Vertically Differentiating Environmental Standards: The Case of the Marine Stewardship Council

This paper explores the externally-led vertical differentiation of third-party certification standards using the case of the Marine Stewardship Council (MSC). We analyze this process in two dimensions. First, fisheries employ strategies to capture further market value from fishing practices that go...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Sustainability 2015, Vol.7 (2), p.1861-1883
Main Authors: Bush, Simon R, Oosterveer, Peter
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
agrifood system
developing-countries
fisheries
global value chains
industry
msc certification
palm oil
private governance
Sustainability
sustainability standards
trade
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This paper explores the externally-led vertical differentiation of third-party certification standards using the case of the Marine Stewardship Council (MSC). We analyze this process in two dimensions. First, fisheries employ strategies to capture further market value from fishing practices that go beyond their initial conditions for certification and seek additional recognition for these activities through co-labelling with, amongst others, international NGOs. Second, fisheries not yet able to meet the requirements of MSC standards are being enrolled in NGO and private sector sponsored Fisheries Improvement Projects (FIPs), providing an alternative route to global markets. In both cases the credibility and authority of the MSC is challenged by new coalitions of market actors opening up new strategies for capturing market value and/or improving the conditions of international market access. Through the lens of global value chains, the results offer new insights on how such standards not only influence trade and markets, but are also starting to change their internal governance in response to threats to their credibility by actors and modes of coordination in global value chains.
ISSN:2071-1050
2071-1050
DOI:10.3390/su7021861