ; Biological and medical sciences ; Business structures ; Chemical hazards ; Cohort Studies ; Confidence Intervals ; Data Collection - methods ; Effects of various physical factors on living matter (vibrations, electric field, ultrasound, sound...) ; Electric fields ; Electric utilities ; Electricity ; Electromagnetic Fields ; Environmental Monitoring ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Luchtkwaliteit ; Magnetic fields ; Mathematical Computing ; Occupational classification ; Occupational Exposure - analysis ; Power Plants ; Random Allocation ; Range errors ; Standard deviation ; Statistical variance ; Tissues, organs and organisms biophysics ; United States</subject><ispartof>Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 1995-02, Vol.21 (1), p.43-50</ispartof><rights>1995 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Wageningen University &amp; Research</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4923-f0b9b9f63b80e79be08a2f0831b72aed8479211e2fb10bae5ddaf51c03ba447e3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40966324$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/40966324$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,777,781,882,27905,27906,58219,58452</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=3451657$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7784864$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kromhout, Hans</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loomis, Dana P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mihlan, Gary J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peipins, Lucy A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kleckner, Robert C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iriye, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Savitz, David A</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment and Grouping of Occupational Magnetic Field Exposure in Five Electric Utility Companies</title><title>Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health</title><addtitle>Scand J Work Environ Health</addtitle><description>Objectives Occupational exposure to 60-Hz magnetic fields was surveyed among randomly selected workers in five electric power companies. Methods The study facilitated the examination of exposure variability and provided the base for a job-exposure matrix linking health outcomes and occupational magnetic field exposures. Results Average exposures ranged from 0.11 to 1.50 μT. The differences among the five companies were small, the more urban companies showing somewhat higher averages. The day-to-day component of variance exceeded the within-and between-group components of variance. The final job-exposure matrix consisted of five groups with average exposure levels of 0.12,0.21,0.39,0.62, and 1.27 μT. Given the variance in exposure, even this optimal grouping considerably overlapped. Conclusions The job-exposure matrix used in this study efficiently incorporated the differences in exposure within occupational categories between companies and provided an objective and statistically based method for estimating cumulative magnetic field exposure.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Air Quality</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Arithmetic mean</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Business structures</subject><subject>Chemical hazards</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Confidence Intervals</subject><subject>Data Collection - methods</subject><subject>Effects of various physical factors on living matter (vibrations, electric field, ultrasound, sound...)</subject><subject>Electric fields</subject><subject>Electric utilities</subject><subject>Electricity</subject><subject>Electromagnetic Fields</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Luchtkwaliteit</subject><subject>Magnetic fields</subject><subject>Mathematical Computing</subject><subject>Occupational classification</subject><subject>Occupational Exposure - analysis</subject><subject>Power Plants</subject><subject>Random Allocation</subject><subject>Range errors</subject><subject>Standard deviation</subject><subject>Statistical variance</subject><subject>Tissues, organs and organisms biophysics</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0355-3140</issn><issn>1795-990X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkk9v1DAQxSMEKktBfAKkHBCcUsb_4vhYrXYLUlEvVOJm2clk8cprBzth6bcnYZcKbpxG9vvN04zeFMVrAleCSvIh74_47Uo-KVZEKlEpBV-fFitgQlSMcHhevMh5D0DVTF8UF1I2vKn5qrDXOWPOBwxjaUJX3qQ4DS7sytiXd207DWZ0MRhffja7gKNry61D35Wbn0PMU8LShfnnB5Ybj-2YZv1-dN6ND-U6HgYTHOaXxbPe-IyvzvWyuN9uvqw_Vrd3N5_W17eV4YqyqgerrOprZhtAqSxCY2gPDSNWUoNdw6WihCDtLQFrUHSd6QVpgVnDuUR2WaiT79HsMMw7YNDBpNZlHY3T3tlk0oM-TkkHv5RhslkzqCmbe9-deocUv0-YR31wuUXvTcA4ZU3qWkrJ_gPkrGYNETP4_gS2KeacsNdDcodlAAJ6iUz_jkzLmXxztpzsAbtH7pzRrL896ya3xvfJhGWnPxjjgtTiL5t9HmN6lDmoumZ0sdmedOOSG53exynNwWa9HMlyI5ooJYBoCgQIoRSA038fnGkB7Bfgdr4E</recordid><startdate>199502</startdate><enddate>199502</enddate><creator>Kromhout, Hans</creator><creator>Loomis, Dana P</creator><creator>Mihlan, Gary J</creator><creator>Peipins, Lucy A</creator><creator>Kleckner, Robert C</creator><creator>Iriye, Richard</creator><creator>Savitz, David A</creator><general>Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health</general><general>National Institute of Occupational Health (Sweden)</general><general>Institute of Occupational Health (Finland)</general><general>National Institute of Occupational Health (Denmark)</general><general>National Institute of Occupational Health (Norway)</general><general>Scandinavian journal of work, environment &amp; health</general><scope>188</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>QVL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199502</creationdate><title>Assessment and Grouping of Occupational Magnetic Field Exposure in Five Electric Utility Companies</title><author>Kromhout, Hans ; Loomis, Dana P ; Mihlan, Gary J ; Peipins, Lucy A ; Kleckner, Robert C ; Iriye, Richard ; Savitz, David A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a4923-f0b9b9f63b80e79be08a2f0831b72aed8479211e2fb10bae5ddaf51c03ba447e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Air Quality</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Arithmetic mean</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Business structures</topic><topic>Chemical hazards</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Confidence Intervals</topic><topic>Data Collection - methods</topic><topic>Effects of various physical factors on living matter (vibrations, electric field, ultrasound, sound...)</topic><topic>Electric fields</topic><topic>Electric utilities</topic><topic>Electricity</topic><topic>Electromagnetic Fields</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Luchtkwaliteit</topic><topic>Magnetic fields</topic><topic>Mathematical Computing</topic><topic>Occupational classification</topic><topic>Occupational Exposure - analysis</topic><topic>Power Plants</topic><topic>Random Allocation</topic><topic>Range errors</topic><topic>Standard deviation</topic><topic>Statistical variance</topic><topic>Tissues, organs and organisms biophysics</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kromhout, Hans</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loomis, Dana P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mihlan, Gary J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peipins, Lucy A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kleckner, Robert C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iriye, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Savitz, David A</creatorcontrib><collection>Airiti Library</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>NARCIS:Publications</collection><jtitle>Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kromhout, Hans</au><au>Loomis, Dana P</au><au>Mihlan, Gary J</au><au>Peipins, Lucy A</au><au>Kleckner, Robert C</au><au>Iriye, Richard</au><au>Savitz, David A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment and Grouping of Occupational Magnetic Field Exposure in Five Electric Utility Companies</atitle><jtitle>Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health</jtitle><addtitle>Scand J Work Environ Health</addtitle><date>1995-02</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>43</spage><epage>50</epage><pages>43-50</pages><issn>0355-3140</issn><eissn>1795-990X</eissn><abstract>Objectives Occupational exposure to 60-Hz magnetic fields was surveyed among randomly selected workers in five electric power companies. Methods The study facilitated the examination of exposure variability and provided the base for a job-exposure matrix linking health outcomes and occupational magnetic field exposures. Results Average exposures ranged from 0.11 to 1.50 μT. The differences among the five companies were small, the more urban companies showing somewhat higher averages. The day-to-day component of variance exceeded the within-and between-group components of variance. The final job-exposure matrix consisted of five groups with average exposure levels of 0.12,0.21,0.39,0.62, and 1.27 μT. Given the variance in exposure, even this optimal grouping considerably overlapped. Conclusions The job-exposure matrix used in this study efficiently incorporated the differences in exposure within occupational categories between companies and provided an objective and statistically based method for estimating cumulative magnetic field exposure.</abstract><cop>Helsinki</cop><pub>Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health</pub><pmid>7784864</pmid><doi>10.5271/sjweh.7</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0355-3140
ispartof Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 1995-02, Vol.21 (1), p.43-50
issn 0355-3140
1795-990X
language eng
recordid cdi_wageningen_narcis_oai_library_wur_nl_wurpubs_30623
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection
subjects Adult
Air Quality
Analysis of Variance
Arithmetic mean
Biological and medical sciences
Business structures
Chemical hazards
Cohort Studies
Confidence Intervals
Data Collection - methods
Effects of various physical factors on living matter (vibrations, electric field, ultrasound, sound...)
Electric fields
Electric utilities
Electricity
Electromagnetic Fields
Environmental Monitoring
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Humans
Luchtkwaliteit
Magnetic fields
Mathematical Computing
Occupational classification
Occupational Exposure - analysis
Power Plants
Random Allocation
Range errors
Standard deviation
Statistical variance
Tissues, organs and organisms biophysics
United States
title Assessment and Grouping of Occupational Magnetic Field Exposure in Five Electric Utility Companies
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T19%3A43%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_wagen&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20and%20Grouping%20of%20Occupational%20Magnetic%20Field%20Exposure%20in%20Five%20Electric%20Utility%20Companies&rft.jtitle=Scandinavian%20Journal%20of%20Work,%20Environment%20%EF%BC%86%20Health&rft.au=Kromhout,%20Hans&rft.date=1995-02&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=43&rft.epage=50&rft.pages=43-50&rft.issn=0355-3140&rft.eissn=1795-990X&rft_id=info:doi/10.5271/sjweh.7&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_wagen%3E40966324%3C/jstor_wagen%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a4923-f0b9b9f63b80e79be08a2f0831b72aed8479211e2fb10bae5ddaf51c03ba447e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14363815&rft_id=info:pmid/7784864&rft_airiti_id=03553140_199501_201011220042_201011220042_43_50&rft_jstor_id=40966324&rfr_iscdi=true