Loading…
Combining analytiacal frameworks to assess livelihood vulnerability to climate change and analyse adaptiation option
Experts working on behalf of international development organisations need better tools to assist land managers in developing countries maintain their livelihoods, as climate change puts pressure on the ecosystem services that they depend upon. However, current understanding of livelihood vulnerabili...
Saved in:
Published in: | Ecological economics 2013, Vol.94 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Ecological economics |
container_volume | 94 |
creator | Reed, M.S Podesta, G Fazey, I Geeson, N Hessel, R Hubacek, K Letson, D Nainggolan, D Prell, C Rickenbach, M.G Ritsema, C.J Schwilch, G Springer, L.C Thomas, A.D |
description | Experts working on behalf of international development organisations need better tools to assist land managers in developing countries maintain their livelihoods, as climate change puts pressure on the ecosystem services that they depend upon. However, current understanding of livelihood vulnerability to climate change is based on a fractured and disparate set of theories and methods. This review therefore combines theoretical insights from sustainable livelihoods analysis with other analytical frameworks (including the ecosystem services framework, diffusion theory, social learning, adaptive management and transitions management) to assess the vulnerability of rural livelihoods to climate change. This integrated analytical framework helps diagnose vulnerability to climate change, whilst identifying and comparing adaptation options that could reduce vulnerability, following four broad steps: i) determine likely level of exposure to climate change, and how climate change might interact with existing stresses and other future drivers of change; ii) determine the sensitivity of stocks of capital assets and flows of ecosystem services to climate change; iii) identify factors influencing decisions to develop and/or adopt different adaptation strategies, based on innovation or the use/substitution of existing assets; and iv) identify and evaluate potential trade-offs between adaptation options. The paper concludes by identifying interdisciplinary research needs for assessing the vulnerability of livelihoods to climate change. |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>wageningen</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_wageningen_narcis_oai_library_wur_nl_wurpubs_450506</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>oai_library_wur_nl_wurpubs_450506</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-wageningen_narcis_oai_library_wur_nl_wurpubs_4505063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqljk1ugzAQha2okUJ_7uALIJnSuCHbKFUP0L01wIRMM9jIY4K4fUHtDbr63uK9T2-jsuLwXua2MPZBZaZ6LfKDMdVOPYp8G2OsrcpMpVPoa_LkOw0eeE4EDbC-ROhxCvEmOgUNIiiime7IdA2h1feRPUaoiSnNa6Vh6iGhbq7gO1xc7a9PltzCsGgTBa_DsOJZbS_Agi9_fFLHj_PX6TOfoMP1C3rnITYkLgA5pjpCnN00Rud5xTDW4t72Zm9s-a_xDz-rY8E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Combining analytiacal frameworks to assess livelihood vulnerability to climate change and analyse adaptiation option</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Reed, M.S ; Podesta, G ; Fazey, I ; Geeson, N ; Hessel, R ; Hubacek, K ; Letson, D ; Nainggolan, D ; Prell, C ; Rickenbach, M.G ; Ritsema, C.J ; Schwilch, G ; Springer, L.C ; Thomas, A.D</creator><creatorcontrib>Reed, M.S ; Podesta, G ; Fazey, I ; Geeson, N ; Hessel, R ; Hubacek, K ; Letson, D ; Nainggolan, D ; Prell, C ; Rickenbach, M.G ; Ritsema, C.J ; Schwilch, G ; Springer, L.C ; Thomas, A.D</creatorcontrib><description>Experts working on behalf of international development organisations need better tools to assist land managers in developing countries maintain their livelihoods, as climate change puts pressure on the ecosystem services that they depend upon. However, current understanding of livelihood vulnerability to climate change is based on a fractured and disparate set of theories and methods. This review therefore combines theoretical insights from sustainable livelihoods analysis with other analytical frameworks (including the ecosystem services framework, diffusion theory, social learning, adaptive management and transitions management) to assess the vulnerability of rural livelihoods to climate change. This integrated analytical framework helps diagnose vulnerability to climate change, whilst identifying and comparing adaptation options that could reduce vulnerability, following four broad steps: i) determine likely level of exposure to climate change, and how climate change might interact with existing stresses and other future drivers of change; ii) determine the sensitivity of stocks of capital assets and flows of ecosystem services to climate change; iii) identify factors influencing decisions to develop and/or adopt different adaptation strategies, based on innovation or the use/substitution of existing assets; and iv) identify and evaluate potential trade-offs between adaptation options. The paper concludes by identifying interdisciplinary research needs for assessing the vulnerability of livelihoods to climate change.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0921-8009</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6106</identifier><subject>adaptive capacity ; agriculture ; challenges ; indicators ; local-communities ; natural-resource management ; rational choice ; south-africa ; sustainability ; variability</subject><ispartof>Ecological economics, 2013, Vol.94</ispartof><rights>Wageningen University & Research</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,4024</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Reed, M.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Podesta, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fazey, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geeson, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hessel, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hubacek, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Letson, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nainggolan, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prell, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rickenbach, M.G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ritsema, C.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwilch, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Springer, L.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, A.D</creatorcontrib><title>Combining analytiacal frameworks to assess livelihood vulnerability to climate change and analyse adaptiation option</title><title>Ecological economics</title><description>Experts working on behalf of international development organisations need better tools to assist land managers in developing countries maintain their livelihoods, as climate change puts pressure on the ecosystem services that they depend upon. However, current understanding of livelihood vulnerability to climate change is based on a fractured and disparate set of theories and methods. This review therefore combines theoretical insights from sustainable livelihoods analysis with other analytical frameworks (including the ecosystem services framework, diffusion theory, social learning, adaptive management and transitions management) to assess the vulnerability of rural livelihoods to climate change. This integrated analytical framework helps diagnose vulnerability to climate change, whilst identifying and comparing adaptation options that could reduce vulnerability, following four broad steps: i) determine likely level of exposure to climate change, and how climate change might interact with existing stresses and other future drivers of change; ii) determine the sensitivity of stocks of capital assets and flows of ecosystem services to climate change; iii) identify factors influencing decisions to develop and/or adopt different adaptation strategies, based on innovation or the use/substitution of existing assets; and iv) identify and evaluate potential trade-offs between adaptation options. The paper concludes by identifying interdisciplinary research needs for assessing the vulnerability of livelihoods to climate change.</description><subject>adaptive capacity</subject><subject>agriculture</subject><subject>challenges</subject><subject>indicators</subject><subject>local-communities</subject><subject>natural-resource management</subject><subject>rational choice</subject><subject>south-africa</subject><subject>sustainability</subject><subject>variability</subject><issn>0921-8009</issn><issn>1873-6106</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqljk1ugzAQha2okUJ_7uALIJnSuCHbKFUP0L01wIRMM9jIY4K4fUHtDbr63uK9T2-jsuLwXua2MPZBZaZ6LfKDMdVOPYp8G2OsrcpMpVPoa_LkOw0eeE4EDbC-ROhxCvEmOgUNIiiime7IdA2h1feRPUaoiSnNa6Vh6iGhbq7gO1xc7a9PltzCsGgTBa_DsOJZbS_Agi9_fFLHj_PX6TOfoMP1C3rnITYkLgA5pjpCnN00Rud5xTDW4t72Zm9s-a_xDz-rY8E</recordid><startdate>2013</startdate><enddate>2013</enddate><creator>Reed, M.S</creator><creator>Podesta, G</creator><creator>Fazey, I</creator><creator>Geeson, N</creator><creator>Hessel, R</creator><creator>Hubacek, K</creator><creator>Letson, D</creator><creator>Nainggolan, D</creator><creator>Prell, C</creator><creator>Rickenbach, M.G</creator><creator>Ritsema, C.J</creator><creator>Schwilch, G</creator><creator>Springer, L.C</creator><creator>Thomas, A.D</creator><scope>QVL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2013</creationdate><title>Combining analytiacal frameworks to assess livelihood vulnerability to climate change and analyse adaptiation option</title><author>Reed, M.S ; Podesta, G ; Fazey, I ; Geeson, N ; Hessel, R ; Hubacek, K ; Letson, D ; Nainggolan, D ; Prell, C ; Rickenbach, M.G ; Ritsema, C.J ; Schwilch, G ; Springer, L.C ; Thomas, A.D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-wageningen_narcis_oai_library_wur_nl_wurpubs_4505063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>adaptive capacity</topic><topic>agriculture</topic><topic>challenges</topic><topic>indicators</topic><topic>local-communities</topic><topic>natural-resource management</topic><topic>rational choice</topic><topic>south-africa</topic><topic>sustainability</topic><topic>variability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Reed, M.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Podesta, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fazey, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geeson, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hessel, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hubacek, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Letson, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nainggolan, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prell, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rickenbach, M.G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ritsema, C.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwilch, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Springer, L.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, A.D</creatorcontrib><collection>NARCIS:Publications</collection><jtitle>Ecological economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Reed, M.S</au><au>Podesta, G</au><au>Fazey, I</au><au>Geeson, N</au><au>Hessel, R</au><au>Hubacek, K</au><au>Letson, D</au><au>Nainggolan, D</au><au>Prell, C</au><au>Rickenbach, M.G</au><au>Ritsema, C.J</au><au>Schwilch, G</au><au>Springer, L.C</au><au>Thomas, A.D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Combining analytiacal frameworks to assess livelihood vulnerability to climate change and analyse adaptiation option</atitle><jtitle>Ecological economics</jtitle><date>2013</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>94</volume><issn>0921-8009</issn><eissn>1873-6106</eissn><abstract>Experts working on behalf of international development organisations need better tools to assist land managers in developing countries maintain their livelihoods, as climate change puts pressure on the ecosystem services that they depend upon. However, current understanding of livelihood vulnerability to climate change is based on a fractured and disparate set of theories and methods. This review therefore combines theoretical insights from sustainable livelihoods analysis with other analytical frameworks (including the ecosystem services framework, diffusion theory, social learning, adaptive management and transitions management) to assess the vulnerability of rural livelihoods to climate change. This integrated analytical framework helps diagnose vulnerability to climate change, whilst identifying and comparing adaptation options that could reduce vulnerability, following four broad steps: i) determine likely level of exposure to climate change, and how climate change might interact with existing stresses and other future drivers of change; ii) determine the sensitivity of stocks of capital assets and flows of ecosystem services to climate change; iii) identify factors influencing decisions to develop and/or adopt different adaptation strategies, based on innovation or the use/substitution of existing assets; and iv) identify and evaluate potential trade-offs between adaptation options. The paper concludes by identifying interdisciplinary research needs for assessing the vulnerability of livelihoods to climate change.</abstract><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0921-8009 |
ispartof | Ecological economics, 2013, Vol.94 |
issn | 0921-8009 1873-6106 |
language | |
recordid | cdi_wageningen_narcis_oai_library_wur_nl_wurpubs_450506 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | adaptive capacity agriculture challenges indicators local-communities natural-resource management rational choice south-africa sustainability variability |
title | Combining analytiacal frameworks to assess livelihood vulnerability to climate change and analyse adaptiation option |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T19%3A19%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wageningen&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Combining%20analytiacal%20frameworks%20to%20assess%20livelihood%20vulnerability%20to%20climate%20change%20and%20analyse%20adaptiation%20option&rft.jtitle=Ecological%20economics&rft.au=Reed,%20M.S&rft.date=2013&rft.volume=94&rft.issn=0921-8009&rft.eissn=1873-6106&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cwageningen%3Eoai_library_wur_nl_wurpubs_450506%3C/wageningen%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-wageningen_narcis_oai_library_wur_nl_wurpubs_4505063%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |