Loading…

A comparative review of recovery processes in rivers, lakes, estuarine and coastal waters

The European Water Framework Directive aims to improve ecological status within river basins. This requires knowledge of responses of aquatic assemblages to recovery processes that occur after measures have been taken to reduce major stressors. A systematic literature review comparatively assesses r...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Hydrobiologia 2013-03, Vol.704 (1), p.453-474
Main Authors: Verdonschot, P. F. M., Spears, B. M., Feld, C. K., Brucet, S., Keizer-Vlek, H., Borja, A., Elliott, M., Kernan, M., Johnson, R. K.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-304597ede8ac86e1394c9f80719515c717f92fe87df17a31f6a6720bd8de0b9c3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-304597ede8ac86e1394c9f80719515c717f92fe87df17a31f6a6720bd8de0b9c3
container_end_page 474
container_issue 1
container_start_page 453
container_title Hydrobiologia
container_volume 704
creator Verdonschot, P. F. M.
Spears, B. M.
Feld, C. K.
Brucet, S.
Keizer-Vlek, H.
Borja, A.
Elliott, M.
Kernan, M.
Johnson, R. K.
description The European Water Framework Directive aims to improve ecological status within river basins. This requires knowledge of responses of aquatic assemblages to recovery processes that occur after measures have been taken to reduce major stressors. A systematic literature review comparatively assesses recovery measures across the four major water categories. The main drivers of degradation stem primarily from human population growth and increases in land use and water use changes. These drivers and pressures are the same in all four water categories: rivers, lakes, transitional and coastal waters. Few studies provide evidence of how ecological knowledge might enhance restoration success. Other major bottlenecks are the lack of data, effects mostly occur only in short-term and at local scale, the organism group(s) selected to assess recovery does not always provide the most appropriate response, the time lags of recovery are highly variable, and most restoration projects incorporate restoration of abiotic conditions and do not include abiotic extremes and biological processes. Restoration ecology is just emerging as a field in aquatic ecology and is a site, time and organism group-specific activity. It is therefore difficult to generalise. Despite the many studies only few provide evidence of how ecological knowledge might enhance restoration success.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10750-012-1294-7
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_wagen</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_wageningen_narcis_oai_library_wur_nl_wurpubs_440967</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A337718690</galeid><sourcerecordid>A337718690</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-304597ede8ac86e1394c9f80719515c717f92fe87df17a31f6a6720bd8de0b9c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kluL1EAQhYMoOK7-AN8CviiYtSu3TnwbFt1dWBC8PPjU1HSqh14znbErmbj_3gpZxBWkoatpvlOcOlSSvAR1DkrpdwxKVypTkGeQt2WmHyUbqHSRVQD6cbJRCpqsgap5mjxjvlWiaXO1Sb5vUzscjhhx9CdKI508zeng5GWHE8W79BgHS8zEqQ9pFCjy27THHySFeJww-kAphk4aIY_YpzOOAj1PnjjsmV7c17Pk28cPXy-usptPl9cX25vMirUxK1RZtZo6atA2NUHRlrZ1jdLQVlBZDdq1uaNGdw40FuBqrHWudl3Tkdq1tjhL3q99Z9xT8EEuEzBaz2ZAb3q_ixjvzDxFE_qlHKcdm7JUba1FnK1inkn-zTH6w0IvSu6nHcalGCZT5qBL4V-vvKTyc5LxzcGzpb7HQMPERrKHGqDIC0Ff_YPeDlMMEoVQTSUD5uVi4Hyl9tiT8cENY0Qrp6ODt0Mg5-V_WxRaQ1O3SgRvHgiEGenXuMeJ2Vx_-fyQhZW1cWCO5P7MB8osa2PWtTGyNov10iyG8vtEhJUw41-2_yv6DcXexag</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1285071247</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparative review of recovery processes in rivers, lakes, estuarine and coastal waters</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Verdonschot, P. F. M. ; Spears, B. M. ; Feld, C. K. ; Brucet, S. ; Keizer-Vlek, H. ; Borja, A. ; Elliott, M. ; Kernan, M. ; Johnson, R. K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Verdonschot, P. F. M. ; Spears, B. M. ; Feld, C. K. ; Brucet, S. ; Keizer-Vlek, H. ; Borja, A. ; Elliott, M. ; Kernan, M. ; Johnson, R. K. ; Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</creatorcontrib><description>The European Water Framework Directive aims to improve ecological status within river basins. This requires knowledge of responses of aquatic assemblages to recovery processes that occur after measures have been taken to reduce major stressors. A systematic literature review comparatively assesses recovery measures across the four major water categories. The main drivers of degradation stem primarily from human population growth and increases in land use and water use changes. These drivers and pressures are the same in all four water categories: rivers, lakes, transitional and coastal waters. Few studies provide evidence of how ecological knowledge might enhance restoration success. Other major bottlenecks are the lack of data, effects mostly occur only in short-term and at local scale, the organism group(s) selected to assess recovery does not always provide the most appropriate response, the time lags of recovery are highly variable, and most restoration projects incorporate restoration of abiotic conditions and do not include abiotic extremes and biological processes. Restoration ecology is just emerging as a field in aquatic ecology and is a site, time and organism group-specific activity. It is therefore difficult to generalise. Despite the many studies only few provide evidence of how ecological knowledge might enhance restoration success.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-8158</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1573-5117</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-5117</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10750-012-1294-7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>anthropogenic pressures ; Aquatic ecology ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Brackish ; climate-change ; Coastal waters ; Coasts ; Comparative studies ; dam removal ; ecological relationships ; Ecology ; Ekologi ; Estuaries ; fish communities ; fresh-water ; Freshwater ; Freshwater &amp; Marine Ecology ; Human populations ; Lakes ; Land use ; large woody debris ; Life Sciences ; Literature reviews ; long-term ; Management ; marine systems ; Population growth ; Revegetation ; River basins ; Rivers ; stream restoration ; Water ; Water Bodies in Europe ; Water use ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Hydrobiologia, 2013-03, Vol.704 (1), p.453-474</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2013 Springer</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013</rights><rights>Wageningen University &amp; Research</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-304597ede8ac86e1394c9f80719515c717f92fe87df17a31f6a6720bd8de0b9c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-304597ede8ac86e1394c9f80719515c717f92fe87df17a31f6a6720bd8de0b9c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://res.slu.se/id/publ/42174$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Verdonschot, P. F. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spears, B. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feld, C. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brucet, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keizer-Vlek, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borja, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elliott, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kernan, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, R. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</creatorcontrib><title>A comparative review of recovery processes in rivers, lakes, estuarine and coastal waters</title><title>Hydrobiologia</title><addtitle>Hydrobiologia</addtitle><description>The European Water Framework Directive aims to improve ecological status within river basins. This requires knowledge of responses of aquatic assemblages to recovery processes that occur after measures have been taken to reduce major stressors. A systematic literature review comparatively assesses recovery measures across the four major water categories. The main drivers of degradation stem primarily from human population growth and increases in land use and water use changes. These drivers and pressures are the same in all four water categories: rivers, lakes, transitional and coastal waters. Few studies provide evidence of how ecological knowledge might enhance restoration success. Other major bottlenecks are the lack of data, effects mostly occur only in short-term and at local scale, the organism group(s) selected to assess recovery does not always provide the most appropriate response, the time lags of recovery are highly variable, and most restoration projects incorporate restoration of abiotic conditions and do not include abiotic extremes and biological processes. Restoration ecology is just emerging as a field in aquatic ecology and is a site, time and organism group-specific activity. It is therefore difficult to generalise. Despite the many studies only few provide evidence of how ecological knowledge might enhance restoration success.</description><subject>anthropogenic pressures</subject><subject>Aquatic ecology</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Brackish</subject><subject>climate-change</subject><subject>Coastal waters</subject><subject>Coasts</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>dam removal</subject><subject>ecological relationships</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ekologi</subject><subject>Estuaries</subject><subject>fish communities</subject><subject>fresh-water</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Freshwater &amp; Marine Ecology</subject><subject>Human populations</subject><subject>Lakes</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>large woody debris</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>long-term</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>marine systems</subject><subject>Population growth</subject><subject>Revegetation</subject><subject>River basins</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>stream restoration</subject><subject>Water</subject><subject>Water Bodies in Europe</subject><subject>Water use</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>0018-8158</issn><issn>1573-5117</issn><issn>1573-5117</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kluL1EAQhYMoOK7-AN8CviiYtSu3TnwbFt1dWBC8PPjU1HSqh14znbErmbj_3gpZxBWkoatpvlOcOlSSvAR1DkrpdwxKVypTkGeQt2WmHyUbqHSRVQD6cbJRCpqsgap5mjxjvlWiaXO1Sb5vUzscjhhx9CdKI508zeng5GWHE8W79BgHS8zEqQ9pFCjy27THHySFeJww-kAphk4aIY_YpzOOAj1PnjjsmV7c17Pk28cPXy-usptPl9cX25vMirUxK1RZtZo6atA2NUHRlrZ1jdLQVlBZDdq1uaNGdw40FuBqrHWudl3Tkdq1tjhL3q99Z9xT8EEuEzBaz2ZAb3q_ixjvzDxFE_qlHKcdm7JUba1FnK1inkn-zTH6w0IvSu6nHcalGCZT5qBL4V-vvKTyc5LxzcGzpb7HQMPERrKHGqDIC0Ff_YPeDlMMEoVQTSUD5uVi4Hyl9tiT8cENY0Qrp6ODt0Mg5-V_WxRaQ1O3SgRvHgiEGenXuMeJ2Vx_-fyQhZW1cWCO5P7MB8osa2PWtTGyNov10iyG8vtEhJUw41-2_yv6DcXexag</recordid><startdate>20130301</startdate><enddate>20130301</enddate><creator>Verdonschot, P. F. M.</creator><creator>Spears, B. M.</creator><creator>Feld, C. K.</creator><creator>Brucet, S.</creator><creator>Keizer-Vlek, H.</creator><creator>Borja, A.</creator><creator>Elliott, M.</creator><creator>Kernan, M.</creator><creator>Johnson, R. K.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>QVL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130301</creationdate><title>A comparative review of recovery processes in rivers, lakes, estuarine and coastal waters</title><author>Verdonschot, P. F. M. ; Spears, B. M. ; Feld, C. K. ; Brucet, S. ; Keizer-Vlek, H. ; Borja, A. ; Elliott, M. ; Kernan, M. ; Johnson, R. K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-304597ede8ac86e1394c9f80719515c717f92fe87df17a31f6a6720bd8de0b9c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>anthropogenic pressures</topic><topic>Aquatic ecology</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Brackish</topic><topic>climate-change</topic><topic>Coastal waters</topic><topic>Coasts</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>dam removal</topic><topic>ecological relationships</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ekologi</topic><topic>Estuaries</topic><topic>fish communities</topic><topic>fresh-water</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Freshwater &amp; Marine Ecology</topic><topic>Human populations</topic><topic>Lakes</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>large woody debris</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>long-term</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>marine systems</topic><topic>Population growth</topic><topic>Revegetation</topic><topic>River basins</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>stream restoration</topic><topic>Water</topic><topic>Water Bodies in Europe</topic><topic>Water use</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Verdonschot, P. F. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spears, B. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feld, C. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brucet, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keizer-Vlek, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borja, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elliott, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kernan, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, R. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Science in Context</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>NARCIS:Publications</collection><jtitle>Hydrobiologia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Verdonschot, P. F. M.</au><au>Spears, B. M.</au><au>Feld, C. K.</au><au>Brucet, S.</au><au>Keizer-Vlek, H.</au><au>Borja, A.</au><au>Elliott, M.</au><au>Kernan, M.</au><au>Johnson, R. K.</au><aucorp>Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparative review of recovery processes in rivers, lakes, estuarine and coastal waters</atitle><jtitle>Hydrobiologia</jtitle><stitle>Hydrobiologia</stitle><date>2013-03-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>704</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>453</spage><epage>474</epage><pages>453-474</pages><issn>0018-8158</issn><issn>1573-5117</issn><eissn>1573-5117</eissn><abstract>The European Water Framework Directive aims to improve ecological status within river basins. This requires knowledge of responses of aquatic assemblages to recovery processes that occur after measures have been taken to reduce major stressors. A systematic literature review comparatively assesses recovery measures across the four major water categories. The main drivers of degradation stem primarily from human population growth and increases in land use and water use changes. These drivers and pressures are the same in all four water categories: rivers, lakes, transitional and coastal waters. Few studies provide evidence of how ecological knowledge might enhance restoration success. Other major bottlenecks are the lack of data, effects mostly occur only in short-term and at local scale, the organism group(s) selected to assess recovery does not always provide the most appropriate response, the time lags of recovery are highly variable, and most restoration projects incorporate restoration of abiotic conditions and do not include abiotic extremes and biological processes. Restoration ecology is just emerging as a field in aquatic ecology and is a site, time and organism group-specific activity. It is therefore difficult to generalise. Despite the many studies only few provide evidence of how ecological knowledge might enhance restoration success.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10750-012-1294-7</doi><tpages>22</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0018-8158
ispartof Hydrobiologia, 2013-03, Vol.704 (1), p.453-474
issn 0018-8158
1573-5117
1573-5117
language eng
recordid cdi_wageningen_narcis_oai_library_wur_nl_wurpubs_440967
source Springer Nature
subjects anthropogenic pressures
Aquatic ecology
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Brackish
climate-change
Coastal waters
Coasts
Comparative studies
dam removal
ecological relationships
Ecology
Ekologi
Estuaries
fish communities
fresh-water
Freshwater
Freshwater & Marine Ecology
Human populations
Lakes
Land use
large woody debris
Life Sciences
Literature reviews
long-term
Management
marine systems
Population growth
Revegetation
River basins
Rivers
stream restoration
Water
Water Bodies in Europe
Water use
Zoology
title A comparative review of recovery processes in rivers, lakes, estuarine and coastal waters
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T09%3A01%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_wagen&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparative%20review%20of%20recovery%20processes%20in%20rivers,%20lakes,%20estuarine%20and%20coastal%20waters&rft.jtitle=Hydrobiologia&rft.au=Verdonschot,%20P.%20F.%20M.&rft.aucorp=Sveriges%20lantbruksuniversitet&rft.date=2013-03-01&rft.volume=704&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=453&rft.epage=474&rft.pages=453-474&rft.issn=0018-8158&rft.eissn=1573-5117&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10750-012-1294-7&rft_dat=%3Cgale_wagen%3EA337718690%3C/gale_wagen%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-304597ede8ac86e1394c9f80719515c717f92fe87df17a31f6a6720bd8de0b9c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1285071247&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A337718690&rfr_iscdi=true